Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #68560 > unrolled thread
| Started by | nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-19 16:50 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-01-23 14:16 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Gassee joins the fray nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2015-01-19 16:50 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-20 00:01 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2015-01-19 22:18 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-20 15:43 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-20 11:16 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-20 16:28 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2015-01-20 12:39 -0600
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 06:18 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-01-20 14:05 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 06:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2015-01-20 19:53 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 02:40 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lao-Ming Liu <laomingliu@gmail.com> - 2015-01-20 20:18 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 04:42 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-20 22:31 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-21 21:46 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lao-Ming Liu <laomingliu@gmail.com> - 2015-01-20 22:01 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-20 23:12 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-21 09:56 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-21 09:22 -0600
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-21 10:59 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 16:29 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 16:52 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 17:06 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-21 13:40 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-01-21 19:02 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-21 14:09 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 19:23 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 19:46 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 19:50 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 20:43 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 20:55 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-21 14:00 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 21:09 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-21 16:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 21:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 23:53 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-22 00:06 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-21 13:55 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 23:55 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-21 17:41 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-21 16:13 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-21 16:10 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 21:12 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-21 23:57 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-01-22 15:16 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-22 11:59 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-23 01:04 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 03:04 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-01-22 11:59 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-21 23:17 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-22 20:42 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-22 22:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 03:52 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-22 22:14 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 14:21 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-01-21 23:12 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2015-01-24 18:42 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2015-01-24 18:40 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 02:53 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-21 21:36 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-22 16:55 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-22 12:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-22 17:24 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-22 13:25 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-22 22:05 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-22 22:06 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 14:16 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2015-01-24 18:47 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 02:57 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-24 21:09 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:30 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-25 16:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-25 09:22 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 11:09 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-26 14:53 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-22 12:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-22 22:03 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 00:00 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-23 09:52 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 15:13 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-01-23 15:40 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 11:28 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 11:44 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:32 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:44 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:48 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:50 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 23:15 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 18:22 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:56 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-24 11:05 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-24 16:22 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 21:51 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-25 12:20 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 02:38 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-24 15:32 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 23:14 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 18:22 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:29 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-24 15:35 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-24 12:38 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:33 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:30 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:42 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:54 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 15:00 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 08:50 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-24 17:07 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 16:35 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-25 00:03 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:19 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 23:13 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 11:01 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-26 21:34 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 23:07 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 18:22 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 14:12 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-23 09:49 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 15:08 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-23 10:49 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 16:18 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-23 11:30 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 