Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #58233 > unrolled thread
| Started by | jgras1970@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-30 11:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-04-02 16:28 +0000 |
| Articles | 16 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Repair Disk Permissions jgras1970@gmail.com - 2014-03-30 11:07 -0700
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-30 19:08 +0000
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Howard.not@home.com (Howard) - 2014-03-31 17:38 +0100
Re: Repair Disk Permissions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 13:40 -0400
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-31 17:41 +0000
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Howard.not@home.com (Howard) - 2014-03-31 21:58 +0100
Re: Repair Disk Permissions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 17:36 -0400
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-31 22:44 +0000
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-31 23:21 +0000
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Frank <gno52@windstream.net> - 2014-04-02 02:47 -0700
Re: Repair Disk Permissions M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-04-02 08:47 -0400
Re: Repair Disk Permissions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-02 09:17 -0400
Re: Repair Disk Permissions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-02 09:17 -0400
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-04-02 06:37 -0700
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-04-02 14:16 +0000
Re: Repair Disk Permissions Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-04-02 16:28 +0000
| From | jgras1970@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-30 11:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Repair Disk Permissions |
| Message-ID | <11ec4b02-709d-42a4-8074-b8051c611a9a@googlegroups.com> |
Are the following kind of messages normal, when repairing disk permissions? Warning: the SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAgent" has been modified and it will not be repaired. This has stroke me because I don't use RemoteManagement. I have not installed anything except an antivirus the last 2 years. Why file permissions get changed without doing anything for it? Thanks in advance for the given help. Bye
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-30 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bpr8e5FrulaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58233 |
On 2014-03-30, jgras1970@gmail.com <jgras1970@gmail.com> wrote: > Are the following kind of messages normal, when repairing disk > permissions? Warning: the SUID file > "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAgent" > has been modified and it will not be repaired. > > This has stroke me because I don't use RemoteManagement. I have not > installed anything except an antivirus the last 2 years. > > Why file permissions get changed without doing anything for it? > > Thanks in advance for the given help. Bye Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a lot of people seem to assume. It's a very simple tool that is meant to reset the states of ownership and permissions of *specific sets of files*, and *only* those files listed in the receipts of specific software in the receipts folder. This receipts folder is located at /Library/Receipts in Mac OS X versions prior to 10.6, and was moved to /private/var/db/receipts starting with version 10.6. Repair Permissions reads the contents of each receipt in the receipts folder to find out which files and folders it should examine. Receipts are typically created by software installers that use the Mac OS X built-in /Applications/Utilities/Installer program to install a software package, though they may be placed into the receipts folder by other means as well. Receipts typically contain a "Bill of Materials" file that lists of each important file and folder in the installed software package, along with the expected ownership and permissions those files and folders, according to the install package. Repair Permissions examines only those files listed by these receipts. This means the files in your home folder and the files in the local domain (/Library for instance) are *not* examined. The Repair Permissions tool has a rather serious design flaw: it does not know how to resolve cases where multiple receipts list the same file or folder with differing ownership and permissions. This actually happens fairly frequently, particularly when more than one software package installs and uses a shared library or other system resource that happens to be used by another software package. If there are multiple receipts that list a given file or folder, and the expected ownership and permissions differ between those two receipts, Repair Permissions will encounter the first receipt, change the ownership and permissions to honor that receipt, then encounter the second receipt and change the ownership and permissions to honor the second receipt. This typically manifests itself in Disk Utility's Repair Permissions log as a file/folder that never seems to be actually repaired, flipping back and forth between two states. Once you understand how it works, you see Repair Permissions is not half as useful or magical as a lot of people seem to believe. I wish more people understood this - we probably wouldn't see so many Mac users running Repair Permissions at the drop of the hat or on a regular schedule as we see so often. ; ) Bottom line: If you are not experiencing problems with a specific piece of software listed in the receipts folder, there's no reason to run Repair Permissions. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Howard.not@home.com (Howard) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 17:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1ljdv72.6e85c01inv210N%Howard.not@home.com> |
| In reply to | #58234 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a > lot of people seem to assume. Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a good job on this issue ? -- Howard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 13:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320141340333152%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58242 |
