Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #49031 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-09-26 08:43 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-09-28 07:45 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 58 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 08:43 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-09-26 13:14 +0000
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 16:43 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-09-27 09:24 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-09-27 09:49 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:56 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 19:02 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 20:20 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 21:52 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-28 07:43 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-09-26 13:53 +0000
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-26 08:23 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 16:55 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 17:08 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:26 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-09-27 09:32 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:55 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-26 16:08 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 20:22 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-26 15:54 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 19:23 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 19:29 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-09-27 19:08 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-27 03:41 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-27 07:44 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-09-28 09:37 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 16:51 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 17:08 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:25 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 10:28 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 16:52 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 17:08 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:25 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 15:51 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 15:59 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 16:08 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-26 16:16 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-26 13:19 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-09-27 09:28 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-09-26 15:47 -0700
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 17:22 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-09-27 11:01 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 20:19 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-26 22:09 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-09-27 16:31 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-27 00:54 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-09-29 20:33 +0200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-09-27 14:42 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-09-29 21:02 +0200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-09-30 01:51 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-01 09:22 +1200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-10-01 12:45 +1300
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question billy@MIX.COM - 2013-09-26 22:51 +0000
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-26 18:55 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-09-29 17:02 +0200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-29 17:44 -0400
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2013-09-27 08:33 +0200
Re: The usual dumbass Migration Assistant Question Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-09-28 07:45 -0400
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 19:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5244c1d5$0$34966$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #49057 |
When Adbobe announced its "cloud" buzzword-driven software subscription offering, it was said that it would "soon" stop selling licences for CS6. And when I called, the agent said that while no date had been set for stop-sales, that it was expected to become end-of-sale soon. But... looking at the Adobe web site I see this now: ## While Adobe Creative Suite® 6 products will continue to be available for purchase, Adobe has no plans for future releases of Creative Suite or other CS products. ## So it looks likle they got enough complaints to keep the licensed software up for sale along with subscription versions. My guess is that within a year, they'll probably review their "no more upgerades" decision once they realise how much that decision has hurt their revenues. BTW, when I login to my Adobe account, while it shows the list of Adobe products I have purchased over the years, (including Page Maker version 1 serial number that had been needed to upgrade from Page Maker to InDesign), it does not show how many machines the software was activated on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 19:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131929162922%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49073 |
In article <5244c1d5$0$34966$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > So it looks likle they got enough complaints to keep the licensed > software up for sale along with subscription versions. My guess is that > within a year, they'll probably review their "no more upgerades" > decision once they realise how much that decision has hurt their revenues. their revenue is not hurting and they aren't going to upgrade cs6. they may tweak the plan options, such as price, but that's about it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-27 19:08 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <270920131908353218%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #49073 |