16:55 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-23 12:03 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 17:07 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 11:41 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:39 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:45 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-24 16:19 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 21:38 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-24 18:45 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 03:04 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 11:17 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 18:46 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-01-24 10:46 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:54 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 13:55 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:42 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-24 16:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-25 03:54 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-23 17:34 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 17:49 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-23 18:05 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 18:37 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 11:41 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 18:43 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 14:13 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 12:23 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 19:28 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:58 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:58 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-26 14:46 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-23 20:46 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-24 10:17 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 19:08 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 11:20 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:40 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 18:23 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 18:21 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 20:50 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-24 10:15 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-23 23:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-24 13:16 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 08:48 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-01-24 09:20 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-01-23 15:38 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:36 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:45 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 23:17 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-24 17:14 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 22:37 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-25 12:24 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:40 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:39 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 18:22 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 18:22 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 18:21 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 22:05 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 20:46 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 19:55 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 21:05 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 20:57 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 21:01 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 00:12 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-24 18:31 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-23 23:17 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 08:52 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-24 18:40 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 03:03 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:27 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-01-26 01:50 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 22:25 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-01-25 14:56 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-25 20:19 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-26 21:55 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 20:07 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 23:57 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:45 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-26 21:52 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:37 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-26 21:49 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-23 11:26 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-24 10:20 +1300
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-23 14:43 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-23 14:48 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 10:56 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-01-22 20:37 -0500
Re: Gassee joins the fray nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2015-01-22 20:55 -0700
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 03:59 +0000
Re: Gassee joins the fray Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-22 22:09 -0800
Re: Gassee joins the fray Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-23 14:16 +0000
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 14:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c54a8c$0$47672$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #68917 |
On 15-01-24 21:40, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: > This just seems to prove my suspicion that you're not just an ardent > Apple defender (perhaps reputation manager would be more apt) but also > a troll. If he is a reputation manager, I am disapointed in Apple because normally, those guys are careful not to insult customers, as Jolly takes pleasure in doing. Of course, discreting people is one way to make those people's criticisms of Apple stick less, but in the long run, it doesn't work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 20:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cil1e3F7u5uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68955 |
On 2015-01-25, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 15-01-24 21:40, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: > >> This just seems to prove my suspicion that you're not just an ardent >> Apple defender (perhaps reputation manager would be more apt) but also >> a troll. > > If he is a reputation manager, I am disapointed in Apple because > normally, those guys are careful not to insult customers, as Jolly takes > pleasure in doing. I *am* a customer, dip shit. > Of course, discreting people is one way to make those people's > criticisms of Apple stick less, but in the long run, it doesn't work. In your demented world, that might be true. And I can understand you taking this position since the majority of what comes out of your mouth is discredited easily. Here in the real world, those who continuously lie and spread misinformation aren't held in high regard. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 21:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfmanno-F02431.21550126012015@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #68955 |
In article <54c54a8c$0$47672$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > Of course, discreting people is one way Would you like to try English? -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com GOP delenda est!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 20:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <m9v5qp$l2f$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #68842 |
