Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #10019 > unrolled thread

R Pi 0

Started by"David B" <askforemail@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-26 11:19 +0000
Last post2015-11-27 00:38 +1200
Articles 4 on this page of 44 — 22 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi


Contents

  R Pi 0 "David B" <askforemail@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 11:19 +0000
    Re: R Pi 0 Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> - 2015-11-26 11:56 +0000
      Re: R Pi 0 "M.O.B. i L." <mobil@orbin.se> - 2015-11-26 23:58 +0100
      Re: R Pi 0 James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:10 +0000
        Re: R Pi 0 Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2015-11-26 23:26 +0000
        Re: R Pi 0 "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2015-11-27 05:26 +0100
        Re: R Pi 0 Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2015-11-27 12:26 +0000
        Re: R Pi 0 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-28 12:24 +0000
          Re: R Pi 0 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-28 14:00 +0000
            Re: R Pi 0 Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2015-11-29 08:45 +0000
              Re: R Pi 0 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-29 11:32 +0000
                Re: R Pi 0 Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2015-11-30 08:00 +0000
    Re: R Pi 0 andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-11-26 17:48 +0000
      Re: R Pi 0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 13:33 -0500
        Re: R Pi 0 Charlie <cdknospam@msn.com> - 2015-12-13 14:56 -0500
          Re: R Pi 0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 18:57 -0500
            Re: R Pi 0 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-12-14 05:28 +0000
              Re: R Pi 0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 01:09 -0500
                Re: R Pi 0 Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2015-12-14 08:08 +0000
                  Re: R Pi 0 Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2015-12-14 18:57 +0000
                    Re: R Pi 0 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-14 19:18 +0000
                Re: R Pi 0 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-12-14 08:11 +0000
                  Re: R Pi 0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 11:30 -0500
                    Re: R Pi 0 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-14 17:12 +0000
                    Re: R Pi 0 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-12-15 08:07 +0000
                      Re: R Pi 0 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 08:40 +0000
                        Re: R Pi 0 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-15 16:44 +0100
                          Re: R Pi 0 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 20:13 +0000
                      Re: R Pi 0 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-15 09:55 +0100
                        Re: R Pi 0 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-15 12:12 +0000
                          Re: R Pi 0 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-15 15:15 +0100
                            Re: R Pi 0 cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2015-12-15 16:55 +0000
                              Re: R Pi 0 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-16 04:55 +0100
                                Re: R Pi 0 cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2015-12-17 21:00 +0000
                            Re: R Pi 0 Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2015-12-15 23:11 +0000
                              Re: R Pi 0 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-16 05:00 +0100
                                Re: R Pi 0 "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2015-12-16 12:05 +0100
                                  Re: R Pi 0 Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-12-16 11:14 +0000
                                    Re: R Pi 0 "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2015-12-16 13:18 +0100
                                      Re: R Pi 0 Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-12-16 14:10 +0000
                        Re: R Pi 0 Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2015-12-15 19:37 +0000
            Re: R Pi 0 Marco Bakera <pintman@bakera.de> - 2015-12-14 16:47 +0100
              Re: R Pi 0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 11:32 -0500
      R Pi 0 removemefirst.mark.lewis@p73.f12.n3634.z1.fidonet.org (mark lewis) - 2015-11-27 00:38 +1200

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]


#10143

FromEli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Date2015-12-15 19:37 +0000
Message-ID<eli$1512151436@qz.little-neck.ny.us>
In reply to#10135
In comp.sys.raspberry-pi, Morten Reistad  <first@last.name.invalid> wrote:
> David Taylor  <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> Of course, if the small size or low cost of the R Pi 0 is required....
> I am tempted to use the pi0, but I need IP connectivity there.

There's the CHIP system (getchip.com), which is a $9 computer with a
different focus than the pi0. There's very limited video without an
add-on -- HDMI is an additional $15 for example -- but it has built-in
wifi and bluetooth.

CHIP is designed around putting a full computer (with linux or whatever)
in devices like digital cameras and wireless speaker systems, not around
putting a full computer (with linux or whatever) on a TV. It grew out of
a desire to sell a product for < $100, which with markup and parts
besides the computer, the original Pi systems were too expensive for.

Elijah
------
has spoken with the CHIP people about the system

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#10121

FromMarco Bakera <pintman@bakera.de>
Date2015-12-14 16:47 +0100
Message-ID<n4mob4$j6v$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#10111
rickman schrieb am 14.12.2015 um 00:57:
> 
> Why exactly is the Pi 2B better?  Do you understand what  I mean by
> "embedded computer"?

The Pi2 model is more accessible when it comes to interfacing with
hardware, network or peripherals. You can do so with the Pi0 - however,
it's not as comfortable as with the model 2.


Best,
Marco.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#10123

Fromrickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-14 11:32 -0500
Message-ID<n4mqpi$ht7$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#10121
On 12/14/2015 10:47 AM, Marco Bakera wrote:
> rickman schrieb am 14.12.2015 um 00:57:
>>
>> Why exactly is the Pi 2B better?  Do you understand what  I mean by
>> "embedded computer"?
>
> The Pi2 model is more accessible when it comes to interfacing with
> hardware, network or peripherals. You can do so with the Pi0 - however,
> it's not as comfortable as with the model 2.

Embedded apps mostly don't need the missing interfaces.  Embedded apps 
are using the I/O pins, not Ethernet.  If you need those interfaces, 
then they are useful, obviously.  I'm talking about apps where those 
interfaces aren't used.

-- 

Rick

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#10028

Fromremovemefirst.mark.lewis@p73.f12.n3634.z1.fidonet.org (mark lewis)
Date2015-11-27 00:38 +1200
Message-ID<1448602777@p73.f12.n3634.z1.fidonet.org>
In reply to#10021
26 Nov 15 17:48, you wrote to David B:

 AG> Got mine this morning from W.H.Smith (UK newsagent for non-UK
 AG> readers). It's free on the front cover of MagPi magzine (£5.99)

 AG> There were none left by lunchtime at my local W.H.Smiths.

the article i read said there were only 10000 in the initial giveaway on the 
magazine cover...

)\/(ark

"So let me ask you a question about this brave new world of yours. When you've 
killed all the bad guys, and when it's all perfect, and just and fair, and when 
you have finally got it exactly the way you want it, what are you going to do 
with the people like you? The trouble makers. How are you going to protect your 
glorious revolution from the next one?"
- The twelfth Doctor

... Make my day - try to pick up someone else!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.raspberry-pi


csiph-web