Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #9830 > unrolled thread
| Started by | removemefirst.Dennis.Ayala@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Dennis Ayala) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-23 14:13 +1200 |
| Last post | 2015-12-13 14:53 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 23 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Pi/2 removemefirst.Dennis.Ayala@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Dennis Ayala) - 2015-10-23 14:13 +1200
Re: Pi/2 alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-10-23 20:20 +0000
Pi/2 removemefirst.Dennis.Ayala@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Dennis Ayala) - 2015-10-24 16:27 +1200
Re: Pi/2 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 05:01 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2015-10-29 09:19 +0000
Re: Pi/2 Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2015-10-29 16:04 +0000
Re: Pi/2 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-11-01 10:47 +0000
Re: Pi/2 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-11-01 10:50 +0000
Re: Pi/2 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 12:25 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2015-10-29 18:58 +0000
Re: Pi/2 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-10-29 19:21 +0000
Re: Pi/2 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:31 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-10-29 21:02 +0000
Re: Pi/2 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-10-30 07:02 +0000
Re: Pi/2 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:30 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-10-30 08:06 +0000
Re: Pi/2 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-10-30 09:23 +0000
Re: Pi/2 Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-10-30 09:29 +0000
Re: Pi/2 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-10-30 12:43 +0000
Re: Pi/2 stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2015-10-29 10:24 +0000
Re: Pi/2 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 12:21 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Alan Larsson <abuse@alstown.com> - 2015-10-29 23:11 -0400
Re: Pi/2 Charlie <cdknospam@msn.com> - 2015-12-13 14:53 -0500
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | removemefirst.Dennis.Ayala@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Dennis Ayala) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:13 +1200 |
| Subject | Pi/2 |
| Message-ID | <1445624082@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org> |
Hello everybody! I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just ordered my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly. Regards, Dennis
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 20:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0e4r3$o8g$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #9830 |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:13:20 +1200, Dennis Ayala wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just ordered
> my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dennis
usually 2 -3 days depending on where you order it
Have fun, Any plans for it yet?
--
_______________________________________
< "Yo baby yo baby yo." -- Eddie Murphy >
---------------------------------------
\
\
.--.
|o_o |
|:_/ |
// \ \
(| | )
/'\_ _/`\
\___)=(___/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | removemefirst.Dennis.Ayala@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Dennis Ayala) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 16:27 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <1445718488@f301.n135.z1.fidonet.org> |
| In reply to | #9831 |
Hello alister! 23 Oct 15 20:20, you wrote to me: al> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:13:20 +1200, Dennis Ayala wrote: >> Hello everybody! >> >> I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just >> ordered my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dennis al> usually 2 -3 days depending on where you order it al> Have fun, Any plans for it yet? Something BBS/FIDO related. Well see. Depends on the performance. Dennis
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 05:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0sn5u$m1$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9831 |
On 10/23/2015 4:20 PM, alister wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:13:20 +1200, Dennis Ayala wrote: > >> Hello everybody! >> >> I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just ordered >> my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dennis > > usually 2 -3 days depending on where you order it > Have fun, Any plans for it yet? What's the cheapest place to buy an rPi 2 for use in the US? They seem to get marked up about $10 then come with free shipping from China. Any better than $45 delivered? I'm in no hurry, so slow boat from China is fine. -- Rick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20151029091907.0ba695b5@debian> |
| In reply to | #9878 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:01:53 -0400 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/23/2015 4:20 PM, alister wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:13:20 +1200, Dennis Ayala wrote: > > > >> Hello everybody! > >> > >> I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just ordered > >> my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Dennis > > > > usually 2 -3 days depending on where you order it > > Have fun, Any plans for it yet? > > What's the cheapest place to buy an rPi 2 for use in the US? They seem > to get marked up about $10 then come with free shipping from China. Any > better than $45 delivered? I'm in no hurry, so slow boat from China is > fine. > Hmmm Curious that you're getting them from China when 'official' production is in Wales. Also that's quite a mark-up. I believe Newark is a subsidiary of Element 14 so should be a reliable and reasonably cheap supplier. -- W J G
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20151029160418.2fb24327@ntlworld.com> |
| In reply to | #9879 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:19:07 +0000 Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> wrote: > Curious that you're getting them from China when 'official' > production is in Wales. ISTR there's a licensed manufacturer in China for the Asian market.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 10:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n14qks$1u9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9895 |
In article <20151029160418.2fb24327@ntlworld.com>, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote: >On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:19:07 +0000 >Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> wrote: > >> Curious that you're getting them from China when 'official' >> production is in Wales. > >ISTR there's a licensed manufacturer in China for the Asian market. Egoman. (Who I think are the ones who produced the original batch) They make Red Pi's for the Asian market - my guess is that it's just too expensive to ship them from the UK back there... (After all the components have alredy come from there...) http://unicorn.drogon.net/redPi.jpg I guess they're onto Pi v2's now too, but I only have an older v1 (I'm in the UK) Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 10:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n14qp8$1u9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9933 |
