Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #72399 > unrolled thread

Re: Are you really that trusting?

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Are you really that trusting? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-03-30 21:25 +0200
    Re: Are you really that trusting? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-31 08:10 +1200
      Re: Are you really that trusting? "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2015-03-31 03:35 +0200
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 21:45 -0700
          Re: Are you really that trusting? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-03-31 07:28 +0200
            Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0700
          Re: Are you really that trusting? "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0200
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-31 18:10 +1200
          Re: Are you really that trusting? "Honorificabilitudinitatibus Lopado­temakho­selakho­galeo­kranio­leipsano­drim­ypo­trimmato­silphio­karabo­melito­katakekhy­meno­kikhl­epikossypho­phatto­perister­alektryon­opto­kephallio­kigklo­peleio­lagoio­siraio­baphe­tragano­pterýgon" <somename@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:16 +0200
    Re: Are you really that trusting? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 20:12 +0000
      Re: Are you really that trusting? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-03-30 20:23 +0000
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-30 17:55 -0400
          Re: Are you really that trusting? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-03-30 22:29 +0000
            Re: Are you really that trusting? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-03-31 02:38 +0200
              Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 21:46 -0700
                Re: Are you really that trusting? Info <info@ventas365.net> - 2015-03-31 05:55 +0100
          Re: Are you really that trusting? Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-03-30 19:55 -0400
          Re: Are you really that trusting? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-31 13:16 +1200
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-03-31 00:54 +0200
          Re: Are you really that trusting? JKP <jkp@yahoo.com> - 2015-04-04 18:35 +0000
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-03-30 21:15 -0400
      Re: Are you really that trusting? John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2015-03-30 21:47 -0400
        Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 21:47 -0700
          Re: Are you really that trusting? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-03-31 09:52 +0200
            Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:42 -0700
            Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-31 09:25 -0700
    Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 13:26 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 08:57 -0500
    Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 13:27 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-30 22:07 +0000
        Re: Are you really that trusting? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2015-03-31 03:03 +0000
    Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 14:19 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 04:59 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 08:58 -0500
        Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:09 -0700
    Re: Are you really that trusting? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 21:42 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-03-31 10:33 +0200
    Re: Are you really that trusting? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 08:56 -0500
    Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:10 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-31 08:35 -0700
        Re: Are you really that trusting? awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:45 -0700
          Re: Are you really that trusting? Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-31 09:27 -0700
      Re: Are you really that trusting? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 14:38 -0500

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#72399 — Re: Are you really that trusting?

In article <d0992eb10e68aee7ff1208ad094e6edf@hoi-polloi.org>
Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>
> Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <499f3efc5a3a8a933fb9b43bd9f1d845@hoi-polloi.org>
> >Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>
> >> An anon remailer application like Omnimix written for OS X?  Where?
> >
> >Not quite Omnimix, read the page and see if it for you.  If you
> >run a modern Mac with the Linux OS...
> >
> >http://web.archive.org/web/20030212075443/http://www.geocities.c
> >om/SiliconValley/Byte/6176/macmixmaster.html
>
> http://download.cnet.com/Mixfit/3000-2367_4-2511.html
>
> An app from 2001, as old as OS X.
>
> Btw, OS X is NeXTSTEP/BSD/Unix based, not a Linux derivative.
> Desktop market share less than 7% I guess.

If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a 
tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.

If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own 
an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your 
floors.

Apple impedes, Intel enables.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#72405

In article <be78435dab594574e66f669897aa5530@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> In article <d0992eb10e68aee7ff1208ad094e6edf@hoi-polloi.org>
> Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> wrote:
> > >In article <499f3efc5a3a8a933fb9b43bd9f1d845@hoi-polloi.org>
> > >Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> An anon remailer application like Omnimix written for OS X?  Where?
> > >
> > >Not quite Omnimix, read the page and see if it for you.  If you
> > >run a modern Mac with the Linux OS...
> > >
> > >http://web.archive.org/web/20030212075443/http://www.geocities.c
> > >om/SiliconValley/Byte/6176/macmixmaster.html
> >
> > http://download.cnet.com/Mixfit/3000-2367_4-2511.html
> >
> > An app from 2001, as old as OS X.
> >
> > Btw, OS X is NeXTSTEP/BSD/Unix based, not a Linux derivative.
> > Desktop market share less than 7% I guess.
> 
> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a 
> tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.
> 
> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own 
> an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your 
> floors.
> 
> Apple impedes, Intel enables.

