Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #3375
| From | Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Noooooooooooooooo! |
| Date | 2015-02-02 22:54 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20150202225449.5a92c490@talktalk.net> (permalink) |
El Reg.: > Developer Olivier Poudade claims he's beaten a 33 year-old record for > the smallest working Chess program. > > The previous record-holder, 1K ZX Chess, ran on the seminal Sinclair > ZX81 which shipped with just 1K of RAM. 1K ZX Chess was lousy at the > game, but its mere existence bestowed a little gravitas on the > easy-to-ridicule ZX81. Oh yeah? "Easy to ridicule," eh? Well you... smell. So ner. > Computers have of course sailed past the 1K RAM mark since, so while > developers have occasionally had a lash at very small Chess > implementations like Toledo Nanochess, there's been little need to > write very small versions of the game. > > That hasn't stopped Poudade from releasing “BootChess”, which he > claims is “the smallest computer implementation of chess on any > platform” and runs in “in a 512-byte x86 boot sector for Windows / > Linux / OS X / DOS / BSD”. Damn. That was the mighty '81's best claim to fame. Apart from running hypothetical nuclear power stations, obviously. And being the first under a hundred quid. And just being generally ace and skill all round, let's be honest. Still, on the bright side - here's something you can't say every day - the ZX81 game has better graphics. Also... > Poudade's claim is being questioned because BootChess appears not to > allow castling and its AI player sometimes makes illegal moves. Hurrah! There's still hope! Although actually, as far as I remember, 1K Chess didn't either. But I don't recall any illegal moves. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/29/zx81_record_falls_as_dev_claims_smallest_chess_code_crown/ -- Duncan Snowden.
Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Noooooooooooooooo! Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2015-02-02 22:54 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2015-02-03 00:32 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2015-02-03 07:44 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> - 2015-02-03 08:05 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! "dottor Piergiorgio M. d' Errico" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2015-02-03 13:15 +0100
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! "Chris Cowley" <chrrris@gmail.com> - 2015-02-05 23:06 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! warste@gmail.com - 2017-03-13 09:58 -0700
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2017-03-14 20:13 +0000
Re: Noooooooooooooooo! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-18 04:54 +0000
csiph-web