Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53161 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-09 07:19 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-12-09 19:22 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 74 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Last Thoth? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-09 07:19 -0700
Re: Last Thoth? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-09 15:46 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 09:49 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 13:40 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-09 14:46 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 13:52 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Guenther Fischer <never@spam.invalid> - 2013-12-09 21:09 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 14:16 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-10 01:53 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2013-12-09 19:37 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-10 04:39 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-12-22 15:19 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-09 13:25 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-10 01:57 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-09 13:24 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-09 13:25 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 15:36 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-09 16:40 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-09 15:50 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-10 10:00 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-09 19:01 -0700
Re: Last Thoth? Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-09 16:49 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-09 07:50 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-10 03:00 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? A N Niel <anniel@nym.alias.net.invalid> - 2013-12-10 09:19 -0700
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-10 12:40 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-13 20:53 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> - 2013-12-13 16:38 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> - 2013-12-13 17:29 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-10 12:22 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Doc O'Leary <droleary@7usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2013-12-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-10 21:59 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-11 05:12 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-10 10:02 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? MalcolmO <user@domain.invalid> - 2013-12-14 16:25 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-09 09:08 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-12-09 19:58 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 12:50 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-19 08:44 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 14:06 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-19 17:31 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 01:48 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-19 20:12 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 02:35 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-19 20:40 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 02:53 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-19 20:58 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2013-12-19 19:27 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-19 21:49 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-19 22:49 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-19 22:48 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-20 07:56 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-20 07:26 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-20 15:24 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? "Mr. Strat" <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> - 2013-12-21 06:43 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-21 10:48 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-21 10:44 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-21 12:34 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-21 19:33 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Charles <fort514@mac.com> - 2013-12-21 22:25 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-22 20:24 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 11:34 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-12-20 11:01 -0600
Re: Last Thoth? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-19 15:00 +0000
Re: Last Thoth? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-19 10:30 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-19 10:32 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Guenther Fischer <never@spam.invalid> - 2013-12-09 18:53 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-12-09 19:50 +0100
Re: Last Thoth? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-09 13:04 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-12-10 03:03 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> - 2013-12-09 13:40 -0500
Re: Last Thoth? Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2013-12-09 18:36 -0800
Re: Last Thoth? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-09 20:13 -0700
Re: Last Thoth? Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2013-12-09 19:22 -0800
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 17:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <bhhdukFfa71U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53487 |
On 2013-12-19 14:06:19 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > On 2013-12-19, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >> In article <bhg8cmF6uafU2@mid.individual.net>, >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-12-09, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> When I kept having to bug him to get updates, I asked why he couldn't >>>> add me to his mailing list. Apparently the software he uses doesn't >>>> support adding without invitation. Since he didn't differentiate between >>>> marketing and updates, I didn't subscribe and had to bug him. I got >>>> tired of it and asked for a refund rather than having to deal with him. >>>> He seems to think he's offering "excellent customer service" but I think >>>> he's just off his meds. >>>> >>>> Again, he's making writing software and supporting it personal. And now >>>> he's taking his ball and going home. Sooner or later, he'll have people >>>> just ignoring him for doing this sort of thing once to often. >>> >>> Sooner or later? Brian's asshat behavior got old for me long ago, and >>> I'm not even one of his customers. We can ignore the question of whether >>> he hijacked NewsWatcher source code to build Thoth. He's pulled this >>> kind of cry baby "software isn't paying for itself" shit before in the >>> past. I don't see the behavior changing. So I say fuck Thoth. Good >>> riddance. >> >> How old is this guy now? > > No idea. But when software development is more about making money than > having fun, it's time to stop writing software, IMO. Dude should find > another hobby. Some like to have fun making money. And hopefully you two are finished with this round of the 'I hate Brian' crap! -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 01:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhhlv5FglsgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53534 |
