Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #57163 > unrolled thread

Snow Leopard retires..

Started byStephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl>
First post2014-02-27 16:53 +0100
Last post2014-03-08 20:38 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 181 — 35 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  Snow Leopard retires.. Stephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-27 16:53 +0100
    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Stephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-27 17:00 +0100
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 18:27 +0000
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Stephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-27 19:50 +0100
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-27 17:13 -0500
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-02-28 14:08 -0800
    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-02-27 11:39 -0500
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Stephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-27 18:41 +0100
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-27 18:35 +0000
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Howard.not@home.com (Howard) - 2014-02-27 23:26 +0000
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-27 18:34 +0000
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-27 13:03 -0600
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-27 21:22 +0000
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2014-03-03 17:53 +0000
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-04 15:37 -0600
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-04 22:20 +0000
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-05 12:51 -0600
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-05 22:33 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 17:50 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-05 23:59 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-06 07:40 -0500
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-06 18:49 +0000
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-06 17:06 -0600
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-07 02:54 +0000
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-03-07 11:41 -0600
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-06 17:03 -0600
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-05 16:54 -0600
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-06 01:20 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-06 17:01 -0600
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-07 16:35 -0500
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-08 14:25 -0600
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Howard.not@home.com (Howard) - 2014-02-27 23:26 +0000
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:53 -0600
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-28 17:58 -0800
    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2014-02-27 20:50 +0000
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-27 21:44 +0000
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-27 18:36 -0500
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-28 00:49 +0000
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-02-27 20:45 -0800
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-28 10:43 +0000
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:52 -0600
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-01 06:41 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-01 15:29 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-01 11:42 -0500
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-01 18:09 +0000
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 11:38 -0500
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-02 17:28 +1300
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 11:40 -0500
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 12:23 -0500
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 18:17 -0600
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-02 19:28 -0500
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-03 18:39 -0500
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-03 13:25 +1300
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-03 00:47 +0000
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:29 -0500
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 03:11 +0000
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-03 16:52 +1300
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-03 04:06 -0500
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-04 12:02 +1300
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-03 18:38 -0500
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-04 12:55 +1300
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-03 19:51 -0500
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-04 01:32 +0000
                                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2014-03-05 12:33 -0500
                                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-05 18:11 +0000
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-04 00:18 -0500
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-03-04 06:43 -0800
                                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-04 17:04 +0000
                                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-04 17:59 -0500
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-05 12:49 +1300
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Kit <kitzyme@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-04 14:55 +0000
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-04 17:05 +0000
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-05 12:49 +1300
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dob@trwxxa-2.local (David Blanchard) - 2014-03-09 18:16 +0000
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-09 21:56 -0400
                                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dob@trwxxa-2.local (David Blanchard) - 2014-03-10 16:45 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-01 18:08 +0000
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-02 17:28 +1300
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-03-01 12:50 -0500
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-01 18:21 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-03-02 12:16 -0500
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-02-28 11:02 -0500
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-28 17:25 +0100
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-28 18:38 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-02-28 20:47 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-02-28 18:37 -0800
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Ronnie Bateman <OurOwnRonnieBateman@earthlinc.net> - 2014-02-28 13:09 -0800
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-28 21:57 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:52 -0600
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-01 08:08 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-02-28 20:49 -0500
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:50 -0600
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-03-01 13:29 +1100
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-03-01 12:48 -0500
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-02-28 21:23 -0800
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:50 -0600
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-01 06:40 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-01 09:31 -0500
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2014-03-01 19:24 -0800
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-03-01 19:44 -0800
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-01 23:38 -0500
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-02 17:51 +1300
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-03-02 11:25 -0800
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 05:21 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 01:59 -0500
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-02 02:39 -0500
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 07:49 +0000
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-02 21:34 +1300
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 17:59 +0000
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-03 13:25 +1300
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 03:14 +0000
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-03 17:05 +1300
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:12 -0500
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 03:22 +0000
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-03 04:29 +0000
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:02 -0500
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 03:17 +0000
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-03 03:47 +0000
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-02 23:02 -0500
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-03 05:12 +0000
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 00:39 -0500
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2014-03-03 07:27 +0100
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 01:29 -0500
                                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2014-03-04 06:51 +0100
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-03 04:11 -0500
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-03 04:27 +0000
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-03 05:09 +0000
                              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 16:16 +0000
                                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-03 16:29 +0000
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 12:35 -0500
                                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-03 20:28 +0000
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-03-04 22:51 +0100
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-04 22:19 +0000
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-01 23:38 -0500
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 01:56 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-02 02:39 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 07:50 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 08:05 -0700
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-03 13:25 +1300
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-03-01 21:13 -0800
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 05:20 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-02 10:07 -0600
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:28 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-03 09:13 -0600
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-28 17:23 +0100
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Ronnie Bateman <OurOwnRonnieBateman@earthlinc.net> - 2014-02-28 13:07 -0800
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:49 -0600
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-03-01 12:30 -0500
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-02-28 12:04 +1300
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-27 18:40 -0500
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-28 19:48 -0600
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-03-01 12:22 -0500
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 11:54 -0500
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 11:59 -0500
    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-27 18:31 -0500
    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-06 12:20 +0000
      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-03-06 09:39 -0800
        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-03-06 10:57 -0800
          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-06 19:05 +0000
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-03-06 11:41 -0800
            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-07 12:12 +1300
              Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-07 02:47 +0000
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-07 03:13 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-07 09:38 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-07 14:43 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-07 07:50 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-07 14:45 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-07 11:24 -0500
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-07 16:39 +0000
                          Re: Snow Leopard retires.. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-07 16:43 -0500
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-07 18:06 -0500
                            Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-08 03:37 +0000
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-07 15:04 +0000
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-03-07 19:37 +1300
                Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-07 18:38 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-07 19:21 -0500
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-08 00:31 +0000
                      Re: Snow Leopard retires.. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-07 19:36 -0500
                        Re: Snow Leopard retires.. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-08 01:35 +0000
                  Re: Snow Leopard retires.. erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-08 14:25 -0600
                    Re: Snow Leopard retires.. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-08 20:38 +0000

Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10  Next page →


#57494

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-03-03 00:39 -0500
Message-ID<030320140039539609%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#57493
In article <lf12v9$p8r$2@dont-email.me>, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca>
wrote:

> > officially it was called erase & install, and also archive & install
> > which is almost the same.
> 
> You have a very odd understanding of "almost the same", considering that 
> one of the above would destroy all user data and the other wouldn't.

normally a clean install is done in order to destroy the existing data,
thus the name 'clean install'. that's the whole point. usually it's a
reformat, thus the name erase & install. 

in both cases, the system is installed without upgrading the existing
system, which makes it almost the same.

in any event, the user should have a backup, so no matter what type of
install they do, no data is ever lost.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57495

FromAndreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch>
Date2014-03-03 07:27 +0100
Message-ID<andreas-5CFAD8.07273503032014@news.individual.de>
In reply to#57482
In article <020320142302439786%nospam@nospam.invalid>,
 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <lf0u0s$3fs$1@dont-email.me>, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca>
> wrote:
> 
> > What is a "Clean Install"? 
> 
> officially it was called erase & install, and also archive & install
> which is almost the same.

uh, your memory seems to be fading or we have a total different 
understanding of "almost the same".

Archive and install keeps the user data and installs new system files, 
whereas erase and install wipes the disk you want to install to.

Cheers
Andreas

-- 
MacAndreas Rutishauser, <http://www.MacAndreas.ch> 
EDV-Dienstleistungen, Hard- und Software, Internet und Netzwerk
Beratung, Unterstuetzung und Schulung
<mailto:andreas@MacAndreas.ch>, Fon: 044 / 721 36 47

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57496

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-03-03 01:29 -0500
Message-ID<030320140129328386%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#57495
In article <andreas-5CFAD8.07273503032014@news.individual.de>, Andreas
Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> wrote:

> > > What is a "Clean Install"? 
> > 
> > officially it was called erase & install, and also archive & install
> > which is almost the same.
> 
> uh, your memory seems to be fading or we have a total different 
> understanding of "almost the same".
> 
> Archive and install keeps the user data and installs new system files, 
> whereas erase and install wipes the disk you want to install to.

in both cases, the installed system is a new install, not an upgrade
over the existing system.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57546

FromAndreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch>
Date2014-03-04 06:51 +0100
Message-ID<andreas-07B682.06510904032014@news.individual.de>
In reply to#57496
In article <030320140129328386%nospam@nospam.invalid>,
 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <andreas-5CFAD8.07273503032014@news.individual.de>, Andreas
> Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> wrote:
> 
> > > > What is a "Clean Install"? 
> > > 
> > > officially it was called erase & install, and also archive & install
> > > which is almost the same.
> > 
> > uh, your memory seems to be fading or we have a total different 
> > understanding of "almost the same".
> > 
> > Archive and install keeps the user data and installs new system files, 
> > whereas erase and install wipes the disk you want to install to.
> 
> in both cases, the installed system is a new install, not an upgrade
> over the existing system.

in 1 case you end up without any user data which seems to be quite far 
away from "almost the same" for me.

-- 
MacAndreas Rutishauser, <http://www.MacAndreas.ch> 
EDV-Dienstleistungen, Hard- und Software, Internet und Netzwerk
Beratung, Unterstuetzung und Schulung
<mailto:andreas@MacAndreas.ch>, Fon: 044 / 721 36 47

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57501

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2014-03-03 04:11 -0500
Message-ID<53144740$0$47894$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#57495
On 14-03-03 01:27, Andreas Rutishauser wrote:
> Archive and install keeps the user data and installs new system files, 
> whereas erase and install wipes the disk you want to install to.


If it moves the current system to an "Archived" folder, then it doesn't
mean you have the system as it was before. None of the preferences
stored in /Library and /Systrem/Library survive, and you will have to
manually move applicatiosn from the archive to the new /Applications,
same for their preference files. That is a lot of work.

It is easier to upgrade to Snow Leopard and then upgrade to Mavericks
because that removes the need to do the manual conversion/move of apps etc.

However, such an exercise does help you document what apps you need, and
which ones you can drop. It is however time consuming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57486

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2014-03-03 04:27 +0000
Message-ID<bniel2Fc8ppU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57480
On 2014-03-03, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote:
> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>> Normally OS X has an option to do a Clean Install. Or it did. If that is
>> gone from 10.9's installer then yes, installing over 10.5 may be a bit
>> more complicated.
>
> What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.

You haven't been around Macs very long, have you? "Clean Install" is
what Apple historically called wiping an existing installation and
installing a brand new one in its place:

<http://www.themacintoshguy.com/mactips/archive/tip41.shtml>

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57492

Fromme@home.spamsucks.ca (Király)
Date2014-03-03 05:09 +0000
Message-ID<lf12r1$p8r$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57486
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
> > What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.
> 
> You haven't been around Macs very long, have you? "Clean Install" is
> what Apple historically called wiping an existing installation and
> installing a brand new one in its place:

Well, I guess it depends on what one's definition of "very long" is. I'd 
definitely say the pre-OS X days were "very long" ago. I started with 
Macs in 2001 with OS 9.2 and OS X 10.0.4. I never had to install a 
pre-OS X system so I never ran into the term before.

-- 
K.

Lang may your lum reek.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57515

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-03-03 16:16 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlh9an0.8tb.g.kreme@oswin.local>
In reply to#57480
In message <lf0u0s$3fs$1@dont-email.me> 
  Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote:
> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>> Normally OS X has an option to do a Clean Install. Or it did. If that is
>> gone from 10.9's installer then yes, installing over 10.5 may be a bit
>> more complicated.

> What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.

Sure they have.

<https://www.google.com/search?q=clean+install+site:apple.com#q=clean+install+site:apple.com+-discussions.apple.com&safe=off>

<http://support.apple.com/kb/TA25045?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
<http://support.apple.com/kb/TA22552?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
<http://support.apple.com/kb/TA43881?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>

I was never a fan of clean installs and always did in-place upgrades,
and I guess in the last few OS versions I've always but new install onto
blank or largely blank disks, so I never noticed that the old option to
set aside the existing OS X version and install a new copy had been
removed.

-- 
I HAVE NEITHER BEEN THERE NOR DONE THAT Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF17

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57518

Fromme@home.spamsucks.ca (Király)
Date2014-03-03 16:29 +0000
Message-ID<lf2alq$ctt$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57515
Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> > What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.
> 
> Sure they have.
> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA25045?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA22552?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA43881?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>

Okay, okay. Apple used it 12+ years ago in the pre-OS X days. I get it 
now. It isn't a useful term for OS X because it isn't clear which of the 
OS X installation options it could refer to.

