Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread

tl;dr:

Started by"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
First post2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Last post2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
        Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
          Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
            Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
                Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
                    Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
                Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
                  Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
                    Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
                      Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
                          Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
                          Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
                    Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
                      Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
                    Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
                    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
                      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
                        Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
                        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
                          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
                          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
                          Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
                                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
                                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
                                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                    Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
                      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
                        Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
                        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
                          Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
                            Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
                              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
                                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
                                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
                                    Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
                                    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
                                      Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
                              Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
                        Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
                          Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
            Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
        Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
    Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
      Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
    Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
    (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
      Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
        Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700

Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10  Next page →


#116680 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid>
Date2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<pe9saq$5f5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116678
David B. STALKER wrote:

> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>> Whilst it has no malware now, it might have tomorrow unless you use a
>>> service like that offered by Sucuri. *DO* you use such a service?
>> 
>> No, it is not necessary for someone who knows how things work.
> 
> OK

So remember that.

>>> You've been told before not to 'doctor' posts. That includes links.
>> 
>> Perhaps I am just following YOUR procedures. You post-edit all the
>> time.
> 
> Only very occasionally.

You do it enough to make it well-known, to even casual observers.

>>> I investigate things which I do not understand.
>> 
>> ..which is nearly EVERYTHING related to computers... and then you
>> forget what the answers were.
> 
> Yes, I *DO* forget, so remind me.

That's one of your most-frequently asked questions. Your addled brain has 
less retention than a wide-mesh sieve.

> Please account for the original result I got way back.
> 
> https://www.dropbox.fake-news
> 
> What do YOU think was amiss? Was it actually your site which had a
> 'problem', was it maybe my computer which had been compromised in some
> way or was it Sucuri itself trying to 'pull a fast one'?

You continue to stalk. You've been told the answer *a thousand times*.

>> Oh, and your methods of "investigation" really suck.
> 
> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)

You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.

-- 
   -bts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116719 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<pee9kd$487$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116680
On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> David B. wrote:
> 
>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
> 
> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.

You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.

The Lord moves in mysterious ways! :-)

-- 
D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116721 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<fb6a4cbc-b6cf-4a67-83da-ee4b846c4c3d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116719
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 5:51:27 AM UTC-7, David B. wrote:
> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> > David B. wrote:
> > 
> >> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> 
> >> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
> >> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
> > 
> > You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
> 
> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.
> 
> The Lord moves in mysterious ways! :-)
> 
> -- 
> D.



Just give it up already. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Steve Petruzzellis. You're the court jester and your many witless tasks show this. Why does Snit focus on his own ego so much? You're clueless! Steve Petruzzellis created at least 20 KVMS in the last year or so. Without Linux that would not be possible. Snit is undeniably dishonest, he got busted and he's doing the predictable defensive funny business taught in http://stanford.io/2lh3f5e as he endeavors to regain a smattering of honor... but it blew up in his face. Virtually everything Snit says about anyone else is false as everyone knows. 

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow
http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow
http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116723 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid>
Date2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<peegvv$3i6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116719
David B. STALKER wrote:

> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> 
>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>> 
>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
> 
> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.

That was not the question. *YOU* had NO hand in their end-of-life.

> The [Fictional Character] moves in mysterious ways! :-)

There is no way he or she can help you weasel out of your bold-faced lie.

-- 
   -bts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116725 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<peeisr$ttj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116723
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> David B. wrote:
> 
>> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>
>>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>>>
>>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
>>
>> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.
> 
> That was not the question. *YOU* had NO hand in their end-of-life.

You, sir, have absolutely no way of knowing that I didn't! ;-)

All three are gone.

>> The Lord moves in mysterious ways! :-)
> 
> There is no way he or she can help you weasel out of your bold-faced lie.

I always thank our Lord when he helps me! :-)

-- 
D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116742 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8EF926D9455CHT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1>
In reply to#116725
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
news:peeisr$ttj$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 15:29:29 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the
>>>>> Annexcafe forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca
>>>>> taken down! ;-) 
>>>>
>>>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things.
>>>> *NONE*. 
>>>
>>> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.
>> 
>> That was not the question. *YOU* had NO hand in their
>> end-of-life. 
> 
> You, sir, have absolutely no way of knowing that I didn't! ;-)

That's entirely incorrect, David.
 
