Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56833 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-22 12:56 -0600 |
| Last post | 2014-03-01 21:53 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 197 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-22 12:56 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 14:15 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 14:47 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 21:30 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 19:04 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 00:36 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 09:48 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 16:41 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 12:05 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 17:22 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-24 02:15 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 03:57 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 18:25 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-25 08:16 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:50 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-23 07:51 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 11:23 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-23 15:05 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 20:01 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 04:21 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-24 04:35 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 06:00 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-24 21:54 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:44 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:19 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 19:26 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:40 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 19:46 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:57 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:43 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:19 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:40 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 19:45 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-25 00:57 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 05:04 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 06:00 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 16:10 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-24 12:15 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 22:33 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:47 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-25 13:41 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-25 09:06 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-25 19:14 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-25 20:42 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-25 21:32 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 17:12 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 17:24 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-26 02:38 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 21:03 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-26 04:19 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2014-02-28 11:29 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 12:48 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-26 01:44 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-25 21:59 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 22:33 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 23:13 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:45 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 23:17 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 18:28 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-24 23:16 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-24 21:17 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-25 21:03 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-25 21:00 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-25 22:02 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-25 08:11 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-25 17:03 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:45 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:05 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-25 20:57 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2014-02-26 09:52 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-06 02:36 +0200
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-24 21:24 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 20:43 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:40 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 16:47 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-23 15:37 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 20:08 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 01:15 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-23 18:45 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 02:52 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-23 19:01 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 04:23 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-24 22:10 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 22:21 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:27 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:27 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-24 21:05 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:34 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-24 21:58 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 18:04 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-25 02:44 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 01:14 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 04:11 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 18:36 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-25 08:20 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-25 17:00 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-25 20:05 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-25 21:31 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-02-25 19:13 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-26 04:35 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-26 06:42 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-01 21:57 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-26 23:29 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-04-13 15:06 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-04-13 21:11 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-04-15 17:03 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-04-16 09:29 +1200
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:29 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-26 00:49 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:59 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-26 02:03 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 22:13 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-26 14:03 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-26 23:42 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-27 17:03 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-26 02:47 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:10 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-04-13 15:11 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-13 15:43 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-26 02:42 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-04-13 15:08 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-04-13 15:41 -0400
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-25 19:18 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-26 23:39 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-27 17:09 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 13:03 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-02-23 01:32 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 10:07 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-06 02:44 +0200
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-22 17:49 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 19:07 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-22 22:23 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 03:49 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 10:12 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 16:42 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 14:38 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 10:11 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 14:38 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-24 10:42 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-22 23:01 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 14:38 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-24 01:46 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-01 21:52 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-02 00:05 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-24 22:24 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw mcarels@xs4all.nl (Maarten Carels) - 2014-02-24 10:43 +0100
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 18:39 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-24 19:16 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 14:18 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-22 13:43 -0600
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 14:52 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-22 20:05 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 15:16 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-22 21:10 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 16:25 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-22 22:13 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 22:19 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 18:55 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-23 09:38 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 10:17 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-23 15:42 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 10:45 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-23 17:09 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 13:51 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-02-23 20:07 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 15:14 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 15:20 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-24 02:18 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-22 17:51 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-22 21:50 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 19:09 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-02-22 12:35 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 16:59 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 22:14 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-22 18:01 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 18:22 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 18:29 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 23:33 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 18:23 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 01:08 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-22 21:49 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-22 22:57 -0800
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 16:36 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-23 11:58 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 14:35 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-23 21:03 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-23 18:23 -0500
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-24 01:07 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-24 01:53 +0000
Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-01 21:53 +0000
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-24 22:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlgni6a.1gv5.g.kreme@oswin.local> |
| In reply to | #56974 |
In message <_dadnQGhF7aH45bOnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one > question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to programming > was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, is this something I should be > concerned about and, if so, WHEN should I be concerned about it? Only if you are suddenly going to start writing code. -- Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and quick to anger.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-24 17:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Ls-dnW81lJOZUZbOnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #56974 |
On 2014.02.24, 12:15 , Kurt Ullman wrote:
>
> While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one
> question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to programming
> was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, [1] is this something I should be
> concerned about and, if so, [2] WHEN should I be concerned about it?
Answer 1: No.
Answer 2: N/A
--
Privacy has become an essential personal chore that most
people are not trained to perform.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 13:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <wwvy50znwbn.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> |
| In reply to | #56974 |
Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> writes: > While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one > question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to > programming was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, is this > something I should be concerned about Yes. > and, if so, WHEN should I be concerned about it? Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX 10.9. -- http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 09:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eaSdnTY9ZZ3BPpHOnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #57064 |
In article
<wwvy50znwbn.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid>,
Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> writes:
> > While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one
> > question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to
> > programming was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, is this
> > something I should be concerned about
>
> Yes.
