Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #120957 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-22 15:52 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 172 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-22 15:52 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-22 16:13 -0200
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 09:36 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-23 11:08 -0200
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-23 16:16 -0200
Re: Can anyone read my post here? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-01-23 20:05 -0800
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-23 18:15 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-24 23:06 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 09:35 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-25 13:34 -0200
TROLL post! "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 15:52 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-26 00:52 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-01-25 13:01 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-25 17:08 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Troll Finder <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-01-25 17:38 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-25 17:22 -0200
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-25 20:36 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-25 22:40 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 22:58 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 15:19 -0800
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 23:29 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 15:41 -0800
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-26 06:43 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-26 05:09 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 12:44 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-04 13:28 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-04 13:55 -0300
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-04 18:33 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-04 16:07 -0300
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-05-05 17:00 +1000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Anonymous <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-06 08:12 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-06 15:46 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-08 02:51 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2019-05-04 15:44 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-04 21:46 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-04 22:01 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-05-04 17:35 -0400
Re: Can anyone read my post here? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-04 22:40 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-04 20:09 -0300
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-05-04 19:32 -0400
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-05-05 06:52 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-08 02:51 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-05 14:54 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-05-06 00:48 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-08 16:32 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-08 19:45 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-05-08 12:53 -0700
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 12:29 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-10 08:45 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-05-10 07:27 -0700
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 14:56 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-06 19:03 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? DGB <DGB@nomail.invalid> - 2019-07-06 20:50 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-07-06 15:45 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-08 02:51 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? DUSTY WHINING AGAIN! "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2019-07-08 08:36 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2019-07-13 01:23 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2019-07-13 10:08 +0100
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-09 10:32 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-09 16:09 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-09 13:56 -0300
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-09 18:11 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-05-09 19:28 -0700
Re: Can anyone read my post here? David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 06:13 +0000
Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 06:31 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-05-10 11:48 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-05-10 07:38 -0400
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 12:08 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-05-10 08:38 -0400
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 14:51 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) briang@panix.com (Brian Gordon) - 2019-05-10 15:46 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-10 16:09 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-10 11:48 -0500
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-10 14:24 -0300
Re: Talking to himself again (was - Can anyone read my stalking post here? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-07-22 12:00 -0300
Re: Talking to himself again (was - Can anyone read my stalking post here? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2019-07-22 15:19 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-23 21:47 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-23 20:47 -0300
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-29 08:45 +0000
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-29 07:45 -0400
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-29 10:11 -0300
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-05-31 06:28 -0400
I'd really appreciate some help with this! "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 12:28 +0100
Re: I'd really appreciate some help with this! jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 13:46 +0100
Re: I'd really appreciate some help with this! ~BD~ <BD@windows10.invalid> - 2019-09-03 09:19 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-02 14:11 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-02 07:45 -0600
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-02 16:28 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-02 09:40 -0600
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-02 17:00 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-02 10:12 -0600
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-05-31 12:01 -0600
Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 21:10 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-31 16:27 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-31 15:44 -0500