> All three are gone.

Which had nothing to do with you.
 


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
I Think....therefore I'm OVER QUALIFIED!!!!!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116750 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<hktlgdpraapm2hu7t1kh9979ahtko7pc2k@4ax.com>
In reply to#116725
On Sun, 27 May 2018 16:29:29 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
>>>
>>> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.
>> 
>> That was not the question. *YOU* had NO hand in their end-of-life.
>
>You, sir, have absolutely no way of knowing that I didn't! ;-)
>
>All three are gone.

	All three sites are legally registered.
	None are "gone".
	All three have been abandoned by their owners. It appears
people are just not that interested in sites updated 10 years ago.

	Except one single poster who has posted about them over 200
times in the last 5 years, long after they were abandoned. Those posts
keep them "active" in search engines.

	Here's a clue to who that psycho might be:

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s

-- 
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116729 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromChar Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<k0llgdpvp9eduuike0ndoq63se7ivpvca5@4ax.com>
In reply to#116719
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:51:26 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>> 
>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
>
>You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.

It takes a special kind of lying scumbag POS to claim credit for things
in which you had no role. So much for 'open and honest', eh?


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116741 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8EF926D4166AHT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1>
In reply to#116719
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pee9kd$487$1@dont-email.me 
Sun, 27 May 2018 12:51:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> 
>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>> 
>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
> 
> You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.

Nobody has. What's been disputed is your claim that you had anything to 
do with it. 
 


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
In the struggle between you and the world, back the world. --Franz 
Kafka

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116747 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<goslgdtok20n25gt74ocpdcohtpo2tksim@4ax.com>
In reply to#116719
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:51:26 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 25-May-18 9:39 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>>> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe
>>> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
>> 
>> You are a bold-faced liar. You did *NONE* of those things. *NONE*.
>
>You cannot dispute the fact that they ARE gone.

	Yes, they were abandoned, probably from lack of interest. They
are both present on DNS servers and legally registered, and can be
reactivated by their rightful owners anytime.
	Neither was taken down by any sort of court order. Both sites
seem to be benign. The only thing that keeps them alive is some kind
of kook. Spambots pick up the addresses in his very frequent posts and
feed them to search engines, so they haven't gone the way of most
abandoned sites.

	That kook calls himself *BD*, BTW.

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s

-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116700 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8EDEE867B320HT1@f49NaSF4OqHmBf7RDEk356k813dR09foiV2ZmoA6yh9MJ76.h8x16>
In reply to#116678
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
news:pe9ooe$c8b$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 18:38:53 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25-May-18 4:36 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>>
>>>> Will you remember that my site has NO malware?
>>>
>>> Whilst it has no malware now, it might have tomorrow unless you
>>> use a service like that offered by Sucuri. *DO* you use such a
>>> service? 
>> 
>> No, it is not necessary for someone who knows how things work.
> 
> OK
> 
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.fake-news
>>>
>>> You've been told before not to 'doctor' posts. That includes
>>> links. 
>> 
>> Perhaps I am just following YOUR procedures. You post-edit all
>> the time. 
> 
> Only very occasionally.

In other words, whenever it pleases you to do so.
 
>>> I investigate things which I do not understand.
>> 
>> ..which is nearly EVERYTHING related to computers... and then you
>> forget what the answers were. 
> 
> Yes, I *DO* forget, so remind me.

Why? You'll be asking the same question again in less than twenty 
four hours. Or, ignoring it, as you've demonstrated to have done with 
ALL of the prior replies wasting time trying to educate you.
 
> Please account for the original result I got way back.

Please, learn to properly ab(use) usenet so that you can re-read many 
of the posts by those of us who wasted our time trying to explain it 
to you, the first time you WRONGLY accused the site of being 
malicious. I see no reason for any of us to waste our time telling 
you again what happened. You ignored it all previously.

I fucking knew I was wasting my time, that you'd learn nothing. I 
even tried to warn others it was a wasted effort. Now they can see 
for themselves, I was right. Attempting to teach you anything of a 
technical nature IS A FUCKING WASTE OF TIME.
 
