Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #132983 > unrolled thread
| Started by | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-06-27 16:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2020-07-04 20:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 519 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 16:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 17:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:33 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 02:45 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 17:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 17:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 17:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 15:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 11:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-06-27 18:02 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-06-28 06:22 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 16:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 03:51 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-02 20:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:31 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 11:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 08:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 04:06 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 21:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 01:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 00:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 03:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 01:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 12:50 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 16:24 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 09:41 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 14:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 14:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 18:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 15:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 17:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-04 07:23 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 11:03 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 16:08 +0000
Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 09:16 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 15:19 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 19:36 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 21:07 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:11 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:18 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 04:02 +0000
Arlen is utterly unmoved by facts Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 21:48 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 15:47 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:07 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:22 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:25 -0500
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:41 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 21:45 +0000
Arlen makes yet another explicit claim... (wasRe: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs You know who! <no@body.net> - 2020-07-04 14:49 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:14 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:34 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 21:52 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 02:56 +0000
Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:38 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-11 15:24 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-10 23:35 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:24 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:36 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-12 12:55 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 01:10 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-11 22:36 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 04:17 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-13 16:16 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-13 05:43 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-13 21:55 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs delvon daily <delvondaily@example.com> - 2020-07-13 14:37 -0700
OT: Why must Arlen nymshift? (was Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-13 15:13 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-14 16:07 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 01:22 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-14 21:12 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 19:27 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-15 11:59 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 22:54 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-16 16:37 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 18:10 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-17 13:29 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 21:45 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-18 22:14 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-19 16:07 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 08:17 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-19 14:34 +0200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-20 16:49 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 11:31 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-22 12:47 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 21:02 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-17 06:41 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-18 22:15 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-19 16:11 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 08:17 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-20 16:51 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 11:31 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-18 07:18 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-18 21:47 +0200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:51 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs John Michael <tonymayo43@gmail.com> - 2020-07-11 01:30 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:55 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:59 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-14 10:11 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-15 17:14 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-18 08:37 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-18 18:31 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-18 21:01 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-18 20:54 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 15:21 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:30 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:42 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 15:44 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 04:18 +0000
Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs For a friend <notyou@yes.yes> - 2020-07-09 21:35 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-10 01:04 -0400
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 22:06 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-10 01:27 -0400
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 23:13 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:20 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-10 10:09 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-11 15:18 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:00 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-10 22:34 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-12 12:54 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-12 04:22 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 06:07 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 18:47 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:27 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:13 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-05 10:09 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 15:10 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 21:36 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-05 10:06 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:23 +0000
How is it that Arlen can be this thick? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs He really has no clue <none@all.com> - 2020-07-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2020-07-05 03:25 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 03:08 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 20:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 17:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:57 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-07-05 21:15 +0100
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 00:14 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:22 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-12 12:21 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 15:32 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-12 12:53 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 17:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 15:14 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 18:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 14:12 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 17:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-19 11:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 12:48 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 16:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-13 09:11 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-12 19:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 01:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 07:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-13 08:06 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 11:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 17:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-13 23:22 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 17:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 18:58 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-14 15:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-15 15:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 15:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-20 12:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-20 20:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-20 16:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 10:39 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 14:45 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 16:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:38 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 08:28 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 08:42 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 15:20 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:38 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 11:17 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 19:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 17:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 20:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-22 23:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 00:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 04:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 13:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 04:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 11:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 11:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 17:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-24 20:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 16:37 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 20:05 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 01:40 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 21:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 03:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 00:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 14:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 14:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 10:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 14:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 18:00 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 23:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 11:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 17:00 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:39 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 23:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 19:19 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 04:09 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 09:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 10:27 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 16:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 20:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 04:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 12:04 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 12:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:31 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 17:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:58 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 16:26 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-24 20:34 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 10:34 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-25 13:08 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 20:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:51 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 17:59 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:39 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:42 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:38 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 01:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 00:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 23:04 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 13:43 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 23:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 00:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-28 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 01:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 00:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 01:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 15:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 18:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-29 17:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 01:25 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 00:17 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 01:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 09:44 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-28 00:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-27 23:32 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 05:33 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 13:33 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-27 07:40 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 00:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 20:57 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 11:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 18:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:34 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-23 11:25 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 14:33 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 20:06 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 16:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-23 20:12 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-22 00:22 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-22 21:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-26 11:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 12:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-27 10:28 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 19:01 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 22:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-27 06:39 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 13:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 23:08 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-13 16:41 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-14 02:17 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-19 11:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 12:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-20 03:17 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 19:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 09:27 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-13 23:42 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-13 21:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:56 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-14 10:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 14:23 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:39 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 21:25 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 22:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 22:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 02:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 07:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 09:02 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-15 09:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 13:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 15:42 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 15:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 08:43 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:45 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-14 10:35 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 14:23 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:38 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 08:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:47 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-14 17:42 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:33 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 16:37 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 08:55 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-15 22:19 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 08:47 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 14:41 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-16 18:44 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-16 10:16 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 14:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-17 08:34 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 17:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-15 10:05 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 13:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 00:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 00:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-23 15:34 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 19:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:42 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-26 11:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 16:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 19:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 02:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-28 00:37 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-28 12:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 21:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:45 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 04:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 02:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-27 22:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 00:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 00:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 02:25 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 03:05 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-28 12:44 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-06-29 11:51 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 08:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-29 13:00 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 11:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 10:00 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 17:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-06-29 19:14 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 15:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 13:53 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 14:32 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 04:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 10:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 16:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 16:56 +0000
Why does Arlen always lose? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Not Arlen <whodat@ness.biz> - 2020-07-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Why does Arlen always lose? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs John Doe <always.look@message.header> - 2020-07-02 03:46 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 13:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 10:37 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 19:13 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 15:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 21:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 11:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 09:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 17:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-03 15:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 13:56 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 20:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 10:32 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2020-07-05 08:59 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 15:52 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 15:43 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:18 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-05 17:14 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 16:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 16:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 21:17 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 13:55 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 15:46 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 12:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:25 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 01:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 15:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 21:12 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 00:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 20:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 03:18 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 23:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 12:40 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 10:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 11:03 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 16:00 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 16:46 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-05 17:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-06 02:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 14:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 10:33 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 14:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 09:15 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 08:14 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2020-06-30 10:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 19:37 +0000
