Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #57283 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-01 09:15 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-03-03 16:21 +1300 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 86 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-01 09:15 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-01 11:56 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-01 17:10 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-01 10:27 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-01 19:23 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 01:47 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-01 21:41 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 03:07 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 01:50 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 08:08 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:21 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 10:23 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 10:36 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 12:48 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 18:09 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 18:09 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social responsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:17 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-02 17:06 +1300
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:25 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 10:32 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 12:47 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:10 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 13:12 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 13:18 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:54 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 13:57 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:21 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 17:25 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 21:47 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 17:56 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-03 01:17 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 21:30 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 18:07 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 21:48 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-02 18:19 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:25 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-03-07 20:38 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 10:13 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:23 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 12:02 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 10:30 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 12:46 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:09 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 14:03 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 21:45 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:15 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-03 01:18 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-03 07:51 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-03 15:05 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 21:44 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 17:55 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 13:56 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 15:49 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 17:44 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 10:29 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 05:19 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-03-01 23:55 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:24 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-01 21:37 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-02 10:28 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 11:04 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-02 16:25 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 18:02 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 11:10 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 11:26 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-02 22:19 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 17:04 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-03-07 20:25 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-07 18:52 -0700
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-08 09:23 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 11:20 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 10:14 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-03 09:00 +1300
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-02 14:25 -0600
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-03 13:40 +1300
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 13:04 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-03 13:44 +1300
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 17:02 -0800
Re: Tim Cook chooses social resonsibility Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-03 16:21 +1300
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 16:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bnh47uF37q6U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57360 |
On 2014-03-02, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 3/1/14 10:37 PM, in article 010320142137499956%michelle@michelle.org, > "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > >> In article <53129a6f$0$59741$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >>> Apple requires this underpaid and overworked labour to remain >>> competitive. So its PR steps are not to end it or fix it, it is only to >>> give the appearance of doing something about it. >> >> If you actually bothered to pay attention to what is actually >> happening, you would see that Apple is actually doing things to fix it. >> >>>> come to expect you to ignore that and shed this in the worst possible >>>> light you can muster. Your trolling is transparent. >>> >>> Debate does not happen if differences in opinion are not tolerated. >> >> Debating with you is like debating with a creationist. > > Or an Obama supporter... Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 12:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #57364 |
In article <bnh47uF37q6U2@mid.individual.net>,
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Or an Obama supporter...
>
> Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a...
Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist...
--
³Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.²
‹ Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141030523080%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57375 |
In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... > > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 12:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cMGdnWAT697o847OnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #57379 |
In article <020320141030523080%michelle@michelle.org>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt
> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a...
> >
> > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist...
>
> Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters,
> and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists.
No, but we were talking about those who are hard to deal with,who won't
listen to the other side and get angry when it is posited that THERE is
another side are always fundamentalists in their particular belief.
--
³Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.²
‹ Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 11:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141109161273%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57384 |
In article <cMGdnWAT697o847OnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > In article <020320141030523080%michelle@michelle.org>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > > In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... > > > > > > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... > > > > Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, > > and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists. > > No, but we were talking about those who are hard to deal with,who won't > listen to the other side and get angry when it is posited that THERE is > another side are always fundamentalists in their particular belief. That's the reason I wrote "not necessarily"; creationists and birthers are fundamentalists. Some supporters of those (and all other, for that matter) political candidates are fundamentalist in their support, but many (most) are not. For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything he has done or said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 14:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <CF38EAA3.A84E8%ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
| In reply to | #57393 |
On 3/2/14 12:09 PM, in article 020320141109161273%michelle@michelle.org, "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <cMGdnWAT697o847OnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> In article <020320141030523080%michelle@michelle.org>, >> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: >> >>> In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >>> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... >>>> >>>> Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... >>> >>> Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, >>> and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists. >> >> No, but we were talking about those who are hard to deal with,who won't >> listen to the other side and get angry when it is posited that THERE is >> another side are always fundamentalists in their particular belief. > > That's the reason I wrote "not necessarily"; creationists and birthers > are fundamentalists. Some supporters of those (and all other, for that > matter) political candidates are fundamentalist in their support, but > many (most) are not. > > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything > he has done or said. Especially when he does 180s on everything he has said and done. Between the out and out lies and deceit there is something positive hidden with those college transcripts, I might allow...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 21:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bnhn3sF7sesU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57393 |
On 2014-03-02, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <cMGdnWAT697o847OnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> In article <020320141030523080%michelle@michelle.org>, >> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: >> >> > In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >> > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... >> > > >> > > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... >> > >> > Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, >> > and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists. >> >> No, but we were talking about those who are hard to deal with,who won't >> listen to the other side and get angry when it is posited that THERE is >> another side are always fundamentalists in their particular belief. > > That's the reason I wrote "not necessarily"; creationists and birthers > are fundamentalists. Some supporters of those (and all other, for that > matter) political candidates are fundamentalist in their support, but > many (most) are not. > > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything > he has done or said. I have yet to see a politician I can support in good conscience. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 20:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5313d7a1$0$32622$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #57393 |
On 14-03-02 13:09, Michelle Steiner wrote: > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything > he has done or said. A good example of fundamentalist is Jolly Rogers. He agress with Apple all the time :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-03 01:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bni3jdFa6ebU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57458 |
On 2014-03-03, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-03-02 13:09, Michelle Steiner wrote: > >> For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything >> he has done or said. > > A good example of fundamentalist is Jolly Rogers. He agress with Apple > all the time :-) As if you'd know. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 19:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141957504241%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57458 |
In article <5313d7a1$0$32622$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-03-02 13:09, Michelle Steiner wrote: > > > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything > > he has done or said. > > > A good example of fundamentalist is Jolly Rogers. He agress with Apple > all the time :-) > Actually, he doesn't. It's a shame, though, that you can't even get the names of people correct.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-03 07:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ov2dnVzt08V754nOnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #57471 |
In article <020320141957504241%michelle@michelle.org>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> In article <5313d7a1$0$32622$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>
> > On 14-03-02 13:09, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> >
> > > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything
> > > he has done or said.
