Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #35
| From | "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed |
| Message-Id | <4D712504.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> |
| References | <5ecebf23-1a66-47d7-aff1-3b3917f617ca@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <0acd516a-d32f-4f7c-b860-1791051fee7d@y31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <4D7000EB.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> <950495e2-c05f-40e2-af9f-331c87f2a3d4@y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <20d85645-67db-4abb-a716-33df5b092f02@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.sinclair |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2011-03-04 17:44 +0100 |
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:17:45 -0800 (PST) da kidz on comp.sys.sinclair were rappin' to MC N.N. Thayer: > Yeah, that's also a good point, why not use all 52 cards? Probably because in a casino, you're dealing with more than one pack :) So you'd have to have an additional option to specify the number of packs in play. This could simply be a variable at the top of the code the user can change if they desire. > One other thing I discovered is that I can't just force the player to > choose 11 or 1 when a card is dealt, because that's a hard commitment, > and real blackjack lets you have a "soft" total where either 11 or 1 > applies until the total > 21 and then you stay with 1. So I'll have > to display both possible totals to the player That sounds like a better solution, and probably easier to work with. Chris -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Unsatisfactory Software - "because it is" | | http://www.unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk | | Your Sinclair: A Celebration | +- http://www.yoursinclair.co.uk -----------+ DISCLAIMER: I may be making all this stuff up again.
Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer1@gmail.com> - 2011-03-03 11:15 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed rwap <rich@rwapservices.co.uk> - 2011-03-03 12:25 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer1@gmail.com> - 2011-03-03 12:45 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed greenaum@yahoo.co.uk (greenaum) - 2011-03-11 06:33 +0000
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2011-03-03 20:58 +0100
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer1@gmail.com> - 2011-03-03 13:34 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer1@gmail.com> - 2011-03-03 13:36 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed gus <gdeldago@gmail.com> - 2011-03-04 04:17 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer1@gmail.com> - 2011-03-04 05:17 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed gus <gdeldago@gmail.com> - 2011-03-04 06:02 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2011-03-04 17:44 +0100
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed gus <gdeldago@gmail.com> - 2011-03-09 08:05 -0800
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de> - 2011-03-07 19:59 +0100
Re: Blackjack for the ZX80 (mostly) completed Leiradella <leiradella@bigfoot.com> - 2011-03-08 07:31 -0800
csiph-web