In article <5244c1d5$0$34966$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > When Adbobe announced its "cloud" buzzword-driven software subscription > offering, it was said that it would "soon" stop selling licences for > CS6. And when I called, the agent said that while no date had been set > for stop-sales, that it was expected to become end-of-sale soon. > > But... looking at the Adobe web site I see this now: > > ## > While Adobe Creative Suite® 6 products will continue to be available for > purchase, Adobe has no plans for future releases of Creative Suite or > other CS products. > ## > > So it looks likle they got enough complaints to keep the licensed > software up for sale along with subscription versions. More likely it's simply a case of supporting the boxes still sitting on reseller shelves. Technically Adobe had stopped selling it, but I got a boxed copy of InDesign 2 PageMaker Upgrade extremely cheaply via an auction house selling off old boxes for a reseller (possibly even the Adobe New Zealand distributor at that time). > My guess is that within a year, they'll probably review their "no > more upgerades" decision once they realise how much that decision > has hurt their revenues. If the subscription system fails (which is unlikely unfortunately), they'll simply start selling boxed copies of whatever the latest version is at the time, along with the usual upgrade deal from the most recent version(s). > BTW, when I login to my Adobe account, while it shows the list of Adobe > products I have purchased over the years, (including Page Maker version > 1 serial number that had been needed to upgrade from Page Maker to > InDesign), it does not show how many machines the software was activated on. You upgraded from PageMerk *1* to InDesign?!? I would have thought the upgrade cut-off was Pagemker 7 or maybe strecth to 6, but all the way back to version 1 seems extremely generous, especially for Adobe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-27 03:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <52453698$0$35006$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #49090 |
On 13-09-27 03:08, Your Name wrote: > You upgraded from PageMerk *1* to InDesign?!? Page marker preserved the serial number from the first version you bought. So despite having had the last version of Page Maker, my serial number dated back to when Page Maker was on 1 diskette. The serial number would not validate on the software, but Adobe did have it on file and they had a "trick" to validate the number.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-27 07:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2013092707443742612-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #49090 |
On 2013-09-27 00:08:35 -0700, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said: > In article <5244c1d5$0$34966$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > >> When Adbobe announced its "cloud" buzzword-driven software subscription >> offering, it was said that it would "soon" stop selling licences for >> CS6. And when I called, the agent said that while no date had been set >> for stop-sales, that it was expected to become end-of-sale soon. >> >> But... looking at the Adobe web site I see this now: >> >> ## >> While Adobe Creative Suite® 6 products will continue to be available for >> purchase, Adobe has no plans for future releases of Creative Suite or >> other CS products. >> ## >> >> So it looks likle they got enough complaints to keep the licensed >> software up for sale along with subscription versions. > > More likely it's simply a case of supporting the boxes still sitting on > reseller shelves. > > Technically Adobe had stopped selling it, but I got a boxed copy of > InDesign 2 PageMaker Upgrade extremely cheaply via an auction house > selling off old boxes for a reseller (possibly even the Adobe New > Zealand distributor at that time). "Adobe New Zealand"?? I don't believe there is an Adobe New Zealand. I thought that it was Adobe Australia that was gouging most of the Southern Hemisphere & SE-Asia by bumping the USA price to its customers. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-28 09:37 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <280920130937455578%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #49092 |
In article <2013092707443742612-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-09-27 00:08:35 -0700, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said:
> > In article <5244c1d5$0$34966$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> When Adbobe announced its "cloud" buzzword-driven software subscription
> >> offering, it was said that it would "soon" stop selling licences for
> >> CS6. And when I called, the agent said that while no date had been set
> >> for stop-sales, that it was expected to become end-of-sale soon.
> >>
> >> But... looking at the Adobe web site I see this now:
> >>
> >> ##
> >> While Adobe Creative Suite® 6 products will continue to be available for
> >> purchase, Adobe has no plans for future releases of Creative Suite or
> >> other CS products.
> >> ##
> >>
> >> So it looks likle they got enough complaints to keep the licensed
> >> software up for sale along with subscription versions.
> >
> > More likely it's simply a case of supporting the boxes still sitting on
> > reseller shelves.
> >
> > Technically Adobe had stopped selling it, but I got a boxed copy of
> > InDesign 2 PageMaker Upgrade extremely cheaply via an auction house
> > selling off old boxes for a reseller (possibly even the Adobe New
> > Zealand distributor at that time).
>
> "Adobe New Zealand"?? I don't believe there is an Adobe New Zealand. I
> thought that it was Adobe Australia that was gouging most of the
> Southern Hemisphere & SE-Asia by bumping the USA price to its customers.
Adobe products were (still are?) distributed in New Zealand by
Rennaissance, who were also the only official Apple distributor, but
both of those contracts changed a while back now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 16:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tYednbrHjNDxA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #49033 |
On 2013.09.26 09:53 , Lewis wrote:
> In message <PdCdnf7sI9icsdnPnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@giganews.com>
> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> New iMac should be here tomorrow. Probably won't have time to do much
>> with it until next week.
>
>> My plan is to migrate-assist only apps and transfer user data in the BG
>> when up and running.
>
> That is not a good idea. If you don't want to copy all the user
> settings, then I would setup the new machine without any migration
> assistant use, copy the apps from the old machine, and start over.