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 21:58 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-31 18:24 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-31 17:36 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-02 12:27 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-02 12:38 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-02 13:33 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-02 18:20 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-03 15:13 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-03 15:20 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-03 15:29 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-05-31 14:35 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 22:03 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-05-31 15:13 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 22:49 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-31 17:50 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 23:29 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-31 18:44 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 23:53 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-05-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-31 18:59 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 07:55 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-01 01:09 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 09:40 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-01 04:11 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 11:30 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-01 07:09 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 15:33 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-01 12:09 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-01 13:41 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) ~BD~ <BD@windows10.invalid> - 2019-09-03 09:57 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) ~BD~ <BD@windows10.invalid> - 2019-09-03 10:08 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-09-03 05:39 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) ~BD~ <BD@windows10.invalid> - 2019-09-03 14:43 +0100
Re: [OT]Jobs are now on offer! Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-09-03 12:04 -0300
Re: [OT]Jobs are now on offer! Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-09-03 11:59 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-01 05:42 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 14:52 +0100
Re: FaceKook scam (was BD STALKER) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-01 12:12 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-01 09:54 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-01 13:22 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-01 18:15 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-06-01 20:29 -0500
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-06-02 06:32 -0600
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) ~BD~ <BD@windows10.invalid> - 2019-09-03 10:05 +0100
Re: [OT]Is FaceKook a scam ? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-06-01 10:09 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-01 07:09 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-06-01 16:50 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-01 07:09 -0400
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-31 22:33 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-31 18:29 -0300
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2019-06-01 08:09 +0100
Re: Jobs are now on offer! (was - Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) "David B." <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-06-01 08:19 +0100
Re: Scam or no scam? (was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-22 12:34 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-08 12:56 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-05-08 16:16 -0400
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-06 19:03 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-05 15:08 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-08 02:51 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-07-06 19:03 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
FAO Jolly Roger. (Was - Can anyone read my post here?) David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-05-08 20:04 +0000
Re: FAO Jolly Roger. (Was - Can anyone read my post here?) Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-05-08 16:14 -0400
Re: FAO Jolly Roger. (Was - Can anyone read my post here?) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-05-08 17:19 -0300
Re: FAO Jolly Roger. (Was - Can anyone read my post here?) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-08 17:13 -0400
Re: FAO Jolly Roger. (Was - Can anyone read my post here?) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-05-08 17:20 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-01-25 13:02 -0500
Re: Can anyone read my post here? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 22:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123754 |
On 04/05/2019 21:44, David Ritz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday, 04 May 2019 13:28 +0100, > in article <qak0he$jlu$1@dont-email.me>, > David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> I did send a couple of the 'rogue' files - which had been found by >> ClamXAV - to Virus Total, with these results:- > >> https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/ecedcf39d03c66912e5a3dc0732bdf75004d4b2db1e8e3e4833c56b867debda6/detection > > V105%20oE%20v1-0.exe (3 of 71) > >> https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/176a7d6d77159920ddfcc470ffe807b51c6de12070f93237b35437107c33963f/detection > > bb_modem_setup.exe (5 of 67) > > Those are some mighty low detection rates. I regularly encounter > files with 50+ detections. > >> What was 'false' about them? > > So, David, please tell us how many Windows executable files you are > able to run under any macOS 10, the only OS under which ClamXAV might > run? None, as far as I'm aware. > Please note, in neither of these VirusTotal scans were the files > identified as malicious by ClamAV, where ClamXAV is a GUI front end > to ClamAV, intended for the timid of CLI. Isn't that rather odd? > - -- > David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> > "Art is not to be taught in Academies. It is what one looks at, not > what one listens to, that makes the artist. The real schools should > be the streets." -- Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iF0EARECAB0WIQSc0FU3XAVGYDjSGUhSvCmZGhLe6wUCXM35sAAKCRBSvCmZGhLe > 63PwAJ9Sn9A9yymsiNfI+9zTAclOyrQpBwCgh5/ckEFmJFSKJ0DYVKvkBsGnfoM= > =npbP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Here's the MID where I posted the 'provocative' message:- <E3X_B.213609$4l3.52500@fx17.fr7> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? Was I surprised at his reaction? No. It was a deliberate 'test'. -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 17:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.D8F37DEC00E3CCF6B02919BF@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #123757 |
On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): [snip] > > http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 > > What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a support request. -- Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <040520191737226268%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #123758 |
In article <0001HW.D8F37DEC00E3CCF6B02919BF@news.astraweb.com>, Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote > (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): > > > > http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 > > > > What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? > > tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a support > request. or at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qal0rn$ofq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123758 |
