Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
(OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6E715E3HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116761 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pef5rj$uva$2@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 20:53:07 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 27-May-18 9:48 PM, Frozen North wrote: >> On 2018-05-27 4:28 PM, David B. wrote: >> >>> If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted >>> here:- >>> >>> https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ >>> >>> There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, >>> Dustin. >>> >>> I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as >>> hell I can do so in your REAL world. >>> >> You are the person who claims not to be a stalker, right? You >> just blew it. > > How so? Re-read what you wrote. > I'll make Dustin famous, if that's what he craves. You'll do what? -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Brother, can you s'paradigm?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <5b0b8469.97550748@istillthinkyousuckatthis.com> |
| In reply to | #116759 |
I thought I overheard Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> say this in alt.computer.workshop on Sun, 27 May 2018 16:48:28 -0400 : >On 2018-05-27 4:28 PM, David B. wrote: > >> If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted here:- >> >> https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ >> >> There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, Dustin. >> >> I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell I can >> do so in your REAL world. >> >You are the person who claims not to be a stalker, right? You just blew it. So much for that "good guy" perception he portrays... -- Usenet - Stays Crunchy Even In Milk!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6E01CA0HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116759 |
Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> news:pef5is$u78$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 20:48:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 2018-05-27 4:28 PM, David B. wrote: > >> If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted >> here:- >> >> https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ >> >> There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, >> Dustin. >> >> I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell >> I can do so in your REAL world. >> > You are the person who claims not to be a stalker, right? You > just blew it. Was there ever any doubt? -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Brother, can you s'paradigm?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <oq7mgdlr7m9v4kcqnrimnmj0sruf805ji9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116757 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:28:27 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted here:- > >https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ > >There's nearly 10,000 users. Am I getting this right ? You are threatening to ILLEGALLY post COPYRIGHTED material to a public site to BLACKMAIL someone ? Wow !!! That's a 15 year jail sentence you are looking at. Alcohol abuse tends to favor estrogen over testosterone levels ..... it'll probably be to your advantage in jail though, "Beau Dave". You'll finally have RL "friends". Lots of them. People that will "have your back". To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6EC3FA4HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116766 |
Shadow <Sh@dow.br> news:oq7mgdlr7m9v4kcqnrimnmj0sruf805ji9@4ax.com Sun, 27 May 2018 21:21:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:28:27 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted >>here:- >> >>https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ >> >>There's nearly 10,000 users. > > Am I getting this right ? You are threatening to ILLEGALLY > post COPYRIGHTED material to a public site to BLACKMAIL someone ? Correct. > Wow !!! That's a 15 year jail sentence you are looking at. > Alcohol abuse tends to favor estrogen over testosterone levels > ..... it'll probably be to your advantage in jail though, "Beau > Dave". He may be of the mistaken impression that he's too old to be sent to prison for a period of time. I don't think he'd get a suspended sentence for health reasons when he can be shown he goes well out of his way to blackmail, threaten, stalk, and copyright infringe others property as often as he does. > You'll finally have RL "friends". Lots of them. People that > will "have your back". I hope he doesn't drop the soap. They'll have more than his back if he does. Who knows though, he might be up for new things. Assuming it's a new thing to him. It may not be. Excessive drinking causes people to do all kinds of things they wouldn't do had they been sober. > To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber > stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: > https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php To further extrapolate: Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Brother, can you s'paradigm?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6FFE6E7HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116757 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pef4de$mmg$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 20:28:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip snip] >> The video you already uploaded to youtube (which has been >> removed) as well as usenet? You must think you've got real dirt >> on me with that video or something? ROFL! > > It shows where you make your videos supporting ISIS and make plans > to cause damage to your fellow citizens in the USA? Just where do you come up with such crazy nonsense? I've seen desperate, but, I've never seen remailer style desperation from you. This is a first. :) >> Your slimey remark regarding the horse did convince me to alter >> my signature a little bit though. >> >>> Nothing is going to get better for *YOU* unless you stop - >>> believe me. >> >> You have no input on the status of things here, David. > > If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted > here:- > > https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ What specifically is wrong with either of the signatures, David? You previously stated the following url is misleading: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php What specifically is misleading on that site, David? > There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, > Dustin. And your point? It's approx 1/5th the size of the population (if you go by what's labeled on the welcome signs) of the city. It's possible one or more who sees the page knows me in person, sure. It's more likely, though, they don't. Either way, you'll have to be in violation of facebook terms of use to make good on your threat. > I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell > I can do so in your REAL world. So... you're actually coming out and threatening me without