Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #11876 > unrolled thread

Re: Stalkers abound

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Stalkers abound "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 09:14 +0100
    Re: Stalkers abound The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-15 11:16 +0100
    Re: Stalkers abound Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2016-07-08 21:52 +0100
      Re: Stalkers abound Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-09 02:31 +0100
        Re: Stalkers abound "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-09 10:03 +0100
          Re: Stalkers abound The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-09 10:20 +0100
            Re: Stalkers abound Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-09 20:59 +0100
          Re: Stalkers abound Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-09 21:01 +0100
        Re: Stalkers abound "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-09 15:18 +0100

#11876 — Re: Stalkers abound

FYI

"gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message 
news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...
> It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
> abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
> where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio, I am
> trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a real
> computer and not being misled by the viruses known respectively as
> Linux and C
>
> Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self
> esteem that they must resort to gratutous abuse?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#11893

On 15/06/16 09:14, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote:
> FYI
>
> "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message
> news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...
>> It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
>> abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
>> where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio, I am
>> trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a real
>> computer and not being misled by the viruses known respectively as
>> Linux and C
>>
>> Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self
>> esteem that they must resort to gratutous abuse?
>
>
Yawn. Really Gareth, with the utmost respect, will you just fuck off and 
die?

*plonk*



-- 
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will 
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such 
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic 
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally 
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for 
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the 
truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

Joseph Goebbels

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12651

In article <njr2p1$evo$1@dont-email.me>,
   gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
> FYI

> "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...
> > It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
> > abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
> > where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio, I am
> > trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a real
> > computer and not being misled by the viruses known respectively as
> > Linux and C
> > Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self esteem that
> > they must resort to gratutous abuse?

If you don't like Linux and C try RISC OS and BBC Basic

-- 
Stuart Winsor

Tools With A Mission
sending tools across the world
http://www.twam.co.uk/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12653

On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 21:52:20 +0100
Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <njr2p1$evo$1@dont-email.me>,
>    gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
> > FYI  
> 
> > "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in
> > message news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...  
> > > It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
> > > abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
> > > where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio,
> > > I am trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a
> > > real computer and not being misled by the viruses known
> > > respectively as Linux and C
> > > Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self esteem
> > > that they must resort to gratutous abuse?  
> 
> If you don't like Linux and C try RISC OS and BBC Basic
> 
He claims not to like any of the higher-level abstractions that make
it easier to build modern systems - having apparently been a
close-to-the-metal real-time developer he claims anyone who doesn't
write assembler is inferior.  I think he just struggles to deal with
stuff he's not used to, and rather than face the fact that he can't
learn new things, he tries to make out that nothing but old-skool is
worth doing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12654

On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 02:31:15 +0100, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 21:52:20 +0100
> Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> In article <njr2p1$evo$1@dont-email.me>,
>>    gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
>> > FYI
>>
>> > "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in
>> > message news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...
>> > > It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
>> > > abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
>> > > where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio,
>> > > I am trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a
>> > > real computer and not being misled by the viruses known
>> > > respectively as Linux and C
>> > > Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self esteem
>> > > that they must resort to gratutous abuse?
>>
>> If you don't like Linux and C try RISC OS and BBC Basic
>>
> He claims not to like any of the higher-level abstractions that make
> it easier to build modern systems - having apparently been a
> close-to-the-metal real-time developer he claims anyone who doesn't
> write assembler is inferior.  I think he just struggles to deal with
> stuff he's not used to, and rather than face the fact that he can't
> learn new things, he tries to make out that nothing but old-skool is
> worth doing.
>
You will now be accused of being abusive. film at 11.


-- 
Bah, and indeed, Humbug

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12655

On 09/07/16 10:03, Kerr Mudd-John wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 02:31:15 +0100, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 21:52:20 +0100
>> Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <njr2p1$evo$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
>>> > FYI
>>>
>>> > "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in
>>> > message news:njmvfh$87p$1@dont-email.me...
>>> > > It now seems that the Mongolian Hordes of gratuitously
>>> > > abusive stalkers have now hounded me in comp.sys.raspberry-pi
>>> > > where in the true spirit of the technical basis of amateur radio,
>>> > > I am trying to discuss driving the Raspberry Pi at its level as a
>>> > > real computer and not being misled by the viruses known
>>> > > respectively as Linux and C
>>> > > Why do those socially inadequate stalkers lack any self esteem
>>> > > that they must resort to gratutous abuse?
>>>
>>> If you don't like Linux and C try RISC OS and BBC Basic
>>>
>> He claims not to like any of the higher-level abstractions that make
>> it easier to build modern systems - having apparently been a
>> close-to-the-metal real-time developer he claims anyone who doesn't
>> write assembler is inferior.  I think he just struggles to deal with
>> stuff he's not used to, and rather than face the fact that he can't
>> learn new things, he tries to make out that nothing but old-skool is
>> worth doing.
>>
> You will now be accused of being abusive. film at 11.
>
>
I cant answer for anyone else, but for me the sigh of relief in being 
able to write what amounted to shorthand macro assembler at 5 times the 
speed, with C, was a blessing not to be denied.


-- 
"I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah 
puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12675

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:20:12 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> I cant answer for anyone else, but for me the sigh of relief in being 
> able to write what amounted to shorthand macro assembler at 5 times
> the speed, with C, was a blessing not to be denied.

I love programming C (and Perl).  I also thought Smalltalk was brilliant
when we did it at uni but never really found a use for it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12676

On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:03:19 +0100
"Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
  
> You will now be accused of being abusive. film at 11.
> 
> 
Hehe - I expect no less.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12661

"Rob Morley" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message 
news:20160709023115.5b8459c6@Mars...
>>
> He claims not to like any of the higher-level abstractions that make
> it easier to build modern systems

That's not true; I worship the computer as a complex machine in its
own right.

> - having apparently been a
> close-to-the-metal real-time developer he claims anyone who doesn't
> write assembler is inferior.

That's not true, either.

What I have said is that anyone claiming to be a computer scientist
who does not understand programming at the lowest level is not
worthy of the accolade.


>  I think he just struggles to deal with
> stuff he's not used to, and rather than face the fact that he can't
> learn new things, he tries to make out that nothing but old-skool is
> worth doing.

That's just rather silly and infantile abuse.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.raspberry-pi

csiph-web