Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #710 > unrolled thread
| Started by | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-03-17 20:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-03-18 20:04 +0000 |
| Articles | 12 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.sinclair
ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-03-17 20:20 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 08:37 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-03-18 12:36 +0100
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-03-18 12:21 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 12:33 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-03-19 09:54 +0100
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs hp <ferd@farkel.net> - 2012-03-20 22:16 -0400
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-03-21 11:16 +0100
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-03-21 17:56 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-03-18 17:47 +0000
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs Peter Liebert-Adelt <peter@zschopower.de> - 2012-03-18 19:21 +0100
Re: ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-03-18 20:04 +0000
| From | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-17 20:20 +0000 |
| Subject | ZX81 runs SPonzy 1.4 times quicker than a real spectrum runs |
| Message-ID | <_l69r.1113$Mn4.661@newsfe18.ams2> |
Yeah you heard it here first... I have a very special ZX81 that has a Turbo mode, not 2x not 3x not even 4x but a crazy 5.333x normal speed running at 17.7333Mhz whilst maintaining slow mode results in a system that can run SPonzy ( Spectrum emulator for ZX81 hardware) at approx 1.4 times the original speed of Spectrum. (display is generated under software control on ZX81 hardware so for approx 2/3 of the CPU time is spent generating the display !) yet to upload some video of Sponzy running but have a copule of zx81 progs at crazy speed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEzS_fwuBnQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAxJd3_NKCk Regards Andy
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 08:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jk46rk$3bo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #710 |
Surely then, its no longer a zx 81 in reality, its a platform for running z80 code. Brian -- Brian Gaff - briang1@blueyonder.co.uk Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! "andy rea" <ask_me@ask.me> wrote in message news:_l69r.1113$Mn4.661@newsfe18.ams2... > Yeah you heard it here first... I have a very special ZX81 that has a > Turbo mode, not 2x not 3x not even 4x but a crazy 5.333x normal speed > running at 17.7333Mhz whilst maintaining slow mode results in a system > that can run SPonzy ( Spectrum emulator for ZX81 hardware) at approx 1.4 > times the original speed of Spectrum. (display is generated under software > control on ZX81 hardware so for approx 2/3 of the CPU time is spent > generating the display !) > > yet to upload some video of Sponzy running but have a copule of zx81 progs > at crazy speed. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEzS_fwuBnQ > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAxJd3_NKCk > > Regards Andy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 12:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9slvlkFlioU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #711 |
Am 18.03.2012 09:37 schrieb Brian Gaff: > Surely then, its no longer a zx 81 in reality, its a platform for > running z80 code. Yeah. There is a guy selling "Apple I Replicas". Actually this is a generic 6502 system with two ATmega chips acting as a TV terminal and PS2-to-parallel converter. Besides the CPU there is not much in common with Woz's orignal design. For me collecting means preserving the machines in as original state as possible. Patrick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 12:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jk4k10$vch$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #712 |
Some people prefer using to collecting though. (of course I agree that if you're selling a replica it should actually *BE* a replica!) On 18/03/2012 11:36, Patrick Schaefer wrote: > For me collecting means preserving the machines in as original state as > possible. > Yeah. There is a guy selling "Apple I Replicas". Actually this is a > generic 6502 system with two ATmega chips
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 12:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jk4kml$2r2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #713 |
Hmm, I remember so many modifications to the standard Sinclair units. the 81 had loads of them from hi res to bleapers lower case mods and rom fiddles and well sooner or later there was more add ons than the original. I remember watching the multi tasking interface for the Spectrum and thinking, blimey its not just multi tasking its two computers really! Look at the memotch, lthough you could plug in a Speccy rom you could also get huge plug in boxes for huge amounts of memory disc drives and goodness knows what else running cp/m and good it was until you found that it still hav the old edge connector trouble but internally between its pcbs. I still have the basic machine here. I mean even the Atari 8 bits had truck loads of bits hanging in here and there. Third party etc. BBC as well. Not up in the Commode world so don't know about that. The main thing I liked about sinclar machines and the Sam was that you did not have to have a great deal of time to learn the basic and you could do fun things with it and of course when blast and hisoft basic came out on the speccy, you could make basic run very fast indeed. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "Guesser" <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> wrote in message news:jk4k10$vch$1@dont-email.me... > Some people prefer using to collecting though. (of course I agree that if > you're selling a replica it should actually *BE* a replica!) > > On 18/03/2012 11:36, Patrick Schaefer wrote: >> For me collecting means preserving the machines in as original state as >> possible. > >> Yeah. There is a guy selling "Apple I Replicas". Actually this is a >> generic 6502 system with two ATmega chips
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-19 09:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uvC9r.149005$GZ3.78145@tornado.fastwebnet.it> |
| In reply to | #714 |
