Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #120979 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-23 09:28 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-27 15:10 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 212 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 09:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:29 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 09:31 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:49 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 10:46 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 18:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 12:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:29 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2019-01-23 20:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 17:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Ed Norton <norton@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-23 18:53 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:01 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:18 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 22:04 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 10:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-24 05:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:03 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 19:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-24 00:20 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-01-25 13:11 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 15:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:50 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:10 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 14:25 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 16:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 16:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 18:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 23:41 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:08 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:15 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 21:04 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:10 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:08 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:07 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:36 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 08:19 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:06 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:09 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-25 21:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 08:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 12:05 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:17 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 13:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:40 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:32 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-27 22:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 09:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:41 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 17:15 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 09:22 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 18:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 10:55 -0800
OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 19:19 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 11:28 -0800
Re: OT? Not really! Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:12 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:03 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:16 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:41 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:56 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:17 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:47 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-06 08:48 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-06 10:23 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:21 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 10:45 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-08 11:33 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 10:47 -0800
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-09 08:22 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-09 15:02 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:16 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-10 08:24 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:47 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:32 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:08 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:00 -0300
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:11 -0600
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0800
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:16 -0600
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:53 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 14:59 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:57 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:58 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:56 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:47 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:55 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 11:42 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 11:04 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 19:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 23:01 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:09 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:35 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 11:01 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 17:42 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0300
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:44 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:52 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:25 +0000
Re: TROLL post Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 20:33 -0800
