Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
(OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe4la6$c0o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116607 |
On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >> >>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >> >> No. You are misleading people. >> >>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>> TIA >> >> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. > > I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. > You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? I give as I'm given. >> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. > >>https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > > If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, > not something you've edited yourself. Ask Sucuri directly. If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are 100% wrong. https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 The site *IS* safe! -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe4skp$j51$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116608 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >>> >>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >>> >>> No. You are misleading people. >>> >>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>>> TIA >>> >>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. >> >> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. > > Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. > >> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? > > I give as I'm given. > >>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >> >>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected% 20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >> >> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, >> not something you've edited yourself. > > Ask Sucuri directly. > > If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are > 100% wrong. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected% 20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > > The site *IS* safe! Yes, it *IS* safe. Hey, thank you for once and *FINALLY* telling a truth!!! This means you can finally stop STALKING me, right? -- -bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe4the$17ev$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #116608 |
On 2018-05-23 2:09 PM, David B. wrote: > On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >>> >>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >>> >>> No. You are misleading people. >>> >>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>>> TIA >>> >>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. >> >> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. > > Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. > >> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? > > I give as I'm given. > >>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >> >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >>> >> >> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, >> not something you've edited yourself. > > Ask Sucuri directly. > I did. Their answer says you're a liar. > If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are > 100% wrong. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > > > The site *IS* safe! >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <02b8e0a8-0f06-469d-a13b-d4de480c75ef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116616 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 4:29:55 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: > On 2018-05-23 2:09 PM, David B. wrote: > > On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." > >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: > >>> > >>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. > >>> > >>> No. You are misleading people. > >>> > >>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your > >>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. > >>>> TIA > >>> > >>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. > >> > >> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. > > > > Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. > > > >> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? > > > > I give as I'm given. > > > >>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. > >> > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > >>> > >> > >> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, > >> not something you've edited yourself. > > > > Ask Sucuri directly. > > > > I did. Their answer says you're a liar. > > > If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are > > 100% wrong. > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > > > > > > The site *IS* safe! > > I have worked in the computer industry for almost 35 years. I have served Fortune 500 OEMs making deals with government agencies and the worlds largest companies. Never, not one single time, were we on any occasion directed to not load any OS we wanted. We sold Netware, Mac, IRIX, and more in addition to Windows very successfully. Sadly there are too many "lowest common denominator is fine" freetards and not enough power users with a clue enough to help the people with Macs. Troll Killer Snit just wiped the floor with Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis. -- Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretwizzer@gmail.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe6615$bea$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116617 |
On 24-May-18 1:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 4:29:55 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: >> On 2018-05-23 2:09 PM, David B. wrote: >>> On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: >>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." >>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >>>>> >>>>> No. You are misleading people. >>>>> >>>>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>>>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>>>>> TIA >>>>> >>>>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. >>>> >>>> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. >>> >>> Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. >>> >>>> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? >>> >>> I give as I'm given. >>> >>>>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >>>> >>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, >>>> not something you've edited yourself. >>> >>> Ask Sucuri directly. >>> >> >> I did. Their answer says you're a liar. >> >>> If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are >>> 100% wrong. >>> >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >>> >>> >>> The site *IS* safe! >>> > > > > I have worked in the computer industry for almost 35 years. I have served Fortune 500 OEMs making deals with government agencies and the worlds largest companies. What result do YOU get when you test the www.tekrider.net web site, here:- https://sucuri.net/lp/sem/ga-sitecheck? TIA FYI .... https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28920086/Help-with-resolving-a-securri-webiste-scan-result-saying-Site-returning-error-40x-HTTP-1-1-403-Forbidden.html -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <7fbdfb41-c6fd-4718-9b25-e2764de317bb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116625 |