On 2015-01-24 03:55:16 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex said: > On 2015-01-24 03:46:14 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > >> In article <m9uvhh$6ud$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex >> <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-01-24 01:22:05 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: >>> >>>> In article <m9uict$83v$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex >>>> <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was the Unix geek that bought an OS X machine before anybody else >>>>> did. >>>> >>>> Wrong. There were a lot of us who had Macs running Mac OS 9.x who >>>> started running OS X right away, and many more who started running OS X >>>> 10.0 as soon as it came out. The vast majority of us didn't know >>>> didley squat about unix. >>> >>> A lot of people running OS 9 did indeed upgrade to OS X, but only after >>> OS X was introduced did we see huge year-on-year growth in terms of the >>> install base. The Mac had been consistently declining in market share >>> for years and years before that. >> >> So, was it because of the capabilities of OS X that people who didn't >> know squat about unix bought, or was it because they knew that they >> could run bare unix? Although there were some of the latter, I submit >> that the majority were of the former. > > It was because of the combination of a really good UI / GUI layer > (essentially Nextstep with new graphics) and a nice geek-friendly Unix > underbelly that OS X was successful. These people weren't the > majority, but they were the ones who wrote (and still write) the OS X > software, who got their families to use the OS, and so on. Nope. It was successful because people noticed that it provided the ease of use the Mac was famous for combined with much better stability. Not one customer in a thousand cared that there was a Unix layer in there. > >>>> OS X is based on the NeXT operating system, which is based on unix. OS >>>> X put the Mac UI on top of unix. (Yes, this is a gross simplification, >>>> but it seems that you need a gross simplification to understand it.) >>> >>> You might think so but I was a Nextstep (on an HP PA-RISC system) user >>> before I used OS X. OS X in fact started with the System 9 UI in >>> Rhapsody, and then they decided to move to a jellied ice cube theme for >>> the release. However, there's almost nothing in common between the >>> look-n-feel of OS X and OS 9. The idea of UI continuity was abandoned >>> after the Rhapsody betas. >> >> There is plenty of the OS 9 interface in OS X. As I recall, the reason >> Apple dropped Rhapsody is that users and developers objected to the >> Blue Box/Yellow Box paradigm. > > Developers used the Yellow Box and Blue Box. They were called Classic > Mode and Carbon. Wrong again. Assuming you meant respectively, Yellow Box was not Classic Mode and Blue Box was not Carbon. Classic Mode was called "Blue Box", but that leaves Yellow Box to be Carbon... ...which it never was.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 23:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <230120152357090087%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68842 |
In article <m9v524$qnt$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> OS X is based on the NeXT operating system, which is based on unix. OS > >>> X put the Mac UI on top of unix. (Yes, this is a gross simplification, > >>> but it seems that you need a gross simplification to understand it.) > >> > >> You might think so but I was a Nextstep (on an HP PA-RISC system) user > >> before I used OS X. OS X in fact started with the System 9 UI in > >> Rhapsody, and then they decided to move to a jellied ice cube theme for > >> the release. However, there's almost nothing in common between the > >> look-n-feel of OS X and OS 9. The idea of UI continuity was abandoned > >> after the Rhapsody betas. > > > > There is plenty of the OS 9 interface in OS X. As I recall, the reason > > Apple dropped Rhapsody is that users and developers objected to the > > Blue Box/Yellow Box paradigm. > > Developers used the Yellow Box and Blue Box. They were called Classic > Mode and Carbon. nope. yellowbox was originally openstep that was intended to run on mac and windows systems but that never happened. it ultimately became cocoa, an api for native mac and now ios apps. bluebox is what became classic mode which allowed for running existing classic mac apps on os x. it's been dead for years. carbon is another api to write native mac apps, however, it's slowly being deprecated and does not exist at all on ios.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 10:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcc6n9.v83.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #68842 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> was all, like: > On 2015-01-24 03:46:14 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: >> In article <m9uvhh$6ud$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex >> <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-01-24 01:22:05 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: >>> >>>> In article <m9uict$83v$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex >>>> <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was the Unix geek that bought an OS X machine before anybody else >>>>> did. >>>> >>>> Wrong. There were a lot of us who had Macs running Mac OS 9.x who >>>> started running OS X right away, and many more who started running OS X >>>> 10.0 as soon as it came out. The vast majority of us didn't know >>>> didley squat about unix. >>> >>> A lot of people running OS 9 did indeed upgrade to OS X, but only after >>> OS X was introduced did we see huge year-on-year growth in terms of the >>> install base. The Mac had been consistently declining in market share >>> for years and years before that. >> >> So, was it because of the capabilities of OS X that people who didn't >> know squat about unix bought, or was it because they knew that they >> could run bare unix? Although there were some of the latter, I submit >> that the majority were of the former. > It was because of the combination of a really good UI / GUI layer > (essentially Nextstep with new graphics) and a nice geek-friendly Unix > underbelly that OS X was successful. These people weren't the > majority, but they were the ones who wrote (and still write) the OS X > software, who got their families to use the OS, and so on. Complete and utter bullshit. Again. I know plenty of developers who *never* use the Terminal and know as little about Unix as anyone could. -- http://2blog.kreme.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 21:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfmanno-5E820F.21523726012015@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #68835 |
In article <m9uvhh$6ud$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > I know you think you're being cute but there's no need to be insulting. > Your need to add a gradeschool level insult betrays the shallowness of > your argument here. Well, we know there aren't any mirrors in your computer room. -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com GOP delenda est!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 10:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcc68f.v83.