-- 
K.

Lang may your lum reek.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57522

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-03-03 12:35 -0500
Message-ID<030320141235276382%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#57518
In article <lf2alq$ctt$2@dont-email.me>, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca>
wrote:

> > > What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.
> > 
> > Sure they have.
> > <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA25045?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
> > <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA22552?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
> > <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA43881?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
> 
> Okay, okay. Apple used it 12+ years ago in the pre-OS X days. I get it 
> now. It isn't a useful term for OS X because it isn't clear which of the 
> OS X installation options it could refer to.

it's quite obvious what clean install refers to, even when the exact
words are not used.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57528

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-03-03 20:28 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlh9pgg.eo2.g.kreme@oswin.local>
In reply to#57518
In message <lf2alq$ctt$2@dont-email.me> 
  Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote:
> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>> > What is a "Clean Install"? Apple has never used that terminology.
>> 
>> Sure they have.
>> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA25045?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
>> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA22552?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>
>> <http://support.apple.com/kb/TA43881?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US>

> Okay, okay. Apple used it 12+ years ago in the pre-OS X days. I get it 
> now. It isn't a useful term for OS X because it isn't clear which of the 
> OS X installation options it could refer to.

Even if Apple stopped using it, Apple USERS continue to use it to this
day.

<https://www.google.com/search?q=clean+install+mavericks>

A clean install is any install where the System is not being upgraded
in-place.


-- 
Say, give it up, give it up, television's taking its toll That's enough,
that's enough, gimme the remote control I've been nice, I've been good,
please don't do this to me Turn it off, turn it off, I don't want to
have to see

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57567

FromLaszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com>
Date2014-03-04 22:51 +0100
Message-ID<lf5hsu$v63$1@tota-refugium.de>
In reply to#57349
On 02.03.2014 08:49, Lewis wrote:
> Fact: OS X 10.9 Mavericks is FREE. It costs NOTHING. It will
> run/install/upgrade on any hardware that meets its requirements.

and you just can't imagine that someone refuses to follow?

If i got an offer to replace my used jacket against a brand new one, but 
clown style, you should not be astonished if I refuse.


-- 
One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round.
One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57576

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-03-04 22:19 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhckca.29qh.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#57567
In message <lf5hsu$v63$1@tota-refugium.de> 
  Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 02.03.2014 08:49, Lewis wrote:
>> Fact: OS X 10.9 Mavericks is FREE. It costs NOTHING. It will
>> run/install/upgrade on any hardware that meets its requirements.

> and you just can't imagine that someone refuses to follow?

Has nothing to do with this thread, where the claim was made that you would
have to purchase a previosu version of OS X in order to upgrade, therefore it
wasn't "really" free.

-- 
Hello Diane, I'm Bucky Goldstein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57334

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-03-01 23:38 -0500
Message-ID<010320142338465642%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#57325
In article <1lhugji.1ysshjwc4ilrgN%RonTheGuy@null.invalid>, Ron
<RonTheGuy@null.invalid> wrote:

> Is the upgrade from SL to Mavericks free? I haven't seen that mentioned
> in this thread.

mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.

the only requirement is being able to access the app store on at least
one machine, which means 10.6.6. or later.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57345

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2014-03-02 01:56 -0500
Message-ID<5312d629$0$35019$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#57334
On 14-03-01 23:38, nospam wrote:

> mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.


Not quite. You require Snow Leopard updated sufficiently to have the App
Store application on it in order to get it.

If you are not at snow leopard, it isn't free because you cannot install
it without first buying Snow Leopard or a more recent version of the OS
to which you can upgrade from your current version.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57347

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-03-02 02:39 -0500
Message-ID<020320140239215770%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#57345
In article <5312d629$0$35019$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF
Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:

> > mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.
> 
> Not quite. You require Snow Leopard updated sufficiently to have the App
> Store application on it in order to get it.

only for the first machine. 

once you download it, you can install it on other machines, including
ones without snow leopard, as long as mavericks is compatible with it.

