Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #68829 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Madison James <madison@mailisnothere.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-24 00:49 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-01-26 01:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Madison James <madison@mailisnothere.org> - 2015-01-24 00:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> - 2015-01-24 14:00 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-01-23 20:19 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 02:07 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-01-24 13:01 +0100
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) victor davis <vic@this.is.not.real.com> - 2015-01-24 15:41 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:47 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 20:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:34 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 10:29 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 20:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-24 15:14 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 21:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 21:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 17:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) victor davis <vic@this.is.not.real.com> - 2015-01-24 16:22 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Mike Barnes <mikebarnes333@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 16:28 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 11:49 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-24 17:08 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-24 14:34 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:56 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:04 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:33 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:47 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-01-25 04:44 +0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2015-01-24 17:55 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 18:24 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:29 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2015-01-25 12:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:31 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-24 17:22 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 00:39 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-25 13:24 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:30 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:21 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:50 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:16 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 13:40 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 00:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:13 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 03:13 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 21:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 03:44 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 03:42 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 08:44 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:50 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 23:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-28 23:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:19 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:11 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:14 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:53 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:05 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:46 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 18:55 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2015-01-27 18:04 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:40 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-01-27 21:04 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 18:12 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:38 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 16:51 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 12:21 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 13:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 15:41 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:21 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:01 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-29 18:35 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-01-29 10:34 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-30 09:06 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-29 11:26 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:20 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-01-28 16:54 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:13 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 17:15 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 23:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:58 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 00:01 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:31 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:14 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 15:46 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-30 12:36 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 17:46 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:14 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:50 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 11:24 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:31 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:47 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:46 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-01-25 18:02 +0100
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:41 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 22:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:33 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:48 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:56 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 15:28 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-27 13:00 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:13 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:52 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 22:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:43 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:40 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:22 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:53 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 03:15 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:48 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 14:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 22:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:43 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:00 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 21:28 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:35 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:47 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 08:12 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:19 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) ". . .winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 15:16 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 13:38 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 14:49 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 18:13 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:28 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 16:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 12:12 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:29 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-27 12:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 08:57 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 20:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 20:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-25 18:27 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-25 22:52 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Stormin' Norman <norman@schwarzkopf.