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 4:00:56 AM UTC-7, David B. wrote: > On 24-May-18 1:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 4:29:55 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: > >> On 2018-05-23 2:09 PM, David B. wrote: > >>> On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." > >>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. > >>>>> > >>>>> No. You are misleading people. > >>>>> > >>>>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your > >>>>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. > >>>>>> TIA > >>>>> > >>>>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. > >>>> > >>>> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to malware. > >>> > >>> Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. > >>> > >>>> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? > >>> > >>> I give as I'm given. > >>> > >>>>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. > >>>> > >>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, > >>>> not something you've edited yourself. > >>> > >>> Ask Sucuri directly. > >>> > >> > >> I did. Their answer says you're a liar. > >> > >>> If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri you are > >>> 100% wrong. > >>> > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > >>> > >>> > >>> The site *IS* safe! > >>> > > > > > > > > I have worked in the computer industry for almost 35 years. I have served Fortune 500 OEMs making deals with government agencies and the worlds largest companies. > > What result do YOU get when you test the www.tekrider.net web site, here:- > > https://sucuri.net/lp/sem/ga-sitecheck? > > TIA > > FYI .... > https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28920086/Help-with-resolving-a-securri-webiste-scan-result-saying-Site-returning-error-40x-HTTP-1-1-403-Forbidden.html > -- > David B. Nobody gets it, only Owl gets it. It's his problem and he has to want to deal with it. Obviously he would rather attack than face reality. Flatfish is being controlled by Owl. Being self-governed as it is, the email infrastructure will never go away but it'll never be common for the general user. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know http://prescottcomputerguy.com http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <v84cgdl30n7ek1ckrhh80git6ljvkh1nj1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116608 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 22:09:25 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber >>stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: >>https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php >>The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. >The site *IS* safe! I know. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <e88c25b5-6117-4ad7-a824-a29299f1ae4b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116620 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:13:13 PM UTC-7, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 22:09:25 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > >>To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber > >>stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: > >>https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php > > >>The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. > > > >The site *IS* safe! > > I know. > []'s > -- > Don't be evil - Google 2004 > We have a new policy - Google 2012 All that he cares about is that Zeus gets to deliver his automated call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that God is an unwitting victim on the other end of the phone is his motivation. Only what Zeus wants matters to Zeus. There is nothing you or I can do to change that. It's a trolling addiction and it is what it is. You purchased it and did extensive testing and your "intuitions" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing. I have a little script I use as well, but it's a bit different. Zeus doesn't have any concept of what he is sobbing about. Too much glue for you, Gluehead. -- Eight things to never feed your dog! http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <dc152e0a-a1d1-4c36-9bf9-8b1b74512c2d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116620 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:13:13 PM UTC-7, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 22:09:25 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > >>To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber > >>stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: > >>https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php > > >>The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. > > > >The site *IS* safe! > > I know. > []'s > -- > Don't be evil - Google 2004 > We have a new policy - Google 2012 Why do you keep rephrasing Desk Rabbit? I'm getting sick of the nonsense in here. I'm guessing the small-minded stalker is unable to control his own actions. Drives the trolls crazy when they do not get attention. Steve Carroll is trying "really hard" to project their approach onto Desk Rabbit. For as long as I can remember Steve Carroll has spurred the theory that Desk Rabbit needs 'documentation' to point out all his deception. The fact is that nobody needs any documentation to do that. So Steve Carroll pulls this outrageous insulting garbage in a feeble effort to 'hawk' the idea that Desk Rabbit is like him. - "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EC80AA1F70BHT1@F826sQG92pVDYw.rfIzbhkNr7CoCxZUOJixBL5D0o7NPV15GI8H3Ec7GZv> |
| In reply to | #116608 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pe4la6$c0o$1@dont-email.me Wed, 23 May 2018 21:09:25 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 23-May-18 9:34 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 21:08:52 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >>> >>>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >>> >>> No. You are misleading people. >>> >>>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>>> TIA >>> >>> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. >> >> I only post it when you stalk, phish, spam or link to >> malware. > > Liar. You've become nothing but a Troll. You do realize people can pull posts and fact check for themselves, right? When/if they do, they'll see for themselves Shadow isn't the one who's lying. >> You deleted the address. Not very honest, huh ? > > I give as I'm given. No, you don't. You stalk people if you feel they've given you the brush off. People typically tend to do this when they realize, you're trying to get them to help you stalk someone