> > Oh, and your methods of "investigation" really suck.
> 
> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the
> Annexcafe forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca
> taken down! ;-) 

You're lying, again. You've done NOTHING of the sort. On the 
contrary, *I* was succesful in having my material removed from your 
youtube channel as well as your google drive. I've also been 
succesful having many of your uploads to a picture viewing site 
removed. You're known! as a multiple time offending copyright 
infringer, amongst other things, none of which are something you'd 
want to put on a resume.

You lie, you stalk, and you lie about doing it or the reason why you 
did. As was confirmed when you posted what you thought was a gsv url 
of my house. You tried to play it off as some innocent little thing, 
but, it never was. You were pissed off because you couldn't hire me 
to break into two websites for you. So you thought (what a fucking 
fool!) you'd intimidate or otherwise try to blackmail me into doing 
it. How'd that work out for you? Not to well as I recall.



-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
We're all amateurs. It's just that some of us are more professional 
about it than others. --George Carlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116717 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<pee7qj$ocv$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116700
On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
> Not to well as I recall.

It's "too", Dustin! :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116701 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<83a09396-0497-4c86-a646-930cb676fa37@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116678
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 12:38:57 PM UTC-7, David B. wrote:
> On 25-May-18 6:13 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> > David B. STALKER wrote:
> > 
> >> On 25-May-18 4:36 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> >>> David B. STALKER wrote:
> >>
> >>> Will you remember that my site has NO malware?
> >>
> >> Whilst it has no malware now, it might have tomorrow unless you use a
> >> service like that offered by Sucuri. *DO* you use such a service?
> > 
> > No, it is not necessary for someone who knows how things work.
> 
> OK
> 
> >>>> https://www.dropbox.fake-news
> >>
> >> You've been told before not to 'doctor' posts. That includes links.
> > 
> > Perhaps I am just following YOUR procedures. You post-edit all the time.
> 
> Only very occasionally.
> 
> >> I investigate things which I do not understand.
> > 
> > ..which is nearly EVERYTHING related to computers... and then you forget
> > what the answers were. 
> 
> Yes, I *DO* forget, so remind me.
> 
> Please account for the original result I got way back.
> 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0
> 
> What do YOU think was amiss? Was it actually your site which had a 
> 'problem', was it maybe my computer which had been compromised in some 
> way or was it Sucuri itself trying to 'pull a fast one'?
> 
>  > Oh, and your methods of "investigation" really suck.
> 
> You are welcome to your opinion, but I HAVE shut down the Annexcafe 
> forums and the Aumha forums too. AND had IdentIt.ca taken down! ;-)
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> David B.



Marketing is a wonderful thing and consumer stupidity is even better. And why the added requirement to edit the DOM via direct input in an embedded system? No matter, Melzzzzz didn't initially list this as part of his inevitably always growing 'needs'. 

Fool! Someone's developed an AI system with (I'd guess) the Borůvka's algorithm to automate posts which are not unlike those from a previous post in the group. Having to suffer the use of GNU/Linux is too much for Melzzzzz to deal with. 

What were you betting on? 

--
One Smart Penny!!
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/
https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116675 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromChar Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Date2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<o8lggdl2r2jk17rbn8e8ud8hjahbs2k55i@4ax.com>
In reply to#116672
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:14:46 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>I investigate things which I do not understand.

I've seen investigators. You're no investigator. You're a stalker.

Besides, with you understanding so little, how do you find time to
"investigate" (stalk) and drink? Obviously, the drinking is a priority,
so that leaves very little time for anything else. No wonder you
understand so little.

>Enjoy your bike riding while you still can.

Enjoy your stalking while you still can.


-- 
Still not sure about David Brooks?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The drunken kook bluffs about about filing a lawsuit:
"It appears that we'll now have to meet in court as YOU are
unlawfully hosting a copyright photograph of ME on YOUR web
site *without permission*." -David Brooks 2017-11-4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116699 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8EDEE85D3846HT1@f49NaSF4OqHmBf7RDEk356k813dR09foiV2ZmoA6yh9MJ76.h8x16>
In reply to#116672
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
news:pe9cq1$p9u$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 16:14:46 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

[snip]

>> You have been told *a thousand times* what the problem was. How
>> many times is that necessary? Oh yeah:  every twenty minutes (as
>> that seems to be the limit of your memory).
> 
> You exaggerate too!