On 2013-12-19, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-19 14:06:19 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2013-12-19, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In article <bhg8cmF6uafU2@mid.individual.net>, >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2013-12-09, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> When I kept having to bug him to get updates, I asked why he couldn't >>>>> add me to his mailing list. Apparently the software he uses doesn't >>>>> support adding without invitation. Since he didn't differentiate between >>>>> marketing and updates, I didn't subscribe and had to bug him. I got >>>>> tired of it and asked for a refund rather than having to deal with him. >>>>> He seems to think he's offering "excellent customer service" but I think >>>>> he's just off his meds. >>>>> >>>>> Again, he's making writing software and supporting it personal. And now >>>>> he's taking his ball and going home. Sooner or later, he'll have people >>>>> just ignoring him for doing this sort of thing once to often. >>>> >>>> Sooner or later? Brian's asshat behavior got old for me long ago, and >>>> I'm not even one of his customers. We can ignore the question of whether >>>> he hijacked NewsWatcher source code to build Thoth. He's pulled this >>>> kind of cry baby "software isn't paying for itself" shit before in the >>>> past. I don't see the behavior changing. So I say fuck Thoth. Good >>>> riddance. >>> >>> How old is this guy now? >> >> No idea. But when software development is more about making money than >> having fun, it's time to stop writing software, IMO. Dude should find >> another hobby. > > Some like to have fun making money. I never said you couldn't have fun making money. Apparently you didn't comprehend what I said. Read it again, and pay closer attention this time. > And hopefully you two are finished with this round of the 'I hate Brian' crap! Are you Brian's mom or something? What do you care what people think about him? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 20:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <bhhnd6Fh2bpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53537 |
On 2013-12-20 01:48:22 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > On 2013-12-19, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2013-12-19 14:06:19 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-19, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> In article <bhg8cmF6uafU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-12-09, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> When I kept having to bug him to get updates, I asked why he couldn't >>>>>> add me to his mailing list. Apparently the software he uses doesn't >>>>>> support adding without invitation. Since he didn't differentiate between >>>>>> marketing and updates, I didn't subscribe and had to bug him. I got >>>>>> tired of it and asked for a refund rather than having to deal with him. >>>>>> He seems to think he's offering "excellent customer service" but I think >>>>>> he's just off his meds. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, he's making writing software and supporting it personal. And now >>>>>> he's taking his ball and going home. Sooner or later, he'll have people >>>>>> just ignoring him for doing this sort of thing once to often. >>>>> >>>>> Sooner or later? Brian's asshat behavior got old for me long ago, and >>>>> I'm not even one of his customers. We can ignore the question of whether >>>>> he hijacked NewsWatcher source code to build Thoth. He's pulled this >>>>> kind of cry baby "software isn't paying for itself" shit before in the >>>>> past. I don't see the behavior changing. So I say fuck Thoth. Good >>>>> riddance. >>>> >>>> How old is this guy now? >>> >>> No idea. But when software development is more about making money than >>> having fun, it's time to stop writing software, IMO. Dude should find >>> another hobby. >> >> Some like to have fun making money. > > I never said you couldn't have fun making money. Apparently you didn't > comprehend what I said. Read it again, and pay closer attention this > time. > >> And hopefully you two are finished with this round of the 'I hate Brian' crap! > > Are you Brian's mom or something? What do you care what people think > about him? In reality I don't care. What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 02:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhhoo1FglsgU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53538 |
On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-20 01:48:22 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2013-12-19, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>> On 2013-12-19 14:06:19 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>> >>>> On 2013-12-19, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> In article <bhg8cmF6uafU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2013-12-09, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I kept having to bug him to get updates, I asked why he couldn't >>>>>>> add me to his mailing list. Apparently the software he uses doesn't >>>>>>> support adding without invitation. Since he didn't differentiate between >>>>>>> marketing and updates, I didn't subscribe and had to bug him. I got >>>>>>> tired of it and asked for a refund rather than having to deal with him. >>>>>>> He seems to think he's offering "excellent customer service" but I think >>>>>>> he's just off his meds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again, he's making writing software and supporting it personal. And now >>>>>>> he's taking his ball and going home. Sooner or later, he'll have people >>>>>>> just ignoring him for doing this sort of thing once to often. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sooner or later? Brian's asshat behavior got old for me long ago, and >>>>>> I'm not even one of his customers. We can ignore the question of whether >>>>>> he hijacked NewsWatcher source code to build Thoth. He's pulled this >>>>>> kind of cry baby "software isn't paying for itself" shit before in the >>>>>> past. I don't see the behavior changing. So I say fuck Thoth. Good >>>>>> riddance. >>>>> >>>>> How old is this guy now? >>>> >>>> No idea. But when software development is more about making money than >>>> having fun, it's time to stop writing software, IMO. Dude should find >>>> another hobby. >>> >>> Some like to have fun making money. >> >> I never said you couldn't have fun making money. Apparently you didn't >> comprehend what I said. Read it again, and pay closer attention this >> time. >> >>> And hopefully you two are finished with this round of the 'I hate Brian' crap! >> >> Are you Brian's mom or something? What do you care what people think >> about him? > > In reality I don't care. > > What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes > on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then we wouldn't be having this conversation. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 20:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53539 |