else. >>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >> >>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infec >>>ted%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >> >> If you have any proof, please post the link to the malware, >> not something you've edited yourself. > > Ask Sucuri directly. No need. Sucuri's webtool has already been analyzed and found to generate false positives. What's more, it's A CONFIRMED false positive on the tekrider site you 'examined' with the tool. There's no point in asking Sucuri about this or suggesting fixes for the problem, because, they've been told and shown all of this many times before; long before you knew of their existance. They've opted to do nothing about the known issues with their tool. The issues may infact result in generated revenue by those who don't know any better and simply trust it, and, that could be one reason why they have no desire to fix it. > If you are suggesting that I edited the warning issued by Sucuri > you are 100% wrong. Nobody suggested any such thing. And, you know that. :) -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Maybe the grass looks greener on the other side of the fence because that is where the leaky septic tank is buried.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EC80A98143DHT1@F826sQG92pVDYw.rfIzbhkNr7CoCxZUOJixBL5D0o7NPV15GI8H3Ec7GZv> |
| In reply to | #116603 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pe4hom$jca$1@dont-email.me Wed, 23 May 2018 20:08:52 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: > >> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. > > No. You are misleading people. How's that? >> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >> TIA > > Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. The warning is valid. You're a potential danger to other people and their privacy. >> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber >> stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: >> https://tekrider.net >> >> The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. >> []'s > > The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Joshu's dog is chasing Scroedinger's cat around the yard again!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe75r5$p8c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116634 |
On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: > "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> > news:pe4hom$jca$1@dont-email.me Wed, 23 May 2018 20:08:52 GMT in > alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: >> >>> PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. >> >> No. You are misleading people. > > How's that? > >>> It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your >>> phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. >>> TIA >> >> Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. > > The warning is valid. You're a potential danger to other people and > their privacy. > >>> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber >>> stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: >>> https://tekrider.net >>> >>> The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. >>> []'s >> >> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. > > You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the > fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false > positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false > positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been > provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net#
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe7asc$8hc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116638 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: >> "David B." wrote: >>> >>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >> >> You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the >> fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false >> positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false >> positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided >> which back the statements up. > > Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? > > "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. -- -bts - owner, tekrider.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe8t5n$jof$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116642 |
On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: >>> "David B." wrote: >>>> >>>> The site is NOT safe according to this warning. >>> >>> You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the >>> fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false >>> positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false >>> positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided >>> which back the statements up. >> >> Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? >> >> "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" > > Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and > forums where you have been BANNED. > > I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same > for *me*. Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. How do you feel about that? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe8vfm$odj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116655 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> David B. STALKER wrote: >> [....] >>> Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? >>> >>> "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" >> >> Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and >> forums where you have been BANNED. >> >> I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the >> same for *me*. > > Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the > pressure off you. LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have (often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP STALKING*. http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php > How do you feel about that? I will let you know when you stop. -- -bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <caee9bb4-adf4-4b6d-b42f-d47acae23724@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116657 |
