Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #117724 > unrolled thread

Re: Is Apple acknowledging that many users want an active stylus on their phones?

Started by	Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
First post	2018-08-19 00:16 +0000
Last post	2018-08-19 15:38 +0000
Articles	6 on this page of 26 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#117735

From	Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date	2018-08-18 22:55 -0700
Message-ID	<plb0ok$ob4$1@news.datemas.de>
In reply to	#117734

On 2018-08-18 10:52 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2018 22:45:28 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> Assumes facts you don't even have a way of knowing.
> 
> Hehheh... proof you, Alan Baker, don't even know what facts you dispute!

No, actually.

You've snipped your assertion (what a surprise)!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#117739

From	Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
Date	2018-08-19 08:31 +0000
Message-ID	<plb9sh$gic$4@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to	#117735

On 18 Aug 2018 22:55:31 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:

> You've snipped your assertion (what a surprise)!

Bear in mind, all you _can_ do is play your silly games.
I've watched you Apple Apologists for more than a decade.

You're all children - just like you Alan Baker.
Stupid too. No education whatsoever.

You deny facts - and yet - you can't even *name* the facts you deny! :)
You're actually _that_ stupid, Alan Baker.

In fact, all you Apple Apologists are almost exactly alike.
  What are well-verified psychological traits of the Apple Apologists?
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.ipad/2BJ0i7LtngQ>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#117743

From	Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Date	2018-08-19 06:48 -0700
Message-ID	<plbseu$8ok$1@news.datemas.de>
In reply to	#117739

On 2018-08-19 1:31 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2018 22:55:31 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:
> 
>> You've snipped your assertion (what a surprise)!
> 
> Bear in mind, all you _can_ do is play your silly games.
> I've watched you Apple Apologists for more than a decade.

Explain why you suddenly snipped the claim to which I was replying.

<rest of ranting snipped>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#117744

From	Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date	2018-08-19 14:55 +0100
Message-ID	<190820181455176790%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to	#117743

In article <plbseu$8ok$1@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
wrote:

>On 2018-08-19 1:31 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
>> On 18 Aug 2018 22:55:31 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:
>> 
>>> You've snipped your assertion (what a surprise)!
>> 
>> Bear in mind, all you _can_ do is play your silly games.
>> I've watched you Apple Apologists for more than a decade.
>
>Explain why you suddenly snipped the claim to which I was replying.
>
><rest of ranting snipped>

Haven't we seen this troll before? Why not just KF him?

-- 
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an
endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

HL Mencken

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#117748

From	Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
Date	2018-08-19 15:41 +0000
Message-ID	<plc32g$78a$3@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to	#117744

On 19 Aug 2018 06:55:17 GMT, Tim Streater wrote:

> Haven't we seen this troll before? Why not just KF him?

Yes, Tim Streater. You are a well-known Apple Apologist troll. 
Just like Alan Baker is.

Want me to point to proof on the Mac newsgroups of your idiocy?
Remember, I tell the truth. Always. 

Hence, my facts are never wrong(*1). 
Facts are funny that way. 

BTW, just killfile me, Tim Streatoer.
Nothing you ever post will ever have a single iota of factual value anyway.

-- 
Out of tens of thousands of facts, I'm only human so I must have made a
factual mistake inadvertantely; but nobody can find a single one - where
you can rest assured the Apple Apologists have tried.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#117746

From	Arlen Holder <arlenholder@nospam.net>
Date	2018-08-19 15:38 +0000
Message-ID	<plc2t1$6sr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to	#117743

On 19 Aug 2018 06:48:12 GMT, Alan Baker wrote:

> Explain why you suddenly snipped the claim to which I was replying.

I just added this latest Apple Apologist trait to the thread on the topic!
  What are common psychological traits of the Apple Apologists? 
 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/2BJ0i7LtngQ/LwsRbuq4DwAJ>

This is generally established proper Usenet protocol for quoting content:
<https://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1>
You quote the singular concept you're responding to.

It's *another* trait of the Apple Apologists that, when they play their
silly semantic games, they expect everyone to play along with their silly
semantic games. 

It's how they pull every thread off topic off the actual facts and
endlessly onto whatever silly game they're currently playing.

And yet - the topic is clear.

You, Alan Baker, deny facts - and yet - you don't even state which facts
you deny!

It's a common trait of all you Apple Apologists.
a. You deny facts a priori, 
b. And yet - you can't even come up with a single fact that you deny!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

csiph-web

Re: Is Apple acknowledging that many users want an active stylus on their phones?

Contents

#117735

#117739

#117743

#117744

#117748

#117746