Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #118507 > unrolled thread

Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED)

Started byArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
First post2018-09-29 18:22 +0000
Last post2018-10-04 14:20 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 21 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-29 18:22 +0000
    Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 12:08 -0700
      Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-29 23:01 +0000
        Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 19:28 -0700
          Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 03:54 +0000
            Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
              Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net> - 2018-09-30 04:08 +0000
                Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0700
                  Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 11:16 +0000
                    Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 07:48 -0700
                      Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 19:36 +0000
                        Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 17:31 -0700
                          Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 02:24 +0000
                            Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                              Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 04:20 +0000
                                Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 21:33 -0700
                                  Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen   H  Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 15:25 +0000
                                    Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-10-01 16:17 -0700
                                      Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Arlen   H  Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 23:36 +0000
                                        Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
    Re: Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 14:20 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#118507 — Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED)

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-29 18:22 +0000
SubjectProof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED)
Message-ID<poofto$72m$1@news.mixmin.net>
Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED).

*Alan Browne proves he can't even construct a _single_ sentence grammatically correctly!*
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/oWW0imXI4zE/IkBZp4aSAgAJ>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#118509

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 12:08 -0700
Message-ID<pooij7$10su$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118507
On 2018-09-29 11:22 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> Proof Alan Browne never graduated high school (he likely failed the GED).
> 
> *Alan Browne proves he can't even construct a _single_ sentence grammatically correctly!*
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/oWW0imXI4zE/IkBZp4aSAgAJ>
> 

Which of his sentences supposedly proves that, twit boy?

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118512

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-29 23:01 +0000
Message-ID<pop07q$uvc$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118509
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:08:25 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Which of his sentences supposedly proves that, twit boy?

Given you, Alan Baker, also prove an utter lack of English skills...

A high school senior was touring the Harvard College freshman dormitory
suites at Weld Hall where he hoped to reside at in the following fall,
because he had heard it was close to the Widener Library.

As he was leaving the slate-roofed sturdy brick building, he encountered a
distinguished-looking man carefully stepping down the well-worn smooth
slate steps and asked, "Sir, could you please tell me where Widener Library
is at?"

The man looked down his nose and replied, "Son, I'm a Senior Lecturer in
the Department of English where I can assure you we use proper modal verbs
and we don't end our sentences with prepositions. Please presently re-cast
your request in a proper form, whence I will graciously reply."

"Could you tell me where Widener Library is at, twit boy?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118513

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 19:28 -0700
Message-ID<popccf$82u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118512
On 2018-09-29 4:01 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:08:25 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Which of his sentences supposedly proves that, twit boy?
> 
> Given you, Alan Baker, also prove an utter lack of English skills...

I notice only that you did not provide such a sentence, nor show how 
it's construction was supposedly lacking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118514

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 03:54 +0000
Message-ID<pophef$pds$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118513
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:28:34 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> I notice only that you did not provide such a sentence, nor show how 
> it's construction was supposedly lacking.

That you didn't notice the inordinate lack of English skills, doesn't mean
that they're not there.

It simply proves, yet again, that you're ignorant, Alan Baker.

HINT: That's never hard to prove since you proved it yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118515

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Message-ID<pophm7$e8h$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118514
On 2018-09-29 8:54 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:28:34 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> I notice only that you did not provide such a sentence, nor show how
>> it's construction was supposedly lacking.
> 
> That you didn't notice the inordinate lack of English skills, doesn't mean
> that they're not there.

It's not my job to go looking for your proof, twit boy.

> 
> It simply proves, yet again, that you're ignorant, Alan Baker.

Produce a sentence.

> 
> HINT: That's never hard to prove since you proved it yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118516

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
Date2018-09-30 04:08 +0000
Message-ID<popi8k$qk1$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118515
On 29 Sep 2018 20:59:03 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:

> It's not my job to go looking for your proof, twit boy.

Your fifth-grade vocabulary betrays proof of my statements' veracity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118519

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 21:48 -0700
Message-ID<popkhe$hr6$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118516
On 2018-09-29 9:08 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2018 20:59:03 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> It's not my job to go looking for your proof, twit boy.
> 
> Your fifth-grade vocabulary betrays proof of my statements' veracity.
> 

Produce the sentence, twit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118523

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 11:16 +0000
Message-ID<poqba5$v7p$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118519
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:48:45 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Produce the sentence, twit.

I love when you post because you prove my point, Alan Baker.
a. You prove to own the comprehensive mind of a child
b. And the vocabulary of a fifth grader

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118527

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 07:48 -0700
Message-ID<poqno8$8h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118523
On 2018-09-30 4:16 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:48:45 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Produce the sentence, twit.
> 
> I love when you post because you prove my point, Alan Baker.
> a. You prove to own the comprehensive mind of a child
> b. And the vocabulary of a fifth grader
> 

I love that you can't actually produce a sentence that proves your claim.

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118540

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 19:36 +0000
Message-ID<por8je$bv4$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118527
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 07:48:41 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> I love that you can't actually produce a sentence that proves your claim.

What's interesting is that all _adults_ saw the sentence.