In article <1ljdv72.6e85c01inv210N%Howard.not@home.com>, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > > Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a > > lot of people seem to assume. > > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a > good job on this issue ? there's no need to repair anything because permissions don't 'break'. if there's a problem, find its cause and fix *that*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bptnlgFdjhmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58242 |
On 2014-03-31, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> >> Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a >> lot of people seem to assume. > > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a > good job on this issue ? Which issue? Repairing permissions? Apple's tool does well enough with that (design flaws withstanding). Or are you referring to some other issue related to permissions? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Howard.not@home.com (Howard) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 21:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1lje7m4.1vk0famaequhkN%Howard.not@home.com> |
| In reply to | #58246 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2014-03-31, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a > >> lot of people seem to assume. > > > > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a > > good job on this issue ? > > Which issue? Repairing permissions? Apple's tool does well enough with > that (design flaws withstanding). Or are you referring to some other > issue related to permissions? No I guess I am just thinking about how often people or software has advised to repair the permissions on my HD ... so I thought if Apple's app doesn't do a great job then maybe there's a 3rd party app for it. I really have no idea what causes the 'problems', if anything :D and 'nospam' has pointed out that there is no such problem .... -- Howard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 17:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320141736191895%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58250 |
In article <1lje7m4.1vk0famaequhkN%Howard.not@home.com>, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > > >> Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a > > >> lot of people seem to assume. > > > > > > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a > > > good job on this issue ? > > > > Which issue? Repairing permissions? Apple's tool does well enough with > > that (design flaws withstanding). Or are you referring to some other > > issue related to permissions? > > No I guess I am just thinking about how often people or software has > advised to repair the permissions on my HD ... so I thought if Apple's > app doesn't do a great job then maybe there's a 3rd party app for it. > > I really have no idea what causes the 'problems', if anything :D and > 'nospam' has pointed out that there is no such problem .... i didn't say there isn't a problem, but rather that permissions don't 'break' so there's nothing to 'repair'. the name is misleading. all that repair permissions does is set the permissions to what apple thinks they should be. there are good reasons for the permissions to be different than that. in some cases, they might be set to where there's a problem, but that's relatively rare. repair permissions is often suggested just in case it does fix something, but usually it's a waste of time and it's definitely a waste of time to do routinely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 22:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bpu9f3Fh0nuU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58250 |
On 2014-03-31, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On 2014-03-31, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: >> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a >> >> lot of people seem to assume. >> > >> > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a >> > good job on this issue ? >> >> Which issue? Repairing permissions? Apple's tool does well enough with >> that (design flaws withstanding). Or are you referring to some other >> issue related to permissions? > > No I guess I am just thinking about how often people or software has > advised to repair the permissions on my HD ... so I thought if Apple's > app doesn't do a great job then maybe there's a 3rd party app for it. > > I really have no idea what causes the 'problems', if anything :D and > 'nospam' has pointed out that there is no such problem .... The flaw in Disk Utility's Repair Permissions facility I outlined doesn't mean the facility doesn't work - it does work. It just means that under one specific circumstance (when more than one receipt's build of materials (BOM) mentions the same file), the tool may not behave as expected. In this case, the tool does correctly set the specified file's permissions according to the receipt BOM that mentioned the file. But since there are multiple receipts referencing that file (possibly with differing permissions specified in the BOM), which of those receipts are honored, and in what order, are unknown. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 23:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnljju4l.1hth.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #58250 |
In message <1lje7m4.1vk0famaequhkN%Howard.not@home.com> Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> On 2014-03-31, Howard <Howard.not@home.com> wrote: >> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Disk Utility's Repair Permissions function isn't as magical a tool as a >> >> lot of people seem to assume. >> > >> > Interesting post. Thanks Jolly. Is there a 3rd party tool that does a >> > good job on this issue ? >> >> Which issue? Repairing permissions? Apple's tool does well enough with >> that (design flaws withstanding). Or are you referring to some other >> issue related to permissions? > No I guess I am just thinking about how often people or software has > advised to repair the permissions on my HD This is because people are idiots and have no idea what they are talking about. > ... so I thought if Apple's > app doesn't do a great job then maybe there's a 3rd party app for it. A great job of what? The repair permissions in DU does exactly what it is supposed to do. It is sometimes, rarely, useful to fix a tiny fraction of a very specific set of problems. -- The real American folksong is a rag -- a mental jag A rhythmic tone for the chronic blues