OT: Why must Arlen constantly lie? (was Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Just for Arlen <justforarlen@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 13:57 -0700
Re: OT: Why must Arlen constantly lie? (was Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2020-07-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 17:48 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 13:09 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 11:25 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 19:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Especially for Arlen <especiallyforarlen@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 13:59 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2020-12-02 04:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Leonardo Pacheco <lpacheco72@gmail.com> - 2020-07-28 23:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-29 08:38 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:44 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 05:02 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-01 15:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 21:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 15:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 20:31 +0000
Page 6 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 26 Next page →
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-18 21:47 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <revjlh$cpc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133628 |
nospam wrote: > In article <rev0bm$n1h$1@dont-email.me>, sms > <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > >> > I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations >> > so I have no real idea. But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a >> > lot more than simple security. Wade through >> > https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't >> > think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it >> > for free). >> >> Apple has included Rambus IP, indirectly, in iPhones. I.e., the iPhone >> 11 (and previous models) includes the ST33G1M2 from ST Micro, which >> includes Rambus's "DPA Countermeasures," see >> <https://www.st.com/resource/en/data_brief/st33g1m2.pdf>. > > indirectly doesn't count and that chip is not used in an iphone 11, nor > would it make any sense to do so. > > <https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+11+Pro+Max+Teardown/126000#s2435 > 62> > >> Obviously Apple wants to develop their own chips when possible, and not >> rely on ST Micro, NXP, Dialog, Intel, or Qualcomm. They can either buy >> chunks of companies (or entire companies), for a one-time cost, like >> they did with PA Semi, Dialog, and Intel, or license whatever IP is >> necessary and put it inside their own devices. > > what they normally do is come up with their own designs, independent of > other companies. So "patents" is another thing you know absolutely nothing about. Among the many other things your knowledge is sorely lacking > buying pa semi got them people, not ip, and they were working on their > own 5g modems. buying intel's 5g division helped that process.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 04:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebggs$9hh$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133394 |
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:24:21 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: >>Qualcomm net income for 2019: $4.386 billion >> >>Apple net income for 2019: $55.256 billion. > > What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? I've studied these strange Apple Apologists like Alan Baker, for years. o Apple apologists _hate_ that Apple isn't what MARKETING told them it was. To answer Eric Steven's question posed, apparently, to Alan Baker... *Apple would be dead, in about two years, without Qualcomm technology.* o That's why they were _desperate_ and surrendered to Qualcomm last year. o *Apple would have died as a company if it didn't surrender to Qualcomm* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/jUEvxhLv2Gk> See also: o *Apple gives up and surrenders billions of dollars to Qualcomm* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/wuNSobnMdCU> o *Why can't anyone find a high-tech company with _lower_ R&D than Apple?* https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/STrAkx09VYk> o *Apple failed (again) in chip design, this time with its graphics chips* https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/_KhXtYcseUU> And to nospam's point: o *Apple will spend BILLIONS acquiring Intel's failed modem business* https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/WgA3zCvEnSY> o *Apple lost the 5G battle, spending billions to try to get back in* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/qsP6-zHCnn8> Notice the only place Apple excels in, is MARKETING. o The Type III apologists _only_ believe in that marketing. They're immune to all facts that prove what Apple really is. o Which is why they _hate_ not only facts - but the bearer of facts. In reality, they hate themselves because they hate that they fell for it. o They hate that Apple isn't even close to what Apple told them it was. -- Apple apologists _hate_ that Apple isn't what MARKETING told them it was.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Michael <tonymayo43@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 01:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebia9$80o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #133398 |
On 11/07/2020 05:51, Arlen Holder wrote: > *Apple would be dead, in about two years, without Qualcomm technology.* Can we start crowdfunding to save Apple. We can't let Apple die just because they made a bad decision. Do you agree?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 05:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebk7n$j40$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133400 |
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 01:30:00 -0400, John Michael wrote: > Can we start crowdfunding to save Apple. > We can't let Apple die just because they made a bad decision. > Do you agree? Bottom line, Apple new they wouldn't ever sell a high end phone without 5G. I don't know you, so I don't know if you're a child who just wants to play on Usenet, or if you're actually a sensible, reasonable, normal adult. My post below assumes you're not an appleseed, brainwashed like a cultist, where my post below presumes you have the capacity for adult cognitive reason. Assume you own adult cognition, your point, I presume, is apparently Apple is one of the richest companies in the world, which is true. It's clear _why_ Apple is so rich (their profits are enormous, in fact). o You just don't make that kind of ungodly profit off of smart customers. Apple has, it appears, the most gullible user base you can imagine. o But this thread is going to Windows users who are NOT similarly gullible. The point Eric Stevens was making, if I understood him correctly, was that, without Qualcomm, Apple wouldn't have _any_ competitive 5G technology for years. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Think about what it would mean to a company that knows itself, which is that it knows it's all MARKETING and almost no R&D, where it has to MARKET itself to its (admittedly loyal) customer base as a "technology leader". How do you market yourself as a technology leader... o When you have the lowest R&D spend in all of high technology? It's _easy_ when you can bullshit, right? o But you can't bullshit 5G modems. What Apple _knew_ would happen is that everyone else but Apple would have had competitive 5G modems when it counts most. Bear in mind I understand Apple, I think, better than its customers do (in many cases, IMHO), where you can fool them that their primitive app launcher is "modern", but it's mired in teh stone age of a decade ago. You can fool their customers by a _lot_ of brilliant MARKETING bullshit o But you can't fool them when there is no competitive 5G modem. Apple _knew_ this. o That's why their abject surrender to Qualcomm was so costly (Apple's surrender was greater than the entire GDP of some countries!) -- Bottom line, Apple new they wouldn't ever sell a high end phone without 5G.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 05:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebkg0$js7$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133402 |
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 05:55:04 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 01:30:00 -0400, John Michael wrote: > >> Can we start crowdfunding to save Apple. >> We can't let Apple die just because they made a bad decision. >> Do you agree? > > Bottom line, Apple new they wouldn't ever sell a high end phone without 5G. Typo! *Apple _knew_ they could never sell a high-priced iPhone sans competitive 5G!* Apple isn't stupid like the majority of its customers appear to be. o Apple _knew_ their entire high-end iPhone business was on the line. Apple was so desperate for 5G technology, they _surrendered_ to Qualcomm. o It was one of the biggest abject surrenders in corporate history. -- You don't & you can't make those ungody profits off intelligent customers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 10:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rek0cu$n02$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133400 |
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:18:20 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote:
> Qualcomm uses the first method, which it is why it charges in relation
> to the sales price of the item.
Hi Eric,
Facts are lost on all Apple apologists (all three types):
o Type I apologists don't even believe what they themselves claim
o Type II apologists simply don't ever bother to check their facts
o Type III apologists, petrifyingly so, actually _believe_ their claims!
Clearly, nospam is a Type I apologist (he's the only one in that class).