On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2013-12-20 01:48:22 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-19, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>> On 2013-12-19 14:06:19 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-12-19, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> In article <bhg8cmF6uafU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2013-12-09, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I kept having to bug him to get updates, I asked why he couldn't >>>>>>>> add me to his mailing list. Apparently the software he uses doesn't >>>>>>>> support adding without invitation. Since he didn't differentiate between >>>>>>>> marketing and updates, I didn't subscribe and had to bug him. I got >>>>>>>> tired of it and asked for a refund rather than having to deal with him. >>>>>>>> He seems to think he's offering "excellent customer service" but I think >>>>>>>> he's just off his meds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Again, he's making writing software and supporting it personal. And now >>>>>>>> he's taking his ball and going home. Sooner or later, he'll have people >>>>>>>> just ignoring him for doing this sort of thing once to often. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sooner or later? Brian's asshat behavior got old for me long ago, and >>>>>>> I'm not even one of his customers. We can ignore the question of whether >>>>>>> he hijacked NewsWatcher source code to build Thoth. He's pulled this >>>>>>> kind of cry baby "software isn't paying for itself" shit before in the >>>>>>> past. I don't see the behavior changing. So I say fuck Thoth. Good >>>>>>> riddance. >>>>>> >>>>>> How old is this guy now? >>>>> >>>>> No idea. But when software development is more about making money than >>>>> having fun, it's time to stop writing software, IMO. Dude should find >>>>> another hobby. >>>> >>>> Some like to have fun making money. >>> >>> I never said you couldn't have fun making money. Apparently you didn't >>> comprehend what I said. Read it again, and pay closer attention this >>> time. >>> >>>> And hopefully you two are finished with this round of the 'I hate Brian' crap! >>> >>> Are you Brian's mom or something? What do you care what people think >>> about him? >> >> In reality I don't care. >> >> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. > > You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the > years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then > we wouldn't be having this conversation. And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I always got good support and prompt responses to questions. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 02:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bhhpojFglsgU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53540 |
On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>> In reality I don't care. >>> >>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >> >> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >> we wouldn't be having this conversation. > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. So be it. Are we done here? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 20:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l90bpb$t7s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53541 |
On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>> In reality I don't care. >>>> >>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>> >>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >> >> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. > > So be it. > > Are we done here? depends... :) -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 19:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <l90de2$oo3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53542 |
In article <l90bpb$t7s$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > > > On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> > >>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > >>>> In reality I don't care. > >>>> > >>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes > >>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. > >>> > >>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the > >>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then > >>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. > >> > >> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > >> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > > > And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. > > > > So be it. > > > > Are we done here? > > depends... :) He asked if you were done, not what kind of undies you have on :) (Sorry, just couldn't resist a straight-line THAT ripe...) -- Security provided by Mssrs Smith and/or Wesson. Brought to you by the letter Q
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 21:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l90ep4$9tr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53543 |
On 2013-12-20 03:27:02 +0000, Don Bruder said: > In article <l90bpb$t7s$1@dont-email.me>, > Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>>>> In reality I don't care. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>>>> >>>>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>>>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>>>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >>>> >>>> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >>>> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. >>> >>> And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. >>> >>> So be it. >>> >>> Are we done here? >> >> depends... :) > > He asked if you were done, not what kind of undies you have on :) > > > > (Sorry, just couldn't resist a straight-line THAT ripe...) Yeah, yeah! I knew someone would take the cheap shot!! :) Of course, at my age I'm probably not far away from needing them. :( -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 22:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013121922491185409-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #53545 |
On 2013-12-20 03:49:56 +0000, Lloyd E Parsons said: > On 2013-12-20 03:27:02 +0000, Don Bruder said: > >> In article <l90bpb$t7s$1@dont-email.me>, >> Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>> >>>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In reality I don't care. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>>>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>>>>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>>>>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >>>>> >>>>> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >>>>> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. >>>> >>>> And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. >>>> >>>> So be it. >>>> >>>> Are we done here? >>> >>> depends... :) >> >> He asked if you were done, not what kind of undies you have on :) >> >> >> >> (Sorry, just couldn't resist a straight-line THAT ripe...) > > Yeah, yeah! I knew someone would take the cheap shot!! :) > > Of course, at my age I'm probably not far away from needing them. :( I'd recommend their new "Hungry Man" line.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-19 22:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013121922483365254-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #53541 |
On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>> In reality I don't care. >>>> >>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>> >>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >> >> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. > > So be it. > > Are we done here? This seems to be good rationale for a bitch session about Obama, I suppose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 07:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <bhj0jmFp769U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53552 |