In article <n14qks$1u9$1@dont-email.me>, Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> wrote: >In article <20151029160418.2fb24327@ntlworld.com>, >Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote: >>On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:19:07 +0000 >>Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> Curious that you're getting them from China when 'official' >>> production is in Wales. >> >>ISTR there's a licensed manufacturer in China for the Asian market. > >Egoman. (Who I think are the ones who produced the original batch) >They make Red Pi's for the Asian market - my guess is that it's just too >expensive to ship them from the UK back there... (After all the components >have alredy come from there...) > >http://unicorn.drogon.net/redPi.jpg > >I guess they're onto Pi v2's now too, but I only have an older v1 (I'm >in the UK) Just to add to this - personally, I'd support a local company, when at all possible - so if in the US, then Adafruit amongst many others. Yes, it may cost a but more than importing, but at least you're keeping a local company going - one that will give you support and that actively develops products/projects. Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 12:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0th61$7kv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9879 |
On 10/29/2015 5:19 AM, Folderol wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:01:53 -0400 > rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/23/2015 4:20 PM, alister wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:13:20 +1200, Dennis Ayala wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everybody! >>>> >>>> I just wanted to say hi. I'm a newbie with Raspberry Pi. I just ordered >>>> my first device and hoping that it arrives quickly. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Dennis >>> >>> usually 2 -3 days depending on where you order it >>> Have fun, Any plans for it yet? >> >> What's the cheapest place to buy an rPi 2 for use in the US? They seem >> to get marked up about $10 then come with free shipping from China. Any >> better than $45 delivered? I'm in no hurry, so slow boat from China is >> fine. >> > Hmmm > Curious that you're getting them from China when 'official' production is in > Wales. Also that's quite a mark-up. I believe Newark is a subsidiary of Element > 14 so should be a reliable and reasonably cheap supplier. Shipping costs are typically much less from China. I can buy items for $1 shipping included. I often pay $15 or more for domestic shipping. Of course that is the "shipping and handling" many companies charge. They put the rPi in a box and pack it in a much larger box with a ton of Styrofoam peanuts and ship that when a padded mailing envelope would do. But if the Asian distributors are tacking on a lot of other costs and markup, it ends up being close to a wash. I thought maybe there were channels where I could get one for closer to $35 is all. -- Rick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 18:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20151029185848.68bbb3f9@debian> |
| In reply to | #9898 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:25:39 -0400 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: > But if the Asian distributors are tacking on a lot of other costs and > markup, it ends up being close to a wash. I thought maybe there were > channels where I could get one for closer to $35 is all. Got any European relatives wanting to send you a Christmas present :) -- W J G
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0trj5$e6l$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #9898 |
On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: > Shipping costs are typically much less from China. Postal exports are state subsidised. And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. -- the biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 15:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0ts1n$n12$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9908 |
On 10/29/2015 3:21 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. > > Postal exports are state subsidised. Your point is? > And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver > to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs > paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. > > Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. > > -- Rick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob <nomail@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 21:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn352c3.ph6.nomail@xs9.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #9908 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. > > Postal exports are state subsidised. > > And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver > to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs > paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. > > Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% so a $60 order will be about $88.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 07:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0v4l6$p58$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #9910 |
On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >> >> Postal exports are state subsidised. >> >> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >> >> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. > > That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% > so a $60 order will be about $88. > That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. -- the biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 03:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0v677$n7d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9916 |
On 10/30/2015 3:02 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >>> >>> Postal exports are state subsidised. >>> >>> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >>> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >>> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >>> >>> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. >> >> That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% >> so a $60 order will be about $88. >> > That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. Doesn't add cost to shipping in the US. Customs is part of the federal budget. -- Rick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob <nomail@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 08:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn3698h.63b.nomail@xs9.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #9916 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >>> >>> Postal exports are state subsidised. >>> >>> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >>> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >>> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >>> >>> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. >> >> That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% >> so a $60 order will be about $88. >> > That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. This is the situation in the Netherlands. Which is in Europe. In other EU countries it is about the same or less (tax is lower than 21% in some countries). I don't think you will find many countries where the tax is around 140% as would be required to arrive at your $160.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 09:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0vcva$873$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #9919 |