Adults will note nospam _always_ takes the position of Apple MARKETING.
o No matter the topic.
The most accurate way to predict what nospam will claim - years in advance
o Is simply to know what Apple MARKETING is trying to foment
Whatever Apple MARKETING would say, is what nospam will say
o It doesn't matter whether they or nospam actually believe what they say.
--
These Type I apologists simply parrot Apple MARKETING mantra; they don't
even believe what they, themselves, claim. They're simply parrots.
Full text of Eric's response, below, for the permanent Usenet record.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:28:16 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:
>In article <f2ongf5ledsc8m5f95j0gjbr4cnomoem0l@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens
><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> >
>> >what apple (and other companies) are reluctant to pay are qualcomm's
>> >illegal and confiscatory fees, which are *not* based on what's licensed
>> >from qualcomm, but rather the total price of the product its going in.
>>
>> There is nothing illegal in this. Its not uncommon for enabling
>> technology being charged out according to the value of the product
>> being enabled.
>
>it's extremely uncommon. only qualcomm does it.
See
https://www.royaltyrange.com/home/blog/what-are-patent-licensing-royalty-rates
"Most licensing professionals rely on three main methods to work out
royalty rates for a patent:
>The income approach: This estimates the income the patent will
generate and bases the royalty rate on that.
>The market approach: This bases the royalty rate on the royalties
charged for comparable patents in the market.
>The cost approach: This involves working out the cost of
producing a similar patented asset, and basing the royalty on
that."
Qualcomm uses the first method, which it is why it charges in relation
to the sales price of the item.
>
>> In any case Apple did not think the terms were
>> excessive when they first signed up.
>
>they had no choice in the matter. qualcomm has a monopoly and is
>abusing it. that's illegal.
Don't be silly. Patents *are* a legal monopoly.
>
>> >in other words, the *very* same qualcomm modem chip in a top of the
>> >line phone (any make, not just apple) will incur a higher licensing fee
>> >than if it's in an entry level model, for the *exact* *same* *part*
>> >solely because it has a larger display, more memory or some other
>> >unrelated feature.
>>
>> And A higher price and a higher profit margin and couldn't be m ade
>> without Qualcomm technology.
>
>the higher price has nothing to do with qualcomm.
See the income approach above.
>
>qualcomm is *only* entitled to licensing fees for *their* parts and ip,
>not the entire product.
>
That's OK if there were alternative suppliers of technology but in
this case Qualcomm is the only supplier. Without Qualcomm there is no
product for Apple to sell.
>> >qualcomm is also trying to extort licensing fees for frand patents,
>> >which stands for fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory.
Under the circumstances, Qualcomm's royalties were "fair, reasonable
and non-discriminatory." Of course, Apple didn't think so.
>>
>> The teerms were certainly not discriminatory.
>
>you don't understand frand.
>
>> >other companies don't do that, and for good reason. it's illegal.
>>
>> You don't know the law on this. I cut my teeth as a shareholder in
>> Rambus.
>
>rambus has nothing to do with it.
Thereby displaying your ignorance.
--
Regards,
Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-15 17:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rendhs$a2u$1@neodome.net> |
| In reply to | #133400 |
On 15 Jul 2020 14:54:47 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote: > It's so funny - in a rather pathetic way - that 'nospam' will argue > the exact opposite (of what he does in this case), when the shoe is on > the other foot (i.e. Apple is the accused party). > > It's also amazing to see that 'nospam' continues to misread/ > misinterpret what is written and 'reads' what's not written and > continues to argue both these fallacies. Hi Frank Slootweg, Apple apologists always prove they have no adult tools to deal with facts. We know each other well where's no love lost between us, where I just want to let you (& others) know I've _studied_ these unprepossessing apologists. Their strange (but consistently repetitive) actions piqued my interest: a. They _always_ take the case of Apple (as you see nospam doing now) b. They brazenly deny what Apple does (or blame M$ for what Apple does) c. They fabricate functionality they _wish_ Apple products have While there are three major types of apologists, what's consistent about their arguments is that they are so used to being among their own cultists, that they have absolutely no adult strategies to deal with actual facts. For example, nospam will literally change your words in his quote of what you said, and then he'll respond to _those_ changed words. He's done this so many hundreds of times that I have an entire thread of when he's done that - simply because he has no skill for handling actual facts. For another example, all the apologists, will simply deny facts outright, where they do it differently depending on the type. For example, Type I apologists (nospam being the canonical member) will claim "he's told you already", or just "nope" without calling all facts "lies by liars" which the