Re: TROLL post Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2019-01-28 23:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:31 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 19:45 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:51 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 19:07 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:56 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 09:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 13:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:10 +0000
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 00:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1f72E.100972$Yn2.15782@fx26.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121037 |
On 23/01/2019 23:53, Ed Norton wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:43:45 -0500, David B. wrote > (in article <T_62E.114921$Mo2.26586@fx28.fr7>): > > [snip] > >> How many 'followers' does it have? https://www.facebook.com/clamxav/ >> >> 377 this evening on my machine. >> >> https://www.facebook.com/Kaspersky/ >> 3,352,483 people follow this! > > How many people follow you? I don't have a business Facebook page, so none. HTH, Ed. :-) -- Regards, David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 18:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <230120191854333580%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #121036 |
In article <T_62E.114921$Mo2.26586@fx28.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. > > > > Software doesn't have to be recommended by Apple to be of good quality > > or trustworthy - same for being on the App Store. That means nothing. > > You are welcome to your view. Apple recommends caution in that respect. no they don't. > https://support.apple.com/kb/PH25087?locale=en_US&viewlocale=en_US that doesn't say what you think it does. > How does one determine if Mark Allan IS an "identified developer"? easily. > Do you have any Apple contacts who can verify this? no need.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 23:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ld72E.100971$Yn2.84786@fx26.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121038 |
On 23/01/2019 23:54, nospam wrote *TROLL RESPONSES* as always > In article <T_62E.114921$Mo2.26586@fx28.fr7>, David B. < > B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. >>> >>> Software doesn't have to be recommended by Apple to be of good quality >>> or trustworthy - same for being on the App Store. That means nothing. >> >> You are welcome to your view. Apple recommends caution in that respect. > > no they don't. > >> https://support.apple.com/kb/PH25087?locale=en_US&viewlocale=en_US > > that doesn't say what you think it does. > >> How does one determine if Mark Allan IS an "identified developer"? > > easily. > >> Do you have any Apple contacts who can verify this? > > no need. *PLONK*!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 01:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gasi3vFq4e3U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #121036 |
On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 23/01/2019 22:02, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> On 23/01/2019 19:53, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>> >>>> I have absolutely no idea why you are so suspicious about this >>>> particular piece of software. It's reputable software from a reputable >>>> company. It just performs a task which I don't see as particularly >>>> necessary or useful. >>> >>> *WHO* says it's a "reputable company"? (apart from it's own marketing blurb) >> >> Thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of other veteran Mac users who >> have used ClamXAV for years and know it to be of decent quality. > > I call bullshit. You can call whatever you want, but you're wrong. ClamXAV has been around for a long time. > The 'professional' service ClamXAV > the professional service. > Do post some published reviews of how great the software is. Nah. Waste of my time. Sorry. >>> It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. >> >> Software doesn't have to be recommended by Apple to be of good quality >> or trustworthy - same for being on the App Store. That means nothing. > > You are welcome to your view. It's not my view. It's the truth. >>> Worst case scenario is that your computer may become part of a Botnet. >> >> That can happen without having ClamXAV installed. Maybe you should just >> stop using your computer. Or is your supposed "concern" about botnets >> not genuine? > > It's a REAL concern! Then you should stop using your computer immediately since it runs all sorts of software not recommended by Apple of questionable trustworthiness, including your news client! Do *YOU* know Thunderbird isn't installing a botnet on your computer at this very *instant*?!?! Go ahead! Prove it isn't!!! >> Nonsense. Many people would know if any popular Mac software like >> ClamXAV did such a thing. > > *HOW*? If the users were completely unaware that their computers had > been compromised? Because many people use ClamXAV and have the technical expertise to be aware enough of what their computers are doing to notice. *Duh*. >>>>> What REALLY is a give-away is the company's inability to run a >>>>> Facebook page! Have you taken a look? >>>> >>>> I've never visited any company's facebook page. I would hope a software >>>> company devotes its time and effort to developing and maintaining >>>> software rather than facebook pages. >>> >>> André, THOUSANDS of companies now advertise their wares on Facebook. >> >> So does ClamXAV. > > How many 'followers' does it have? Irrelevant. Your claim that they don't have a Facebook page is false, and Facebook is not a gauge for software quality. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 22:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q2bh11$68j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #121013 |
