Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53263 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joe <none@given.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-11 23:00 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-12-20 21:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-11 23:00 -0800
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-12 01:14 -0800
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 13:10 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-19 23:42 -0800
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL android <here@there.was> - 2013-12-20 10:01 +0100
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-21 06:11 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 14:30 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-21 07:59 -0700
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 15:25 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-21 19:40 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 21:41 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-21 14:19 -0800
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 04:55 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL David Ryeburn <david_ryeburn@telus.netz> - 2013-12-21 21:26 -0800
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-12-22 20:33 +1300
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 15:44 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-12-23 11:07 +1300
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-22 09:09 +1100
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 22:42 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 17:49 +0000
Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-20 21:34 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 22:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhmjqgFh28qU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53619 |
On 2013-12-21, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote: > In article <bhln0lFbq9pU1@mid.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Perhaps this endevour simply isn't worth the fucking effort. I suspect >> "android" is simply trolling. If he is, he's FAILING hard, because he >> can't seem to convey his point in a way anyone but himself and the >> crazies can comprehend. > > It is interesting that you think a crazy can *comprehend* something > that you - who regard himself as anything but - cannot. Likewise, I find it interesting that a grammatical inconsistency is the only little shred of anything you could find here to discuss further. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 17:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhje9oFrgi2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53555 |
On 2013-12-20, Joe <none@given.now> wrote: > In article <bhg9heF6uafU3@mid.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-12-12, Joe <none@given.now> wrote: >> > Please 'scuse the off-topicness of this. >> >> Okay. Can you do us a return favor though? Please indicate in the >> subject line that your post is off topic in the future. Something as >> simple as "OT: Blah" or "[OT] Blah" would suffice. > > Goodness, it took a week for you to NOT figure out, FROM THE TOPIC, that > is was off-topic. Sometimes I don't check Usenet for a few days. I literally couldn't care less if that presents some sort of personal problem for you. > Plz, Rog, go back to sleep. Make me, bitch. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-dptDXcUc8syS@localhost> |
| In reply to | #53555 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 07:42:17 UTC, Joe <none@given.now> wrote: > In article <bhg9heF6uafU3@mid.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > > On 2013-12-12, Joe <none@given.now> wrote: > > > Please 'scuse the off-topicness of this. > > > > Okay. Can you do us a return favor though? Please indicate in the > > subject line that your post is off topic in the future. Something as > > simple as "OT: Blah" or "[OT] Blah" would suffice. > > Goodness, it took a week for you to NOT figure out, FROM THE TOPIC, that > is was off-topic. Plz, Rog, go back to sleep. Labeling off-topic posts as such is common courtesy on Usenet. Evidently you're not big on courtesy. -- John Varela
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web