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank <gno52@windstream.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 02:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6e02611-de5f-4f11-a31b-3574db0853fc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58233 |
So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that develop with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging in windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | M-M <nospam@ny.more> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 08:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <020420140847186972%nospam@ny.more> |
| In reply to | #58283 |
In article <c6e02611-de5f-4f11-a31b-3574db0853fc@googlegroups.com>, Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that develop > with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging in windows. Delete the contents of Library/Caches -- m-m http://www.mhmyers.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 09:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <020420140917377298%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58284 |
In article <020420140847186972%nospam@ny.more>, M-M <nospam@ny.more> wrote: > > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that develop > > with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging in windows. > > Delete the contents of Library/Caches that will make things slower.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 09:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <020420140917397435%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58283 |
In article <c6e02611-de5f-4f11-a31b-3574db0853fc@googlegroups.com>, Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that develop > with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging in windows. what gradual slowdown is that? about the only issue is that some apps have memory leaks and over time, the virtual memory system will thrash. the solution for that is to quit the leaky apps and relaunch them. a more drastic step is log out/log in which quits all apps and an even bigger step is reboot the computer. other than that there should be no gradual slowdown in normal use.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 06:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vilain-1F62C7.06371802042014@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58283 |
In article <c6e02611-de5f-4f11-a31b-3574db0853fc@googlegroups.com>, Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that develop > with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging in windows. Actually, with periodic security upgrades, I don't see those slowdowns you're talking about on MacOS X. I've seen a vast improvement on how it deals with the virtual memory system. 10.6 and Safari would bloat significantly and create swap files until the sytem bogged down at the 4GB mark, but a reboot fixes that. I haven't heard good things about 10.9 and have a couple apps that won't work on it, so I'm sticking with 10.8 for now. It seems to be most stable. But to answer your question, "that depends". I think there are several assumptions behind it that are fallacious. HFS with journaling is pretty tolerant of file fragments. If you're running off a SSD, just forgetaboutit. Really, forget about it. Defragging will supposedly decrease the lifetime of a SSD. Still, I take regular (nightly) backups. Have the system the volume for consistency and permissions and reboot weekly. Others prefer to brag about how long their systems have been up, but I find that if install or change things, a reboot to validate that it all works is a Good Thing(tm). That's overly cautious, but sysadmin habits die hard. I use Onyx to do the disk consistancy check, run periodic maintenance, and clean up stuff like the "Open with" database, clear system, user, and font caches, etc. That requires a reboot. But you can re-install Windows. That works every time. -- DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee... [I filter all Goggle Groups posts, so any reply may be automatically ignored]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 14:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnljo6ti.b7e.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #58283 |
In message <c6e02611-de5f-4f11-a31b-3574db0853fc@googlegroups.com> Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that > develop with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging > in windows. What gradual slowdowns are these? I don't notice this under OS X myself. If the system is running slow it's something pretty specific causing it, and I will often root out a poorly written LaunchAgent or a left over LaunchAgent that is still trying to load. Enough of these can certainly cause minor issues. I know what *I* do to eliminate these issues, but it's not something I recommend to others. Perhaps one of those tool suites like Onyx will help root out old LaunchAgents? I don't bother deleting caches, except on the laptop which is space-constrained, and even then, rarely. -- I is for IDA who drowned in a lake J is for JAMES who took lye by mistake
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 16:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bq2s4vFgqs3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58283 |
On 2014-04-02, Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > So what is a good application to use for the gradual slowdowns that > develop with the passage of time and usage... sort of like defragging > in windows. Nothing like that is necessary with Mac OS X. Are you saying you are experiencing slow performance? If so, please give us the details and we'll help you diagnose the problem. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web