And you're yet another know-nothing brainless moron ... for a start,
Apple computers are Intel-based.  :-\

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72443

In article <310320150810010833%YourName@YourISP.com>
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>
> In article <be78435dab594574e66f669897aa5530@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
> <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > In article <d0992eb10e68aee7ff1208ad094e6edf@hoi-polloi.org>
> > Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> wrote:
> > > >In article <499f3efc5a3a8a933fb9b43bd9f1d845@hoi-polloi.org>
> > > >Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> An anon remailer application like Omnimix written for OS X?  Where?
> > > >
> > > >Not quite Omnimix, read the page and see if it for you.  If you
> > > >run a modern Mac with the Linux OS...
> > > >
> > > >http://web.archive.org/web/20030212075443/http://www.geocities.c
> > > >om/SiliconValley/Byte/6176/macmixmaster.html
> > >
> > > http://download.cnet.com/Mixfit/3000-2367_4-2511.html
> > >
> > > An app from 2001, as old as OS X.
> > >
> > > Btw, OS X is NeXTSTEP/BSD/Unix based, not a Linux derivative.
> > > Desktop market share less than 7% I guess.
> >
> > If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a
> > tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.
> >
> > If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own
> > an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your
> > floors.
> >
> > Apple impedes, Intel enables.
>
> And you're yet another know-nothing brainless moron ... for a start,
> Apple computers are Intel-based.  :-\

They might be NOW, but they weren't for most of their existence. 
 Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel and 
became "real computer capable" but still "made for mindless 
morons" expensive junk.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72450

In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

> They might be NOW, 

And for the past nine years.

> but they weren't for most of their existence. 

Immaterial and irrelevant.

> Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel 

Mac users became even more productive, and are outstripping people
using other brands of computers.

Further, sales of Macintosh computers are increasing, while sales of
other brands are decreasing.

You really suck as a trol

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72458

In article <300320152145053823%michelle@michelle.org>
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>
> In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
> Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> > They might be NOW,
>
> And for the past nine years.
>
> > but they weren't for most of their existence.
>
> Immaterial and irrelevant.
>
> > Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel
>
> Mac users became even more productive, and are outstripping people
> using other brands of computers.
>
> Further, sales of Macintosh computers are increasing, while sales of
> other brands are decreasing.
>
> You really suck as a trol

Troll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72460

In article <db7fa486b7beb5d78d842b661a81ec02@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

> In article <300320152145053823%michelle@michelle.org>
> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> >
> > In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
> > Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
> >
> > > They might be NOW,
> >
> > And for the past nine years.
> >
> > > but they weren't for most of their existence.
> >
> > Immaterial and irrelevant.
> >
> > > Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel
> >
> > Mac users became even more productive, and are outstripping people
> > using other brands of computers.
> >
> > Further, sales of Macintosh computers are increasing, while sales of
> > other brands are decreasing.
> >
> > You really suck as a trol
> 
> Troll.

I deliberately spelled it that way; it was my way of telling you to get
the "l" out of here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72467

In article <300320152145053823%michelle@michelle.org>
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>
> In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
> Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> > They might be NOW,
>
> And for the past nine years.

Apple still can't write reliable code to run on them.

> > but they weren't for most of their existence.
>
> Immaterial and irrelevant.

Oh but it's very relevant.  Computing for dummies - and they 
still can't get it done.  That's why they have Apple stores, for 
dummies.

> > Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel
>
> Mac users became even more productive, and are outstripping people
> using other brands of computers.

Really?  Why don't we see Apple products deployed in the 
enterprise?

Start here:_________________________________.  Take all the time 
you need.

> Further, sales of Macintosh computers are increasing, while sales of
> other brands are decreasing.