Type III apologists do. He'll deny any fact he simply doesn't like. And yet, unlike the other types of apologists, nospam actually _knows_ the facts, which is why his credibility is rather high for an apologists at about the same result as a dumb random coin toss outcome. The three types are clearly distinct, even as they're all strange people: o Type I (e.g., nospam) will always parrot Apple MARKETING mantra. o Type II (e.g., sms) are normal people who simply aren't factual minded. o Type III (e.g., Alan Baker) are well into Quadrant 1 of Dunning-Kruger. Notice what sets apart nospam from the other two despicable types is that he doesn't believe a word he, himself, says, whereas the other two types literally believe what they say (where the Type II are simply ignorant people who aren't used to facts, e.g., Steve Scharf _still_ thinks the Qualcomm royalties went down per iPhone!)... but it's the Type III (e.g., Jolly Roger, Lewis, Alan Baker, BK, Joerg Lorenz, et al.) who are the most petrifying since they truly believe the strange things they claim. By way of contrast with nospam, the Type III apologist are clearly of very low IQ, whereas nospam has only a slightly below normal IQ (AFAICT), where the fact he _understands_ the facts puts him in the normal range but the fact he has no methods to deal with facts shows he's below normal in IQ. The Type II apologists, as far as I can tell, have a normal range of IQ (e.g., Alan Browne, Andreas Rutishauser, Savageduck, Steve Scharf, et al.), where their flaws are simply that facts aren't something they're used to dealing with (it's likely zero of them were science or engineering majors, for example, but more likely they couldn't handle any factually rigorous field of endeavor, e.g., Steve is the mayor of Cupertino, which doesn't require factual skills - but which requires political acumen instead). One thing that distinguishes apologists is their purpose on denying facts: o Type I simply defend Apple and blame Microsoft/Google for Apple faults. o Type II simply believe the MARKETING but otherwise are normal people. o Type III are vicious hate-filled horribly unprepossessing bullies. One trait both Type I and Type III apologists share is that they're easily shown to be sadistic, which has been proven many times, where they sadistically send innocent users on wild-goose chases simply because they incessantly claim functionality that simply never existed. It's shocking, actually, how horribly sadistic nospam is when he does that. o He's a completely unprepossessing human being - devoid of purposefully helpful advice - as he NEVER has any other goal but to push Apple's marketing message on Usenet. He's NEVER purposefully helpful. Ever. In short, nospam is, IMHO, a truly despicable human being, devoid of purposefully helpful intent, honor, credibility, or compassion. But he's not stupid! He's of only slightly below normal intelligence. o He is the way he is because he _chooses_ to be despicable. Unlike Type III and Type II apologists, who don't know any better. o This nospam actually _knows_ he's despicable; he simply doesn't care. In summary, all of the apologists deny what normal people know to be facts. o Type I know the facts, but they'll support Apple at all costs Hence, most Usenet threads they participate in are _filled_ with their garbage, such that some threads are 99% them simply denying what nobody normal would ever deny. IMHO, these despicable people like nospam are what ruins Usenet. o They don't have a single purposefully helpful bone in their bodies. Happened just this week, for example, fully documented here: o *Clear evidence that the real factual problem on Apple Usenet newsgroups - is simply that apologists exist* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/mQsBECSbICw> -- Apple apologists always prove they have no adult tools to deal with facts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-18 08:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rev4v5$s05$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133362 |
On 7/9/2020 8:38 PM, Alan Baker wrote: <snip> Please don't leave "Arlen" in the subject lines because many of us have filters not only based on "from" but also based on "subject contains Arlen." I only saw this post because it was cross-posted to a group where I had not yet added that filter. Changing "Arlen" to "xxxxx" is sufficient.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-18 18:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <slrnrh6g0n.2534.g.kreme@ProMini.lan> |
| In reply to | #133626 |
In message <rev4v5$s05$1@dont-email.me> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > On 7/9/2020 8:38 PM, Alan Baker wrote: > <snip> > Please don't leave "Arlen" in the subject lines because many of us have > filters not only based on "from" but also based on "subject contains Arlen." Your inability to filter or your news reader's inability to filter is not an "other people" problem, and other people do not have an obligation to jump through your hoops to make sure you can read the messages you want to read. -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but if the plural of mouse is mice, wouldn't the plural of spouse be spice?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-18 21:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <revo06$2t9i$1@neodome.net> |
| In reply to | #133632 |
I've studied, for years, these Apple Apologists like Steve Scharf & Lewis.