On 2019-01-23 1:29 p.m., David B. wrote: > On 23/01/2019 19:53, André G. Isaak wrote: >> On 2019-01-23 11:02 a.m., David B. wrote: >>> On 23/01/2019 17:46, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-23 10:22 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>> On 23/01/2019 15:17, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-01-23 2:28 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has >>>>>>> installed ClamXAV. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. A former employer required, for some unspecified reason, that >>>>>> it be installed on all Macs attached to the network. It never >>>>>> caused me any problems. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, André. >>>>> >>>>> Are you using it on your personal machine right now? >>>> >>>> No >>> >>> OK - me neither! >>> >>>>> Will you, please, just clarify - was your employer using ClamXAV >>>>> ...... >>>>> >>>>> ..... or simply ClamAV ? >>>> >>>> ClamXAV, which is just a graphical front-end for ClamAV. >>> >>> I hope you are right about that, André. >>> >>> There's no way any ordinary folk can check that. :-( >> >> I have absolutely no idea why you are so suspicious about this >> particular piece of software. It's reputable software from a reputable >> company. It just performs a task which I don't see as particularly >> necessary or useful. > > *WHO* says it's a "reputable company"? (apart from it's own marketing > blurb) You can easily search for reviews from third parties, and for comparisons between anti-virus software. The fact that it is frequently included in such comparisons would certainly suggest others view it as reputable. > It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. Apple doesn't generally make recommendations about third-party software. And lots of things aren't available through the App Store. Microsoft Office, Adobe Illustrator, BBEdit, etc. Does that make Microsoft, Adobe[*], or BareBones not reputable? And there are good reasons why lots of software isn't available through the App Store. Apple imposes numerous restrictions on software distributed through the App Store which often aren't reasonable for larger, more complex applications or for software which performs fairly low-level tasks. As a general rule, if software is available both through the App Store and directly from the vendor, I prefer to get the version available from the vendor. >> Worst case scenario, it's buggy or causes a notable slowdown, in which >> case you simply uninstall it. > > Worst case scenario is that your computer may become part of a Botnet. > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet > > ..... and you'd likely never know about it! Given that ClamXAV has been around for at least 15 years, if it were doing something malicious someone would certainly have pointed this out by now and would have shouted it far and wide. There would have been lawsuits and much gnashing of teeth. >>> What REALLY is a give-away is the company's inability to run a >>> Facebook page! Have you taken a look? >> >> I've never visited any company's facebook page. I would hope a >> software company devotes its time and effort to developing and >> maintaining software rather than facebook pages. > > André, THOUSANDS of companies now advertise their wares on Facebook. I never claimed they didn't. But I don't use facebook and wouldn't judge a company by the quality of its facebook page, or blog, or website, or whatever. Being a competent programmer and being a competent web designer are entirely different skills. André [*] Actually, if you're going to be paranoid, these might be better targets. The Adobe Flash Player Installer available from Adobe.com has the nasty habit of trying to install Adobe Flash Player. You can find lots of unofficial versions of this installer at other places on the web which don't install this, but they usually install some other piece of malware instead. And earlier versions of Microsoft Office used to install that irritating paper-clip dude. That was the closest thing to actual malware which I've ever encountered on a Mac. -- To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail service.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 10:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kSg2E.70325$hO1.12355@fx29.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121059 |
On 24/01/2019 05:04, André G. Isaak wrote: > On 2019-01-23 1:29 p.m., David B. wrote: >> On 23/01/2019 19:53, André G. Isaak wrote: >>> On 2019-01-23 11:02 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>> On 23/01/2019 17:46, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-23 10:22 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>> On 23/01/2019 15:17, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-01-23 2:28 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has >>>>>>>> installed ClamXAV. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. A former employer required, for some unspecified reason, >>>>>>> that it be installed on all Macs attached to the network. It >>>>>>> never caused me any problems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, André. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you using it on your personal machine right now? >>>>> >>>>> No >>>> >>>> OK - me neither! >>>> >>>>>> Will you, please, just clarify - was your employer using ClamXAV >>>>>> ...... >>>>>> >>>>>> ..... or simply ClamAV ? >>>>> >>>>> ClamXAV, which is just a graphical front-end for ClamAV. >>>> >>>> I hope you are right about that, André. >>>> >>>> There's no way any ordinary folk can check that. :-( >>> >>> I have absolutely no idea why you are so suspicious about this >>> particular piece of software. It's reputable software from a >>> reputable company. It just performs a task which I don't see as >>> particularly necessary or useful. >> >> *WHO* says it's a "reputable company"? (apart from it's own marketing >> blurb) > > You can easily search for reviews from third parties, and for > comparisons between anti-virus software. The fact that it is frequently > included in such comparisons would certainly suggest others view it as > reputable. I've tried - and not found any. :-( https://www.macworld.co.uk/feature/mac-software/mac-antivirus-3672182/ https://antivirus-uk.thetop10sites.com/best-antivirus-for-mac.html >> It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. > > Apple doesn't generally make recommendations about third-party software. > > And lots of things aren't available through the App Store. Microsoft > Office, Adobe Illustrator, BBEdit, etc. Does that make Microsoft, > Adobe[*], or BareBones not