Yeah that 13% market share is really impressive.

> You really suck as a trol

troll if you please.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72454

In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
austria <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

> In article <310320150810010833%YourName@YourISP.com>
> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> >
> > In article <be78435dab594574e66f669897aa5530@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
> > <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > > In article <d0992eb10e68aee7ff1208ad094e6edf@hoi-polloi.org>
> > > Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > > Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> wrote:
> > > > >In article <499f3efc5a3a8a933fb9b43bd9f1d845@hoi-polloi.org>
> > > > >Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> An anon remailer application like Omnimix written for OS X?  Where?
> > > > >
> > > > >Not quite Omnimix, read the page and see if it for you.  If you
> > > > >run a modern Mac with the Linux OS...
> > > > >
> > > > >http://web.archive.org/web/20030212075443/http://www.geocities.c
> > > > >om/SiliconValley/Byte/6176/macmixmaster.html
> > > >
> > > > http://download.cnet.com/Mixfit/3000-2367_4-2511.html
> > > >
> > > > An app from 2001, as old as OS X.
> > > >
> > > > Btw, OS X is NeXTSTEP/BSD/Unix based, not a Linux derivative.
> > > > Desktop market share less than 7% I guess.
> > >
> > > If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a
> > > tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.
> > >
> > > If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own
> > > an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your
> > > floors.
> > >
> > > Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> >
> > And you're yet another know-nothing brainless moron ... for a start,
> > Apple computers are Intel-based.  :-\
> 
> They might be NOW, but they weren't for most of their existence. 
>  Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel and 
> became "real computer capable" but still "made for mindless 
> morons" expensive junk.

Oh goody, another know-nothing moron to add to the killfile.  :-\

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72465

In article <310320151810220512%YourName@YourISP.com>
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>
> In article <006c9bfe19fdf359bcaf238d1a6a0dae@remailer.privacy.at>,
> austria <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> > In article <310320150810010833%YourName@YourISP.com>
> > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <be78435dab594574e66f669897aa5530@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
> > > <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <d0992eb10e68aee7ff1208ad094e6edf@hoi-polloi.org>
> > > > Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > > > Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> wrote:
> > > > > >In article <499f3efc5a3a8a933fb9b43bd9f1d845@hoi-polloi.org>
> > > > > >Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> An anon remailer application like Omnimix written for OS X?  Where?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Not quite Omnimix, read the page and see if it for you.  If you
> > > > > >run a modern Mac with the Linux OS...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >http://web.archive.org/web/20030212075443/http://www.geocities.c
> > > > > >om/SiliconValley/Byte/6176/macmixmaster.html
> > > > >
> > > > > http://download.cnet.com/Mixfit/3000-2367_4-2511.html
> > > > >
> > > > > An app from 2001, as old as OS X.
> > > > >
> > > > > Btw, OS X is NeXTSTEP/BSD/Unix based, not a Linux derivative.
> > > > > Desktop market share less than 7% I guess.
> > > >
> > > > If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a
> > > > tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.
> > > >
> > > > If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own
> > > > an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your
> > > > floors.
> > > >
> > > > Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> > >
> > > And you're yet another know-nothing brainless moron ... for a start,
> > > Apple computers are Intel-based.  :-\
> >
> > They might be NOW, but they weren't for most of their existence.
> >  Look at what happened to them since they switched to Intel and
> > became "real computer capable" but still "made for mindless
> > morons" expensive junk.
>
> Oh goody, another know-nothing moron to add to the killfile.  :-\

Be sure and spell it correctly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72406

On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a 
> tire, you will own a Mac or iPhone.
>
> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own 
> an Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your 
> floors.
>
> Apple impedes, Intel enables.

And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72409

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

> On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire, you
>> will own a Mac or iPhone.
>>
>> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an Intel
>> based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
>>
>> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> 
> And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.