It's not the user settings I worry about - it's not having a computer to
use while the greater part of the data transfer (over 0.5 TB) is taking
place. A rough estimate of that is 1.6 - 2.0 hours based on ethernet
speed of 800 Mb/s and disk write speeds for the 2012 iMac reported as
107 MB/s (pretty well matched). Even if I get higher ethernet speeds
the disk won't be able to swallow much more.
I'll be reviewing all the user settings, and using Onyx and/or terminal
to set those that don't have a GUI setting. (Such as being able to see
~/Library, turning off some OS X options that are irritating and so on).
>> - What happens to licensed s/w such as Photoshop? Do I have to
>> de-authorize on the source and authorize on target?
>
> Knowing Adobe, this will be 1) a huge pain in the ass 2) will fuck up no
> matter what you do 3) will involve hours on the phone with Adobe.
At worst I'd reinstall PS from the DMG and do the one update that is
needed for Bridge/DNG converter to load photos from media without hanging.
> You're ONLY hope for it working is to do a full migration assistant
> install, but I have no confidence Adobe will have gone to great lengths
> to ensure that doesn't work.
I'm not quite as pessimistic where Adobe is concerned but I do get where
you're coming from.
--
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media,
which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."
-Unknown
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 17:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131708265922%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49043 |
In article <tYednbrHjNDxA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > It's not the user settings I worry about - it's not having a computer to > use while the greater part of the data transfer (over 0.5 TB) is taking > place. A rough estimate of that is 1.6 - 2.0 hours based on ethernet > speed of 800 Mb/s and disk write speeds for the 2012 iMac reported as > 107 MB/s (pretty well matched). Even if I get higher ethernet speeds > the disk won't be able to swallow much more. let it run overnight. when you wake up it will be ready to go.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 17:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wcqdnTFoIo7aO9nPnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #49047 |
On 2013.09.26 17:08 , nospam wrote:
> In article <tYednbrHjNDxA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> It's not the user settings I worry about - it's not having a computer to
>> use while the greater part of the data transfer (over 0.5 TB) is taking
>> place. A rough estimate of that is 1.6 - 2.0 hours based on ethernet
>> speed of 800 Mb/s and disk write speeds for the 2012 iMac reported as
>> 107 MB/s (pretty well matched). Even if I get higher ethernet speeds
>> the disk won't be able to swallow much more.
>
> let it run overnight.
>
> when you wake up it will be ready to go.
>
That's no fun.
--
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media,
which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."
-Unknown
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 10:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131028306200%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49031 |
In article <PdCdnf7sI9icsdnPnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > New iMac should be here tomorrow. Probably won't have time to do much > with it until next week. > > My plan is to migrate-assist only apps and transfer user data in the BG > when up and running. That's the huge bulk of the machine in any case > and there is cruft I'd probably leave behind. That would get me my apps > quickly while leaving user data for a more leisurely transfer via the > ethernet network (and available if needed via same) while I fool around, > er, carefully explore the new machine. Comments? migrate during initial setup. otherwise you're asking for problems. delete whatever you don't want afterwards. > - What happens to licensed s/w such as Photoshop? Do I have to > de-authorize on the source and authorize on target? deauthorize on the old mac, migrate, reauthorize on the new mac.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 16:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tYednbXHjNAbA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_ucAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #49034 |
On 2013.09.26 10:28 , nospam wrote:
> In article <PdCdnf7sI9icsdnPnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> New iMac should be here tomorrow. Probably won't have time to do much
>> with it until next week.
>>
>> My plan is to migrate-assist only apps and transfer user data in the BG
>> when up and running. That's the huge bulk of the machine in any case
>> and there is cruft I'd probably leave behind. That would get me my apps
>> quickly while leaving user data for a more leisurely transfer via the
>> ethernet network (and available if needed via same) while I fool around,
>> er, carefully explore the new machine. Comments?
>
> migrate during initial setup. otherwise you're asking for problems.
> delete whatever you don't want afterwards.
Stinks as a strategy. "What" problems specifically?
>
>> - What happens to licensed s/w such as Photoshop? Do I have to
>> de-authorize on the source and authorize on target?
>
> deauthorize on the old mac, migrate, reauthorize on the new mac.
OK - as I thought.
--
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media,
which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."
