Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #54748 > unrolled thread

Latest OS X

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Latest OS X David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 11:30 -0800
    Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 14:36 -0500
      Re: Latest OS X Tom Joad <no@spam.nl> - 2014-01-15 20:48 +0100
        Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 14:51 -0500
          Re: Latest OS X gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-15 17:03 -0800
          Re: Latest OS X Tom Joad <no@spam.nl> - 2014-01-16 20:12 +0100
      Re: Latest OS X Philo D <doozy@earthling.net.invalid> - 2014-01-15 12:52 -0700
        Re: Latest OS X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-16 08:57 +1300
          Re: Latest OS X Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 14:12 -0600
            Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 15:15 -0500
            Re: Latest OS X Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-01-16 06:47 +0000
          Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 15:14 -0500
        Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-01-16 02:35 +0100
          Re: Latest OS X Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-24 21:51 +1000
            Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-24 19:45 +0200
              Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-24 14:53 -0400
              Re: Latest OS X dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-04-25 12:20 +1200
    Re: Latest OS X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-16 08:55 +1300
      Re: Latest OS X Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:05 +1000
        Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-19 17:24 +0000
          Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-19 20:17 +0200
            Re: Latest OS X Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-19 14:31 -0400
              Re: Latest OS X Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-19 20:54 +0000
            Re: Latest OS X Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 22:39 -0400
              Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-20 13:49 +0200
                Re: Latest OS X Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-20 14:14 +0100
                  Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-20 16:21 +0200
                    Re: Latest OS X Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-20 11:21 -0400
                      Re: Latest OS X android <here@there.was> - 2014-04-20 17:37 +0200
                        Re: Latest OS X Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-20 11:42 -0400
                    Re: Latest OS X billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-20 16:16 +0000
                      Re: Latest OS X Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-20 12:50 -0400
                    Re: Latest OS X Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-20 15:30 -0400
                      Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-20 22:26 +0200
                        Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-21 04:07 +0000
                      Re: Latest OS X Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-20 22:18 +0100
                        Re: Latest OS X billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-21 02:16 +0000
                          Re: Latest OS X Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-21 08:48 +0100
                        Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-21 04:09 +0000
                          Re: Latest OS X Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-25 20:58 +1000
                            Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-27 21:43 +0000
                              Re: Latest OS X Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-27 19:09 -0400
                      Re: Latest OS X dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-21 10:01 +1000
                        Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-21 03:15 +0200
                          Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-21 04:11 +0000
                          Re: Latest OS X dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-22 06:59 +1000
                            Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-21 23:35 +0200
                              Re: Latest OS X dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-22 11:21 +1000
                                Re: Latest OS X ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-04-22 03:40 +0200
                                  Re: Latest OS X dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-22 13:08 +1000
                                    Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-22 04:13 +0000
                    Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-21 04:00 +0000
                      Re: Latest OS X billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-21 17:29 +0000
            Re: Latest OS X Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-04-20 20:15 -0700
        Re: Latest OS X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-04-20 10:07 +1200
          Re: Latest OS X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 18:09 -0400
          Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-19 22:09 +0000
          Re: Latest OS X billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-19 23:54 +0000
    Re: Latest OS X David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 13:07 -0800
      Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 16:30 -0500
        Re: Latest OS X John Albert <j.albert@snet.net> - 2014-01-15 20:16 -0500
          Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-16 01:59 +0000
          Re: Latest OS X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-15 19:12 -0700
          Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 23:03 -0500
          Re: Latest OS X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-16 18:17 +1300
      Re: Latest OS X Fred McKenzie <fmmck@aol.com> - 2014-01-15 17:09 -0500
      Re: Latest OS X Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:07 +1000
    Re: Latest OS X David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 15:16 -0800
      Re: Latest OS X J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2014-01-15 18:27 -0500
      Re: Latest OS X nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 18:37 -0500
      Re: Latest OS X dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-01-16 14:02 +1300
        Re: Latest OS X Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 22:23 -0600
          Re: Latest OS X Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> - 2014-01-16 12:43 +0000
            Re: Latest OS X "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> - 2014-01-16 15:14 +0000
              Re: Latest OS X Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-23 16:00 +1000
          Re: Latest OS X dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-01-17 10:11 +1300
      Re: Latest OS X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-16 02:00 +0000
    Re: Latest OS X Earl Grey <earl@t.net> - 2014-01-15 18:30 -0500
      Re: Latest OS X John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2014-01-24 22:36 +0000

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#54748 — Latest OS X

Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#54749

In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?

no. 

snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old. 

the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54750

On 2014-01-15 19:36:14 +0000, nospam said:

> In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
> David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
> 
> no.
> 
> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
> 
> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.

In fact the latest stable version is OS 10.9.1.

