Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53606 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-21 11:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-12-28 18:55 +1300 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 392 — 38 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 11:21 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-21 21:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-21 13:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 13:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 13:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-22 11:21 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 16:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:35 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:47 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 21:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 09:13 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-24 16:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 21:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-23 19:09 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-23 09:05 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-23 18:58 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 14:06 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 18:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:56 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:19 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-24 17:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Martin Frost me at invalid stanford daht edu <nospam@stanford.edu.invalid> - 2013-12-25 01:43 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-25 08:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:29 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 18:51 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 19:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:59 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:07 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:36 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 12:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 16:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 17:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 23:56 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 16:59 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:22 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe "Ed H." <fake@notreal.net> - 2013-12-27 13:30 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-24 22:02 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:20 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 12:47 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:09 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:09 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 12:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:38 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 17:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 18:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:24 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-24 23:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:50 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-25 13:28 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 15:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:54 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:10 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:26 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-25 04:34 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:52 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 21:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 15:16 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-26 19:00 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-27 08:20 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-27 18:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 10:20 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:50 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 09:27 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 13:07 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-29 18:17 +0100
Re: Semantics Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-29 12:34 -0500
Re: Semantics Gripe Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-29 14:53 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-29 21:55 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:04 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-26 16:28 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-24 18:22 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-25 00:02 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:15 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-27 18:36 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 21:08 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-24 18:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-01-01 17:55 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 11:41 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 11:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-02 09:10 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 13:49 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 15:38 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-02 13:16 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 17:31 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-02 09:10 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-02 11:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-02 22:17 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-02 15:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-01-02 18:33 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 13:46 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 15:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:42 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 10:49 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-22 16:54 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-26 10:37 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-26 18:32 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 05:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-26 09:30 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:35 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-23 10:59 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 04:58 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-21 20:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-22 15:43 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-22 11:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-22 22:35 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 18:08 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-23 09:07 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 04:12 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 15:15 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-23 15:39 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 18:46 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 04:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 22:02 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 01:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-23 19:41 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-23 11:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-23 09:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 13:33 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 18:40 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-24 10:15 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:01 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:10 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 18:23 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:49 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 10:32 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 12:36 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:40 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 16:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:41 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-23 09:26 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 18:47 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:39 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:46 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 19:10 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 04:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-25 14:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 01:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 07:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 05:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 09:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-26 21:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 02:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:43 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 19:16 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-27 08:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:00 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 09:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 10:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-26 10:00 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-27 13:22 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 10:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-27 15:57 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-27 18:34 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 12:43 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 11:00 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 10:57 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 09:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 14:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe Di Domenico <joedid@email.com> - 2013-12-28 14:46 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-31 11:54 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-31 14:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:04 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 15:55 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-19 21:20 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 17:21 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 17:22 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-04-20 03:16 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-20 00:00 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:40 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 10:54 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:02 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:34 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-19 15:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-20 08:51 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 22:37 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 12:36 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-20 07:03 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 17:33 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe Wolf Dee <joedid@email.com> - 2014-04-21 07:57 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 03:23 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-04-20 03:11 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 09:35 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 15:51 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 15:56 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 17:07 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-27 12:05 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-27 21:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-28 09:48 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-26 09:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-27 09:38 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:59 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:58 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-23 22:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 04:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-24 14:19 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 10:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:14 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 20:01 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 15:19 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:14 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 16:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 15:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:07 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:08 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:25 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:11 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 20:54 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:00 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 10:21 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:12 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:40 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 13:37 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 04:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 