There are three types of Apple apologists, all of whom fail to comprehend
facts that normal adults have no problems understanding.
*No adult conversation is ever possible with these known Apple apologists.*
o Type I will always parrot only what an Apple MARKETING position would be
o Type II are otherwise normal people who don't bother to check their facts
o Type III are 1st Quadrant Dunning-Kruger in terms of adult cognition
These are well-known Apple apologists who post to this Usenet newsgroup:
*Type I* canonical member:
o nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> (bullshitter par excellence)
*Type II* canonical members:
o Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> (sometimes is rational)
o Ammammata <ammammata@tiscalinet.it> (ignores basic facts)
o Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch>
o Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> (educated & yet immune to fact)
o Meanie <Me@gmail.com> (probably couldn't handle any science degree)
o Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> (not dumb - but ignorant)
o sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> (pretty smart but not factually focused)
*Type III* canonical members:
o Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
o Beedle <Beedle@dont-email.me>
o BK@Onramp.net (it's hard to find a human any dumber, sadly to say)
o Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
o Davoud <star@sky.net>
o dpb <none@none.net> (posts worthless drivel - but keeps it short)
o Elden <usenet@moondog.org>
o Elfin <elfinarc6@gmail.com> (aka Lloyd, aka Lloyd Parsons)
o Hawk <Hawk@gmail.com> (literally posts what children would post)
o Hemidactylus <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>
o hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
o joe <none@domain.invalid>
o Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> (has no adult thought processes)
o Johan <JHvB@nospam.invalid>
o John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> (child-like cognitive skills)
o Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> (one of the dumbest of all)
o Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> (dumber than most)
o Lloyd <elfinarc6@gmail.com> (aka "Elfin")
o Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> (aka "Elfin")
o Panthera Tigris Altaica <northerntiger@outlook.com> (childish always)
o roctb <ghost@mouse-potato.com> Russian poster hates all facts
o Sandman <mr@sandman.net> (likely Alan Baker, hates facts about Apple)
o Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (aka Michael Glasser, troll #1)
o Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> (indescribably childish)
o Wade Garrett <wade@cooler.net> (about as dumb as a human can be)
o Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com>
o Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> (never posts anything of value
--
No adult conversation is ever possible with these known Apple apologists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-18 20:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <revni4$crt$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133626 |
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:37:07 -0700, sms wrote: > Please don't leave "Arlen" in the subject lines because many of us have > filters not only based on "from" but also based on "subject contains Arlen." Hi Steve, Stop complaining like a whiny little crying baby. o Just stop it. It's unbecoming of a man that you whine & cry in the face of simple facts. First off, you're obviously an idiot if you can't filter properly, where even Lewis, clearly a Type III apologist utter moron, told you as much. Secondly, the fact you filter all facts about Apple products you simply don't like is why you're a Type II apologist. Type II apologists like you, people with normal IQ who simply don't bother to check their facts since you Type II apologists literally believe, without checking even a _single_ fact, everything Apple feeds you to believe. The fact you _still_ believe that Qualcomm royalties from Apple went down, is a classic example of why you Type II apologists, while not malicious like Type III apologists, are unable to grasp facts that normal adults quantify. The fact you _filter_ out facts about Apple products, as proven by your own words, adds to why you Type II apologists are _immune_ to facts. In summary, you're _different_ from Type I apologists (e.g., nospam) who simply parrot, at all costs, whatever Apple MARKETING would want them to say. And, you're different from the Type III apologists, who are all utter morons (e.g., Alan Baker), who have an IQ of roughly between 40 and 50, which is why, petrifyingly so, they _believe_ what they say (i.e., nospam doesn't believe a word he, himself, says, by way of contrast). You, Steve Scharf, are a Type II apologist: a. You have a normal IQ & you're not malicious, per se, like Alan Baker is. b. But you're almost always wrong on facts because you don't grasp facts. c. Worse, you say yourself you _filter_ out all facts you simply don't like (e.g., Qualcomm royalties went down, as one, and as another, you _still_ believe (without a shred of evidence) that iPhones are cheaper than Android phones, which you can only believe if you completely filter out facts). o Type I (e.g., nospam) don't care about facts as they parrot MARKETING o Type II (e.g., sms) don't have a brain that responds well to actual facts o Type III (e.g., Alan Baker) have an IQ of about 40 or 50 so they actually (petrifyingly so) believe the strange things that they say on Usenet. In summary, you will always be wrong, Steve, because you filter out facts. -- Those who filter out facts are doomed to always be wrong in assessments.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-10 15:21 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8mrg$1rhm$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #133351 |