reputable? No - but they are not 'one man bands'! > And there are good reasons why lots of software isn't available through > the App Store. Apple imposes numerous restrictions on software > distributed through the App Store which often aren't reasonable for > larger, more complex applications or for software which performs fairly > low-level tasks. > > As a general rule, if software is available both through the App Store > and directly from the vendor, I prefer to get the version available from > the vendor. OK >>> Worst case scenario, it's buggy or causes a notable slowdown, in >>> which case you simply uninstall it. >> >> Worst case scenario is that your computer may become part of a Botnet. > > > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet >> >> ..... and you'd likely never know about it! > > Given that ClamXAV has been around for at least 15 years, if it were > doing something malicious someone would certainly have pointed this out > by now and would have shouted it far and wide. There would have been > lawsuits and much gnashing of teeth. So did Mark Allan frequent the ASC before my time there? Or did he/does he post there under a pseudonym? >>>> What REALLY is a give-away is the company's inability to run a >>>> Facebook page! Have you taken a look? >>> >>> I've never visited any company's facebook page. I would hope a >>> software company devotes its time and effort to developing and >>> maintaining software rather than facebook pages. >> >> André, THOUSANDS of companies now advertise their wares on Facebook. > > I never claimed they didn't. But I don't use facebook and wouldn't judge > a company by the quality of its facebook page, or blog, or website, or > whatever. Being a competent programmer and being a competent web > designer are entirely different skills. Which are *YOU*? > [*] Actually, if you're going to be paranoid, these might be better > targets. The Adobe Flash Player Installer available from Adobe.com has > the nasty habit of trying to install Adobe Flash Player. You can find > lots of unofficial versions of this installer at other places on the web > which don't install this, but they usually install some other piece of > malware instead. I don't use Flash now. That target is far to big for me anyway! ;-) = "When you run installer packages from outside the App Store, macOS checks the Developer ID signature and notarization status to verify that the software is from an identified developer and that it has not been altered." *IS* Mark Allan an 'identified developer'? How can one check? > And earlier versions of Microsoft Office used to install that irritating > paper-clip dude. That was the closest thing to actual malware which I've > ever encountered on a Mac. I remember him! :-) https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-life-death-microsoft-clippy-paper-clip-loved-hate -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 05:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q2ccfh$h4s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #121074 |
On 2019-01-24 3:57 a.m., David B. wrote: > On 24/01/2019 05:04, André G. Isaak wrote: >> On 2019-01-23 1:29 p.m., David B. wrote: >>> On 23/01/2019 19:53, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-23 11:02 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>> On 23/01/2019 17:46, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-01-23 10:22 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/01/2019 15:17, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-23 2:28 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has >>>>>>>>> installed ClamXAV. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes. A former employer required, for some unspecified reason, >>>>>>>> that it be installed on all Macs attached to the network. It >>>>>>>> never caused me any problems. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, André. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you using it on your personal machine right now? >>>>>> >>>>>> No >>>>> >>>>> OK - me neither! >>>>> >>>>>>> Will you, please, just clarify - was your employer using ClamXAV >>>>>>> ...... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ..... or simply ClamAV ? >>>>>> >>>>>> ClamXAV, which is just a graphical front-end for ClamAV. >>>>> >>>>> I hope you are right about that, André. >>>>> >>>>> There's no way any ordinary folk can check that. :-( >>>> >>>> I have absolutely no idea why you are so suspicious about this >>>> particular piece of software. It's reputable software from a >>>> reputable company. It just performs a task which I don't see as >>>> particularly necessary or useful. >>> >>> *WHO* says it's a "reputable company"? (apart from it's own marketing >>> blurb) >> >> You can easily search for reviews from third parties, and for >> comparisons between anti-virus software. The fact that it is >> frequently included in such comparisons would certainly suggest others >> view it as reputable. > > I've tried - and not found any. :-( > > https://www.macworld.co.uk/feature/mac-software/mac-antivirus-3672182/ > > https://antivirus-uk.thetop10sites.com/best-antivirus-for-mac.html > >>> It's not recommended by Apple and it isn't available in the App Store. >> >> Apple doesn't generally make recommendations about third-party software. >> >> And lots of things aren't available through the App Store. Microsoft >> Office, Adobe Illustrator, BBEdit, etc. Does that make Microsoft, >> Adobe[*], or BareBones not reputable? > > No - but they are not 'one man bands'! What does being a 'one man band' have to do with anything? Some people choose to accept Apple various restrictions and the cut which apple takes and distribute software through the App Store. Others do not and distribute it on their own. The size of an organization isn't really relevant. >> And there are good reasons why lots of software isn't available >> through the App Store. Apple imposes numerous restrictions on software >> distributed through the App Store which often aren't reasonable for >> larger, more complex applications or for software which performs >> fairly low-level tasks. >> >> As a general rule, if software is available both through the App Store >> and directly from the