It's only _you_, Alan Baker, who can't see what is obvious to adults.

There are only two possibilities:
a. You, Alan Baker, are _really_ that dumb, or, 
b. You, Alan Baker, are just playing games.
Pick one.

I don't have to prove this, since you proved it yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118545

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 17:31 -0700
Message-ID<porpt9$1tsj$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118540
On 2018-09-30 12:36 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 07:48:41 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> I love that you can't actually produce a sentence that proves your claim.
> 
> What's interesting is that all _adults_ saw the sentence.

What's interesting is that, when pressed, you'll do anything rather than 
simply copy and paste the "proof" you claim exists.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118548

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 02:24 +0000
Message-ID<pos0gd$ga8$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118545
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:31:38 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> What's interesting is that, when pressed, you'll do anything rather than 
> simply copy and paste the "proof" you claim exists.

You are so stupid, you missed that proof so many times already.

There are only two possibilities, Alan Baker, for you to have missed it:
a. You really are that stupid, or, 
b. You're just playing games.
Pick one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118551

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Message-ID<pos0tc$774$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118548
On 2018-09-30 7:24 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:31:38 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> What's interesting is that, when pressed, you'll do anything rather than
>> simply copy and paste the "proof" you claim exists.
> 
> You are so stupid, you missed that proof so many times already.

You've never provided any proof here when requested; never once to my 
knowledge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118555

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 04:20 +0000
Message-ID<pos7al$qp1$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118551
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:31:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> You've never provided any proof here when requested; never once to my 
> knowledge.

That's the problem.

You missed it.

Every time.

You're _that_ stupid, Alan Baker.

You're so stupid, Alan Baker, that alienating you ... helps everyone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118557

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 21:33 -0700
Message-ID<pos82f$fba$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118555
On 2018-09-30 9:20 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:31:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> You've never provided any proof here when requested; never once to my
>> knowledge.
> 
> That's the problem.
> 
> You missed it.
> 
> Every time.

Nope. It was never posted.

Period.

All you have to do to prove me a liar is quote the text and post a link 
to the post HERE where I was supposed to have been able to read your 
proof that Alan Browne writes sentences that are grammatically incorrect.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118563

FromArlen H Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 15:25 +0000
Message-ID<potea0$lrb$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118557
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:33:19 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Nope. It was never posted.
> 
> Period.
> 
> All you have to do to prove me a liar is quote the text and post a link 
> to the post HERE where I was supposed to have been able to read your 
> proof that Alan Browne writes sentences that are grammatically incorrect.

I'm not trying to prove you a liar since you prove you're _stupid_.
HINT: The link was posted and is clear to sentient adults.

What's odd is that it seems you're not really just playing games.

That means the unfathomable is really the case.
You, Alan Baker, really are _that_ stupid. 

-- 
Jesus. Please Lord. Please tell me these people don't vote.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118568

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-10-01 16:17 -0700
Message-ID<pou9sc$4dr$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118563
On 2018-10-01 8:25 AM, Arlen H Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:33:19 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Nope. It was never posted.
>>
>> Period.
>>
>> All you have to do to prove me a liar is quote the text and post a link
>> to the post HERE where I was supposed to have been able to read your
>> proof that Alan Browne writes sentences that are grammatically incorrect.
> 
> I'm not trying to prove you a liar since you prove you're _stupid_.
> HINT: The link was posted and is clear to sentient adults.

A link is not a quote.

Here's a link:

<https://www.google.com>

I assert that somewhere you can get from there will show you are an idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118570

FromArlen H Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 23:36 +0000
Message-ID<poub28$add$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118568
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:17:34 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> I assert that somewhere you can get from there will show you are an idiot.

It is you, Alan Baker, who didn't graduate high school.
Not me.

To wit:
 <http://www.rvelthuis.de/articles/articles-quoting.html>
  "Do not overquote. "

See also:
 <http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/#quotes>
  "quote only those portions of the original message that are 
   relevant to the topic we're addressing."
  "There is almost never any need to quote someone else's post in full. 
   As a matter of fact, full-quoting is usually considered quite rude."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118572

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Message-ID<poubv7$5u1$13@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118570
On 2018-10-01 4:36 PM, Arlen H Holder wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:17:34 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> I assert that somewhere you can get from there will show you are an idiot.
> 
> It is you, Alan Baker, who didn't graduate high school.
> Not me.
> 
> To wit:
>   <http://www.rvelthuis.de/articles/articles-quoting.html>
>    "Do not overquote. "
> 
> See also:
>   <http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/#quotes>
>    "quote only those portions of the original message that are
>     relevant to the topic we're addressing."
>    "There is almost never any need to quote someone else's post in full.
>     As a matter of fact, full-quoting is usually considered quite rude."
> 

We weren't discussing how to quote in this sub-thread...

...and look! You've snipped what we WERE talking about (i.e. "relevant" 
material) all along.

This sub-thread was about you never having posted a single example of 
Alan Browne's supposed inability to construct a grammatically correct 
sentence.

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web