On 04/05/2019 22:35, Ed Norton wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote > (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): > > [snip] >> >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 >> >> What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? > > tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a support > request. Too long - Didn't read eh? //You may, of course, read the Usenet posts for yourself. Here's a response from a poster calling himself 'Diesel' (I'll tell you that in real life his name is Dustin Cook - the author of a virus called IROK, amongst others. He was also employed by Malwarebytes Inc as a Malware Researcher in their early days. Be cautious if you choose to interact with him.) http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151298130700 The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found them, so they most certainly were present.// That was relevant, no? -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 20:09 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <b46sce99qkjopoeovucqhlf99em9mh1ukk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #123761 |
On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: A rather gullible poster wrote: //It would be helpful to the community in general if you would take steps to reform those behaviors which serve to offend others. I think the simplest path to take would be to replace your interest in doing investigations you claim to/ feel/ 'help folks' with some completely different endeavor and leave such investigations in the hands of others. Since you seem to have some religious persuasions, maybe you could view the importance of making such personal changes in the light of an endeavor to help others; that is, it would be a great deal more helpful to others if you were NOT striving to be an investigator, but instead replaced those interests w/ something else completely different. // BD: I understand. I promise I'll do my very best to never STALK or HURT anyone again. A few hours later: ><CUT_TONS_OF_TOTALLY_OFF-TOPIC_STALKING> > >That was relevant no? Not at all relevant. Now where are the apologies ? <http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php> 41 fake nyms and counting ..... []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-04 19:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.D8F3995800EA3A39B02919BF@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #123761 |
On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:40:04 -0400, David B. wrote (in article <qal0rn$ofq$1@dont-email.me>): > On 04/05/2019 22:35, Ed Norton wrote: >> On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote >> (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): >> >> [snip] >>> >>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 >>> >>> What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? >> >> tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a support >> request. > > Too long - Didn't read eh? > > //You may, of course, read the Usenet posts for yourself. Here's a > response from a poster calling himself 'Diesel' (I'll tell you that in > real life his name is Dustin Cook - the author of a virus called IROK, > amongst others. He was also employed by Malwarebytes Inc as a Malware > Researcher in their early days. Be cautious if you choose to interact > with him.) > > http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151298130700 > > The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those > 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found > them, so they most certainly were present.// > > That was relevant, no? > > Nice selective snipping. But even with the fragment you left, is there a support question in there somewhere? You bleat out your life story, and then say you found something "intriguing". Maybe you didn't get an answer because you didn't ask a question. Then again, maybe it was just, you know, tl:dr. -- Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-05 06:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qaltno$meo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123763 |
On 05/05/2019 00:32, Ed Norton wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:40:04 -0400, David B. wrote > (in article <qal0rn$ofq$1@dont-email.me>): > >> On 04/05/2019 22:35, Ed Norton wrote: >>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote >>> (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): >>> >>> [snip] >>>> >>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 >>>> >>>> What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark Allan? >>> >>> tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a support >>> request. >> >> Too long - Didn't read eh? >> >> //You may, of course, read the Usenet posts for yourself. Here's a >> response from a poster calling himself 'Diesel' (I'll tell you that in >> real life his name is Dustin Cook - the author of a virus called IROK, >> amongst others. He was also employed by Malwarebytes Inc as a Malware >> Researcher in their early days. Be cautious if you choose to interact >> with him.) >> >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151298130700 >> >> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >> them, so they most certainly were present.// >> >> That was relevant, no? >> >> > > Nice selective snipping. But even with the fragment you left, is there > a support question in there somewhere? You bleat out your life story, > and then say you found something "intriguing". Maybe you didn't get an > answer because you didn't ask a question. Then again, maybe it was > just, you know, tl:dr. Perhaps you are right. I saw no reason for Mark to immediately block me from Facebook and LinkedIn though. The corporate Facebook page is a farce. https://www.facebook.com/clamxav Thank you for responding, Ed. -- Regards, David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-08 02:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsAA85E958C7B36HT1@VG3MqGSHzc161DLZx9BnHv4u659z.8mz8HJ0z0JupR> |
| In reply to | #123763 |
Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> news:0001HW.D8F3995800EA3A39B02919BF@news.astraweb.com Sat, 04 May 2019 23:32:40 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:40:04 -0400, David B. wrote > (in article <qal0rn$ofq$1@dont-email.me>): > >> On 04/05/2019 22:35, Ed Norton wrote: >>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 17:01:30 -0400, David B. wrote >>> (in article <qakuja$c2t$1@dont-email.me>): >>> >>> [snip] >>>> >>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155213775200 >>>> >>>> What did I say therein to bring about a total rejection by Mark >>>> Allan? >>> >>> tl;dr Who the hell wants to read the story of your life in a >>> support request. >> >> Too long - Didn't read eh? >> >> //You may, of course, read the Usenet posts for yourself. Here's >> a response from a poster calling himself 'Diesel' (I'll tell you >> that in real life his name is Dustin Cook - the author of a virus >> called IROK, amongst others. He was also employed by Malwarebytes >> Inc as a Malware Researcher in their early days. Be cautious if >> you choose to interact with him.) >> >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151298130700 >> >> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE >> those 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV >> software found them, so they most certainly were present.// >> >> That was relevant, no? >> >> > > Nice selective snipping. But even with the fragment you left, is > there a support question in there somewhere? You bleat out your > life story, and then say you found something "intriguing". Maybe > you didn't get an answer because you didn't ask a question. Then > again, maybe it was just, you know, tl:dr. > Not even that. Just review the following and you'll learn all you need to know about the poster you've been interacting with. https://preview.tinyurl.com/AdmittedLiar-DavidBrooksDevon https://preview.tinyurl.com/Stalking-DavidBrooksDevon https://preview.tinyurl.com/Housestalker-DavidBrooksDevon https://preview.tinyurl.com/Stalker-DavidBrooksDevon -- Bite the head off one lousy chicken and they never let you forget!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-05 14:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mjfuce1iq71cm7d7ju9qu8i4phvled7gnt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #123761 |