16:20 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 09:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 19:59 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-24 15:38 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 21:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-24 20:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-25 10:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-25 11:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:55 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-19 13:42 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-19 06:52 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-20 09:24 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 22:35 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 23:56 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 21:02 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-19 21:16 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-20 13:43 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-28 16:34 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-28 18:39 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:57 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:36 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-22 22:54 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-23 03:20 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 22:07 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-23 09:56 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 04:10 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:38 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:50 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-28 16:24 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 08:55 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-28 04:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 10:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-28 09:39 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:37 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:18 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 22:36 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 15:07 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 17:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:24 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-30 17:34 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 10:04 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 10:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 19:25 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 13:56 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-01-02 15:10 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-01-03 01:21 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2014-01-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-28 22:17 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 11:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 09:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-29 09:42 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 14:01 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 17:49 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 18:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 19:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 22:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 22:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-29 01:12 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 21:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:27 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 00:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-30 01:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 11:57 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-30 07:39 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 08:55 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe JoeWolfDee <joedid@email.com> - 2013-12-30 11:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 17:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 18:29 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 17:32 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 15:56 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 21:32 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 20:44 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:25 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 22:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-31 15:27 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:42 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-31 02:33 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-01 09:50 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:24 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 14:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-31 17:09 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-01 09:34 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-01-10 18:16 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-31 13:04 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-31 03:03 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 20:44 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-01-10 18:20 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-11 16:17 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:29 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-31 14:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 12:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 09:27 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 19:29 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 16:12 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 17:53 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:01 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 05:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:39 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 14:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 12:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-29 10:28 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 17:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 18:58 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 23:26 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 21:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-29 01:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 09:23 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:44 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:22 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-29 21:13 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-30 00:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-29 22:44 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-29 21:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 09:26 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 12:14 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 09:23 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 12:51 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 16:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 21:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 17:26 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 22:41 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 18:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 23:25 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-29 22:37 -0700
Re: Uniqueness Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-31 13:21 +0100
Re: Uniqueness gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:52 -0800
Re: Uniqueness Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:47 -0700
Re: Uniqueness gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 14:55 -0800
Re: Uniqueness Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-01 00:32 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:33 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-23 10:57 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> - 2013-12-23 00:00 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2013-12-27 21:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-28 18:55 +1300
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-30 18:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <301220131829399933%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #54088 |
In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is > > positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and > > distinct purpose. > > Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. > Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-30 17:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54098 |
On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > >>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is >>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and >>> distinct purpose. >> >> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. >> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. > > Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested. I rebooted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 15:56 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54099 |
In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
> > In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is
> >>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and
> >>> distinct purpose.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested.
> >> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested.
> >
> > Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested.
>
> I rebooted.
Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's
help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-)
The correct phrase would be something like:
"Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-30 21:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <301220132132278017%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #54102 |
In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > > On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > > > In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF > > > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is > > >>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and > > >>> distinct purpose. > > >> > > >> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. > > >> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. > > > > > > Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested. > > > > I rebooted. > > Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's > help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-) > > The correct phrase would be something like: > "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." "the computer" is implied, and "as you suggested" is superfluous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-30 20:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <201312302044073321-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #54107 |
On 2013-12-31 04:32:27 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said: > In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > >> In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: >>> On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: >>>> In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF >>>> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is >>>>>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and >>>>>> distinct purpose. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. >>>>> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. >>>> >>>> Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested. >>> >>> I rebooted. >> >> Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's >> help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-) >> >> The correct phrase would be something like: >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." > > "the computer" is implied, and "as you suggested" is superfluous. Recommended reboot executed. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 18:25 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <311220131825374675%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54108 |
In article <201312302044073321-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-31 04:32:27 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said:
>
> > In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
> > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> >>> On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
> >>>> In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> >>>> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is
> >>>>>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and
> >>>>>> distinct purpose.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested.
> >>>>> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested.
> >>>
> >>> I rebooted.
> >>
> >> Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's
> >> help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-)
> >>
> >> The correct phrase would be something like:
> >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested."
> >
> > "the computer" is implied, and "as you suggested" is superfluous.
>
> Recommended reboot executed.