-- 
Tom Joad
my.name@xs4all.nl

"It don't take no nerve to do somepin when there ain't nothin' else you can do"
John Steinbeck, The grapes of wrath

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54751

In article <52d6e5fd$0$2914$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Tom Joad
<no@spam.nl> wrote:

> >> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
> > 
> > no.
> > 
> > snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
> > 
> > the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
> > free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
> 
> In fact the latest stable version is OS 10.9.1.

that depends what you call stable. 

mavericks still needs some work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54769

On 2014-01-15 19:51:31 +0000, nospam said:

> In article <52d6e5fd$0$2914$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Tom Joad
> <no@spam.nl> wrote:
> 
>>>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>>> 
>>> no.
>>> 
>>> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
>>> 
>>> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
>>> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
>> 
>> In fact the latest stable version is OS 10.9.1.
> 
> that depends what you call stable.
> 
> mavericks still needs some work.

Where's the short list?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54782

On 2014-01-15 19:51:31 +0000, nospam said:

> In article <52d6e5fd$0$2914$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Tom Joad
> <no@spam.nl> wrote:
> 
>>>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>>> 
>>> no.
>>> 
>>> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
>>> 
>>> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
>>> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
>> 
>> In fact the latest stable version is OS 10.9.1.
> 
> that depends what you call stable.
> 
> mavericks still needs some work.

This is what I call stable:

Presently the uptime of my 10.9.1 system is 30 days, 2 hours and 27 
minutes. Since the latest update that required rebooting that is.

-- 
Tom Joad
my.name@xs4all.nl

"It don't take no nerve to do somepin when there ain't nothin' else you can do"
John Steinbeck, The grapes of wrath

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54752

In article <150120141436149286%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam
<nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
> David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
> 
> no. 
> 
> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old. 
> 
> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.

Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54754

In article <150120141252348060%doozy@earthling.net.invalid>, Philo D
<doozy@earthling.net.invalid> wrote:
> In article <150120141436149286%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam
> <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
> > David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
> > 
> > no. 
> > 
> > snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old. 
> > 
> > the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
> > free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
> 
> Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
> very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".

Depending on where you're looking, Snow Leopard may also be the latest
version you can buy on physical media or in  anormal shop, thanks to
Apple's rather silly decision to move to *only* downloads.  :-(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54756

On 1/15/14, 1:57 PM, Your Name wrote:
> Depending on where you're looking, Snow Leopard may also be the latest
> version you can buy on physical media or in  anormal shop, thanks to
> Apple's rather silly decision to move to*only*  downloads.:-(

Isn't it also the case that Snow Leopard is the last one that contained 
Rosetta, i.e., would run PPC code on Intel machines?

-- 
Ted

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54758

In article <lb6q3k$32u$1@dont-email.me>, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Isn't it also the case that Snow Leopard is the last one that contained 
> Rosetta, i.e., would run PPC code on Intel machines?

that is the case.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54778

In article <lb6q3k$32u$1@dont-email.me>, Ted Lee  <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Isn't it also the case that Snow Leopard is the last one that contained 
>Rosetta, i.e., would run PPC code on Intel machines?

Yep, which is why I bought an iMac just before Apple started
shipping them with 10.7.


Patty

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54757

In article <160120140857112811%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> Depending on where you're looking, Snow Leopard may also be the latest
> version you can buy on physical media or in  anormal shop, thanks to
> Apple's rather silly decision to move to *only* downloads.  :-(

nothing silly about it. electronic distribution has many advantages. 

they did offer lion on a usb stick but almost nobody bought it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54771

Philo D wrote:
> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>>
>> no.
>>
>> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
>>
>> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
>> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
>
> Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
> very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".

Sure your MacPro1.1 will run Lion 10.7.5. - I do this on my own 
MacPro1.1 sep.2007.

The first 'MacPro' - the latest PowerPC G5 2,0ghz, 2,5ghz & 2,7ghz will 
not run systems newer than 10.5.8.

The MacPros 1.1 & 2.1 (2006-2007) runs up to and including Lion 10.7.5. 
The MacPro 3.1, 4.1 & 5.1 will run anything available from 10.6.x to 
10.9.x. Though minimum requirements for these models vary from 10.5.8 to 
10.6.4.

Cheers, ERik Richard

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC, <mac-daneRE@MOVEstofanet.dk>
NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Text Processing - www.nisus.com
Openoffice.org - The Modern Productivity Solution - www.openoffice.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58849

On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:35:36 +0100, ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Philo D wrote:
>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>>>
>>> no.
>>>
>>> snow leopard, or 10.6, is a few years old.
>>>
>>> the latest version of os x is mavericks, or 10.9. mavericks is also a
>>> free upgrade and will run on most intel macs.
>>
>> Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
>> very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".
>
>Sure your MacPro1.1 will run Lion 10.7.5. - I do this on my own 
>MacPro1.1 sep.2007.
>
>The first 'MacPro' - the latest PowerPC G5 2,0ghz, 2,5ghz & 2,7ghz will 
>not run systems newer than 10.5.8.

I don't believe there was any 2,000ghz or 2,500ghz or 2,700ghz CPUs.
You may have meant the latest PowerPC G5 2.0ghz, 2.5ghz & 2.7ghz


>The MacPros 1.1 & 2.1 (2006-2007) runs up to and including Lion 10.7.5. 
>The MacPro 3.1, 4.1 & 5.1 will run anything available from 10.6.x to 
>10.9.x. Though minimum requirements for these models vary from 10.5.8 to 
>10.6.4.