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #68804 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> was all, like: > On 2015-01-23 15:38:35 +0000, Tim Streater said: >> In article <54c25f87$0$1156$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >>> On 15-01-23 01:03, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: >>> >>>> I assure you this is representative of the whole system. The majority >>>> of daemons are undocumented, and the ones that are are usually older >>>> (Steve era). >>> >>> Apple is targetting the hipster Starbucks crowd, not the IT geeks who >>> know Unix. Another example of the Unix side no longer being pushed, >>> Apple no longer includes X windows with OS-X. >> >> Good thing too. > It was the Unix geek that bought an OS X machine before anybody else > did. Bullshit. > It was a Unix geek that wrote the programs, Also bullshit. > it was a Unix geek that got hired at Apple to improve the system, it > was a Unix geek that got his whole family onto OS X, and it will be a > Unix geek who undoes Apple's hopes of growing its desktop market > share, if Apple doesn't get its shit together. You are really grasping here. > Apple didn't have to put a user-accessible Unix into OS X (or any Unix > at all). This was a deliberate decision by Steve to court the computer > geeks out there, because they - not the Starbucks hipsters - are the > ones who initiate the long-term trends in the computer world. You are completely and utterly in every possible way wrong. You haven't a clue what you are talking about and are just making shit up that has no basis *at all* in fact. OS X was developed because Copland failed. OS X was UNIX because it is largely an update of NeXT Step. This is why so many classes are named starting with NS, the NS stands for "Next Step." -- http://2blog.kreme.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 21:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfmanno-6C8C78.21495026012015@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #68804 |
In article <m9uict$83v$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > It was the Unix geek that bought an OS X machine before anybody else > did. The first person to buy a Power Macintosh G3 was a Unix geek? What color is the sky on your world? -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com GOP delenda est!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 11:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c2764c$0$24967$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #68735 |
In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2015-01-22 17:14:19 +0000, Warren Oates said: > > > In article <m9q27p$t0q$1@dont-email.me>, > > Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that > >> are suddenly running, > > > > Which ones? > > Many of them. > > Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will > start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: > > accountd - no man page > AddressBookSourceSync - no man page > AirPlayUIAgent - no man page > airportd - has man page, no real info though > amfid - has man page, no real info though > appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant > config files > AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page > AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page > apsd - has man page, no real info though > askpermissiond - no man page > ath - no man page > authd - no man page > autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files > awdd - no man page > How are these "Unix programs?" What do you mean or understand by that? -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 10:20 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <240120151020455770%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #68759 |
In article <54c2764c$0$24967$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, > Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On 2015-01-22 17:14:19 +0000, Warren Oates said: > > > In article <m9q27p$t0q$1@dont-email.me>, > > > Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > >> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that > > >> are suddenly running, > > > > > > Which ones? > > > > Many of them. > > > > Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will > > start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: > > > > accountd - no man page > > AddressBookSourceSync - no man page > > AirPlayUIAgent - no man page > > airportd - has man page, no real info though > > amfid - has man page, no real info though > > appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant > > config files > > AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page > > AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page > > apsd - has man page, no real info though > > askpermissiond - no man page > > ath - no man page > > authd - no man page > > autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files > > awdd - no man page > > How are these "Unix programs?" What do you mean or understand by that? Besides which, why would Apple waste many many hours writing man pages for thing you shouldn't be mucking about with anyway. Most users don't even know that Terminal exists, let alone man pages. :-\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 14:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <m9uipl$9ck$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68759 |
On 2015-01-23 16:26:51 +0000, Warren Oates said: > In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, > Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-01-22 17:14:19 +0000, Warren Oates said: >> >>> In article <m9q27p$t0q$1@dont-email.me>, >>> Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that >>>> are suddenly running, >>> >>> Which ones? >> >> Many of them. >> >> Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will >> start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: >> >> accountd - no man page >> AddressBookSourceSync - no man page >> AirPlayUIAgent - no man page >> airportd - has man page, no real info though >> amfid - has man page, no real info though >> appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant >> config files >> AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page >> AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page >> apsd - has man page, no real info though >> askpermissiond - no man page >> ath - no man page >> authd - no man page >> autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files >> awdd - no man page >> > > > How are these "Unix programs?" What do you mean or understand by that? I'm afraid that, if you can't understand that these are fundamentally Unix programs (remember, all daemons are also programs) then there's no point in discussing it further. Perhaps you're just attempting to move the goalposts? I'm sure you didn't actually expect me to respond to your inquiry. Now, if you want to continue this little game, I'd be happy to play. But I'm going to need a down payment - please explain how these are NOT "Unix programs." Then we can play.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 14:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <m9uj4o$uj8$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #68808 |
On 2015-01-23 22:43:33 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex said: > On 2015-01-23 16:26:51 +0000, Warren Oates said: > >> In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, >> Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-01-22 17:14:19 +0000, Warren Oates said: >>> >>>> In article <m9q27p$t0q$1@dont-email.me>, >>>> Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that >>>>> are suddenly running, >>>> >>>> Which ones? >>> >>> Many of them. >>> >>> Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will >>> start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: >>> >>> accountd - no man page >>> AddressBookSourceSync - no man page >>> AirPlayUIAgent - no man page >>> airportd - has man page, no real info though >>> amfid - has man page, no real info though >>> appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant >>> config files >>> AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page >>> AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page >>> apsd - has man page, no real info though >>> askpermissiond - no man page >>> ath - no man page >>> authd - no man page >>> autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files >>> awdd - no man page >>> >> >> >> How are these "Unix programs?" What do you mean or understand by that? > > I'm afraid that, if you can't understand that these are fundamentally > Unix programs (remember, all daemons are also programs) then there's no > point in discussing it further. So explain it: how are they Unix programs? > > Perhaps you're just attempting to move the goalposts? I'm sure you > didn't actually expect me to respond to your inquiry. > > Now, if you want to continue this little game, I'd be happy to play. > But I'm going to need a down payment - please explain how these are NOT > "Unix programs." Then we can play. Sorry, but yours is the claim and it has been challenged.