Far too long. Try: "Done" or "Yep". ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-30 22:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123022411429464-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #54111 |
On 2013-12-31 05:25:37 +0000, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said:
> In article <201312302044073321-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-12-31 04:32:27 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said:
>>
>>> In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
>>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>>>>> On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
>>>>>> In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF
>>>>>> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is
>>>>>>>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and
>>>>>>>> distinct purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested.
>>>>>>> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested.
>>>>>
>>>>> I rebooted.
>>>>
>>>> Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's
>>>> help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> The correct phrase would be something like:
>>>> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested."
>>>
>>> "the computer" is implied, and "as you suggested" is superfluous.
>>
>> Recommended reboot executed.
>
> Far too long. Try: "Done" or "Yep". ;-)
Uh huh!
--
Regards,
Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 10:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123110411584956-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54115 |
On 2013-12-31 06:41:14 +0000, Savageduck said:
> On 2013-12-31 05:25:37 +0000, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said:
>
>> In article <201312302044073321-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-12-31 04:32:27 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said:
>>>
>>>> In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
>>>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
>>>>>>> In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF
>>>>>>> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is
>>>>>>>>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and
>>>>>>>>> distinct purpose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested.
>>>>>>>> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I rebooted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's
>>>>> help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The correct phrase would be something like:
>>>>> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested."
>>>>
>>>> "the computer" is implied, and "as you suggested" is superfluous.
>>>
>>> Recommended reboot executed.
>>
>> Far too long. Try: "Done" or "Yep". ;-)
>
> Uh huh!
Done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 15:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlc5oih.iid.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #54107 |
In message <301220132132278017%michelle@michelle.org> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <311220131556092894%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >> In article <2013123017325079421-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: >> > On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: >> > > In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> > > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is >> > >>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and >> > >>> distinct purpose. >> > >> >> > >> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. >> > >> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. >> > > >> > > Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested. >> > >> > I rebooted. >> >> Only Doctor Who was able to reboot himself (and only with Amy Pond's >> help). Star Trek's Data probably can as well. ;-) >> >> The correct phrase would be something like: >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." > "the computer" is implied, Not necessarily. The router. The Modem. The Printer. The iPad. All of these might be rebooted. >and "as you suggested" is superfluous. Again, not necessarily. It is often polite and sometimes necessary, to acknowledge the reason you did something. -- 7-Up? What happened to Ups 1-6?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <311220131442024711%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #54127 |
In article <slrnlc5oih.iid.g.kreme@amelia.local>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > >> The correct phrase would be something like: > >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." > > > "the computer" is implied, > > Not necessarily. The router. The Modem. The Printer. The iPad. All of > these might be rebooted. True, but when someone suggests you reboot the computer,"I rebooted" implies that you rebooted the computer, and not something else. > >and "as you suggested" is superfluous. > > Again, not necessarily. It is often polite and sometimes necessary, to > acknowledge the reason you did something. If the reason is not obvious; in this situation it is obvious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 02:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52c27344$0$61316$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #54102 |
On 13-12-30 21:56, Your Name wrote: > The correct phrase would be something like: > "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." > Dave: "If John had rebooted the computer as I instructed him to do, the airplane would have have landed at the wrong airport" possible responses: John "I rebooted as instructed". or John "But I DID reboot as you told me to do". There is something about the later structure which makes it more convincing in that context.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 10:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54116 |
On 2013-12-31 07:33:22 +0000, JF Mezei said: > On 13-12-30 21:56, Your Name wrote: > >> The correct phrase would be something like: >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." >> > > > Dave: "If John had rebooted the computer as I instructed him to do, the > airplane would have have landed at the wrong airport" > > possible responses: > > John "I rebooted as instructed". > > or > > John "But I DID reboot as you told me to do". > > > There is something about the later structure which makes it more > convincing in that context. How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm lying." I think that's a skosh more convincing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-01 09:50 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <010120140950465757%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54139 |
In article <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2013-12-31 07:33:22 +0000, JF Mezei said:
> > On 13-12-30 21:56, Your Name wrote:
> >>
> >> The correct phrase would be something like:
> >> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested."
