Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #118517 > unrolled thread

Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max

Started byArlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
First post2018-09-30 04:28 +0000
Last post2018-09-30 11:31 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 23 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net> - 2018-09-30 04:28 +0000
    Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0700
      Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-09-29 22:05 -0700
        Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-29 23:00 -0700
          Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 11:31 +0000
            Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 07:49 -0700
              Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 14:54 +0000
                Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 08:00 -0700
                  Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 15:13 +0000
                    Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 08:14 -0700
                      Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 15:20 +0000
                        Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 08:22 -0700
                          Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 15:37 +0000
                            Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 17:41 -0700
                              Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 02:24 +0000
                                Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 19:33 -0700
                                  Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 04:18 +0000
                                    Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-09-30 21:32 -0700
                                      Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen   H  Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 15:08 +0000
                                        Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-10-01 16:16 -0700
                                          Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen   H  Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-01 23:35 +0000
                                            Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2018-10-01 16:49 -0700
        Re: Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max Arlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net> - 2018-09-30 11:31 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#118517 — Video shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
Date2018-09-30 04:28 +0000
SubjectVideo shows new design flaws in the new iPhone XS Max
Message-ID<popjdl$sb4$1@news.mixmin.net>
<https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#118518

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 21:48 -0700
Message-ID<popkgk$hr6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118517
On 2018-09-29 9:28 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>
> 

No. It does not.

There may be issues with charging for some users, but you don't know if 
they're design issues with the phone or no.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118520

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2018-09-29 22:05 -0700
Message-ID<0001HW.21609107017745DD700001CA72CF@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#118518
On Sep 29, 2018, Alan Baker wrote
(in article <popkgk$hr6$1@gioia.aioe.org>):

> On 2018-09-29 9:28 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> > <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>
>
> No. It does not.
>
> There may be issues with charging for some users, but you don't know if
> they're design issues with the phone or no.

Why are you the only one in the room arguing with this attention hog?

-- 
Regards,
Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118521

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-29 23:00 -0700
Message-ID<popopa$n8k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118520
On 2018-09-29 10:05 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2018, Alan Baker wrote
> (in article <popkgk$hr6$1@gioia.aioe.org>):
> 
>> On 2018-09-29 9:28 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
>>> <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>
>>
>> No. It does not.
>>
>> There may be issues with charging for some users, but you don't know if
>> they're design issues with the phone or no.
> 
> Why are you the only one in the room arguing with this attention hog?
> 
For my amusement of course.

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118524

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 11:31 +0000
Message-ID<poqc5j$uu$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118521
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 23:00:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> For my amusement of course.

Why are people like Savageduck so deathly _afraid_ of facts?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118528

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 07:49 -0700
Message-ID<poqnq9$8h6$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118524
On 2018-09-30 4:31 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 23:00:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> For my amusement of course.
> 
> Why are people like Savageduck so deathly _afraid_ of facts?
> 

I don't know that he is.

Based on your posts to date, you've never argued using facts, so how 
could I know?

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118530

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 14:54 +0000
Message-ID<poqo29$irv$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118528
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 07:49:46 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Based on your posts to date, you've never argued using facts

Since you're an Apple Apologist, you're blind to facts - such as this.
 <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>

HINT: Just because you're blind to fact, doesn't make fact not fact.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118531

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 08:00 -0700
Message-ID<poqoe2$8p8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118530
On 2018-09-30 7:54 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 07:49:46 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Based on your posts to date, you've never argued using facts
> 
> Since you're an Apple Apologist, you're blind to facts - such as this.
>   <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>
> 
> HINT: Just because you're blind to fact, doesn't make fact not fact.
> 

Your conclusion (that the iPhone XS Max has a DESIGN flaw) is 
unsupported by the video.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118532

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 15:13 +0000
Message-ID<poqp6o$kaj$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118531
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:00:19 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Your conclusion (that the iPhone XS Max has a DESIGN flaw) is 
> unsupported by the video.

Only Apple Apologists prove to be so _stupid_ as to miss basic facts.