vendor, I prefer to get the version available >> from the vendor. > > OK > >>>> Worst case scenario, it's buggy or causes a notable slowdown, in >>>> which case you simply uninstall it. >>> >>> Worst case scenario is that your computer may become part of a Botnet. > >> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet >>> >>> ..... and you'd likely never know about it! >> >> Given that ClamXAV has been around for at least 15 years, if it were >> doing something malicious someone would certainly have pointed this >> out by now and would have shouted it far and wide. There would have >> been lawsuits and much gnashing of teeth. > > So did Mark Allan frequent the ASC before my time there? Or did he/does > he post there under a pseudonym? How would I know? And is there some particular reason why you think he should have frequented ASC? That's a place where people go to get help on apple hardware and software, not on third party products. >>>>> What REALLY is a give-away is the company's inability to run a >>>>> Facebook page! Have you taken a look? >>>> >>>> I've never visited any company's facebook page. I would hope a >>>> software company devotes its time and effort to developing and >>>> maintaining software rather than facebook pages. >>> >>> André, THOUSANDS of companies now advertise their wares on Facebook. >> >> I never claimed they didn't. But I don't use facebook and wouldn't >> judge a company by the quality of its facebook page, or blog, or >> website, or whatever. Being a competent programmer and being a >> competent web designer are entirely different skills. > > Which are *YOU*? I never claimed to be either. André >> [*] Actually, if you're going to be paranoid, these might be better >> targets. The Adobe Flash Player Installer available from Adobe.com has >> the nasty habit of trying to install Adobe Flash Player. You can find >> lots of unofficial versions of this installer at other places on the >> web which don't install this, but they usually install some other >> piece of malware instead. > > I don't use Flash now. That target is far to big for me anyway! ;-) > > = > > "When you run installer packages from outside the App Store, macOS > checks the Developer ID signature and notarization status to verify that > the software is from an identified developer and that it has not been > altered." > > *IS* Mark Allan an 'identified developer'? How can one check? > >> And earlier versions of Microsoft Office used to install that >> irritating paper-clip dude. That was the closest thing to actual >> malware which I've ever encountered on a Mac. > > I remember him! :-) > https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-life-death-microsoft-clippy-paper-clip-loved-hate > > -- To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail service.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 21:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gas616FnqsqU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #120994 |
On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 23/01/2019 17:46, André G. Isaak wrote: >> On 2019-01-23 10:22 a.m., David B. wrote: >>> On 23/01/2019 15:17, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-23 2:28 a.m., David B. wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed >>>>> ClamXAV. >>>> >>>> Yes. A former employer required, for some unspecified reason, that it >>>> be installed on all Macs attached to the network. It never caused me >>>> any problems. >>> >>> Thank you, André. >>> >>> Are you using it on your personal machine right now? >> >> No > > OK - me neither! I have it installed. >>> Will you, please, just clarify - was your employer using ClamXAV ...... >>> >>> ..... or simply ClamAV ? >> >> ClamXAV, which is just a graphical front-end for ClamAV. > > I hope you are right about that, André. He is. > There's no way any ordinary folk can check that. :-( Incorrect. And it doesn't do anything "untoward" as you repeatedly assert. You're spreading FUD. What do you have against the author of ClamXAV? What did he ever do to you to deserve slander? > What REALLY is a give-away is the company's inability to run a Facebook > page! Whether a company has a Facebook page says absolutely nothing about the trustworthiness of that company or their software products. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 21:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gas5peFnqsqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #120979 |
On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > Here's a screenshot of much of what is contained in the installation > package. There's no way that I could determine whether or not anything > untoward is being installed! > > https://i.imgur.com/yELJvy8.png There's no cause for you to be worried about something 'untoward"; but I suspect you know this and are spreading FUD about it on purpose. > I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 23:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jw62E.42833$Xl2.9869@fx20.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121028 |
On 23/01/2019 21:48, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >> Here's a screenshot of much of what is contained in the installation >> package. There's no way that I could determine whether or not anything >> untoward is being installed! >> >> https://i.imgur.com/yELJvy8.png > > There's no cause for you to be worried about something 'untoward"; but I > suspect you know this and are spreading FUD about it on purpose. > >> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. > > Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so > countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The > real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! Did you read this thread of mine? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/protect/forum/protect_other-protect_scanning-windows_other/ramnit-trojan-on-imac-aol-disk-from-2008-false/e18cc0a4-5895-412e-9306-e565d2571849 It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed it countless times"? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <230120191824245049%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #121033 |