> >
> >
> > A good example of fundamentalist is Jolly Rogers. He agress with Apple
> > all the time :-)
> >
> Actually, he doesn't. It's a shame, though, that you can't even get
> the names of people correct.
The most disconcerting part of the post was the use of the plural. You
mean there may be more than one (grin).
--
³Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.²
‹ Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-03 15:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bnjk15Fk228U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57505 |
On 2014-03-03, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > In article <020320141957504241%michelle@michelle.org>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > >> In article <5313d7a1$0$32622$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >> > On 14-03-02 13:09, Michelle Steiner wrote: >> > >> > > For example, I"m an Obama supporter, but I do not agree with everything >> > > he has done or said. >> > >> > >> > A good example of fundamentalist is Jolly Rogers. He agress with Apple >> > all the time :-) >> > >> Actually, he doesn't. It's a shame, though, that you can't even get >> the names of people correct. > > The most disconcerting part of the post was the use of the plural. You > mean there may be more than one (grin). I wish. I've lost count of how many times I could've used a clone or two. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 21:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bnhn17F7sesU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #57379 |
On 2014-03-02, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... >> >> Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... > > Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, > and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists. Certainly a subset of any of those exhibit behavior that is fundamentalist in nature. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141755132795%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57423 |
In article <bnhn17F7sesU4@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2014-03-02, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > In article <vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> > Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... > >> > >> Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... > > > > Unlike creationists, and birthers, Obama supporters, Bush supporters, > > and Reagan supporters are not necessarily fundamentalists. > > Certainly a subset of any of those exhibit behavior that is > fundamentalist in nature. That's why I wrote "not necessarily".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 13:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <CF38E8F8.A84E5%ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
| In reply to | #57375 |
On 3/2/14 11:02 AM, in article vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com, "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > In article <bnh47uF37q6U2@mid.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>> Or an Obama supporter... >> >> Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a... > > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist... And fanatics... <http://weaselzippers.us/147728-texas-pro-abortion-fanatic-to-pro-life-legis lator-i-want-to-pummel-his-face-in/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <B4OdnXOQzN_BBI7OnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #57411 |
In article <CF38E8F8.A84E5%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>,
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/2/14 11:02 AM, in article
> vv-dnU37guS_-Y7OnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com, "Kurt Ullman"
> <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <bnh47uF37q6U2@mid.individual.net>,
> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Or an Obama supporter...
> >>
> >> Or a birther, or a Bush supporter, or a Regan supporter, or a...
> >
> > Pretty much any kind of fundamentalist...
>
> And fanatics...
>
Personally pretty much the same thing in real life.
--
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital."
-- Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 17:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141744042618%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57411 |
In article <CF38E8F8.A84E5%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote: > <http://weaselzippers.us/147728-texas-pro-abortion-fanatic-to-pro-life-legis > lator-i-want-to-pummel-his-face-in/> Nice spin there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <020320141029237741%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57360 |
In article <CF38B4B8.A8463%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>, George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Debate does not happen if differences in opinion are not tolerated. > > > > Debating with you is like debating with a creationist. > > > > Or an Obama supporter... Not at all. > <http://tinypic.com/r/fyepoo/8> First of all, I doubt it. Secondly, what's the matter with that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 05:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlh5fqb.r7d.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #57323 |
In message <53129a6f$0$59741$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-03-01 20:47, Jolly Roger wrote: >> From what I've read, Apple actually does more than any other similar >> company to reduce underpaid and overworked labor. > Apple requires this underpaid and overworked labour to remain > competitive. Underpaid according to whom? The workers certainly do not feel underpaid or overworked. They know exactly what the job is and they line up by the thousands for a chance at making very good money. -- I thank my lucky stars I'm not superstitious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-01 21:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <010320142137318886%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #57321 |
In article <531279ff$0$46373$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > Most large corporations have some "goodwill" endeavours to help with > their image which is often damaged by terrible big business practices. > Apple's "green" endeavours compensate for the bad image Apple gets for > building its iToys in China with underpaid and overworked labour. As opposed to all the other manufacturers who build their toys in China with underpaid and overworked labor, but who don't get a bad image because they're not Apple, right? At least Apple, unlike many of those other companies, is addressing those labor issues. But that doesn't count because it's Apple,right? Did it ever occur to you that Apple's is doing those green endeavors because they're the right thing to do? > So cultivating a good image is an integral part of Apple's strategy, so > those "green" initiaties are part of doing business for a company such > as Apple. How about because they're the right things to do for the sake of the planet and the human race? Try scaling back your cynicism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web