What is max for Xserve early 2008 Intel Zeon dual quad core?

>Cheers, ERik Richard

-- 
Creationists - get educated before you argue,
And when you're corrected, try to learn something. 

Creationists only need know that
Evolution is important proven science
and
creation is made up nonsense

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58853

Barry OGrady wrote:
> ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> wrote:
>> Philo D wrote:
>>> Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
>>> very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".
>>
>> Sure your MacPro1.1 will run Lion 10.7.5. - I do this on my own
>> MacPro1.1 sep.2007.
>>
>> The first 'MacPro' - the latest PowerPC G5 2,0ghz, 2,5ghz & 2,7ghz will
>> not run systems newer than 10.5.8.
>
> I don't believe there was any 2,000ghz or 2,500ghz or 2,700ghz CPUs.
> You may have meant the latest PowerPC G5 2.0ghz, 2.5ghz & 2.7ghz

The nickname for the G5 2,0ghz and 2,5ghz was 'MacPro', but it isnot 
Intel CPUs...

>> The MacPros 1.1 & 2.1 (2006-2007) runs up to and including Lion 10.7.5.
>> The MacPro 3.1, 4.1 & 5.1 will run anything available from 10.6.x to
>> 10.9.x. Though minimum requirements for these models vary from 10.5.8 to
>> 10.6.4.
>
> What is max for Xserve early 2008 Intel Zeon dual quad core?

according to this link it is 10.7.x for XServe 2008 and 10.8.x and 
10.9.x for XServe 2009 models... XServe 2009 MUST have either 10.6.l8 or 
10.7.x installed to be able to upgrade. Seems as it isn't possible to 
make a 'clean' install of Mavericks on the 2009 models...

<https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5478237?tstart=0>

Cheers, Erik Richard
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC, <mac-daneRE@MOVEstofanet.dk>
NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Text Processing - www.nisus.com
Openoffice.org - The Modern Productivity Solution - www.openoffice.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58854

In article <ljbiji$ak5$1@solani.org>, ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid>
wrote:

> >>> Snow Leopard may be the latest version of OS X that will run on certain
> >>> very old Macs.  For example, my old Mac Pro 1,1 had this "feature".
> >>
> >> Sure your MacPro1.1 will run Lion 10.7.5. - I do this on my own
> >> MacPro1.1 sep.2007.
> >>
> >> The first 'MacPro' - the latest PowerPC G5 2,0ghz, 2,5ghz & 2,7ghz will
> >> not run systems newer than 10.5.8.
> >
> > I don't believe there was any 2,000ghz or 2,500ghz or 2,700ghz CPUs.
> > You may have meant the latest PowerPC G5 2.0ghz, 2.5ghz & 2.7ghz
> 
> The nickname for the G5 2,0ghz and 2,5ghz was 'MacPro', but it isnot 
> Intel CPUs...

no it wasn't. 

a g5 tower was called a powermac g5.

when apple switched to intel, they renamed several models to use the
prefix mac- rather than power-. the powermac g5 became a mac pro, the
powerbook became a macbook pro and the ibook became a macbook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58866

ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> wrote:

> Barry OGrady wrote:
> > What is max for Xserve early 2008 Intel Zeon dual quad core?
> 
> according to this link it is 10.7.x for XServe 2008 and 10.8.x and 
> 10.9.x for XServe 2009 models... XServe 2009 MUST have either 10.6.l8 or
> 10.7.x installed to be able to upgrade. Seems as it isn't possible to
> make a 'clean' install of Mavericks on the 2009 models...

It is possible to do a clean install of Mavericks on any Mac which
supports Mavericks, including a 2009 Xserve. You just need to create a
bootable installer. Apple even has a document pointing you in the right
direction.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5856

-- 
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#54753

In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?

No, that's three versions old. Since then there has been Lion, Mountain
Lion, and Mavericks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58645

On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:55:15 +1300, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
wrote:

>In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
>David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>
>No, that's three versions old. Since then there has been Lion, Mountain
>Lion, and Mavericks.

Mavericks is free because its a downgrade.

-- 
Creationists - get educated before you argue,
And when you're corrected, try to learn something. 

Creationists only need know that
Evolution is important proven science
and
creation is made up nonsense

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58666

In message <7ji4l9t44v5mta4c8h34td9foittn5feaf@4ax.com> 
  Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:55:15 +1300, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
> wrote:

>>In article <fe702e95-dc89-4c63-be98-fc99e2eb0fa3@googlegroups.com>,
>>David Downing <david.h.downing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is snow Leopard the latest version of OS X?
>>
>>No, that's three versions old. Since then there has been Lion, Mountain
>>Lion, and Mavericks.

> Mavericks is free because its a downgrade.

You are a troll and I claim my £5


-- 
"His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork." - Mae West

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web