The design flaw clearly shows itself in both the new iPhone XS & XSMax.
 <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>

HINT: It doesn't happen to the iPhone X on the _same_ OS version!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118533

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 08:14 -0700
Message-ID<poqp81$ao9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118532
On 2018-09-30 8:13 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:00:19 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Your conclusion (that the iPhone XS Max has a DESIGN flaw) is
>> unsupported by the video.
> 
> Only Apple Apologists prove to be so _stupid_ as to miss basic facts.
> 
> The design flaw clearly shows itself in both the new iPhone XS & XSMax.
>   <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc>
> 
> HINT: It doesn't happen to the iPhone X on the _same_ OS version!
> 

Which means nothing.

The error can still be in the OS and not the phone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118534

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 15:20 +0000
Message-ID<poqpja$kve$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118533
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:14:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Which means nothing.
> 
> The error can still be in the OS and not the phone.

You prove you own the comprehension of a child, Alan Baker.

The fact is that both the iPhone XS and XSMax have a design flaw.
Otherwise, they'd charge when they're supposed to.

The clear fact is, as usual, Apple never tested them in the real world.

Here's a quote from the video:
 "The ability to recharge your phone confidently ... that's like step 1"

*Yet again, proof that Apple never tests their products in the real world.*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118535

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 08:22 -0700
Message-ID<poqpo0$bdi$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118534
On 2018-09-30 8:20 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:14:10 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Which means nothing.
>>
>> The error can still be in the OS and not the phone.
> 
> You prove you own the comprehension of a child, Alan Baker.
> 
> The fact is that both the iPhone XS and XSMax have a design flaw.

That's not a fact.

I've explained this before. You are making an assertion, not stating a fact.

> Otherwise, they'd charge when they're supposed to.

No. There could also be an issue with the OS.

> 
> The clear fact is, as usual, Apple never tested them in the real world.

That is both an assertion and one that is obviously incorrect.

> 
> Here's a quote from the video:
>   "The ability to recharge your phone confidently ... that's like step 1"

The "..." is interesting. What else was said between "confidently" and 
"that's like step 1"?

> 
> *Yet again, proof that Apple never tests their products in the real world.*
> 

No. It is not proof of that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118536

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-09-30 15:37 +0000
Message-ID<poqqjm$mfv$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118535
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:22:41 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> That's not a fact.

Just because your belief system has no room for facts, doesn't make facts,
not facts.

> I've explained this before. You are making an assertion, not stating a fact.
Hehhehheh... 

Since you exhibit the comprehension of a child, Alan Baker, there's
_nothing_ you could ever say, that I don't instantly comprehend.

It's _easy_ to comprehend the logic of a child like you, Alan Baker.

The problem is that you don't comprehend the logic of an adult.

>> Otherwise, they'd charge when they're supposed to.
> 
> No. There could also be an issue with the OS.

Why doesn't this charging fiasco occur with the iPhone X?

>> The clear fact is, as usual, Apple never tested them in the real world.
> 
> That is both an assertion and one that is obviously incorrect.

Again, you exhibit the comprehension of a child, Alan Baker.

Do you have any idea what 75% to 83% of tested devices indicates?

None?
Really?

You really have no comprehension of such huge percentages?

>> 
>> Here's a quote from the video:
>>   "The ability to recharge your phone confidently ... that's like step 1"
> 
> The "..." is interesting. What else was said between "confidently" and 
> "that's like step 1"?

OMG.
Are you _really_ that stupid, Alan Baker?

It's unfathomably _anyone_ is as stupid as you prove to be, Alan Baker.
You don't even comprehend that simple sentence above?
Really?

You think something critical is missing, Alan Baker?
Really?
You're _that_ stupid, Alan Baker?
Jesus. 

You don't even _listen_ to the video, Alan Baker?
If you listened, then you missed what was cut out?

You know what was cut out, Alan Baker (you idiot moron).
 "I mean".
Yes. 
 "I mean".

Jesus, Alan Baker. 
You Apple Apologists are the _dumbest_ freaking morons on the planet!

Only two possibilities exist, Alan Baker:
a. You're really _that_ stupid, or, 
b. You're just playing silly games.
 