In article <jw62E.42833$Xl2.9869@fx20.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. > > > > Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so > > countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The > > real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? > > You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! no, he's not the first. > Did you read this thread of mine? no need. it's the same garbage you spew here. > It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed > it countless times"? there's a lot you don't understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 00:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Lh72E.100973$Yn2.99664@fx26.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121034 |
On 23/01/2019 23:24, nospam wrote more *TROLL ANSWERS* > In article <jw62E.42833$Xl2.9869@fx20.fr7>, David B. < > B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. >>> >>> Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so >>> countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The >>> real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? >> >> You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! > > no, he's not the first. > >> Did you read this thread of mine? > > no need. it's the same garbage you spew here. > >> It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed >> it countless times"? > > there's a lot you don't understand. *PLONK*!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Campbell <none@none.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 19:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <SeadnTJXWOJ1n9TBnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #121041 |
On 1/23/19 7:03 PM, David B. wrote: >> there's a lot you don't understand. > > *PLONK*! Clearly, Plonk is yet another thing that The Village Idiot does not understand, as he has PLONKed you twice. It is to laugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 00:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lt72E.39085$0C.28771@fx02.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121042 |
On 24/01/2019 00:12, Bob Campbell is yet *ANOTHER PLONKER*! > On 1/23/19 7:03 PM, David B. wrote: > >>> there's a lot you don't understand. >> >> *PLONK*! > > Clearly, Plonk is yet another thing that The Village Idiot does not > understand, as he has PLONKed you twice. > > It is to laugh. Like you, he's forever whining, *PLONKER*! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(wine)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 19:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <230120191924100164%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #121043 |
In article <lt72E.39085$0C.28771@fx02.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 24/01/2019 00:12, Bob Campbell is yet *ANOTHER PLONKER*! > > > On 1/23/19 7:03 PM, David B. wrote: > > > >>> there's a lot you don't understand. > >> > >> *PLONK*! > > > > Clearly, Plonk is yet another thing that The Village Idiot does not > > understand, as he has PLONKed you twice. > > > > It is to laugh. > > Like you, he's forever whining, *PLONKER*! > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(wine) yep, it is to laugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Campbell <none@none.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 00:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Acqdncql7Nqs1tTBnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #121043 |
On 1/23/19 7:16 PM, David B. wrote: > On 24/01/2019 00:12, Bob Campbell is yet *ANOTHER PLONKER*! > >> On 1/23/19 7:03 PM, David B. wrote: >> >>>> there's a lot you don't understand. >>> >>> *PLONK*! >> >> Clearly, Plonk is yet another thing that The Village Idiot does not >> understand, as he has PLONKed you twice. >> >> It is to laugh. > > Like you, he's forever whining, *PLONKER*! > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(wine) Giggle. Snort. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Look. The Village Idiot thinks he knows what PLONK means. You are truly a fucking moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2fjg4$b6a$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #121060 |
On 2019-01-24 00:20, Bob Campbell wrote: > On 1/23/19 7:16 PM, David B. wrote: >> On 24/01/2019 00:12, Bob Campbell is yet *ANOTHER PLONKER*! >> >>> On 1/23/19 7:03 PM, David B. wrote: >>> >>>>> there's a lot you don't understand. >>>> >>>> *PLONK*! >>> >>> Clearly, Plonk is yet another thing that The Village Idiot does not >>> understand, as he has PLONKed you twice. He does not know anything. He is so dim that he does not know that he does not know anything. He advertises how little he knows with his every post. He is so dim that he does not know that his every post shows just how dim he is. He has said that he deliberately tries to post to make himself look dimmer than he really is. He is so dim that he does not know that it is impossible to be dimmer than he really is. >>> >>> It is to laugh. >> >> Like you, he's forever whining, *PLONKER*! >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(wine) > > Giggle. Snort. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. > > Look. The Village Idiot thinks he knows what PLONK means. > > You are truly a fucking moron. That he is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 01:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gashlmFq4e3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #121033 |
On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 23/01/2019 21:48, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> >>> Here's a screenshot of much of what is contained in the installation >>> package. There's no way that I could determine whether or not anything >>> untoward is being installed! >>> >>> https://i.imgur.com/yELJvy8.png >> >> There's no cause for you to be worried about something 'untoward"; but I >> suspect you know this and are spreading FUD about it on purpose. >> >>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. >> >> Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so >> countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The >> real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? > > You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! > > Did you read this thread of mine? No, why? > It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed > it countless times"? Nah. It's just an app. I have owned and used many computers in the last decades. I don't keep track of trivial things like how many times I've installed a harmless piece of software. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36b5240da43f9fe59897e4@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #121048 |
