Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid (Nick Naym) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-18 14:32 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-02-20 15:13 +0000 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 48 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Can't Eject a Volume nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid (Nick Naym) - 2014-02-18 14:32 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-18 14:48 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-18 19:52 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-02-22 12:05 -0800
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 21:25 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-02-22 21:03 -0800
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-18 20:13 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Ralph <alan.ralph@gmail.com> - 2014-02-18 20:18 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 15:13 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Ralph <alan.ralph@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 21:07 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 21:52 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 06:27 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 16:53 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 12:38 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 21:24 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 22:51 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:35 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 06:27 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 17:02 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 17:21 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 19:14 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-21 14:49 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 22:13 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 00:29 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 16:59 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-02-25 16:49 +1100
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-21 18:28 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-22 00:29 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 10:02 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 10:22 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 17:01 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 12:13 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 17:16 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-22 12:34 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 21:23 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-22 21:53 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-22 17:00 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2014-02-18 20:37 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-19 02:13 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-18 21:42 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-19 04:21 +0000
Re: Can't Eject a Volume nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-18 23:35 -0500
Re: Can't Eject a Volume Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 15:13 +0000
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-22 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bmskj7FmdpqU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #56851 |
On 2014-02-22, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > In message <-9KdnQ05Sfk3QpXOnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@giganews.com> > Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: >> I do use Safari to watch Netflix now as Chrome doesn't play perfect with >> Netflix for some content. (I pipe the Mac to the Apple TV to the big >> screen and use the Apple keyboard and mouse (bluetooth) to control the >> mac from that room. Kinda nifty really). > > You use you mac to watch netflix that you send to your appletv? > > Why not use netflix on the AppleTV? That does seem strange. Maybe he meant something else? In my house, we use an AppleTV to watch Netflix in the living room, but have an old Mac mini connected to an LCD display in another room, and watch Netflix through a web browser there. Netflix and ISPs have largely failed to manage Netflix throughput properly (which has gotten much worse during the past year or so here). Also, Netflix's idea of "choice" content is pretty dismal. We've been considering getting rid of Netflix altogether lately. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-22 17:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlghltc.1l3f.g.kreme@oswin.local> |
| In reply to | #56824 |
In message <JLSdnQC9T8meIZXOnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > On 2014.02.22, 00:29 , nospam wrote: >> In article <frydnZ7hS4i0fJrOnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne >> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: >> >>>>> To expand on this, force quitting an application can cause any file that >>>>> the application currently has open to become corrupt, since it does not >>>>> give the application a chance to finish updating the file in question >>>>> and close it before quitting. Applications may have their own preference >>>>> files open, or other files on your startup volume. If an application's >>>>> preference file becomes malformed or corrupt, it can cause the >>>>> application in question to behave in unpredictable ways on subsequent >>>>> launches. >>>> >>>> that's possible, but very unlikely because files are written atomically. >>>> >>>> you might lose changes you made since the last save, but that's about >>>> it. it's extremely unlikely that anything will be corrupted. >>> >>> I have to agree with J-R although we don't usually agree on very much. >>> >>> Apps only do as the programmer programmed. I've written apps where >>> files remain open for weeks - that includes random access read/writeable >>> files (simple flat databases, if you will). Certainly data recorders >>> with files open for hours or even days at a time. No ill came from it >>> (DOS, Windows). >> >> lots of apps leave files open. that is not the problem. >> >> the issue is what happens on a force-quit and almost always, the only >> data that is lost is anything changed since the last save. > What I wrote was in reply your claim: > "... very unlikely because files are written atomically." > Some are. Some are not. lsof your system disk with some general apps > open. Oops. Correction: many are not. It's funny how wrong he is, considering he never admits it. -- "I'm not bad; I'm just drawn that way."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-18 20:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180220142037089724%nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
| In reply to | #56663 |
In article <1lh9o11.jdr30za7497aN%nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid>, Nick Naym <nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid> wrote: > I have a 2TB WD "My Book Essential" (read that as "cheap piece of crap") > external drive on which I created two 1TB partitions. Initially, I used > one simply as a place to store selected (drag & dropped) folders from my > internal drive; the other for a SuperDuper clone. I got the thing a > couple of years ago when my previous iMac's HD was failing, simply to > have an additional (to my TM and clone backups on two external LaCie d2 > Quadras) backup. > > Recently, I erased the one that contained the dragged & dropped folders > and used it to create a second SuperDuper clone. > > When I plug the drive in (that's right, there's no on/off switch...you > turn it on/off by plugging/un[plugging it into the AC), both volumes > appear on the desktop, and both can be accessed. Oddly, however, > virtually any time I attempt to unmount/eject the volumes, the one > containing the second SuperDuper clone refuses to eject: I receive the > alert "The disk [name of volume] wasn't ejected because one or more > programs may be using it." Besides Finder, nothing is running, and Disk > Utility can't find any problems.The only way I can unmount/eject it is > by force-ejection or by shutting down my iMac and unplugging the drive. > > Any ideas? The problem is likely because Spotlight is busy indexing the disk. Go to Spotlight's Privacy settings and exclude that disk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-19 02:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bmiiacFi6mfU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #56686 |