> >
> > Dave: "If John had rebooted the computer as I instructed him to do, the
> > airplane would have have landed at the wrong airport"
> >
> > possible responses:
> >
> > John "I rebooted as instructed".
> >
> > or
> >
> > John "But I DID reboot as you told me to do".
or
John: "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." ;-)
> > There is something about the later structure which makes it more
> > convincing in that context.
>
> How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm
> lying." I think that's a skosh more convincing.
John: "Waaahhhh!!! It ain't my fault. I only did what Dave
told me to do!" ;-)
or
John: "If Dave wasn't such a cheapskate, we would be using
Macs, and not silly Windows 'blue screen of death'
computers that have to be rebooted every two minutes!" ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 14:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <311220131424150678%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #54139 |
In article <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > > There is something about the later structure which makes it more > > convincing in that context. > > How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm > lying." "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 14:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123114512164511-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54153 |
On 2013-12-31 21:24:15 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > In article <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > >>> There is something about the later structure which makes it more >>> convincing in that context. >> >> How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm >> lying." > > "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." Let's face it, if your argument starts off with God as your witness, you're in trouble. This is the way drunks begin their defense on Cops after being stopped. Actually no, they usually start with "Look, I'm not gonna lie to you [insert lie], as God is my witness."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 17:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013123117093057443-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #54153 |
On 2013-12-31 21:24:15 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said: > In article <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > >>> There is something about the later structure which makes it more >>> convincing in that context. >> >> How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm >> lying." > > "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." Oh! The humanity! The "turkey bombing" was one of my favorite episodes of WKRP. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-01 09:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlc7o9g.n71.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #54167 |
In message <2013123117093057443-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-31 21:24:15 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said:
>> In article <2013123110422957902-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>>
>>>> There is something about the later structure which makes it more
>>>> convincing in that context.
>>>
>>> How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm
>>> lying."
>>
>> "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly."
> Oh! The humanity!
> The "turkey bombing" was one of my favorite episodes of WKRP.
One of many favorites.
--
The trouble with being a god is that you've got no one to pray to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-10 18:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <laq9ir$5o9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #54139 |
On 12/31/13 PDT, 10:42 AM, gtr wrote: > On 2013-12-31 07:33:22 +0000, JF Mezei said: > >> On 13-12-30 21:56, Your Name wrote: >> >>> The correct phrase would be something like: >>> "Yeah, I rebooted the computer, as you suggested." >>> >> >> >> Dave: "If John had rebooted the computer as I instructed him to do, the >> airplane would have have landed at the wrong airport" >> >> possible responses: >> >> John "I rebooted as instructed". >> >> or >> >> John "But I DID reboot as you told me to do". >> >> >> There is something about the later structure which makes it more >> convincing in that context. > > How about, "As God is my witness I rebooted; I should drop dead if I'm > lying." I think that's a skosh more convincing. No; it's much less. The person protests too much!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 13:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l9ubsd$sjl$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| In reply to | #54099 |
On 31.12.2013 02:32, gtr wrote: > On 2013-12-31 01:29:39 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > >> In article <52c1ef75$0$46358$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >>>> I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is >>>> positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and >>>> distinct purpose. >>> >>> Yeah, I did perform the reboot as you suggested. >>> Yeah, I did do the reboot as you suggested. >> >> Yeah, I rebooted as you suggested. > > I rebooted. > OK -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 03:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bieqfkFig6iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54061 |
On 2013-12-30, JoeWolfDee <joedid@email.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-30 15:55:46 +0000, Michelle Steiner said: > > I agree that the use of "do" as an auxiliary, for emphasis, is > positively acceptable in speech, even serving a significant and > distinct purpose. And annoying as hell when [over]used by airline personnel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web