Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
(OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <peera1$c66$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116734 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> David B. STALKER wrote: >> >>> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely >>> alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who >>> displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really >>> shouldn't have done such things. :-( >> >> You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any >> video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less >> than zero. > > You most certainly WERE involved in The Real Truth MVP debacle. > > The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.virus/ b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ *LIES and MORE LIES*. I did *not* participate in that nine-year-old thread AT ALL. > Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at 'work':- > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/ Didn't look; not interested in any hackers group. > HTH Yes, it helps, but only to PROVE that you lie all the friggin' time! -- -bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <peerr8$q1b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116738 |
On 27-May-18 6:53 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>> >>>> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely >>>> alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who >>>> displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really >>>> shouldn't have done such things. :-( >>> >>> You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any >>> video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less >>> than zero. >> >> You most certainly WERE involved in The Real Truth MVP debacle. >> >> The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.virus/ > b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ > > *LIES and MORE LIES*. I did *not* participate in that nine-year-old thread > AT ALL. > >> Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at 'work':- >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/ > > Didn't look; not interested in any hackers group. You *DO* know that Dustin/Diesel is one of them, don't you? >> HTH > > Yes, it helps, but only to PROVE that you lie all the friggin' time! Are you saying that this statement "He even supports a known 'bad guy." shown on your special web page does NOT refer to PCButts1? If that's so, to whom DOES that phrase relate? -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <peeufj$vh2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116739 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 27-May-18 6:53 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> David B. STALKER wrote: >>> On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>>>> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely >>>>> alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who >>>>> displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really >>>>> shouldn't have done such things. :-( >>>> >>>> You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any >>>> video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less >>>> than zero. >>> >>> You most certainly WERE involved in The Real Truth MVP debacle. >>> >>> The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.virus/ >> b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ >> >> *LIES and MORE LIES*. I did *not* participate in that nine-year-old >> thread AT ALL. >> >>> Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at 'work':- >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/ >> >> Didn't look; not interested in any hackers group. > > You *DO* know that Dustin/Diesel is one of them, don't you? Doesn't matter what I know. I *do* know he is not a *STALKER*, as you are. >>> HTH >> >> Yes, it helps, but only to PROVE that you lie all the friggin' time! > > Are you saying that this statement "He even supports a known 'bad guy." > shown on your special web page does NOT refer to PCButts1? "Special web page"; this one? http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Of course it refers to PCButts. He's the only "bad guy" you've ever found, and YOU SUPPORT HIM. Further, what does that have to do with any video? > If that's so, to whom DOES that phrase relate? It is not so. There was no reason to name him on the "special web page" as the page is all about YOU and not him. It boggles the mind, knowing that you have a twenty-minute brain retention when presented with facts, yet you can constantly dig up old irrelevant shit. Do you have a surrogate poster? -- -bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef2c2$8cd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116754 |
On 27-May-18 7:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > >> On 27-May-18 6:53 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>>> On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>>>> David B. STALKER wrote: >>>>>> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely >>>>>> alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who >>>>>> displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really >>>>>> shouldn't have done such things. :-( >>>>> >>>>> You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any >>>>> video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less >>>>> than zero. >>>> >>>> You most certainly WERE involved in The Real Truth MVP debacle. >>>> >>>> The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.virus/ >>> b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ >>> >>> *LIES and MORE LIES*. I did *not* participate in that nine-year-old >>> thread AT ALL. >>> >>>> Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at 'work':- >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/ >>> >>> Didn't look; not interested in any hackers group. >> >> You *DO* know that Dustin/Diesel is one of them, don't you? > > Doesn't matter what I know. I *do* know he is not a *STALKER*, as you are. Dustin Cook *IS* a real-life STALKER. He drove Jenn to despair and gloated over the pain it caused her. He also stalked Jax and had one of her ISPs expel her. *AND* he stalked Eagle's niece. By associating with him, you demonstrate that you simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth. >>>> HTH >>> >>> Yes, it helps, but only to PROVE that you lie all the friggin' time! >> >> Are you saying that this statement "He even supports a known 'bad guy." >> shown on your special web page does NOT refer to PCButts1? > > "Special web page"; this one? > http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php > > Of course it refers to PCButts. He's the only "bad guy" you've ever found, > and YOU SUPPORT HIM. Further, what does that have to do with any video? I most certainly have NEVER supported PCButts - rather, I tried to get folk to tell the truth. DUSTIN COOK is *THE* 'bad guy' I found. He's STILL not sorry for all the bad things he's done - like using stolen automotive software to sell to his shady clientele. >> If that's so, to whom DOES that phrase relate? > > It is not so. There was no reason to name him on the "special web page" as > the page is all about YOU and not him. I accept that. > It boggles the mind, knowing that you have a twenty-minute brain retention > when presented with facts, yet you can constantly dig up old irrelevant > shit. Do you have a surrogate poster? No surrogate poster. You should 'know your enemy' before you start a war. -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef96n$ne$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116756 |
David B. STALKER wrote:
> On 27-May-18 7:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> David B. STALKER wrote:
>>> {snippage}
>>> You *DO* know that Dustin/Diesel is one of them, don't you?