On 2014-02-19, M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > In article ><1lh9o11.jdr30za7497aN%nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid>, Nick > Naym <nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid> wrote: > >> I have a 2TB WD "My Book Essential" (read that as "cheap piece of crap") >> external drive on which I created two 1TB partitions. Initially, I used >> one simply as a place to store selected (drag & dropped) folders from my >> internal drive; the other for a SuperDuper clone. I got the thing a >> couple of years ago when my previous iMac's HD was failing, simply to >> have an additional (to my TM and clone backups on two external LaCie d2 >> Quadras) backup. >> >> Recently, I erased the one that contained the dragged & dropped folders >> and used it to create a second SuperDuper clone. >> >> When I plug the drive in (that's right, there's no on/off switch...you >> turn it on/off by plugging/un[plugging it into the AC), both volumes >> appear on the desktop, and both can be accessed. Oddly, however, >> virtually any time I attempt to unmount/eject the volumes, the one >> containing the second SuperDuper clone refuses to eject: I receive the >> alert "The disk [name of volume] wasn't ejected because one or more >> programs may be using it." Besides Finder, nothing is running, and Disk >> Utility can't find any problems.The only way I can unmount/eject it is >> by force-ejection or by shutting down my iMac and unplugging the drive. >> >> Any ideas? > > The problem is likely because Spotlight is busy indexing the disk. Go > to Spotlight's Privacy settings and exclude that disk. Save yourself some mystery and potential time, and don't bother doing this until you use the lsof command to see what's using it. It's best to know what the problem is *before* you try to fix it. ; ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-18 21:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180220142142385183%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #56689 |
In article <bmiiacFi6mfU3@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > The problem is likely because Spotlight is busy indexing the disk. Go > > to Spotlight's Privacy settings and exclude that disk. > > Save yourself some mystery and potential time, and don't bother doing > this until you use the lsof command to see what's using it. It's best to > know what the problem is *before* you try to fix it. ; ) it's very likely it's spotlight and if turning it off fixes it, then that's what the problem was. plus, spotlight should be off for a superduper clone anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-19 04:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bmipquFjsegU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #56693 |
On 2014-02-19, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <bmiiacFi6mfU3@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger ><jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > The problem is likely because Spotlight is busy indexing the disk. Go >> > to Spotlight's Privacy settings and exclude that disk. >> >> Save yourself some mystery and potential time, and don't bother doing >> this until you use the lsof command to see what's using it. It's best to >> know what the problem is *before* you try to fix it. ; ) > > it's very likely it's spotlight and if turning it off fixes it, then > that's what the problem was. plus, spotlight should be off for a > superduper clone anyway. LOL! You really are a fuck tard. You yourself suggested running lsof in a reply in this very thread. The only reason you're popping your head out of your ass now is to start yet another pointless argument because you have a hard stick up your ass for me since I call you out on your stupid weasel games time and again. If you think that's not crystal clear for anyone with an IQ greater than a watermelon to see, you're just plain fucking delusional. Idiot. Anyway, feel free to carry on your pathetic argument on your own, because I won't be participating past this point. Enjoy, loser! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-18 23:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180220142335532867%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #56700 |
In article <bmipquFjsegU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > The problem is likely because Spotlight is busy indexing the disk. Go > >> > to Spotlight's Privacy settings and exclude that disk. > >> > >> Save yourself some mystery and potential time, and don't bother doing > >> this until you use the lsof command to see what's using it. It's best to > >> know what the problem is *before* you try to fix it. ; ) > > > > it's very likely it's spotlight and if turning it off fixes it, then > > that's what the problem was. plus, spotlight should be off for a > > superduper clone anyway. > > LOL! You really are a fuck tard. You yourself suggested running lsof in > a reply in this very thread. yes i did, but i also didn't think about spotlight, which is almost certainly the cause. > The only reason you're popping your head > out of your ass now is to start yet another pointless argument because > you have a hard stick up your ass for me since I call you out on your > stupid weasel games time and again. don't flatter yourself. i don't give a flying fuck what you do. my reason for posting was to help the original poster, but then you decided to turn this into a flame fest and demonstrate just how much of utter an asshole you can be. it's a lot easier to turn off spotlight and see if it fixes the problem rather than wade through the output of lsof, but if that doesn't solve the problem, then use lsof.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-20 15:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlgc6sa.ku.g.kreme@oswin.local> |
| In reply to | #56663 |
In message <1lh9o11.jdr30za7497aN%nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid> Nick Naym <nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid> wrote: > When I plug the drive in (that's right, there's no on/off switch...you > turn it on/off by plugging/un[plugging it into the AC), both volumes > appear on the desktop, and both can be accessed. Oddly, however, > virtually any time I attempt to unmount/eject the volumes, the one > containing the second SuperDuper clone refuses to eject: I receive the > alert "The disk [name of volume] wasn't ejected because one or more > programs may be using it." Besides Finder, nothing is running, and Disk > Utility can't find any problems.The only way I can unmount/eject it is > by force-ejection or by shutting down my iMac and unplugging the drive. When this happens, open up Terminal.app lsof /Volumes/Drivename -- oh no! there's been unauthorized access to my paypal account!!! ... how nice of someone at a grade school in korea to notice and inform me of it
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web