HINT: It would take you all of a few seconds to *listen* to the quote.
Your mind is so childish, that you can't even research 10 seconds!
 <https://youtu.be/J_lRJuQtBmc?t=445>

"The ability to recharge your phone confidently, _I mean_ that's like step 1"

> 
>> 
>> *Yet again, proof that Apple never tests their products in the real world.*
>> 
> 
> No. It is not proof of that.

Alan Baker,
You prove you possess the mind of a child, Alan Baker.
You "question" a quote, where the only thing removed was "I mean".

You're literally _that_ stupid that you can't figure out that removing 
"I mean" is not nefarious.

Jesus.
*You prove you're the dumbest of the dumbest of the dumb, Alan Baker*

I don't have to prove this - you proved it yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118547

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 17:41 -0700
Message-ID<porqf3$1uhq$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118536
On 2018-09-30 8:37 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:22:41 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> That's not a fact.
> 
> Just because your belief system has no room for facts, doesn't make facts,
> not facts.

Says the guy who snipped all that was written to prevent direct comparisons.

<rest of your ranting snipped>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118549

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 02:24 +0000
Message-ID<pos0gk$gaf$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118547
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:41:09 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Says the guy who snipped all that was written to prevent direct comparisons.

I don't play your silly games, Alan Baker.

I quote what I respond to, which happens to be accepted Usenet protocol.
 <http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?quoting?>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118552

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 19:33 -0700
Message-ID<pos124$774$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118549
On 2018-09-30 7:24 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:41:09 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Says the guy who snipped all that was written to prevent direct comparisons.
> 
> I don't play your silly games, Alan Baker.
> 
> I quote what I respond to, which happens to be accepted Usenet protocol.
>   <http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?quoting?>
> 

Your link doesn't take me to anything about "quoting".

Searching your link for "quoting" returns no results.


However, when I fix your broken URL (by removing the trailing "?"), I 
find this:

'The reply to the post should go BELOW the quoted material, whilst 
snipping out everything you are not commenting on (including signatures).'

But you were commenting on text you snipped, so you were violating the 
rules that you just chose.

And you can be sure I'll now remind you at every opportunity.

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118554

FromArlen Holder <arlenholder@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 04:18 +0000
Message-ID<pos75p$qfo$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118552
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:33:42 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Searching your link for "quoting" returns no results.

It's amazing, actually, how you repeatedly prove inept.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118556

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-09-30 21:32 -0700
Message-ID<pos80h$fba$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118554
On 2018-09-30 9:18 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:33:42 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Searching your link for "quoting" returns no results.
> 
> It's amazing, actually, how you repeatedly prove inept.
> 

Says the guy who's now carefully snipped his bad link...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118562

FromArlen H Holder <arlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Date2018-10-01 15:08 +0000
Message-ID<potd9k$kad$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#118556
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:32:17 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:

> Says the guy who's now carefully snipped his bad link...

Here are some on-topic links for you to ponder:

 iPhone XS Max lightning port charging issue
 <https://discussions.apple.com/thread/8551504?page=1>

iPhone XS Max lightning port charging issue
<https://www.pcmag.com/news/364091/iphone-xs-and-xs-max-have-a-charging-problem> 

HINT: If Apple can't even get the _easy_ stuff right, can you imagine how
bad the security holes are in iOS and Mac devices? 

--
(Cosmic sizes!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118567

FromAlan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date2018-10-01 16:16 -0700
Message-ID<pou9qj$4dr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#118562
On 2018-10-01 8:08 AM, Arlen H Holder wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:32:17 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Says the guy who's now carefully snipped his bad link...
> 
> Here are some on-topic links for you to ponder:

We were discussing your supposed link to the netiquette rules about quoting.

Let's stick with that:

 > I quote what I respond to, which happens to be accepted Usenet protocol.
 >   <http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?quoting?>
 >

Your link doesn't take me to anything about "quoting".

Searching your link for "quoting" returns no results.


However, when I fix your broken URL (by removing the trailing "?"), I 
find this:

'The reply to the post should go BELOW the quoted material, whilst 
snipping out everything you are not commenting on (including signatures).'

But you were commenting on text you snipped, so you were violating the 
rules that you just chose.

And you can be sure I'll now remind you at every opportunity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web