>>
>> Doesn't matter what I know. I *do* know he is not a *STALKER*, as you
>> are.
>
> Dustin Cook *IS* a real-life STALKER.
Not of me, he isn't.
> By associating with him, you demonstrate that you simply cannot be
> trusted to tell the truth.
Once again, thickhead, there is no association between Dustin and me. None
at all. Absorb that into your synapse.
>>> Are you saying that this statement "He even supports a known 'bad
>>> guy." shown on your special web page does NOT refer to PCButts1?
>>
>> "Special web page"; this one?
>> http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
>>
>> Of course it refers to PCButts. He's the only "bad guy" you've ever
>> found, and YOU SUPPORT HIM. Further, what does that have to do with
>> any video?
>
> I most certainly have NEVER supported PCButts - rather,
Today it's a constant flow of lies for you. All day now all you've done is
tell lies. When people would tell you (over and over) that Butts was a
notorious, brazen code thief and copyright infringer, you'd make up shit
and tell us he really was "The Real Truth." And a blond woman. LOL!
>> It boggles the mind, knowing that you have a twenty-minute brain
>> retention when presented with facts, yet you can constantly dig up old
>> irrelevant shit. Do you have a surrogate poster?
>
> No surrogate poster.
Then it is really strange that you cannot remember a fact from twenty
minutes ago, but you can remember a Usenet thread from *NINE* years ago.
That means something.
Alzheimer's. Compounded by whiskey.
--
-bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6D65BD7HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116756 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pef2c2$8cd$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:34 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] >> Doesn't matter what I know. I *do* know he is not a *STALKER*, as >> you are. > > Dustin Cook *IS* a real-life STALKER. He drove Jenn to despair and > gloated over the pain it caused her. He also stalked Jax and had > one of her ISPs expel her. *AND* he stalked Eagle's niece. Wait a minute... I'll address your so called victim examples, one by one here. Jenn went to various newsgroups that she wasn't a normal participant of and attempted to spread completely bullshit stories concerning me. Various regulars of those newsgroups (alt.comp.virus was one) justifiably told her where she was welcome to take herself. Jenn informed me prior to doing so that she was going to do this and the intention was to try and ruin whatever 'business' she thought I was personally responsible for as well as harm my supposed 'online reputation' as one of the good guys. She incorrectly assumed she was free to do this without any possible repercussions. That wasn't the only thing she'd done mind you, but by then, I'd had enough of her bullshit and decided to show her that she wasn't as anonymous as she thought she was. And couldn't just do as she damn well pleased without a response or two she may not like, but asked for. I didn't have any ISP expel Jax (or anyone else for that matter). ALL I actually did was forward a select few posts from Jax to the appropriate email address and whatever action resulted was something they determined appropriate. As far as Eagle's niece, I responded in kind, AFTER he bragged about using his credit card to pay for information on my brother and threatened to provide it to usenet if I didn't do as he demanded. Not only did I refuse to comply with his wishes, I gave him a taste of his own medicine; and I didn't need to use a fucking credit card to do it. In ALL of your examples above, I RESPONDED to action taken against me, first. And in NONE OF YOUR EXAMPLES DID I STALK ANYONE! I responded to their aggression with superior firepower, but, I did NOT STALK anybody in doing so. > By associating with him, you demonstrate that you simply cannot be > trusted to tell the truth. Only by what passes for logic to you could that statement possibly make any sense. >> Of course it refers to PCButts. He's the only "bad guy" you've >> ever found, and YOU SUPPORT HIM. Further, what does that have to >> do with any video? > > I most certainly have NEVER supported PCButts - rather, I tried to > get folk to tell the truth. You are a fucking liar, David. You have supported pcbutts on several occasions. You've quoted KNOWN BULLSHIT he's written to attack not only myself but other posters from time to time too. You've referred to that asshat as some expert on myself and a few others on more than one occasion, too. > DUSTIN COOK is *THE* 'bad guy' I found. No, actually, I'm not. If I were, You'd have been able to abuse my skills to crack into those web forums on your behalf. You decided you had a problem with me after you couldn't get far enough by asking me personal questions and failed to con me into breaking into those sites for your benefit. Until you decided to try blackmailing me by posting what you thought was a google streetmap view of my house url, I had no real issue with you. Incidently, You'd been stalking me for awhile prior to your initial email pretending to have questions about BugHunter. You wrongly assumed that based on what you'd read about me, that you'd be able to get me to do some shady shit for you; and you were wrong. So no, you didn't find a bad guy when you found me. > He's STILL not sorry for all the bad things he's done - I've never claimed I was sorry for every single thing I've done, David. OTH, I have written official apologies for some of the poor decisions I made that had a bad outcome for people I didn't personally know. I AM sorry I caused those problems. > like using stolen automotive software to sell to his shady > clientele. Do I sense some real bottom of the barrel reaching here? >> It boggles the mind, knowing that you have a twenty-minute brain >> retention when presented with facts, yet you can constantly dig >> up old irrelevant shit. Do you have a surrogate poster? > > No surrogate poster. You should 'know your enemy' before you start > a war. Several of us know a considerable amount more about you than I suspect any of us would like. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff. --Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6D21F90HT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116739 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:peerr8$q1b$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 18:02:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] > You *DO* know that Dustin/Diesel is one of them, don't you? Is one of what exactly, David? -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that ALERT Notice from Microsoft. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <c6f03970-ed08-465b-89af-bf972a9ef9e1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116738 |
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 10:53:08 AM UTC-7, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > > > On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > >> David B. STALKER wrote: > >> > >>> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely > >>> alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who > >>> displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really > >>> shouldn't have done such things. :-( > >> > >> You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any > >> video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less > >> than zero. > > > > You most certainly WERE involved in The Real Truth MVP debacle. > > > > The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.virus/ > b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ > > *LIES and MORE LIES*. I did *not* participate in that nine-year-old thread > AT ALL. > > > Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at 'work':- > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/ > > Didn't look; not interested in any hackers group. > > > HTH > > Yes, it helps, but only to PROVE that you lie all the friggin' time! > > -- > -bts It's a long story, and Satan is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with nyms that speak just like him. And given how often it is clear that Satan's post is some exaggeration of an observation Steve Carroll shared which had been a bodyslam on Satan for something he did which was stupid/false/etc... its really a repeated demonstration of Satan's ever-present unease for having been so regularly humiliated: Satan is undeniably incapable of being slapped down. Frankly I do not really have any hope. Well... like I said, Steve Carroll would never deny the flooder is Satan, who is a demonstrable AppleScripter but I don't know if it could be used to get by Google's spam filters. Yup. It seems this is what we have to deal with. Trolls who have no reason for being here other than to flood. Time to end this. It's Satan's problem but he blames Steve Carroll. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. You guys can only speculate from the viewpoint of a sociopath. -- E-commerce Simplified https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EF926E2D714HT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1> |
| In reply to | #116734 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:peemkh$n2i$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 16:33:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > The Real Truth (MVP)/PCButts http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152744416700 This Is A Public Service Announcement Should you trust pcbutts1 AKA TheRealTruth ???? Here is a sampling of what the anti-malware community has to say: http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2006/09/07/I-do-believe-PCBUTTS1-has-finally-lost-the-plot.aspx http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2006/11/10/272921.aspx http://forums.security-central.us/showthread.php?p=10097 http://www.digg.com/security/PCButts1_Under_Attack http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/pcbutts1.com http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/PCBUTTS.TXT http://www.atribune.org/Blog/?p=16 http://www.viruslist.com/en/weblog?weblogid=197597102 http://blog.subratam.org/?p=17 http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/securityblog/2006/09/07/pcbutts1what-a-royal-pain-in-the-butt/ http://www.besttechie.net/2006/09/07/pcbutts1-back-at-it/ http://temerc.blogspot.com/2006/09/pcbutts-internet-software-theif.html There was no video, David. And, pcbutts got busted stealing the picture from a site that hosted alot of things of that nature. The individual had more than just that pic and made no effort to hide who they were. The individual, btw, Isn't me. > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/microsoft.public.security.vir > us/b8_XlJ0bUX8/IixGDFpSXyIJ > > Here's a classic example of Diesel (aka Dustin J. Cook) at > 'work':- > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.hackers.malicious/JL80_R2 > kwWE/xLO97BFa0q8J HAHAHA. I can't claim to be the first or the only person to out him. He was well known as a code thief and had already been outed for that previously by others. He's certainly NOT the female white model YOU mistook him for being, David. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef6ck$3mt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116744 |