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 10:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcc7be.v83.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #68808 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> was all, like: > On 2015-01-23 16:26:51 +0000, Warren Oates said: >> In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, >> Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-01-22 17:14:19 +0000, Warren Oates said: >>> >>>> In article <m9q27p$t0q$1@dont-email.me>, >>>> Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that >>>>> are suddenly running, >>>> >>>> Which ones? >>> >>> Many of them. >>> >>> Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will >>> start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: >>> >>> accountd - no man page >>> AddressBookSourceSync - no man page >>> AirPlayUIAgent - no man page >>> airportd - has man page, no real info though >>> amfid - has man page, no real info though >>> appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant >>> config files >>> AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page >>> AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page >>> apsd - has man page, no real info though >>> askpermissiond - no man page >>> ath - no man page >>> authd - no man page >>> autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files >>> awdd - no man page >>> >> >> >> How are these "Unix programs?" What do you mean or understand by that? > I'm afraid that, if you can't understand that these are fundamentally > Unix programs (remember, all daemons are also programs) then there's no > point in discussing it further. "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I know I'm right!" > Perhaps you're just attempting to move the goalposts? I'm sure you > didn't actually expect me to respond to your inquiry. "I don't understand your question, so I'm sticking my fingers in my ears, LALALALALALAALAICAN'THEARYOULALALALALALA." > Now, if you want to continue this little game, I'd be happy to play. > But I'm going to need a down payment - please explain how these are NOT > "Unix programs." Then we can play. [www ~]$ uname -v FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Fri Jan 17 01:46:25 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC [www ~]$ which authd [www ~]$ make -C /usr/ports quicksearch name=authd Port: cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.26_1 Path: /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd Info: SASL authentication server for cyrus-sasl2 [www ~]$ Hmmm... -- http://2blog.kreme.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <230120151344485622%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68735 |
In article <m9so6h$7np$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> the whole system, write man pages for all the new Unix programs that > >> are suddenly running, > > > > Which ones? > > Many of them. > > Just going off the running processes on my machine right now, I will > start at the top and list just the processes starting with A: > > accountd - no man page > AddressBookSourceSync - no man page > AirPlayUIAgent - no man page > airportd - has man page, no real info though > amfid - has man page, no real info though > appleeventsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant > config files > AppleIDAuthAgent - no man page > AppleMobileDeviceHelper - no man page > apsd - has man page, no real info though > askpermissiond - no man page > ath - no man page > authd - no man page > autofsd - has man page, surprisingly lists options and relevant config files > awdd - no man page none of those are intended to be used by end users so there is no need for a man page (which are mostly useless anyway). > I assure you this is representative of the whole system. The majority > of daemons are undocumented, and the ones that are are usually older > (Steve era). > > This is just another illustration of Apple's slide into shitware. I > expect undocumented processes from Microsoft, but not Apple. nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-22 20:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfmanno-7F556D.20370222012015@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #68560 |
In article <1lyi997.xex7dh1r8ghuqN%nmassello@yahoo.com>, nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) wrote: > on Apple's software disarray. > > <http://www.mondaynote.com/2015/01/18/apple-software-quality-questions/> As long as there's the potential to make money by shorting AAPL, someone will be along to spread FUD. -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com GOP delenda est!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-22 20:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1lyo3sn.1vux4cd1om0fo2N%nmassello@yahoo.com> |
| In reply to | #68716 |
D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote: > As long as there's the potential to make money by shorting AAPL, someone > will be along to spread FUD. It's very convenient but very childish to assume that all contrary opinion comes from bad motives. That's what religious and political zealots . . . oh wait, I just noticed your sig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 03:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cidv98FcmnnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68729 |
On 2015-01-23, Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> wrote: > D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote: > >> As long as there's the potential to make money by shorting AAPL, someone >> will be along to spread FUD. > > It's very convenient but very childish to assume that all contrary > opinion comes from bad motives. That's what religious and political > zealots . . . oh wait, I just noticed your sig. Likewise, it's very convenient but very naive to assume that the mere existence of bugs and release issues is evidence of a downward trend in software quality. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-22 22:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <m9sohn$8ij$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68716 |
On 2015-01-23 01:37:03 +0000, D.F. Manno said: > In article <1lyi997.xex7dh1r8ghuqN%nmassello@yahoo.com>, > nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) wrote: > >> on Apple's software disarray. >> >> <http://www.mondaynote.com/2015/01/18/apple-software-quality-questions/> > > As long as there's the potential to make money by shorting AAPL, someone > will be along to spread FUD. This isn't FUD, this is genuine criticism. Sadly, while Apple's problems remain unfixed, and while they are compounded with each new release, they will see more people who are reluctant to continue to buy Apple. Just as they were the early adopters of OS X, it will be the alpha geeks who jump ship first. The trickle-down effect won't be felt for a while, but it will severely damage Apple in the long term.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-23 14:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cif3erFlcqdU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68737 |
On 2015-01-23, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2015-01-23 01:37:03 +0000, D.F. Manno said: > >> In article <1lyi997.xex7dh1r8ghuqN%nmassello@yahoo.com>, >> nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) wrote: >> >>> on Apple's software disarray. >>> >>> <http://www.mondaynote.com/2015/01/18/apple-software-quality-questions/> >> >> As long as there's the potential to make money by shorting AAPL, someone >> will be along to spread FUD. > > This isn't FUD [rest of FUD deleted] Sure it is. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web