On 30/10/15 08:06, Rob wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>>>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >>>> >>>> Postal exports are state subsidised. >>>> >>>> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >>>> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >>>> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >>>> >>>> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. >>> >>> That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% >>> so a $60 order will be about $88. >>> >> That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. > > This is the situation in the Netherlands. Which is in Europe. > In other EU countries it is about the same or less (tax is lower than 21% > in some countries). > > I don't think you will find many countries where the tax is around 140% > as would be required to arrive at your $160. > It wasn't JUST the tax, it was all the labour charges for 'handling customs' etc etc. So there is product cost. There is bare shipping cost There is import duty There is labour on handling the paper work for processing the import duty. then there is VAT on the labour used in handling the import duty. The total makes the final price more than double the actual product cost, on some items/quantities. Whereas importing from China, you get a small amount of postage added, and it never goes near customs,. Cos postal services are in general not interested in that. Whereas DHL et al see it as a neat way to increase profits. -- the biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob <nomail@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 09:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn36e3s.ccb.nomail@xs9.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #9921 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 30/10/15 08:06, Rob wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: >>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>>>>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >>>>> >>>>> Postal exports are state subsidised. >>>>> >>>>> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >>>>> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >>>>> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >>>>> >>>>> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. >>>> >>>> That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% >>>> so a $60 order will be about $88. >>>> >>> That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. >> >> This is the situation in the Netherlands. Which is in Europe. >> In other EU countries it is about the same or less (tax is lower than 21% >> in some countries). >> >> I don't think you will find many countries where the tax is around 140% >> as would be required to arrive at your $160. >> > It wasn't JUST the tax, it was all the labour charges for 'handling > customs' etc etc. Ok that is 13 EURO here, about $15. > So there is product cost. > There is bare shipping cost > There is import duty > There is labour on handling the paper work for processing the import duty. > then there is VAT on the labour used in handling the import duty. > > The total makes the final price more than double the actual product > cost, on some items/quantities. > > Whereas importing from China, you get a small amount of postage added, > and it never goes near customs,. Cos postal services are in general not > interested in that. > > Whereas DHL et al see it as a neat way to increase profits. Ok, you use DHL? That may explain part of it, their handling cost are way higher than the handling cost of the post office. But you can hardly blame that on the customs and taxes... DHL is for businesses who don't care about cost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 12:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0vokr$t1k$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #9922 |
On 30/10/15 09:29, Rob wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 30/10/15 08:06, Rob wrote: >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 29/10/15 21:02, Rob wrote: >>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 29/10/15 16:25, rickman wrote: >>>>>>> Shipping costs are typically much less from China. >>>>>> >>>>>> Postal exports are state subsidised. >>>>>> >>>>>> And in general don't attract customs attention. US companies who deliver >>>>>> to Europe via courier ALWAYS get import duty, labour to process customs >>>>>> paperwork, and VAT on top of that, added. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like a $60 order costs around $160 by the time it arrives. >>>>> >>>>> That is bullshit, processing cost is about $15 and tax is about 21% >>>>> so a $60 order will be about $88. >>>>> >>>> That may be so in the USA, but it aint so in Europe. >>> >>> This is the situation in the Netherlands. Which is in Europe. >>> In other EU countries it is about the same or less (tax is lower than 21% >>> in some countries). >>> >>> I don't think you will find many countries where the tax is around 140% >>> as would be required to arrive at your $160. >>> >> It wasn't JUST the tax, it was all the labour charges for 'handling >> customs' etc etc. > > Ok that is 13 EURO here, about $15. > >> So there is product cost. >> There is bare shipping cost >> There is import duty >> There is labour on handling the paper work for processing the import duty. >> then there is VAT on the labour used in handling the import duty. >> >> The total makes the final price more than double the actual product >> cost, on some items/quantities. >> >> Whereas importing from China, you get a small amount of postage added, >> and it never goes near customs,. Cos postal services are in general not >> interested in that. >> >> Whereas DHL et al see it as a neat way to increase profits. > > Ok, you use DHL? > That may explain part of it, their handling cost are way higher than > the handling cost of the post office. > > But you can hardly blame that on the customs and taxes... > DHL is for businesses who don't care about cost. > I didn't use them, the supplier did. My $100 order became £120 -- the biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 10:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5631f252.327232330@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #9878 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:01:53 -0400, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: >What's the cheapest place to buy an rPi 2 for use in the US? They seem >to get marked up about $10 then come with free shipping from China. Any >better than $45 delivered? I'm in no hurry, so slow boat from China is >fine. They are mostly made in Wales, so no need for a slow boat. Newark have them for US$35. http://www.newark.com/raspberry-pi/raspberrypi-2-modb-1gb/sbc-raspberry-pi-2-model-b-1gb/dp/38Y6467 Stephen -- Stephen Pelc, stephenXXX@mpeforth.com MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd - More Real, Less Time 133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England tel: +44 (0)23 8063 1441, fax: +44 (0)23 8033 9691 web: http://www.mpeforth.com - free VFX Forth downloads
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.raspberry-pi
csiph-web