On 2020-07-10 01:34:33 +0000, sms said: > On 7/4/2020 12:19 PM, Paul wrote: > > <snip> > >> When Microsoft said "we're going to make an x86 software interpreter >> for our new ARM box". Intel threatened them. Microsoft backed off. >> >> Which company has the richest patent portfolio ? >> >> Will they go to patent war with one another ? >> >> Will Apple boxes be stopped at the border, on their way from China ? > > I think that you can be pretty sure that Apple worked out some kind of > licensing and royalty deal with Intel, regarding x86, prior to > announcing the ARM-based Macs. Intel has already said that they are working with Apple through the changeover period. Even after Macs go fully Apple Silicon there will still some Intel-tech in there that Apple pays for (such as Thunderbolt, which has also said to continue in Apple Silicon Macs).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-09 20:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8ndc$jkj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133358 |
On 2020-07-09 8:21 p.m., Your Name wrote: > On 2020-07-10 01:34:33 +0000, sms said: >> On 7/4/2020 12:19 PM, Paul wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> When Microsoft said "we're going to make an x86 software interpreter >>> for our new ARM box". Intel threatened them. Microsoft backed off. >>> >>> Which company has the richest patent portfolio ? >>> >>> Will they go to patent war with one another ? >>> >>> Will Apple boxes be stopped at the border, on their way from China ? >> >> I think that you can be pretty sure that Apple worked out some kind of >> licensing and royalty deal with Intel, regarding x86, prior to >> announcing the ARM-based Macs. > > Intel has already said that they are working with Apple through the > changeover period. Even after Macs go fully Apple Silicon there will > still some Intel-tech in there that Apple pays for (such as Thunderbolt, > which has also said to continue in Apple Silicon Macs). And it wouldn't surprise me to see the Intel CPUs continue in the Mac Pro for at least 2-3 years...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-09 23:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <090720202336460925%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133359 |
In article <re8ndc$jkj$1@dont-email.me>, Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote: > And it wouldn't surprise me to see the Intel CPUs continue in the Mac > Pro for at least 2-3 years... it would surprise everyone, since apple stated that the transition to apple silicon would be complete in 2 years. note that they said that the powerpc->intel transition would take 2 years and it was complete in about a year.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-09 20:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8o3k$uqk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133361 |
On 2020-07-09 8:36 p.m., nospam wrote: > In article <re8ndc$jkj$1@dont-email.me>, Alan Baker > <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote: > >> And it wouldn't surprise me to see the Intel CPUs continue in the Mac >> Pro for at least 2-3 years... > > it would surprise everyone, since apple stated that the transition to > apple silicon would be complete in 2 years. > > note that they said that the powerpc->intel transition would take 2 > years and it was complete in about a year. > Maybe so, maybe no. We'll see. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-10 15:44 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8o60$86s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #133359 |
On 2020-07-10 03:30:50 +0000, Alan Baker said: > On 2020-07-09 8:21 p.m., Your Name wrote: >> On 2020-07-10 01:34:33 +0000, sms said: >>> On 7/4/2020 12:19 PM, Paul wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> When Microsoft said "we're going to make an x86 software interpreter >>>> for our new ARM box". Intel threatened them. Microsoft backed off. >>>> >>>> Which company has the richest patent portfolio ? >>>> >>>> Will they go to patent war with one another ? >>>> >>>> Will Apple boxes be stopped at the border, on their way from China ? >>> >>> I think that you can be pretty sure that Apple worked out some kind of >>> licensing and royalty deal with Intel, regarding x86, prior to >>> announcing the ARM-based Macs. >> >> Intel has already said that they are working with Apple through the >> changeover period. Even after Macs go fully Apple Silicon there will >> still some Intel-tech in there that Apple pays for (such as >> Thunderbolt, which has also said to continue in Apple Silicon Macs). > > And it wouldn't surprise me to see the Intel CPUs continue in the Mac > Pro for at least 2-3 years... The Mac Pro and iMac Pro will almost certainly be the last Macs to transistion over to Apple Silicon, but the Apple no doubt wants to get the whole lot done as soon as practical rather than drag it out for too long.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-10 04:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8q7a$uj4$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133364 |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:44:00 +1200, Your Name wrote: > transistion over to Apple Silico *Why do you call it Apple silicon when it has _always_ been ARM silicon?* It has _always_ been "ARM silicon", in fact, even in Apple based reports. /Is it that your brain can only comprehend what Apple MARKETING feeds it?/ -- The ignorati fall for every trick in Apple's (clever) Marketing playbook.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | For a friend <notyou@yes.yes> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-09 21:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8r5m$vio$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133365 |
On 2020-07-09 9:18 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:44:00 +1200, Your Name wrote: > >> transistion over to Apple Silico > > *Why do you call it Apple silicon when it has _always_ been ARM silicon?* It has never been ARM silicon, Liar; well, not since the A6. Apple designs its own chips, Liar. > > It has _always_ been "ARM silicon", in fact, even in Apple based reports. > > /Is it that your brain can only comprehend what Apple MARKETING feeds it?/ >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-10 01:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8sta$1ltc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #133366 |
For a friend wrote:
> On 2020-07-09 9:18 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:44:00 +1200, Your Name wrote:
>>
>>> transistion over to Apple Silico
>>
>> *Why do you call it Apple silicon when it has _always_ been ARM silicon?*
>
> It has never been ARM silicon, Liar; well, not since the A6.