On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >them, so they most certainly were present.// "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives completely eludes you. So were the files present? Of course not. Everyone but you knows that. Why don't you know that, too? What right do you have to be more ignorant than everyone around you? >That was relevant, no? Huh? -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-06 00:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gj9ei1Fsu86U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #123788 |
On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> > wrote: > >>The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>them, so they most certainly were present.// > > "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false > positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some > grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and > wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. > It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives > completely eludes you. *slow clap* -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-08 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qav0b7$9io$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123801 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >> wrote: >> >>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >> >> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >> completely eludes you. > > *slow clap* > If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD, how did VirusTotal manage to scan them? Simple question. Please answer it. The poster calling herself ‘Char’ has no clue about my current lifestyle - I do NOT drink alcohol - none at all. — David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-08 16:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gjgf6rFebuqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #123834 |
On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>> >>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>> completely eludes you. >> >> *slow clap* >> > > If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD You haven't established that. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-08 19:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qavbkg$icg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123836 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>> >>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>> completely eludes you. >>> >>> *slow clap* >>> >> >> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD > > You haven't established that. If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found them months beforehand. No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and Windows computers. Any other thoughts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-08 12:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qavc2v$bru$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #123843 |
On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>>> >>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>>> completely eludes you. >>>> >>>> *slow clap* >>>> >>> >>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD >> >> You haven't established that. > > > If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found > them months beforehand. > > No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and > Windows computers. > > Any other thoughts? > You haven't had any yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-10 12:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qb3qra$vk9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123844 |
Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: > On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>>>> >>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>>>> completely eludes you. >>>>> >>>>> *slow clap* >>>>> >>>> >>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD >>> >>> You haven't established that. >> >> >> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found >> them months beforehand. >> >> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and >> Windows computers. >> >> Any other thoughts? >> > > You haven't had any yet. Yes, I have. Finding non-existent files on a computer is a great way to convince a subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a product which protects one from malware - even though it doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. Am I close? — David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-10 08:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <trvade1egri0iuvc083o8q3hsuahsnqinm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #123870 |
On Fri, 10 May 2019 12:29:30 -0000 (UTC), David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >> On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>>>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>>>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>>>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>>>>> completely eludes you. >>>>>> >>>>>> *slow clap* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD >>>> >>>> You haven't established that. >>> >>> >>> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found >>> them months beforehand. >>> >>> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and >>> Windows computers. >>> >>> Any other thoughts? >>> >> >> You haven't had any yet. > >Yes, I have. > >Finding non-existent files More imprecise language, as Mike calls it. AV programs don't find non-existent files because that's not what they're looking for. If they flag a file, the file always exists or they wouldn't be able to flag it. It may or may not have actual malware present, but the file exists. >on a computer is a great way to convince a >subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a product which protects one >from malware - even though it doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. > >Am I close? If you have to ask if you're close, you already know the answer is no. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-10 07:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qb41p3$14m2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #123870 |