In article <gashlmFq4e3U2@mid.individual.net>, jollyroger@pobox.com says... > > On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed ClamXAV. > >> > >> Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so > >> countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The > >> real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? > > > > You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! > > > > Did you read this thread of mine? > > No, why? > > > It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed > > it countless times"? > > Nah. It's just an app. I have owned and used many computers in the last > decades. I don't keep track of trivial things like how many times I've > installed a harmless piece of software. At the risk of fanning the flames... I installed ClamXAV back in November I think on my macbook on which I am running Mojave and parallels 14 (and within which I run Win10) I have been having serious issues with my Win10 - slow program loading times, lacklustre performance, really slow to "sort itself out" after opening the lid when on battery power (I always simply shut the lid - no hibernate or other options used). I had installed ClamXAV as a trial - wasn't sure I wanted it but know that Clam is a well-regarded AV product so that I'd give it a whirl. As it wa a trial, it quickly became out of date - it kept prompting to download latest AV defintions (a good thign of course!) but as had no subscription I didn't bother. I couln't find out how to prevent it from running automatically on bootup of Mojave and couldn't find out how to deinstal it either. I ran a trial version of App Cleaner on Monday - it removed ClamXAV successfully. Since rebooting directy after, I have had none of the issues of performanc that I was experiencing before (and have caused me a lot of lost time & frustration over the last couple of months). This was on Monday - I thought "give it a few days to make sure" - as I use this machine extensively every day I think I have probably proven a point - that (in my isolated case) ClamXAV was causing signifcant issues. I don't want to "feed the trolls" and have no idea if this is linked to the OP's assertions that the product should be avoided (and clearly, if they cannot have a good Facebook page they probably aren't deserving of anyone's custom, I can see that completely [1]) but thought it might be worth sharing. [1] this is where you might insert a smiley - you, dear reader, can decide [2] [2] As [1] -- jeremy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 15:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ESF2E.44495$Hn2.23035@fx19.fr7> |
| In reply to | #121103 |
On 25/01/2019 13:48, jeremy wrote: > In article <gashlmFq4e3U2@mid.individual.net>, jollyroger@pobox.com > says... >> >> On 2019-01-23, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>> I'd like to know if ANYONE reading the Usenet groups has installed > ClamXAV. >>>> >>>> Of course some people here have installed ClamXAV. I've done so >>>> countless times in the past myself, and am sure others have as well. The >>>> real question is why you care what other people do? I have. So what? >>> >>> You are the *FIRST* to admit that you have it on YOUR computer! >>> >>> Did you read this thread of mine? >> >> No, why? >> >>> It's a subscription service. I don't understand why have you "installed >>> it countless times"? >> >> Nah. It's just an app. I have owned and used many computers in the last >> decades. I don't keep track of trivial things like how many times I've >> installed a harmless piece of software. > > At the risk of fanning the flames... > > > I installed ClamXAV back in November I think on my macbook on which I am > running Mojave and parallels 14 (and within which I run Win10) > > I have been having serious issues with my Win10 - slow program loading > times, lacklustre performance, really slow to "sort itself out" after > opening the lid when on battery power (I always simply shut the lid - no > hibernate or other options used). > > I had installed ClamXAV as a trial - wasn't sure I wanted it but know > that Clam is a well-regarded AV product so that I'd give it a whirl. > > As it wa a trial, it quickly became out of date - it kept prompting to > download latest AV defintions (a good thign of course!) but as had no > subscription I didn't bother. I couln't find out how to prevent it from > running automatically on bootup of Mojave and couldn't find out how to > deinstal it either. > > > I ran a trial version of App Cleaner on Monday - it removed ClamXAV > successfully. > > Since rebooting directy after, I have had none of the issues of > performanc that I was experiencing before (and have caused me a lot of > lost time & frustration over the last couple of months). This was on > Monday - I thought "give it a few days to make sure" - as I use this > machine extensively every day I think I have probably proven a point - > that (in my isolated case) ClamXAV was causing signifcant issues. > > I don't want to "feed the trolls" and have no idea if this is linked to > the OP's assertions that the product should be avoided (and clearly, if > they cannot have a good Facebook page they probably aren't deserving of > anyone's custom, I can see that completely [1]) but thought it might be > worth sharing. > > [1] this is where you might insert a smiley - you, dear reader, can > decide [2] > [2] As [1] An interesting tale, Jeremy - thanks for sharing. :-) My friend has asked this question on the Apple Developers site but, as you can see, made no progress. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ni5cbv6kv4rgkil/Screenshot%202019-01-25%2015.05.43.png?dl=0 Can anyone suggest how the question should be modified? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web