>
> > and, if so, WHEN should I be concerned about it?
>
> Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a
> website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX
> 10.9.
ALL or just public? Am I okay on my own WiFi? Is the same concern there
if I am using the cell phone data line?
--
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital."
-- Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | billy@MIX.COM |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 17:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <leik6i$1jh$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #57066 |
Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> writes, quotiing
Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk>:
> > Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a
> > website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX
> > 10.9.
>
> ALL or just public? Am I okay on my own WiFi? Is the same concern there
> if I am using the cell phone data line?
See above. The problem is in verifying signatures, not in the path you
use to reach a particular site.
I'm surprised (well, not really) Apple has yet to cough up a patch for
OS 10.9/10.9.1. By the way.
Billy Y..
--
sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte
add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer
bcc 20$ ; not a number
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | billy@MIX.COM |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <leiq2p$4g6$3@reader2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #57308 |
> I'm surprised (well, not really) Apple has yet to cough up a patch for
> OS 10.9/10.9.1. By the way.
OK, I must retract this, as they just did.
http://support.apple.com/downloads/
Billy Y..
--
sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte
add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer
bcc 20$ ; not a number
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 20:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <p98vta-au71.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #57064 |
On 2014-02-25, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> writes: >> While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one >> question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to >> programming was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, is this >> something I should be concerned about > > Yes. > >> and, if so, WHEN should I be concerned about it? > > Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a > website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX > 10.9. Am I correct in assuming that includes Apple Mail? And any third party mail apps which use the Apple libraries of course. Mavericks Server too? -- Paul Sture How many Linux users does it take to change a lightbulb? 20. 1 to change it and 19 others to install new sockets do it their own way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 21:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bn4gf6FcrkaU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57080 |
On 2014-02-25, Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> wrote: > On 2014-02-25, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote: >> Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> writes: >>> While I have to admit to be fascinated by this, I have but one >>> question. Please explain to a person whose only exposure to >>> programming was a single FORTRAN class in the mid-70s, is this >>> something I should be concerned about >> >> Yes. >> >>> and, if so, WHEN should I be concerned about it? >> >> Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a >> website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX >> 10.9. > > Am I correct in assuming that includes Apple Mail? > And any third party mail apps which use the Apple libraries of course. Best to assume it goes for *any* SSL connection. > Mavericks Server too? Of course. Mavericks Server is just an extension of Mavericks "client". BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 17:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lej80m$bs5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #57085 |
On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: > BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. So it is. Interesting that it didn't tell me about it unasked -- I had to open the app store and ask it to check for updates. -- Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 17:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lej8mh$bs5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #57085 |
On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: > BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. No fix for the wifi/bluetooth problem, it would seem. It does claim some fixes to gmail/Mailapp problems. Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't find it. -- Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-26 02:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bn52dbFgm4aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57094 |
On 2014-02-25, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >> BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. > > No fix for the wifi/bluetooth problem, it would seem. It does claim > some fixes to gmail/Mailapp problems. "The" WiFi/Bluetooth problem? I don't have any problems at all with either one. Maybe it's not as wide spread as you seem to think? > Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say > anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't > find it. Yes it does: <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6150> Data Security Available for: OS X Mavericks 10.9 and 10.9.1 Impact: An attacker with a privileged network position may capture or modify data in sessions protected by SSL/TLS Description: Secure Transport failed to validate the authenticity of the connection. This issue was addressed by restoring missing validation steps. CVE-ID CVE-2014-1266 Secure Transport Available for: OS X Mountain Lion v10.8.5 Impact: An attacker may be able to decrypt data protected by SSL Description: There were known attacks on the confidentiality of SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 when a cipher suite used a block cipher in CBC mode. To address these issues for applications using Secure Transport, the 1-byte fragment mitigation was enabled by default for this configuration. CVE-ID CVE-2011-3389 : Juliano Rizzo and Thai Duong -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 21:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lejliq$ai1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #57106 |