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-26 07:36 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-26 07:27 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:42 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 16:11 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 21:27 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:35 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-26 12:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 00:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:51 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 22:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 18:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:44 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2015-01-24 22:29 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:11 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:29 +0000
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 23:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma3v7r$gvj$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #68954 |
nospam wrote, on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:35:36 -0500: > you can start by taking off the tinfoil hat, but the answer is, you > can't have a standard set of fonts Let's just agree to disagree. I can't imagine that, for a standard person, the font matters all that much for their email and usenet and web browsing. For example, I have no idea what font I'm using right now, and, I don't care. If it's a "standard" Truetype font, all the better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 01:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcb6j4.2fdl.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #68965 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Sage <sage@mail.invalid> was all, like: > nospam wrote, on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:35:36 -0500: >> you can start by taking off the tinfoil hat, but the answer is, you >> can't have a standard set of fonts > Let's just agree to disagree. > I can't imagine that, for a standard person, the font matters > all that much for their email and usenet and web browsing. It might not matter to you. I matters to me. -- I have as much authority as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 11:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma58h1$qh8$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #68975 |
Lewis wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:37:08 +0000: > It might not matter to you. I matters to me. What font am I using when you visualize this message?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 13:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma5f0a$gal$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69004 |
Sage wrote: > Lewis wrote: >> It might not matter to you. I matters to me. > > What font am I using when you visualize this message? You didn't specify any font whatsoever. What I see is what I have set my newsreader to display messages with, and that is Monospace 13pt. What you see depends on what you have set your own newsreader to use. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 11:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1ufk2qvk7pg9g$.dlg@stumbler1907.invalid> |
| In reply to | #69016 |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:21:14 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > Sage wrote: > >> Lewis wrote: >>> It might not matter to you. I matters to me. >> >> What font am I using when you visualize this message? > > You didn't specify any font whatsoever. What I see is what I have set my > newsreader to display messages with, and that is Monospace 13pt. What you > see depends on what you have set your own newsreader to use. More importantly, Sage is ignoring the fact that to some people, the use of fonts might just matter *outside* of reading Usenet. Usenet is not the whole world, IMO. It happens that I'm no connoisseur of fonts, but I don't see that as a reason to try to deny other people their esthetic pleasures... -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 00:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma6lc7$l9f$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69031 |
Gene E. Bloch wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:50:43 -0800: > It happens that I'm no connoisseur of fonts, but I don't see that as a > reason to try to deny other people their esthetic pleasures... All I'm saying is that I can easily live within whatever fonts are supplied by the operating system, and, furthermore, I would NOT want any specific fonts because of the stated privacy reasons. So, if someone wants to install custom fonts, and, hence, allow their machine to be fingerprinted no matter where they used that machine in the entire world, that's fine. But, I, for one, prefer to be just like the rest. Question is...... how do I get my fonts to look like everyone elses?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 13:40 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <270120151340003749%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #69051 |
In article <ma6lc7$l9f$3@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > Gene E. Bloch wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:50:43 -0800: > > > > It happens that I'm no connoisseur of fonts, but I don't see that as a > > reason to try to deny other people their esthetic pleasures... > > All I'm saying is that I can easily live within whatever fonts > are supplied by the operating system, and, furthermore, I would > NOT want any specific fonts because of the stated privacy reasons. > > So, if someone wants to install custom fonts, and, hence, allow > their machine to be fingerprinted no matter where they used that > machine in the entire world, that's fine. > > But, I, for one, prefer to be just like the rest. > > Question is...... how do I get my fonts to look like everyone elses? There is no "everyone elses". The fonts installed on any individual computer depend on what applications you've installed (plus whatever individual fonts you might install yourself) - Mac OS installs a set of fonts, Microsoft Office installs it's own needed fonts, Adobe products install their own fonts, etc. The particular fonts have also changed over the years. Someone without Microsoft Office won't have the extra fonts that Office installs, while someone who installed various Mac OS updates and versions over the years will have different fonts to someone who installed just the latest. Besides which, unless you're creating and installing your own custom fonts, there is no way that can "fingerprint" you individually, even if anyone was stupid enough to bother trying to get such a list. The tin-foil hat is around the corner. :-\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma6noe$l9f$7@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69055 |