even so much as trying to hide that fact? What do you think you'll actually gain by making such a threat? Didn't anyone ever tell you not to make threats or promises you can't backup or keep? Someone should have. The more you abuse the crippled video you have, the longer it'll be before you are given permission to regain access to the original video. And the longer (sadly) it'll be before I can share any other neat (to me) videos or pictures without having to lock them down so that only select individuals can access them. Yes, I could do that. I realize there's always a risk when you put something online that someone else is going to copy it and pass it around; I accept that. But, most of the time, people who do that aren't trying to stalk the person(s) in the video(s) they're passing around. In all my time online (and I've been online for a very very long time), I've never met someone who invests as much time and energy into stalking people as you do. That's out of thousands of people I've interacted with, and, hundreds I've met and/or hungout with in person, David. Suffice to say, there's nothing realistically you can do that will have any influence on my day to day life. All you can do is continue copyright infringing my work and phishing others to help you dox me. The longer my signature is used, the less fish will be available to you, and, that's a good thing. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pe97rb$o3s$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116664 |
On 2018-05-25 10:05 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 25-May-18 2:31 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> David B. STALKER wrote: >> [....] >>>> What would *convince* me would be for you to remove the 'block' on >>>> your web site (robots.txt?) >>>> so that Sucuri can, once again, scan Tekrider.net. >>>> >>>> If the scan STILL shows that there is malware on your site I will >>>> accept that Sucuri is, indeed, a "lureware" site. >>>> >>>> Are you willing to do that? >>> >>> Why should I? >> >> Simply to demonstrate that you are *not* one of the bad guys and that >> you really do have nothing to hide. > > Okay, go for it. > > https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net > >>> Do I think you could ever change? >> >> Yes. My working days are over. > > We'll see about that... > The site is clean, therefore it is true and accurate, after all is is on the interwebs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <a22c510c-9bad-4bb1-abb2-f73dc0a76aaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116667 |
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 7:50:21 AM UTC-7, Frozen North wrote: > On 2018-05-25 10:05 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > > David B. STALKER wrote: > > > >> On 25-May-18 2:31 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > >>> David B. STALKER wrote: > >> [....] > >>>> What would *convince* me would be for you to remove the 'block' on > >>>> your web site (robots.txt?) > >>>> so that Sucuri can, once again, scan Tekrider.net. > >>>> > >>>> If the scan STILL shows that there is malware on your site I will > >>>> accept that Sucuri is, indeed, a "lureware" site. > >>>> > >>>> Are you willing to do that? > >>> > >>> Why should I? > >> > >> Simply to demonstrate that you are *not* one of the bad guys and that > >> you really do have nothing to hide. > > > > Okay, go for it. > > > > https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net > > > >>> Do I think you could ever change? > >> > >> Yes. My working days are over. > > > > We'll see about that... > > > The site is clean, therefore it is true and accurate, after all is is on > the interwebs. Open source is only cost effective if your time has no value. The one thing The Holy Ghost learned well is to attempt to guilt Troll Killer Snit into silence and if that doesn't work, shout him down or quickly change the target. It is clear from how The Holy Ghost responded - by demanding basics of the OS and so on - he has not once studied an algorithmically challenging challenge. If he had he would have understood the requirements such as knowing what are local and global variables! -- Live on Kickstarter http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <bm8ggddo84b9ai56pgqeqr8ci9t0vsaktn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116663 |
On Fri, 25 May 2018 14:54:41 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 25-May-18 2:31 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >[....] >>> >>> Are you willing to do that? >> >> Why should I? > >Simply to demonstrate that you are *not* one of the bad guys and that >you really do have nothing to hide. > >> Do I think you could ever change? > >Yes. My working days are over. I'd rather hear that your stalking days are over, but I guess we'll have to wait for that. -- Still not sure about David Brooks? https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The drunken kook bluffs about about filing a lawsuit: "It appears that we'll now have to meet in court as YOU are unlawfully hosting a copyright photograph of ME on YOUR web site *without permission*." -David Brooks 2017-11-4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <9q8ggdpoekanefde52477grohudsh3b6ig@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116661 |
On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:31:14 -0000 (UTC), "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> wrote: >David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 25-May-18 1:27 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>> >>>> On 25-May-18 1:22 AM, Shadow asked ... >>>>> Why does it matter ? >>>> >>>> According the the site certificate information, >>>> [CUT-A-HUNDRED-LINES-YOU- >>> DON'T-UNDERSTAND] > >Aha. Now I know *where* you got those hundred lines. You copied, word-for- >word - and *WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION* - the words of VanguardLH in the >Windows10 group. Shame on you for doing that, stalker. >MID: <1r5jonybn4br0$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> > >Is "Steve Carroll" a new nym of yours? (Of course it is...) >MID: <OYONC.388869$XF1.225599@fx27.fr7> In his next follow-up, he snipped both of the items above that clearly show him to be caught out yet again. A normal person wouldn't have copied someone else's post and used it as his own, nor would a normal person suddenly switch nym's like that, but David isn't normal. A normal person would have apologized rather than snipping and ignoring, but that won't happen, either. -- Still not sure about David Brooks? https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The drunken kook bluffs about about filing a lawsuit: "It appears that we'll now have to meet in court as YOU are unlawfully hosting a copyright photograph of ME on YOUR web site *without permission*." -David Brooks 2017-11-4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EDEE8239B81HT1@f49NaSF4OqHmBf7RDEk356k813dR09foiV2ZmoA6yh9MJ76.h8x16> |