On 2/25/14, 8:38 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2014-02-25, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. >> No fix for the wifi/bluetooth problem, it would seem. It does claim >> some fixes to gmail/Mailapp problems. > "The" WiFi/Bluetooth problem? I don't have any problems at all with > either one. Maybe it's not as wide spread as you seem to think? > Go check the support community discussions. It appears to be quite common with certain hardware (If I remember right, recent laptops) and Mavericks -- if bluetooth is on, wifi won't reconnect well, if at all, after waking from sleep. It certainly was a problem with mine. I don't use bluetooth much, but I did once and accidentally left it on -- thereafter, not that I was aware of the "thereafter" at the time, I had that problem with my wifi until I turned the bluetooth off, after having stumbled across a discussion about it. Having said that, I just tried turning on bluetooth after installing the update and could not make the misbehavior happen, so possibly they did fix it. >> Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say >> anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't >> find it. > Yes it does: > > <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6150> > > Thanks. Where did you find that link? The one with the update, http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222, and anything referenced in it that I followed, has no details and doesn't even list an update for any 10.9. security issues. > -- > Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-26 04:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bn58b2FhkarU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57111 |
On 2014-02-26, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/25/14, 8:38 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2014-02-25, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. >>> No fix for the wifi/bluetooth problem, it would seem. It does claim >>> some fixes to gmail/Mailapp problems. >> "The" WiFi/Bluetooth problem? I don't have any problems at all with >> either one. Maybe it's not as wide spread as you seem to think? >> > Go check the support community discussions. It appears to be quite > common with certain hardware (If I remember right, recent laptops) and > Mavericks -- if bluetooth is on, wifi won't reconnect well, if at all, > after waking from sleep. It certainly was a problem with mine. I don't > use bluetooth much, but I did once and accidentally left it on -- > thereafter, not that I was aware of the "thereafter" at the time, I had > that problem with my wifi until I turned the bluetooth off, after having > stumbled across a discussion about it. > > Having said that, I just tried turning on bluetooth after installing the > update and could not make the misbehavior happen, so possibly they did > fix it. >>> Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say >>> anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't >>> find it. >> >> Yes it does: >> >> <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6150> >> > Thanks. Where did you find that link? Since I am subscribed to the apple security announcements mail list, I got a message this morning announcing the release. The message gave an exhaustive list of all of the updated packages, along with a link to <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222>. > The one with the update, http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222, and > anything referenced in it that I followed, has no details and doesn't > even list an update for any 10.9. security issues. It's the very first item at the top of the "Security updates" list: <http://imageshack.com/a/img716/1199/580s.png> -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-28 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <leqdgl$vnk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #57111 |
On 2/25/14, 10:03 PM, Ted Lee wrote: > On 2/25/14, 8:38 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2014-02-25, Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2/25/14, 3:32 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> BTW, the Mac OS X update is available now. >>> No fix for the wifi/bluetooth problem, it would seem. It does claim >>> some fixes to gmail/Mailapp problems. >> "The" WiFi/Bluetooth problem? I don't have any problems at all with >> either one. Maybe it's not as wide spread as you seem to think? >> > Go check the support community discussions. It appears to be quite > common with certain hardware (If I remember right, recent laptops) and > Mavericks -- if bluetooth is on, wifi won't reconnect well, if at all, > after waking from sleep. It certainly was a problem with mine. I don't > use bluetooth much, but I did once and accidentally left it on -- > thereafter, not that I was aware of the "thereafter" at the time, I had > that problem with my wifi until I turned the bluetooth off, after having > stumbled across a discussion about it. > > Having said that, I just tried turning on bluetooth after installing the > update and could not make the misbehavior happen, so possibly they did > fix it. Still working out for you? My MacBook Air is still having a problem with bluetooth on. Seems a little different, though. I don't see any indication that it's looking for a wifi connection. Turned off bluetooth, no problem. >>> Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say >>> anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't >>> find it. >> Yes it does: >> >> <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6150> >> >> > Thanks. Where did you find that link? The one with the update, > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222, and anything referenced in it that I > followed, has no details and doesn't even list an update for any 10.9. > security issues. >> -- >> Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-28 12:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <leqllt$kvr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #57245 |
On 2/28/14, 10:29 AM, M. John Matlaw wrote: > > Still working out for you? My MacBook Air is still having a problem with > bluetooth on. Seems a little different, though. I don't see any > indication that it's looking for a wifi connection. Turned off > bluetooth, no problem. It may not be -- last couple of times I tried turning bt on, while wifi connected OK, it didn't negotiate a very good rate (only 7 mbps!). Turned bt off and rate came back up to a good speed (117) -- Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | billy@MIX.COM |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-26 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lejguo$5d6$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #57094 |
Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> writes:
> Nor does either the update info or the link to security update info say
> anything that implies the SSL flaw has been fixed! At least I couldn't
> find it.