Your Name wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:40:00 +1300: > Someone without Microsoft Office won't have the extra > fonts that Office installs Almost every Windows and Mac laptop in the USA has Microsoft Office on it, so, that's the set of fonts we would want to replicate. It must be easy. For you to say it's impossible can't be right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cio683F35f3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #69058 |
On 2015-01-27, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > Your Name wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:40:00 +1300: > >> Someone without Microsoft Office won't have the extra >> fonts that Office installs > > Almost every Windows and Mac laptop in the USA has Microsoft > Office on it Certainly not almost every Mac. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 01:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma6p23$irm$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69060 |
Jolly Roger wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:59:47 +0000: > Certainly not almost every Mac. You want to be in the middle of the bell curve, and that middle has Microsoft Office, no doubt about it. For you to say that most USA Mac laptops do NOT have Microsoft Office on them, would belie belief. But, even if it were true, then that just makes being in the middle of the bell curve different. All you want is the font set that most of the others have. You're saying that font set is the default font set that comes with the Mac, and I'm saying it also probably includes Microsoft Office default fonts. Either way, that's the set you want. So, the question is how to get that set and ONLY that set?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120152041106331%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #69061 |
In article <ma6p23$irm$1@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > > > Certainly not almost every Mac. > > You want to be in the middle of the bell curve, and that middle > has Microsoft Office, no doubt about it. > > For you to say that most USA Mac laptops do NOT have Microsoft Office > on them, would belie belief. many do, as microsoft office for mac is one of the top selling titles. the point is that it's not almost every mac, especially since a mac out of the box can read and write microsoft office documents without any additional software. in other words, there isn't a need for ms office on a mac unless someone is actively creating and modifying office documents. occasionally reading them (which is what most people need office for) is already covered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 01:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma6r7h$irm$4@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69067 |
nospam wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:41:10 -0500: > the point is that it's not almost every mac, especially since a mac out > of the box can read and write microsoft office documents without any > additional software. That's fine. What matters is identifying the fonts that are on the system (which is easy, since Panopticlick does that for you), and then figuring out HOW to delete the non-standard ones. That's not so easy. Or is it? How do we go about deleting non-standard fonts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 16:13 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <270120151613149714%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #69072 |
In article <ma6r7h$irm$4@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > nospam wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:41:10 -0500: > > > the point is that it's not almost every mac, especially since a mac out > > of the box can read and write microsoft office documents without any > > additional software. > > That's fine. > > What matters is identifying the fonts that are on the system > (which is easy, since Panopticlick does that for you), and then > figuring out HOW to delete the non-standard ones. > > That's not so easy. > Or is it? > > How do we go about deleting non-standard fonts? There aren't any "non-standard" fonts, except those you've installed yourself individually. If you start removing other fonts, then some applciations will start failing to work properly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-28 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcgcc5.1eih.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #69072 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Sage <sage@mail.invalid> was all, like: > nospam wrote, on Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:41:10 -0500: >> the point is that it's not almost every mac, especially since a mac out >> of the box can read and write microsoft office documents without any >> additional software. > That's fine. > What matters is identifying the fonts that are on the system > (which is easy, since Panopticlick does that for you), and then > figuring out HOW to delete the non-standard ones. > That's not so easy. It is trivial. > How do we go about deleting non-standard fonts? This has been explained to you many times. -- http://2blog.kreme.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 03:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cioe1vF4nsqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #69061 |
On 2015-01-27, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:59:47 +0000: > >> Certainly not almost every Mac. > > You want to be in the middle of the bell curve, and that middle > has Microsoft Office, no doubt about it. I doubt it. And you'll have to do a lot more to convince me. > For you to say that most USA Mac laptops do NOT have Microsoft Office > on them, would belie belief. How so? Macs can view Word documents without having Word installed. The fact is a whole lot of Mac users have no need to spend good money on Microsoft Office. > But, even if it were true, then that just makes being in the middle > of the bell curve different. > > All you want is the font set that most of the others have. No, that's what *you* want, apparently. I and millions of Mac users have no such desire. > You're saying that font set is the default font set that comes > with the Mac, and I'm saying it also probably includes Microsoft > Office default fonts. Most Mac users have the fonts that come with Mac OS X, and perhaps a few installed by third-party applications. Having used and service many, many Macs during the past almost 30 years, I am fairly certain the majority don't have Microsoft Office installed. > Either way, that's the set you want. You want it. I couldn't care less which fonts are installed on my machines. > So, the question is how to get that set and ONLY that set? First you need to know what fonts most others have. As far as I can see, you haven't done that. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-28 00:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcgblh.1eih.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #69080 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> was all, like: > On 2015-01-27, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: >> Jolly Roger wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:59:47 +0000: >> >>> Certainly not almost every Mac. >> >> You want to be in the middle of the bell curve, and that middle >> has Microsoft Office, no doubt about it. > I doubt it. And you'll have to do a lot more to convince me. >> For you to say that most USA Mac laptops do NOT have Microsoft Office >> on them, would belie belief. > How so? Macs can view Word documents without having Word installed. The > fact is a whole lot of Mac users have no need to spend good money on > Microsoft Office. Ten years ago, and more, I might have been convinced that MS Office was on most Macs. Maybe. Now? There is no possible chance. Of the several dozen Macs I work on on a regular basis, only two have MS Office and only one has a legal copy of MS Office. >> But, even if it were true, then that just makes being in the middle >> of the bell curve different. >> >> All you want is the font set that most of the others have. > No, that's what *you* want, apparently. I and millions of Mac users have > no such desire. There are so many things in fingerprinting that concentrating on Fonts is stupid. Fingerprinting *IS* a problem though, and will probably become more and more of a problem. I would consider running an addon that let me strip out most of the information viewable by a remote website as to what sort of browser I had and what it is capable of. -- http://2blog.kreme.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 21:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c84893$0$24658$b1db1813$46decd27@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #69173 |
In article <slrnmcgblh.1eih.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > There are so many things in fingerprinting that concentrating on Fonts is > stupid. Fingerprinting *IS* a problem though, and will probably become > more and more of a problem. I would consider running an addon that let > me strip out most of the information viewable by a remote website as to > what sort of browser I had and what it is capable of. It's elementary Watson, we must track down and question everyone using Firefox on Mac in the Central time zone; start with Mexico City. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-28 03:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma9lu5$cgb$5@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69186 |
Warren Oates wrote, on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:25:21 -0500: > It's elementary Watson, we must track down and question everyone using > Firefox on Mac in the Central time zone; start with Mexico City. It's actually far easier than that. If your browser signature is unique, then you can be tracked anywhere. No matter what IP or ISP or country you are logging in from.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-28 03:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma9lri$cgb$4@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #69173 |
Lewis wrote, on Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:34:21 +0000: > There are so many things in fingerprinting that concentrating on Fonts is > stupid. Fingerprinting *IS* a problem though, and will probably become > more and more of a problem. I would consider running an addon that let > me strip out most of the information viewable by a remote website as to > what sort of browser I had and what it is capable of. Here's my summary of what I have discovered for reducing entropy in the specific items that are reported by panopticlick.eff.org (with your help). ============================================================================ We can now reduce entropy for all the items reported by Panopticlick 1. User Agent 2. HTTP_ACCEPT Headers 3. Browser Plugin Details 4. Time Zone 5. Screen Size and Color Depth 6. System Fonts 7. Are Cookies Enabled? 8. Limited supercookie test ============================================================================ 1. Panopticlick User Agent entropy: SecretAgent extension https://www.dephormation.org.uk UserAgentSwitcher extension http://chrispederick.com/work/user-agent-switcher ============================================================================ 2. Panopticlick HTTP_ACCEPT Headers entropy: RandomAgentSpoofer extension https://github.com/dillbyrne/random-agent-spoofer ============================================================================ 3. Panopticlick Browser Plugin Details entropy: Extensions are OK but do NOT add Plug-ins (which will affect entropy) ============================================================================ 4. Panopticlick TimeZone entropy: This pops up Panopticlick.eff.org with a different time zone: $ TZ=CET-1 firefox -url panopticlick.eff.org & $ TZ=UTC+08:00 firefox -url panopticlick.eff.org & $ TZ=UTC+5 firefox -url panopticlick.eff.org & ============================================================================ 5. Panopticlick Screen Size & Color Depth entropy: Too bad xrandr can only increase the size of the display (not decrease it): $ xrandr --output DISPLAY --fb 1366x768 ============================================================================ 6. Panopticlick System Fonts entropy: NoScript extension extension https://noscript.net $ locate fonts.dir (remove any oddball directory that is not generally found) ============================================================================ 7. Panopticlick Are Cookies Enabled? entropy: Self-Destructing Cookies https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/self-destructing-cookies ============================================================================ 8. Panoptoclick Limited supercookie test entropy: Foundstone HTML5 Local Storage Explorer http://www.foundstone.com ============================================================================ Encrypt web pages that are not encrypted: HTTPS Everywhere https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ============================================================================ That last item is new to me, but, it seems useful if I can figure out how to get it to encrypt non-encrypted sites, such as www.google.com.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-28 08:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c8e7d1$0$54703$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #69190 |
In article <ma9lri$cgb$4@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > That last item is new to me, but, it seems useful if I can figure out how > to get it to encrypt non-encrypted sites, such as www.google.com. Google is https by default. If you disbelieve, then you can just type your own "https:" scheme into the destination bar, or set it up as a bookmark. Http Everywhere won't encrypt pages for you -- it seeks out the encrypted versions of pages you visit. I have it installed here. You might also want to look at Privacy Badger and MailVelope. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web