This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.  
Also, rec.autos.tech

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72427

In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>,
 sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
> 
> > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire, you
> >> will own a Mac or iPhone.
> >>
> >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an Intel
> >> based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
> >>
> >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> > 
> > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
> 
> This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.  
> Also, rec.autos.tech

     How do you troll a studebaker car group?  It isn't like you can 
make the case Studebakers are better than Fords any more, can you?
-- 
“Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
     but what they conceal is vital.”
                       — Aaron Levenstein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72429

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:55:18 -0400, Kurt Ullman wrote:

> In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>,
>  sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> 
>> > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire,
>> >> you will own a Mac or iPhone.
>> >>
>> >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an
>> >> Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
>> >>
>> >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
>> > 
>> > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
>> 
>> This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.
>> Also, rec.autos.tech
> 
>      How do you troll a studebaker car group?  It isn't like you can
> make the case Studebakers are better than Fords any more, can you?

He just comes up with crap.  He says that he owns a Lark, or a early 50's 
Champion, but he comes up with the most outrageous shit, just like here. 
In rec.autos.tech, he is a known pest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72441

In article <mfcip1$ap5$5@dont-email.me>
sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:55:18 -0400, Kurt Ullman wrote:
>
> > In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>,
> >  sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire,
> >> >> you will own a Mac or iPhone.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an
> >> >> Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
> >> >>
> >> >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> >> >
> >> > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
> >>
> >> This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.
> >> Also, rec.autos.tech
> >
> >      How do you troll a studebaker car group?  It isn't like you can
> > make the case Studebakers are better than Fords any more, can you?
>
> He just comes up with crap.  He says that he owns a Lark, or a early 50's
> Champion, but he comes up with the most outrageous shit, just like here.
> In rec.autos.tech, he is a known pest.

Lark, Macintosh, same difference.  Junk is junk.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72451

In article <2ffe38b0468b9810ee4525f19bad734f@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

> Lark, Macintosh, same difference.  Junk is junk.

You should know, junkman.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72453

In article <300320152146147975%michelle@michelle.org>
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>
> In article <2ffe38b0468b9810ee4525f19bad734f@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
> <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > Lark, Macintosh, same difference.  Junk is junk.
>
> You should know, junkman.

Yawn.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72439

In article <9YmdnaO3nKjbW4TInZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>,
>  sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
> >
> > > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire, you
> > >> will own a Mac or iPhone.
> > >>
> > >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an Intel
> > >> based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
> > >>
> > >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> > >
> > > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
> >
> > This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.
> > Also, rec.autos.tech
>
>      How do you troll a studebaker car group?  It isn't like you can
> make the case Studebakers are better than Fords any more, can you?

Gotta hand it to him if he can do that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72440

In article <9YmdnaO3nKjbW4TInZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt
Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>,
>  sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
> > > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire, you
> > >> will own a Mac or iPhone.
> > >>
> > >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an Intel
> > >> based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
> > >>
> > >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> > > 
> > > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
> > 
> > This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.  
> > Also, rec.autos.tech
> 
> How do you troll a studebaker car group?  It isn't like you can 
> make the case Studebakers are better than Fords any more, can you?

Of course you can't ... everybody already knows Studebakers are better
than Fords.  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72432

In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>
sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
>
> > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire, you
> >> will own a Mac or iPhone.
> >>
> >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an Intel
> >> based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your floors.
> >>
> >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
> >
> > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
>
> This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known troll.
> Also, rec.autos.tech

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72644

On 30 Mar 2015, Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> posted some
news:6b33c5dddddae7e6dd2a1b7b4d8e4d4f@hoi-polloi.org: 

> In article <mfcbbv$ap5$3@dont-email.me>
> sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:12:23 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>
>> > On 2015-03-30, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If you need help using an electric can opener or changing a tire,
>> >> you will own a Mac or iPhone.
>> >>
>> >> If you invented the can opener and sell the tire, you will own an
>> >> Intel based product and the Mac users will be sweeping your
>> >> floors. 
>> >>
>> >> Apple impedes, Intel enables.
>> >
>> > And haters gonna hate. Troll on, trollboi.
>>
>> This weirdo also haunts the studebaker car group.  He is a known
>> troll. Also, rec.autos.tech
> 

How do you know it's a he?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web