| In reply to | #116654 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pe8sv5$hs6$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 11:44:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 25-May-18 1:22 AM, Shadow asked ... > >> Why does it matter ? > > According the the site certificate information, the cert is valid. [snip Vanguards post] Lifting others replies and posting them elsewhere now are we? I mean no disrespect when I write this, but, Vanguard is probably one of the last people I'd ever ask for technical advice. They tend to write alot of semi technical stuff in an effort to give the impression they actually know the subject matter. It's obvious to those who do know the subject matter, they're BSing about theirs. Need proof? I thought you might ask: MID: <1oe7dzm1z9drw$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> Vanguard post. You'll notice at no time does he tell the OP about the false positive issue. Instead, entirely blames the OP for it. :) The OPs original post: MID <pcskv5$1gr2$1@gioia.aioe.org> It keeps killing apps that I wrote. They are NOT any kind of threat ! You can read the thread if you'd like to read the rest of the sorry excuses they had for missing the obvious there. I can summerize it with this post for you though: MID: <XnsA8E1179694448HT1@PAw3Rr6iVs1LZ0.7fRHk0V0> > Wonder what a-hole's excuse will be now. Oh yes, such a > complicated GUI. Well, maybe that's true for toddlers since this > software has more "knobs" than an Etch-A-Sketch. Hmm..How is it possible that of three replies I've read on this thread so far, none credited Malwarebytes for the false positive, but, all assumed the OP is an idiot? I know Malwarebytes has been spammed to hell and back and koolaid has been drank by the metric tons at this point, but, seriously... Has it become that blinding? Are the three of you listed by MID below, really that fucking stupid? Not *one* of you acknowledges the FALSE POSITIVE issue the OP is complaining about, All *three* of you are blaming the OP for the issue. As if it's their problem and theirs alone. Newsflash: it's highly unlikely to be alerting on his programs and his alone specifically. It is most likely, affecting other programs on machines all over the world. It's also most likely, those people have no idea why Malwarebytes thinks xxx file is malware. The OP would not only be doing himself a favor by having it corrected, he'd be helping people he doesn't even know who also use the product. Demanding the OP tell Malwarebytes to ignore his files specifically instead of having the actual issue corrected, IS A STUPID AND SELFISH way of handling the issue. If you know for a fact you have clean files that MBAM is hitting on, don't tell the damn program to just ignore them, submit them so that the FALSE POSITIVES can be corrected. As, it's most likely doing the same fucking thing to someone else. Everybody benefits this way. Including Malwarebytes; they can free up room for definitions which are necessary. Fred responded a couple of times accusing me of trying to keep how to fix the issue a secret (Clearly I didn't, Just about all? of the replies from me in the thread state to contact malwarebytes and be prepared to share samples of the files in question); Vanguard didn't respond, afaik. And, this isn't the first time he's basically talked a bunch of shit trying to pass himself off as some sort of technician. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== The first 90% of the task takes 90% of the time, and the last 10% takes the other 90%.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EDEE854E64CHT1@f49NaSF4OqHmBf7RDEk356k813dR09foiV2ZmoA6yh9MJ76.h8x16> |
| In reply to | #116638 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pe75r5$p8c$1@dont-email.me Thu, 24 May 2018 20:03:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] >> You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of >> the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating >> false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's >> a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have >> been provided which back the statements up. > > Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? How is the tekrider site misleading people, David? When posts like this exist: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 It's rather difficult to deny that the contents of this: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Are true. Not only did you copyright infringe my work (again), you *lied* about the reason the audio track is missing (well twice actually, but, let's not dwell on specifics rofl). All in the same post, no less. And, that's not your original post doing it. That's your second one (that I'm aware of, anyway) the first was where you also admitted to posting it to usenet to make it very difficult if not impossible for me to remove. You're an admitted copyright infringing stalker (who's had others content removed by administrators when you knowingly infringed their work) so it's only natural you'd continue to do it via other means. Especially since your impotent otherwise concerning options to deal with me. So really, how and in what possible way is anything provided via: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Not true about you? Please, be specific! -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== For centuries, the English have had a love affair with all types of hunting. Early one morning, a fellow was blasting away at a clump of brush on a grouse hunt. Suddenly an outraged gentleman appeared and said "See here old man, you almost shot my wife with that volley." The hunter, properly shamed replied, "So sorry old chap. Here, have a go at mine, over there."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.20B50B74009AA56F70000DB1F2CF@news.supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #116535 |
On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article <pe0ge9$1bo$1@dont-email.me>): > On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: > > On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote > > (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>): > > > > > True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > > > obtained from the 'App Store'. > > > > oh? Really? Where is this stated? > > Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pe31gd$bjf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116579 |
On 23-May-18 3:37 AM, Wolffan wrote: > On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote > (in article <pe0ge9$1bo$1@dont-email.me>): > >> On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: >>> On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote >>> (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>): >>> >>>> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >>>> obtained from the 'App Store'. >>> >>> oh? Really? Where is this stated? >> >> Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. > > In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock. Here’s how to manage your privacy. You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and with whom. https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ HTH HAND -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <230520180846374409%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116587 |