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 5:27:36 AM UTC-7, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > > > On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > >> David B. STALKER wrote: > >> [....] > >>> Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? > >>> > >>> "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" > >> > >> Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and > >> forums where you have been BANNED. > >> > >> I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the > >> same for *me*. > > > > Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the > > pressure off you. > > LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because you > have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have (often) been > told the page will go away if and when you *STOP STALKING*. > > http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php > > > How do you feel about that? > > I will let you know when you stop. > > -- > -bts Flatfish claims that he uses Linux, while of course he never installed it on bare metal and faithfully played with it. How Flatfish decides when to use the flood script to disrupt discussions best http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. Enough already. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Snit. You're the village idiot and your many incoherent videos show this. Flatfish doesn't have any idea what he is sniveling about. Some time ago I did work on and showed some Swift for the front end which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Flatfish's dishonest crap while reading with Google Groups. -- Curious how these posts are made? Email: mr@sandman.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EDEE859C064HT1@f49NaSF4OqHmBf7RDEk356k813dR09foiV2ZmoA6yh9MJ76.h8x16> |
| In reply to | #116657 |
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> news:pe8vfm$odj$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 12:27:34 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>> [....] >>>> Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? >>>> >>>> "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" >>> >>> Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other >>> sites and forums where you have been BANNED. >>> >>> I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do >>> the same for *me*. >> >> Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll >> take the pressure off you. > > LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because > you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have > (often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP > STALKING*. I wouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon... http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 One of several usenet sharing posts of his. The only issue is, he's sharing something he *knows he doesn't have permission* to be sharing. And! in that particular post, tried to blame me for his own Mac editing fuckups! The original video wasn't done with anything Apple, AND, had a working audio track; where incidently nobody else claimed I had a lisp..(too funny) Only David has made such a claim. And we all know how reliable those are. It's a damn shame that he feels the need to do that, as it prevents me from sharing some pretty cool (imho) videos of my doing various things or semi showing off the work I've done on various projects. I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. I really cannot tell you how proud I was to read his post with shared contents of a discussion between him and the lead malware researcher of Malwarebytes. His post only helps to prove that what I've written about Malwarebytes for several years now IS infact, true. They aren't a replacement for AV, and, there crypto skills leave much to be desired too; I've never seen someone forgo all known crypto analysis methods and instead, opt for simply trying to unzip an encrypted file with known, standard, archiving tools; and when it obviously fails to accomplish this task, declare the file to be garbage of some kind and not being what I told him it was. I know for a fact that because David had no idea of what she was writing about, he didn't take into consideration what sort of exposure it was going to provide for the support of my argument. Had he known, He would have kept the details he was so proud to share, a secret. [g] He mistook what she wrote for slime on me. And shared it! h0h0h0. And, icing on the cake for me, the individual he leaked a conversation with happens to be the 'lead malware researcher' for Malwarebytes Corporation. The company which markets a product that boldly claims it is a replacement for your current antivirus product. Outright, replacement. Uh huh. Proudly displaying the West Coast AV labs certification, but, umm, the problem is; they don't do anything with an actual virus so I can't fathom how they got AV certification? Yes, the product doesn't know a fucking thing about an actual virus. It cannot do much to protect you from one. Your Antivirus knows about them and can offer you some protection against them, as well as the possible disinfection if you do catch a cold. Malwarebytes current cold rememdy is the death of the bug. In this case, since this is an actual viral beastie, that will result in the death of your computers operating system files which are carrying it along with any other executable program discovered to be carrying it; ASSUMING the virus in question has a static block of code which Malwarebytes can secure lock onto. If it's a poly/oglymorphic, sadly, the user who replaced his/her current av with Malwarebytes as Malwarebytes suggests and provides reasons to backup their suggestion as far as they are concerned, is now fuxored quite nicely. They will be resorting to backups (oh, they didn't make any? Oopsie!) or a fresh reinstall of everything. Malwarebytes on a good day in hell might hit it once out of every twenty or more thousand (or more) infections. Or, the user, can admit they would actually rather use an antivirus product, and pull one from the net, transport it's happy arse to their infected machine and have a decent chance of saving it by just killing the nasty cold. Obviously, their decision to make. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Artificial Intelligence? I'll be impressed when they invent artificial cunning.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <peed96$pu0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116698 |
On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: > I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip > file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. ;-) -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EF926E7FC19HT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1> |
| In reply to | #116722 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:peed96$pu0$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 13:53:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: >> I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the >> .zip file which does contain the original video file. > > THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T > have a lisp, Dustin. ;-) Actually, that's not how it works. You made the claim, it's on YOU to prove it. :) -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <odtlgd1aj6l376lg9glu7u3ta3qk426r2n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116722 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: >> I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip >> file which does contain the original video file. > >THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a >lisp, Dustin. I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk through your arse all the time. Do you have a link ? To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web