>
> Apple designs its own chips, Liar.
To be technically correct, you might call it an "Apple SOC".
Because that implies little about who designed it, or who
fabricated it.
It TSMC fabricates it, it's "TSMC silicon".
If the SOC is constructed from IP blocks purchased on the
open market, that doesn't say much, except that you had
buckets of money. An engineer at work was given such buckets
of money once, to prepare a chip that was almost engineering-free.
Just a bunch of blocks connected to some sort of Wishbone bus.
And he finished the design in around 30 days. Or so the
Powerpoint slide deck says.
Apple will use different design techniques per market
segment. The lower end equipment will use SOCs. The
Mac Pro highest end equipment will be closer to a
complete processor (like an Epyc or ThreadRipper
in terms of capability).
There is already a proxy for what Apple could build
out there, which I located in some random reading,
so they very well could make something impressive.
The part is fabricated by TSMC. It will need a
second chip specializing in I/O (a Southbridge or PCH design).
They could even purchase a PCH from Intel, as long as they could
license the DMI from Intel, as an example of a
collaboration. This would give Intel little in the
way of profits though. At the current time, Intel
is hungry to sell $1000 parts with decent margins.
It's not in a jellybean race with other companies.
Intel wants to be an "IBM" at the moment, in terms
of market mix.
Apple could purchase this server-grade chip right now,
and use its porting kit if it wanted to. The company
which designed the chip, makes two versions, and the
second one is in announcement phase, rather than shipping
immediately. But it's just a scaled version of the existing
one, so no technical challenges (no new cores). And, it
has a *lot* of cores. And that's why I consider it a
proxy for what Apple could do. What the advertising
material didn't dwell on, is clock rate versus
core utilization. It draws 250W, under some set of
conditions (that's their "bragging" number rather than
their "shipping" number). Being a server, it's unlikely to have
flavors of turbo built in. But it still might have
a power management system. They didn't dwell on those
sorts of details.
But at least in terms of "how big of a chip could TSMC
make for them", that chip gives some idea. 250W
being a good place to stop.
But because that companies CPU doesn't have "the Apple smell",
of course Apple couldn't use it. But it would allow a
relatively painless ship date.
Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-09 22:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <re8t11$6sa$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133367 |
On 2020-07-09 10:04 p.m., Paul wrote: > For a friend wrote: >> On 2020-07-09 9:18 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:44:00 +1200, Your Name wrote: >>> >>>> transistion over to Apple Silico >>> >>> *Why do you call it Apple silicon when it has _always_ been ARM >>> silicon?* >> >> It has never been ARM silicon, Liar; well, not since the A6. >> >> Apple designs its own chips, Liar. > > To be technically correct, you might call it an "Apple SOC". > > Because that implies little about who designed it, or who > fabricated it. > > It TSMC fabricates it, it's "TSMC silicon". Yup. The fact that Apple has no fab of its own is well known. > > If the SOC is constructed from IP blocks purchased on the > open market, that doesn't say much, except that you had > buckets of money. An engineer at work was given such buckets > of money once, to prepare a chip that was almost engineering-free. > Just a bunch of blocks connected to some sort of Wishbone bus. > And he finished the design in around 30 days. Or so the > Powerpoint slide deck says. Except literally no one is saying that Apple SOC is "constructed from IP blocks purchased on the open market".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web