On 27-May-18 7:15 PM, Diesel wrote: > He's certainly NOT the female white model > YOU mistook him for being, David. I most surely did NOT mistake him for a white model - as described in detail by bts - but now removed from the tekrider website. Perhaps she's no longer a threat, eh? In actual fact, I once had him as a Facebook friend for a short while but thought better of it and unfriended him. He was a black man and seemed to be a family orientated individual. -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pefadu$ne$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116763 |
David B. STALKER wrote: > On 27-May-18 7:15 PM, Diesel wrote: >> He's certainly NOT the female white model YOU mistook him for being, >> David. > > I most surely did NOT mistake him for a white model - as described in > detail by bts - but now removed from the tekrider website. Perhaps she's > no longer a threat, eh? She? ROF'L!! Yes, you did insist Butts was the blond woman, or the other women's pictures he randomly changed to on his blog. I don't remember you ever admitting Butts was a man. (It is not removed...) > In actual fact, I once had him as a Facebook friend for a short while > but thought better of it and unfriended him. He was a black man You must be a racist. > ..and seemed to be a family orientated individual. A family-oriented thief. -- -bts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F02A6DB25CFHT1@63GuV.Q50m5CvD2.9762H0> |
| In reply to | #116763 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:pef6ck$3mt$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 21:02:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 27-May-18 7:15 PM, Diesel wrote: >> He's certainly NOT the female white model >> YOU mistook him for being, David. > > I most surely did NOT mistake him for a white model - as described > in detail by bts - but now removed from the tekrider website. > Perhaps she's no longer a threat, eh? BULLSHIT. You have on more than one occasion disagreed when several people, including myself, all told you it's a black dude, not a white female. You have on more than one occasion quoted horseshit they wrote about people and tried to pass it off as the truth. You've defended his sorry ass on more than one occasion. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Some people's brains are purely for life support purposes only.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <a3ulgd5pt4u1o7ae0fvi2btlpq11010du5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116734 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 17:33:20 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> David B. wrote: >> >>> This is another reminder of what was found:- >>> >>> <CUT_LINK_TO_DATAMINING_SITE> >> >> It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, >> you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely >> NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the >> *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to >> learn even the tiniest technological fact? > >That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? Maybe BD has malware on his precious Apple, and it's blocking the site. It's there for me. I suggest everyone else checks it out for him. You'll be doing him a BIG favor. https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <9aa36cea-4779-47ff-86a1-9dbf2f92ea22@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116724 |
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 7:57:10 AM UTC-7, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > David B. STALKER wrote: > > > This is another reminder of what was found:- > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2jzglu/MX%20Toolbox%20-% > 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 > > It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, > you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely > NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the > *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to > learn even the tiniest technological fact? > > I doubt it. You are too stupid. > > > Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly unlikely > > alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the guy who displayed > > a video in which you were sucking off a horse. You really shouldn't have > > done such things. :-( > > You LIE. I have never helped Diesel (or anyone else) with outing any > video, much less one about a horse. You have zero credibility. Less than > zero. > > -- > -bts Time to blame the cult-like herd of convenient friends! You're like a bowling pin in a needle-stack. We all see you there and just laugh at you. And you're so dumb you keep rejecting it. Recently I did work on and showed some AppleScript for the front end (only works on C+) which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Snit's narcissistic crap while reading with Google Groups. The Mac has better color selection options. He's incontrovertibly dishonest, he got called out on it and he's doing the standard ego protecting tricks covered in Trolling 101 as he does his damnedest to hang on to his story... but it won't work. Are you being like Snit on purpose? -- Get Rich Slow! http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <bujlgddp9ipgcdsc5ue1g0g0hliihs8t46@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116720 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:19:09 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >Nothing is going to get better for *YOU* unless you stop - believe me. I don't believe you. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <lallgdtcu1rfu7jaom01o7gkhequ0jeqpg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116720 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:19:09 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >As you may have seen, now that the malware has been removed, Sucuri >reported the site clean. How, pray tell, does one remove something that was never there? If that site ever had malware, you would have posted a link to it and everyone would have been on your side, calling it out. As you know, though, there never was any malware and it was simply a campaign by you to discredit the site for hosting a page containing embarrassing, but completely factual, information about you. There's no more to it than that. Your campaign was unsuccessful, obviously. By the way, now that you acknowledge the lack of malware, isn't it time to break out the apologies? That's what normal people would do. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8EF926F1B82DHT1@61h42cwiKOq6SsyYDRJ.p0t2aACe.77EPv3pyu8n5M8bC2UqE9CFMN017V64R1> |