In article <pe31gd$bjf$1@dont-email.me>, David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > >>>> obtained from the 'App Store'. > >>> > >>> oh? Really? Where is this stated? > >> > >> Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. > > > > In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. > > If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock. then stop trolling. > Here¹s how to manage your privacy. > > You¹ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along > with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and > with whom. privacy is not the issue and has absolutely nothing to do with your ignorant and baseless claim that apple's advice is to not install non-store apps. you are wrong. again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <cesagdltqt5eieod58490prcn566uinatl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116587 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 23-May-18 3:37 AM, Wolffan wrote: >> On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote >> (in article <pe0ge9$1bo$1@dont-email.me>): >> >>> On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: >>>> On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote >>>> (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>): >>>> >>>>> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >>>>> obtained from the 'App Store'. >>>> >>>> oh? Really? Where is this stated? >>> >>> Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. >> >> In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. > >...<CUT_INSULTS> > >Here’s how to manage your privacy. > >You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along >with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and >with whom. Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? ><CUT_OFF_TOPIC_SPAM_LINK> While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pe47lo$cla$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116597 |
On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: [....] >> Here’s how to manage your privacy. >> >> You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along >> with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and >> with whom. > > Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where > does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? It doesn't. Made you look though! :-P >> https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ > > While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding > alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10. alt.comp.os.windows-10 reinstated. HTH -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <ikbbgdp511m3653gf9tn9gef2r1dl8hsid@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116598 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:37 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >[....] > >>> Here’s how to manage your privacy. >> >> Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where >> does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >> obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? > >It doesn't. Made you look though! I didn't, the link was a commercial link about privacy, not apps or policy. I don't click on your links, unless I'm absolutely certain they are not spam/malicious (which they usually are, from comments from other posters). >> >> While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding >> alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? > >It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10. No, this is a public forum, you don't *own* anything. The fact that you can't abide by the *good-guy* rules and respect others is why you have been *BANNED* from so many places. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s > >alt.comp.os.windows-10 reinstated. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pe4f19$ee$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116600 |
On 23-May-18 7:17 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:37 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." >>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> [....] >> >>>> Here’s how to manage your privacy. >>> >>> Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where >>> does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >>> obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? >> >> It doesn't. Made you look though! > > I didn't, the link was a commercial link about privacy, not > apps or policy. You SHOULD have looked. You would have learned some interesting things about Apple. It's still not too late:- https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ > I don't click on your links, unless I'm absolutely certain > they are not spam/malicious (which they usually are, from comments > from other posters). Then why bother trying to correspond with me? >>> While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding >>> alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? >> >> It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10. > > No, this is a public forum, you don't *own* anything. The fact > that you can't abide by the *good-guy* rules and respect others is why > you have been *BANNED* from so many places. I *DO* use Windows 10 - and I have NOT been banned from Usenet. You most certainly formed some odd views when you were in prison. You remind me so much of a fellow who once posted on Usenet as Aardvark. I must email his local pub again to see if he's still alive. It's eight years now since he came to visit me on my boat. -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <4pjbgdd0jljmu17rdv65gi6gtcbgpu7j13@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116601 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:22:16 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 23-May-18 7:17 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:37 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote: >>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." >>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> [....] >>> >>>>> Here’s how to manage your privacy. >>>> >>>> Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where >>>> does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >>>> obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? >>> >>> It doesn't. Made you look though! >> >> I didn't, the link was a commercial link about privacy, not >> apps or policy. > >You SHOULD have looked. You would have learned some interesting things >about Apple. It's still not too late:- > ><CUT_OFF_TOPIC_SPAM_LINK> > >> I don't click on your links, unless I'm absolutely certain >> they are not spam/malicious (which they usually are, from comments >> from other posters). > >Then why bother trying to correspond with me? I don't. My replies are warning to people that might think you are not a common criminal stalker. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web