On 2019-05-10 5:29 a.m., David B. wrote: > Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >> On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>>>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>>>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>>>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>>>>> completely eludes you. >>>>>> >>>>>> *slow clap* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD >>>> >>>> You haven't established that. >>> >>> >>> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found >>> them months beforehand. >>> >>> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and >>> Windows computers. >>> >>> Any other thoughts? >>> >> >> You haven't had any yet. > > Yes, I have. > > Finding non-existent files on a computer is a great way to convince a > subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a product which protects one > from malware - even though it doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. > > Am I close? Nope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-10 14:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qb43fi$k3r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #123875 |
Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: > On 2019-05-10 5:29 a.m., David B. wrote: >> Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >>> On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of WHERE those >>>>>>>>> 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, your ClamXAV software found >>>>>>>>> them, so they most certainly were present.// >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of false >>>>>>>> positives explained to you multiple times, and each time you make some >>>>>>>> grunting noise about how you understand. Then you drink, pass out, and >>>>>>>> wake up in a whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of false positives >>>>>>>> completely eludes you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *slow clap* >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the AOL DVD >>>>> >>>>> You haven't established that. >>>> >>>> >>>> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would have/should have found >>>> them months beforehand. >>>> >>>> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on both Apple and >>>> Windows computers. >>>> >>>> Any other thoughts? >>>> >>> >>> You haven't had any yet. >> >> Yes, I have. >> >> Finding non-existent files on a computer is a great way to convince a >> subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a product which protects one >> from malware - even though it doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. >> >> Am I close? > > > Nope. > OK. <shrug>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-06 19:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsAA8499F1A7F21HT1@GYuG4PYtgXj.Kf128yHv> |
| In reply to | #123877 |
David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> news:qb43fi$k3r$1@dont-email.me Fri, 10 May 2019 14:56:52 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >> On 2019-05-10 5:29 a.m., David B. wrote: >>> Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >>>> On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." >>>>>>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of >>>>>>>>>> WHERE those 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, >>>>>>>>>> your ClamXAV software found them, so they most certainly >>>>>>>>>> were present.// >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of >>>>>>>>> false positives explained to you multiple times, and each >>>>>>>>> time you make some grunting noise about how you >>>>>>>>> understand. Then you drink, pass out, and wake up in a >>>>>>>>> whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of >>>>>>>>> false positives completely eludes you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *slow clap* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the >>>>>>> AOL DVD >>>>>> >>>>>> You haven't established that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would >>>>> have/should have found them months beforehand. >>>>> >>>>> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on >>>>> both Apple and Windows computers. >>>>> >>>>> Any other thoughts? >>>>> >>>> >>>> You haven't had any yet. >>> >>> Yes, I have. >>> >>> Finding non-existent files on a computer is a great way to >>> convince a subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a >>> product which protects one from malware - even though it >>> doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. >>> >>> Am I close? >> >> >> Nope. >> > > OK. <shrug> > Dumb and dangerous. How did you manage to live this long? -- We all live in a yellow subroutine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DGB <DGB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-06 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rY6UE.23613$Ja1.1328@fx01.fr7> |
| In reply to | #125083 |
On 06/07/2019 20:03, Diesel wrote: > David B. <no_email@invalid.invalid> news:qb43fi$k3r$1@dont-email.me > Fri, 10 May 2019 14:56:52 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >>> On 2019-05-10 5:29 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>> Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> wrote: >>>>> On 2019-05-08 12:45 p.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-05-08, David B <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-05-05, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:40:04 +0100, "David B." >>>>>>>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The thing I find most intriguing is that regardless of >>>>>>>>>>> WHERE those 'ramnit' files were lurking on my computer, >>>>>>>>>>> your ClamXAV software found them, so they most certainly >>>>>>>>>>> were present.// >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "most certainly were present"?? You've had the concept of >>>>>>>>>> false positives explained to you multiple times, and each >>>>>>>>>> time you make some grunting noise about how you >>>>>>>>>> understand. Then you drink, pass out, and wake up in a >>>>>>>>>> whole new day, except it isn't a new day at all, is it. >>>>>>>>>> It's the same day all over again, where the concept of >>>>>>>>>> false positives completely eludes you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *slow clap* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the files in question were not on my computer or on the >>>>>>>> AOL DVD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You haven't established that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If the files HAD been on my computer, ClamXAV would >>>>>> have/should have found them months beforehand. >>>>>> >>>>>> No malware has been found on the DVD by any other AV scan on >>>>>> both Apple and Windows computers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any other thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You haven't had any yet. >>>> >>>> Yes, I have. >>>> >>>> Finding non-existent files on a computer is a great way to >>>> convince a subscriber that it’s a great idea to pay for a >>>> product which protects one from malware - even though it >>>> doesn’t _actually_ do any such thing. >>>> >>>> Am I close? >>> >>> >>> Nope. >>> >> >> OK. <shrug> >> > > Dumb and dangerous. How did you manage to live this long? Just to update you, the disk from AOL (which was posted to my home address by AOL at my request when I bought my first Mac) is a CD, not a DVD. Scans with various other tools finds NO malware on the disk. How would YOU check that it really IS clean if you had the disk in your personal possession?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web