| In reply to | #116720 |
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> news:peeb8c$e1i$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 13:19:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: >> "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >> news:pe97oa$n79$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 14:48:30 GMT in >> alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>>> https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net >>> >>> That all seems fine now. *THANK YOU* :-) >> >> Nothings changed on the tekrider site, David. It never contained >> malware. > > So you say. I was taught not to blame my tools. I wasn't taught to blindly trust what my tools were telling me. For example, in the electrical trade one such tool has a nickname of being 'widowmaker' because when it faults and you don't confirm it faulted, well.. you get the idea, right? Further, as you well know from prior stalking efforts by you concerning me, I'm not a typical end user or even power user. I know the site doesn't contain malware because I imaged the entire thing, multiple times and have thoroughly examined it, every single time. NONE of the images contain malware. >>> Can you account for the original result I got way back? >>> What do YOU think was amiss? Was it actually your site which had >>> a 'problem', was it maybe my computer which had been compromised >>> in some way or was it Sucuri itself trying to 'pull a fast one'? >> >> Your questions have already been answered, several times by >> several different people. Nothing has changed with that. >> Admission that you ignored all of them, noted. > > Everyone who answered blamed Sucuri. So the reason you need to ask the same questions again? > https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infect > ed%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 > > As you may have seen, now that the malware has been removed, > Sucuri reported the site clean. ROFL! Umm, no. There wasn't ever any malware on the site, David. Sucuri finally got around to addressing one of their false positives issues. Likely because enough people were able to demonstrate it existed and wrote about it. That's never good for business in the long run, if you don't fix it at some point. Evidently, they have. > Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly > unlikely alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the > guy who displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. > You really shouldn't have done such things. :-( ROFL! David, First, it wasn't me (halfway decent resemblance though if you ignore a few minor details such as hair, body build, etc). Second, it wasn't a video. And finally, it was something pcbutts lifted from a website that was/still is? actually dedicated to things of that nature (Yes, rofl, he got caught and the guy in the picture actually does all kinds of off the wall shit - And we don't share the same names) rofl!. What can I say, he has a twisted mind. And incidently, I wasn't the one who located the pictures original site; another poster to usenet did and called him out on it. So... caught you lying again. :) So not only is the post you wrote below: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 A great example of the pos you are, so is this one: MID: <peeb8c$e1i$1@dont-email.me> Bts has never helped me out in any way that I can think of. We're not 'friends' and have no alliance that I'm aware of. That can also be said for Char Jackson, etc. I don't know any of them and none of them actually know me. I do not communicate with them outside of usenet and have no intentions of doing so. We're all different people who have the same educated opinion of you and voice it from time to time. >> As long as you keep doing shit like this: >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 >> >> Nothings going to get better for you. > > Unless the item in your signature is removed, your video will be > placed on Facebook - so EVERYONE can see it. The video you already uploaded to youtube (which has been removed) as well as usenet? You must think you've got real dirt on me with that video or something? ROFL! Your slimey remark regarding the horse did convince me to alter my signature a little bit though. > Nothing is going to get better for *YOU* unless you stop - believe > me. You have no input on the status of things here, David. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef4de$mmg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116746 |