> If you are not at snow leopard, it isn't free because you cannot install
> it without first buying Snow Leopard or a more recent version of the OS
> to which you can upgrade from your current version.

you can go to an apple store and get it there. no need to buy anything,
and it's probably faster to download it there anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57350

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-03-02 07:50 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlh5om5.h2.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#57345
In message <5312d629$0$35019$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> 
  JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 14-03-01 23:38, nospam wrote:

>> mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.


> Not quite. You require Snow Leopard updated sufficiently to have the App
> Store application on it in order to get it.

No. You can get it at any Apple Store. Just bring in a thumb drive.

> If you are not at snow leopard, it isn't free because you cannot install
> it without first buying Snow Leopard or a more recent version of the OS
> to which you can upgrade from your current version.

That is not true.

-- 
Criticizing evolutionary theory because Darwin was limited is like
claiming computers don't work because Chuck Babbage didn't foresee Duke
Nukem 3.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57355

FromMichelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Date2014-03-02 08:05 -0700
Message-ID<020320140805440578%michelle@michelle.org>
In reply to#57345
In article <5312d629$0$35019$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF
Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:

> > mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.
> 
> 
> Not quite. You require Snow Leopard updated sufficiently to have the App
> Store application on it in order to get it.
> 
> If you are not at snow leopard, it isn't free because you cannot install
> it without first buying Snow Leopard or a more recent version of the OS
> to which you can upgrade from your current version.

Mavericks is still free; it's that Snow Leopard isn't free.  But if
you're running Leopard or (especially) earlier, it's quite likely that
the computer is not capable of running Mavericks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57440

Fromdempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
Date2014-03-03 13:25 +1300
Message-ID<1lhxfsc.kaf1cz1u7pyokN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz>
In reply to#57355
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <5312d629$0$35019$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> 
> > > mavericks is free, regardless of the initial system.
> > 
> > Not quite. You require Snow Leopard updated sufficiently to have the App
> > Store application on it in order to get it.
> > 
> > If you are not at snow leopard, it isn't free because you cannot install
> > it without first buying Snow Leopard or a more recent version of the OS
> > to which you can upgrade from your current version.
> 
> Mavericks is still free; it's that Snow Leopard isn't free.  But if
> you're running Leopard or (especially) earlier, it's quite likely that
> the computer is not capable of running Mavericks.

There are quite a few models that are officially able to run both
Leopard and Mavericks, so if someone is running Leopard on an Intel Mac,
it is worth checking.

Furthermore, anyone still running Tiger (10.4.x) or Leopard (10.5.x) on
an Intel Mac which is accessing the Internet really should upgrade it at
least to Snow Leopard (10.6.x) for better security and compatibility
with more up to date web browsers.

These are the models officially able to run both Leopard (10.5.x) and
Mavericks (10.9.x). To save space, I haven't bothered mentioning screen
sizes.

MacBook (Aluminum, Late 2008)
MacBook (Early 2009)
MacBook (Mid 2009)

MacBook Air (Late 2008)
MacBook Air (Mid 2009)

MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007) - these originally came with Tiger (10.4.9)
MacBook Pro (Early 2008)
MacBook Pro (Late 2008)
MacBook Pro (Early 2009)
MacBook Pro (Mid 2009)

iMac (Mid 2007) - these originally came with Tiger (10.4.10)
iMac (Early 2008)
iMac (Early 2009)
iMac (Mid 2009) - education only

Mac mini (Early 2009)

Mac Pro (Early 2008)
Mac Pro (Early 2009)

Xserve (Early 2009)

-- 
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57338

Frombill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca>
Date2014-03-01 21:13 -0800
Message-ID<billvan-FD3190.21131701032014@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#57325
In article <1lhugji.1ysshjwc4ilrgN%RonTheGuy@null.invalid>,
 RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) wrote:

> bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
> > Some of us are still on 10.6 because it does everything we need it to,
> > it's familiar, and no features of later versions have sounded compelling
> > enough to upgrade. Now that support for 10.6 is being dropped I'll have
> > to reconsider. I'm loath to go to Mavericks, though, because I 
> > understand it will break my newsreader and possibly some other older 
> > apps I keep around.
> Is the upgrade from SL to Mavericks free? I haven't seen that mentioned
> in this thread.

Free through the Mac store, as I understand it.
-- 
bill

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web