It's not on the web site yet, but -
| APPLE-SA-2014-02-25-1 OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 and Security Update
| 2014-001
|
| OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 and Security Update 2014-001 is now available
| and addresses the following:
| Data Security
|
| Available for: OS X Mavericks 10.9 and 10.9.1
|
| Impact: An attacker with a privileged network position may capture
| or modify data in sessions protected by SSL/TLS
|
| Description: Secure Transport failed to validate the authenticity of
| the connection. This issue was addressed by restoring missing
| validation steps.
|
| CVE-ID
| CVE-2014-1266
Billy Y..
--
sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte
add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer
bcc 20$ ; not a number
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | billy@MIX.COM |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-25 21:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lej3n8$re7$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #57085 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> writes, quoting
Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> and Paul
Sture <nospam@sture.ch>:
> >> Whenever you make any https (or other SSL/TLS-protected) connection to a
> >> website, mail server, etc, using Apple software (Safari etc) under OSX
> >> 10.9.
> >
> > Am I correct in assuming that includes Apple Mail?
> > And any third party mail apps which use the Apple libraries of course.
>
> Best to assume it goes for *any* SSL connection.
From what I read the Firefox and Chrome use other libs and weren't affected,
but I don't use either of those. FF has fallen into tab hell, and I don't
feel like disclosing what I do to Google. On the good side, Chrome is now
pinning at least Google certs, and FF has the Convergence addon.
Billy Y..
--
sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte
add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer
bcc 20$ ; not a number
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-24 22:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlgni58.1gv5.g.kreme@oswin.local> |
| In reply to | #56967 |
In message <bn1988Fmd88U1@mid.individual.net>
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
> On 2014-02-24, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>> In message <bn026nFe8lqU1@mid.individual.net>
>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> On 2014-02-24, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>>>> In message <ItGdnd5-bfmfB5fOnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>>> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>>>>> if bar(foo) then
>>>>> begin
>>>>> brat (tat);
>>>>> stat (a,v)
>>>>> end
>>>>> else
>>>>> faggetaboutit("I object!");
>>>>
>>>> Is how I would space that. However, that else is something I
>>>> particularly dislike. That, to me, is terrible obtuse code.
>>>>
>>>> if bar(foo) {
>>>> brat(tat);
>>>> stat(a,v);
>>>> } else {
>>>> faggetaboutit("I object!");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> That is much clearer and more concise that the code above.
>>>>
>>>> I don't like putting {'s on empty lines for no reason, but the last
>>>> close bracket matches up the else and if showing the block has ended.
vvvvvvvvvv this vvvvvvvv
>>>> That said, I can't stand writing in python because of its reliance of
>>>> using white space for block control. That seems like the stupidest idea
>>>> any language designer ever had.
>>> White space isn't the enemy. Far from it.
>> SIGNIFICANT white space is *an* enemy.
> I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with your definition of
> significant if it includes placing brackets on their own lines. And
> that's okay. As I said earlier, getting developers to agree on minutia
> is like herding cats. ; ) I'm happy we have the freedom of choice.
No, I was talking about my dislike for coding python because it requires
specific and significant spacing to control logical blocks.
--
Gods don't like people not doing much work. People who aren't busy all
the time might start to think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-24 23:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bn21vuFrogrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57007 |
On 2014-02-24, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > In message <bn1988Fmd88U1@mid.individual.net> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> On 2014-02-24, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > > No, I was talking about my dislike for coding python because it requires > specific and significant spacing to control logical blocks. Yeah. Python is just plain fugly. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-24 17:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Ls-dnWw1lJMGVpbOnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #56951 |
On 2014.02.24, 00:04 , Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2014-02-24, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>> In message <ItGdnd5-bfmfB5fOnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>>> if bar(foo) then
>>> begin
>>> brat (tat);
>>> stat (a,v)
>>> end
>>> else
>>> faggetaboutit("I object!");
>>
>> Is how I would space that. However, that else is something I
>> particularly dislike. That, to me, is terrible obtuse code.
>>
>> if bar(foo) {
>> brat(tat);
>> stat(a,v);
>> } else {
>> faggetaboutit("I object!");
>> }
>>
>> That is much clearer and more concise that the code above.
>>
>> I don't like putting {'s on empty lines for no reason, but the last
>> close bracket matches up the else and if showing the block has ended.
>>
>> That said, I can't stand writing in python because of its reliance of
>> using white space for block control. That seems like the stupidest idea
>> any language designer ever had.
>
> White space isn't the enemy. Far from it.
As structure guidance for the compiler it sure is ...
--
Those who have reduced our privacy, whether they are state
or commercial actors, prefer that we do not reduce theirs.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web