On 27-May-18 7:15 PM, Diesel wrote: > "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> > news:peeb8c$e1i$1@dont-email.me Sun, 27 May 2018 13:19:09 GMT in > alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: >>> "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> >>> news:pe97oa$n79$1@dont-email.me Fri, 25 May 2018 14:48:30 GMT in >>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>>> https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net >>>> >>>> That all seems fine now. *THANK YOU* :-) >>> >>> Nothings changed on the tekrider site, David. It never contained >>> malware. >> >> So you say. I was taught not to blame my tools. > > I wasn't taught to blindly trust what my tools were telling me. For > example, in the electrical trade one such tool has a nickname of > being 'widowmaker' because when it faults and you don't confirm it > faulted, well.. you get the idea, right? > > Further, as you well know from prior stalking efforts by you > concerning me, I'm not a typical end user or even power user. I know > the site doesn't contain malware because I imaged the entire thing, > multiple times and have thoroughly examined it, every single time. > NONE of the images contain malware. > >>>> Can you account for the original result I got way back? >>>> What do YOU think was amiss? Was it actually your site which had >>>> a 'problem', was it maybe my computer which had been compromised >>>> in some way or was it Sucuri itself trying to 'pull a fast one'? >>> >>> Your questions have already been answered, several times by >>> several different people. Nothing has changed with that. >>> Admission that you ignored all of them, noted. >> >> Everyone who answered blamed Sucuri. > > So the reason you need to ask the same questions again? > >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infect >> ed%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0 >> >> As you may have seen, now that the malware has been removed, >> Sucuri reported the site clean. > > ROFL! Umm, no. There wasn't ever any malware on the site, David. > Sucuri finally got around to addressing one of their false positives > issues. Likely because enough people were able to demonstrate it > existed and wrote about it. That's never good for business in the > long run, if you don't fix it at some point. Evidently, they have. > >> Perhaps YOU can persuade him? You appear to have an highly >> unlikely alliance. Mind you, I recall him helping you 'out' the >> guy who displayed a video in which you were sucking off a horse. >> You really shouldn't have done such things. :-( > > ROFL! David, First, it wasn't me (halfway decent resemblance though > if you ignore a few minor details such as hair, body build, etc). > Second, it wasn't a video. And finally, it was something pcbutts > lifted from a website that was/still is? actually dedicated to things > of that nature (Yes, rofl, he got caught and the guy in the picture > actually does all kinds of off the wall shit - And we don't share the > same names) rofl!. What can I say, he has a twisted mind. > > And incidently, I wasn't the one who located the pictures original > site; another poster to usenet did and called him out on it. So... > caught you lying again. :) > > So not only is the post you wrote below: > http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 > > A great example of the pos you are, so is this one: > MID: <peeb8c$e1i$1@dont-email.me> > > Bts has never helped me out in any way that I can think of. We're not > 'friends' and have no alliance that I'm aware of. That can also be > said for Char Jackson, etc. I don't know any of them and none of them > actually know me. I do not communicate with them outside of usenet > and have no intentions of doing so. We're all different people who > have the same educated opinion of you and voice it from time to time. > >>> As long as you keep doing shit like this: >>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 >>> >>> Nothings going to get better for you. >> >> Unless the item in your signature is removed, your video will be >> placed on Facebook - so EVERYONE can see it. > > The video you already uploaded to youtube (which has been removed) as > well as usenet? You must think you've got real dirt on me with that > video or something? ROFL! It shows where you make your videos supporting ISIS and make plans to cause damage to your fellow citizens in the USA? Note the question mark. Is this true? > Your slimey remark regarding the horse did convince me to alter my > signature a little bit though. > >> Nothing is going to get better for *YOU* unless you stop - believe >> me. > > You have no input on the status of things here, David. If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted here:- https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, Dustin. I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell I can do so in your REAL world. -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef5is$u78$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116757 |
On 2018-05-27 4:28 PM, David B. wrote: > If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted here:- > > https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ > > There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, Dustin. > > I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell I can > do so in your REAL world. > You are the person who claims not to be a stalker, right? You just blew it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) |
| Message-ID | <pef5rj$uva$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116759 |
On 27-May-18 9:48 PM, Frozen North wrote: > On 2018-05-27 4:28 PM, David B. wrote: > >> If your new signature remains, your silent video will be posted here:- >> >> https://www.facebook.com/onekingsport/ >> >> There's nearly 10,000 users. I'll wager ONE of them knows you, Dustin. >> >> I may not be able to influence things in Usenet, but sure as hell I >> can do so in your REAL world. >> > You are the person who claims not to be a stalker, right? You just blew > it. How so? I'll make Dustin famous, if that's what he craves. -- D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web