Point remains. Your questions have already been answered, many times.
 
> I investigate things which I do not understand.

So how many hours do you spend investigating the process of tying 
your shoes? It's clear you don't understand a considerable amount of 
how computers work, despite being told, repeatedly. So it's no far 
stretch then to theorize you have the same problem with other aspects 
of daily life. Extended alcohol abuse does permanent long term, 
damage as you're discovering.
 
>>> Is that possible as far as you are concerned? Can we 'start
>>> over' as it were?
>> 
>> That would never be possible. As I said *a thousand times* I am
>> open to removing your 'Special page' IF you stop stalking
>> completely, after a period of time with no violations.
> 
> The choice is yours. I cannot influence your actions in any way.

Either you don't understand what you quoted and responded to, or, you 
do but aren't going to comply with it. Which is it, David?
 
>>> As an aside, now - were you involved in military aviation at
>>> some stage? 
>> 
>> Yes.
> 
> Thanks. I'm sorry you didn't make it as a pilot.

Correction. You're the one who confirmed they failed as one. You know 
nothing of his history and opted to insult him with a fake, yet, to 
you, no doubt witty reply.

Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get something 
you want.
 


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
CAT ADVICE: Take some time to eat the flowers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116718 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<pee88u$s4d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116699
On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
> Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get something
> you want.

You are wrong about that. It's 'bts' who's hiding and being unfriendly.

I know full well from a lifetime of experience, reasonable people don't 
behave in such a manner. He has never been 'open and honest' with me - EVER!

-- 
D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116728 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromChar Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<aiklgd14lv642lne13kuni4t5442mni66a@4ax.com>
In reply to#116718
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:28:15 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
>> Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get something
>> you want.
>
>You are wrong about that. It's 'bts' who's hiding and being unfriendly.

You've said the same about me because I declined to hook up with you on
LinkedIn or Facekook. Face it, you're not everyone's cup of tea. I like
my contacts to be of a higher ethical standard than what you continually
display.

>I know full well from a lifetime of experience, reasonable people don't 
>behave in such a manner. He has never been 'open and honest' with me - EVER!

How come you don't know from a lifetime of experience that reasonable
people don't stalk people who refuse their advances? And how come you
don't know from a lifetime of experience that you can't expect others to
be open and honest with you when you don't offer the same in return?


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116740 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<rkslgdlg9lfq392m6k3ifripv8bimqtsc0@4ax.com>
In reply to#116718
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:28:15 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
>> Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get something
>> you want.
>
>You are wrong about that. It's 'bts' who's hiding

	What part of you is he "hiding" ?
	You think he should add even more proof ? I could always
contribute ....

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s

-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116787 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8F02A6CD8F19HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0>
In reply to#116740
Shadow <Sh@dow.br> news:rkslgdlg9lfq392m6k3ifripv8bimqtsc0@4ax.com
Sun, 27 May 2018 18:03:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:28:15 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
>>On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
>>> Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get
>>> something you want.
>>
>>You are wrong about that. It's 'bts' who's hiding
> 
>      What part of you is he "hiding" ?
>      You think he should add even more proof ? I could always
> contribute ....

I've got all kinds of material if he wanted to use it. Of course, just 
between the two of us, it would be pages in length! :)
 


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
Why are Jewish Men circumcised?  Because Jewish women don't like 
anything that isn't 20% off. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116743 — Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
SubjectRe: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
Message-ID<XnsA8EF926DE169EHT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1>
In reply to#116718
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
news:pee88u$s4d$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 12:28:15 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
>> Any kindness you display is usually a facade to try and get
>> something you want.
> 
> You are wrong about that. It's 'bts' who's hiding and being
> unfriendly. 

I disagree. I've known you for a long time, unfortunately. You've 
always treated people in the same manner. You try to use them and when 
it fails, you slime them.
 


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
Don't get even -- get odd!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web