Il 18/03/2012 13:33, Brian Gaff ha scritto: > Hmm, I remember so many modifications to the standard Sinclair units. the > 81 had loads of them from hi res to bleapers lower case mods and rom > fiddles and well sooner or later there was more add ons than the original. > I remember watching the multi tasking interface for the Spectrum and > thinking, blimey its not just multi tasking its two computers really! A different question, there was/is EPROM/PROM debug monitor firmware for the ZX80/ZX81 around ? I suspect that because of their really low price, these ought to have made back then (early 1980s) good embedded systems, esp. for really short runs or one-offs and prototyping (aside a possible usage as trainer and/or hardware hacking/fooling testbed) late 1980s, I have looked on used ZX81 as dirty cheap hardware test bed (10,000 or 15,000 italian £, IIRC the UK £ was around 2500 it £ back then) or even a good "caffè and cornetto" (equivalent of a good pint of beer in UK, I suppose) and I suspect that for an UK small embedded system industry a £99 (or less) hardware platform/engineering test bed can be worth of consideration... Best regards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-20 22:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jkbdm8$1n2$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718 |
On 3/19/2012 4:54 AM, dott.Piergiorgio wrote: > Il 18/03/2012 13:33, Brian Gaff ha scritto: >> Hmm, I remember so many modifications to the standard Sinclair units. the >> 81 had loads of them from hi res to bleapers lower case mods and rom >> fiddles and well sooner or later there was more add ons than the >> original. >> I remember watching the multi tasking interface for the Spectrum and >> thinking, blimey its not just multi tasking its two computers really! > A different question, there was/is EPROM/PROM debug monitor firmware for > the ZX80/ZX81 around ? > I suspect that because of their really low price, these ought to have > made back then (early 1980s) good embedded systems, esp. for really > short runs or one-offs and prototyping (aside a possible usage as > trainer and/or hardware hacking/fooling testbed) > late 1980s, I have looked on used ZX81 as dirty cheap hardware test bed > (10,000 or 15,000 italian £, IIRC the UK £ was around 2500 it £ back > then) or even a good "caffè and cornetto" (equivalent of a good pint of > beer in UK, I suppose) and I suspect that for an UK small embedded > system industry a £99 (or less) hardware platform/engineering test bed > can be worth of consideration... > Best regards from Italy, > dott. Piergiorgio. I seem to recall a store demo unit that was running from a EPROM daughter board, the sort where the store staff could turn it on in the morning and let it run all day in 'demo' mode. Think I used to have one somewhere. But since some of that stuff I haven't messed with in over 12 years, I might have to really dig deep to see if it was still in my pile of Sinclair stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-21 11:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4Uhar.149803$GZ3.143892@tornado.fastwebnet.it> |
| In reply to | #719 |
Il 21/03/2012 03:16, hp ha scritto: > I seem to recall a store demo unit that was running from a EPROM > daughter board, the sort where the store staff could turn it on in the > morning and let it run all day in 'demo' mode. > Think I used to have one somewhere. But since some of that stuff I > haven't messed with in over 12 years, I might have to really dig deep to > see if it was still in my pile of Sinclair stuff. thanks. for "store demo unit" you mean a demo showing the capability of the machine ? (and I consider those the "primordial soup" of the demoscene) if you dug it and put the bin image somewhere perhaps will be interesting...) best regards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-21 17:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6Doar.4979$qt2.4268@fx20.am4> |
| In reply to | #720 |
On 21/03/2012 10:16, dott.Piergiorgio wrote: > Il 21/03/2012 03:16, hp ha scritto: > >> I seem to recall a store demo unit that was running from a EPROM >> daughter board, the sort where the store staff could turn it on in the >> morning and let it run all day in 'demo' mode. >> Think I used to have one somewhere. But since some of that stuff I >> haven't messed with in over 12 years, I might have to really dig deep to >> see if it was still in my pile of Sinclair stuff. > > thanks. > > for "store demo unit" you mean a demo showing the capability of the > machine ? (and I consider those the "primordial soup" of the demoscene) > if you dug it and put the bin image somewhere perhaps will be > interesting...) > > best regards from Italy, > dott. Piergiorgio. indeed i'd be interested in seeing it too. Thanks Andy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 17:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xcp9r.3434$p5.961@newsfe04.ams2> |
| In reply to | #711 |
It's still a ZX81, in fact it powers up as a ZX81, all that is needed to run SPonzy is the ability to load or map a ROM image at 0-16K and then of course some memory on top of that, but no other modifications are necessary for it to run, I just happen to have a Zeddy that been a little souped up. Andy On 18/03/2012 08:37, Brian Gaff wrote: > Surely then, its no longer a zx 81 in reality, its a platform for running > z80 code. > Brian >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Liebert-Adelt <peter@zschopower.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 19:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <jk593o$t8p$1@online.de> |
| In reply to | #710 |
17.03.2012 21:20, andy rea wrote: > I have a very special ZX81 that has a > Turbo mode, not 2x not 3x not even 4x but a crazy 5.333x normal speed > running at 17.7333Mhz I hope, we will see it "running" at the 16th ZX81 users meeting in Mahlerts near Fulda in the heart of Germany next weekend. Peter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 20:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t9r9r.2970$054.2852@newsfe12.ams2> |
| In reply to | #716 |
On 18/03/2012 18:21, Peter Liebert-Adelt wrote: > 17.03.2012 21:20, andy rea wrote: >> I have a very special ZX81 that has a >> Turbo mode, not 2x not 3x not even 4x but a crazy 5.333x normal speed >> running at 17.7333Mhz > > I hope, we will see it "running" at the 16th ZX81 users meeting in > Mahlerts near Fulda in the heart of Germany next weekend. > > Peter Indeed you shall, i still need to write a few programs to 'show off' the speed :-) Andy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.sinclair
csiph-web