Re: Pi power

From	The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject	Re: Pi power
Date	2021-01-07 08:16 +0000
Organization	A little, after lunch
Message-ID	<rt6g0a$65a$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <nvigch-tg441.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <5FF5A976.CD864BEA@Berger-Odenthal.De> <20210106124744.9db0cf16aa03f76fefeac64c@eircom.net> <eli$2101061710@qaz.wtf> <20210107074042.df7dcb8f3d2a551a78cf1a64@eircom.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/01/2021 07:40, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:08:51 +0000 (UTC)
> Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:
> 
>> In comp.sys.raspberry-pi, Ahem A Rivet's Shot  <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>>> Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> wrote:
>>>> Exactly. And there is another thing. Originally video had to be fast,
>>>> for the eye needed at least 70 Hz not to see annnoying flicker. Those
>>> 	That number seems to have been creeping up all my life - 24FPS
>>> was once considered good enough for movie cameras.
>>
>> Possibly, but probably not. Thomas Edison believed 48 FPS was minimum
>> quality projection. Is that during your life?
> 
> 	No, but 50Hz interlaced monitors (stripped TVs really) are and
> removing the interlace was considered enough to make it flicker free and
> "professional" circa 1980 - I sometimes turned the interlace back on and
> pushed the resolution up. In more recent times 60Hz was said to be needed
> for flicker free and now it's 70Hz I'm seeing and high end TVs are currently
> advertising 120Hz.
> 
>> Film was recorded at 24
>> FPS, yes, but projected so that each frame was shown two or three
>> times, 48 to 72 FPS.
> 
> 	Weren't domestic cine projectors 24 fps and considered good enough
> for the use ?
> 
16fps IIRC?


-- 
Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have 
guns, why should we let them have ideas?

Josef Stalin

Thread

Pi power Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-05 22:54 +0000
  Re: Pi power Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-05 23:16 +0000
    Re: Pi power "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-05 19:59 -0500
      Re: Pi power A. Dumas <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2021-01-06 07:31 +0000
        Re: Pi power "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-06 08:18 -0500
        Re: Pi power jornws200602@xs4all.nl (Oscar) - 2021-01-06 14:02 +0000
    Re: Pi power mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2021-01-06 09:44 +0000
      Re: Pi power Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2021-01-06 10:31 +0000
        Re: Pi power Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 10:44 +0000
          Re: Pi power Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-01-06 11:03 +0000
      Re: Pi power Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 10:32 +0000
        Re: Pi power Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-06 10:57 +0000
          Re: Pi power TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 11:44 +0000
            Re: Pi power Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-06 12:10 +0000
              Re: Pi power TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 13:25 +0000
                Re: Pi power Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-06 14:41 +0000
                Re: Pi power TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 15:17 +0000
                Re: Pi power Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2021-01-06 16:05 +0000
                Re: Pi power TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 16:14 +0000
        Re: Pi power A. Dumas <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2021-01-06 12:02 +0000
      Re: Pi power Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-06 10:55 +0000
        Re: Pi power Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-06 11:19 +0000
          Re: Pi power Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2021-01-06 13:13 +0100
            Re: Pi power Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-06 12:47 +0000
              Re: Pi power Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-01-06 20:20 +0000
                Re: Pi power druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2021-01-06 20:43 +0000
              Re: Pi power Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-06 23:08 +0000
                Re: Pi power Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-07 07:40 +0000
                Re: Pi power Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2021-01-07 09:08 +0100
                Re: Pi power John Aldridge <jpsa@cantab.net> - 2021-01-07 09:20 +0000
                Re: Pi power The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-01-07 08:16 +0000
                Re: Pi power druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2021-01-07 09:53 +0000
                Re: Pi power Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2021-01-07 12:40 +0000
                Re: Pi power Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-07 19:29 +0000
                Re: Pi power David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2021-01-07 21:05 +0000
          Re: Pi power Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-06 12:39 +0000
            Re: Pi power Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-06 17:04 +0000
              Re: Pi power Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-01-06 18:02 +0000
          Re: Pi power Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-01-06 16:41 +0000
            Re: Pi power Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2021-01-06 17:04 +0000
              Re: Pi power druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2021-01-06 18:50 +0000
                Re: Pi power Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2021-01-06 20:39 +0000
            Re: Pi power TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2021-01-06 18:58 +0000
  Re: Pi power Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-01-08 22:33 -0500
    Re: Pi power Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2021-01-09 12:03 +0200

csiph-web