On 2013-12-20 06:48:33 +0000, gtr said: > On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>> >>>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>>> In reality I don't care. >>>>> >>>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>>> >>>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >>> >>> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >>> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. >> >> And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. >> >> So be it. >> >> Are we done here? > > This seems to be good rationale for a bitch session about Obama, I suppose. I suppose we could, but then we'd need to bitch about all of Washington DC's political residents since not a damned one of them have been actually earning their paycheck for way too long. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 07:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013122007262672749-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #53562 |
On 2013-12-20 13:56:06 +0000, Lloyd E Parsons said: > On 2013-12-20 06:48:33 +0000, gtr said: > >> On 2013-12-20 02:53:07 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> >>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>> On 2013-12-20 02:35:45 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-12-20, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >>>>>> In reality I don't care. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I do care about is the bitch-a-thon that usually starts and goes >>>>>> on and on ad nauseum whenever Brian's name comes up. >>>>> >>>>> You can blame Brian for that. If not for his assinine behavior over the >>>>> years, waffling back and forth, blaming users for his bad attitude, then >>>>> we wouldn't be having this conversation. >>>> >>>> And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >>>> always got good support and prompt responses to questions. >>> >>> And your definition of "good support" differs from mine. >>> >>> So be it. >>> >>> Are we done here? >> >> This seems to be good rationale for a bitch session about Obama, I suppose. > > I suppose we could, but then we'd need to bitch about all of Washington > DC's political residents since not a damned one of them have been > actually earning their paycheck for way too long. Well what do you expect when Brian is doing what he's doing!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-20 15:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
| In reply to | #53540 |
In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. As did I -- m-m photo gallery: http://mhmyers.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Strat" <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 06:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <211220130643032900%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #53580 |
In article <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > > As did I The few times I've had to contact him about something, he's been quick and courteous in his response.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 10:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <211220131048146356%nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
| In reply to | #53595 |
In article <211220130643032900%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>, Mr. Strat <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> wrote: > In article <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M > <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > > > In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons > > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > > > > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > > > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > > > > > As did I > > The few times I've had to contact him about something, he's been quick > and courteous in his response. The problem is, now it is unavailable. You cannot download Thoth from anywhere. -- m-m photo gallery: http://mhmyers.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 10:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lybanon-673740.10440321122013@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net> |
| In reply to | #53598 |
In article <211220131048146356%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > In article <211220130643032900%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>, Mr. Strat > <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> wrote: > > > In article <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M > > <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > > > > > In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons > > > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > > > > > > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > > > > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > > > > > > > > As did I > > > > The few times I've had to contact him about something, he's been quick > > and courteous in his response. > > The problem is, now it is unavailable. You cannot download Thoth from > anywhere. http://download.cnet.com/Thoth/3000-2164_4-6733.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 12:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <211220131234402300%nospam.m-m@ny.more> |
| In reply to | #53600 |
In article <lybanon-673740.10440321122013@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net>, Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > The problem is, now it is unavailable. You cannot download Thoth from > > anywhere. > > http://download.cnet.com/Thoth/3000-2164_4-6733.html Thanks. I saw that but declined the installer app CNET forced you to download. Seems harmless though. -- m-m photo gallery: http://mhmyers.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 19:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlbbr8d.1c7f.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #53598 |
In message <211220131048146356%nospam.m-m@ny.more> M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > In article <211220130643032900%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>, Mr. Strat > <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> wrote: >> In article <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M >> <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: >> >> > In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons >> > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> > >> > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I >> > > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. >> > >> > >> > As did I >> >> The few times I've had to contact him about something, he's been quick >> and courteous in his response. > The problem is, now it is unavailable. You cannot download Thoth from > anywhere. Oh, I bet there is SOMEWHERE you can download it from... -- It was where the city kept all those things it occasionally needed but was uneasy about, like the Watch-house, the theatres, the prison and the publishers. It was the place for all those things which might go off bang in unexpected ways.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charles <fort514@mac.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-21 22:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <211220132225114407%fort514@mac.com> |
| In reply to | #53595 |
In article <211220130643032900%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>, Mr. Strat <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> wrote: > In article <201220131524223870%nospam.m-m@ny.more>, M-M > <nospam.m-m@ny.more> wrote: > > > In article <l90amv$odl$1@dont-email.me>, Lloyd E Parsons > > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > > > > > And yet many of us did not have that experience with him at all. I > > > always got good support and prompt responses to questions. > > > > > > As did I > > The few times I've had to contact him about something, he's been quick > and courteous in his response. My experiences with Brian's support were also positive. And I recall reporting a bug to him and he swiftly fixed it. -- Charles
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web