-Unknown
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 17:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131708276017%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49044 |
In article <tYednbXHjNAbA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_ucAAAAA@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > migrate during initial setup. otherwise you're asking for problems. > > delete whatever you don't want afterwards. > > Stinks as a strategy. "What" problems specifically? migrating afterwards will create a new account with a new uid. that means you are likely to have permissions issues because of the mismatch. you can chown it, but that's a pain. migrating at setup will create your initial account and copy everything to it, so there won't be a second account at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 17:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wcqdnTBoIo7-O9nPnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #49048 |
On 2013.09.26 17:08 , nospam wrote:
> In article <tYednbXHjNAbA9nPnZ2dnUVZ_ucAAAAA@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>>> migrate during initial setup. otherwise you're asking for problems.
>>> delete whatever you don't want afterwards.
>>
>> Stinks as a strategy. "What" problems specifically?
>
> migrating afterwards will create a new account with a new uid.
>
> that means you are likely to have permissions issues because of the
> mismatch. you can chown it, but that's a pain.
>
> migrating at setup will create your initial account and copy everything
> to it, so there won't be a second account at all.
I was afraid of that.
--
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media,
which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."
-Unknown
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 15:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5244905a$0$9753$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #49031 |
On 13-09-26 08:43, Alan Browne wrote: > My plan is to migrate-assist only apps and transfer user data in the BG > when up and running. If that is the case, make sure yoiur new user account on the new machine has the same GUID UUID as on the old machine. In unix security, username doesn't count, its the numbers behind it. What you did not mention is whether the new machine will have same OS version or not. Also, will the two machines be hardwired together for the initial transfer and then ethernet for rest, or will it be ethernet for both ? With regards to Photoshop: There is stuff spread around the system that may not be caught by migration assistant. For instance in /Library/Preferences, there is a "Flexnet" directiory which contains the authorisations for your various adobe packages. So after migration assistant has done its job, you can go through the new /Library to make sure it caught everything adobe related. If you re-install from scratch, you lose your preferences and default to the garish look by default. > - What happens to licensed s/w such as Photoshop? Do I have to > de-authorize on the source and authorize on target? Since Adobe no longer sells licensed software, there is not much point in going out of your way to manage your licenses. Just copy the software.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 15:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131559257507%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49037 |
In article <5244905a$0$9753$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > My plan is to migrate-assist only apps and transfer user data in the BG > > when up and running. > > If that is the case, make sure yoiur new user account on the new machine > has the same GUID UUID as on the old machine. In unix security, username > doesn't count, its the numbers behind it. that's why it's best to migrate at initial setup, not later. > What you did not mention is whether the new machine will have same OS > version or not. it will probably be a version of 10.8.5 for that hardware. > Also, will the two machines be hardwired together for the initial > transfer and then ethernet for rest, or will it be ethernet for both ? firewire target mode or fw800/usb3 to a time machine or clone is the best. > With regards to Photoshop: > > There is stuff spread around the system that may not be caught by > migration assistant. For instance in /Library/Preferences, there is a > "Flexnet" directiory which contains the authorisations for your various > adobe packages. it works just fine with photoshop. > > - What happens to licensed s/w such as Photoshop? Do I have to > > de-authorize on the source and authorize on target? > > Since Adobe no longer sells licensed software, there is not much point > in going out of your way to manage your licenses. Just copy the software. adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 16:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <52449454$0$16995$c3e8da3$40d4fd75@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #49038 |
On 13-09-26 15:59, nospam wrote: > adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software. Did it change its mind to go to a subscription-only sales model ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 16:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <260920131616339128%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #49039 |
In article <52449454$0$16995$c3e8da3$40d4fd75@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software. > > Did it change its mind to go to a subscription-only sales model ? creative cloud is subscription based. creative suite 6 is still available as a full purchase, no subscription. there are also other apps, such as photoshop elements, which are only full purchase.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2013092613193437709-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #49039 |
On 2013-09-26 13:08:52 -0700, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said: > On 13-09-26 15:59, nospam wrote: > >> adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software. > > Did it change its mind to go to a subscription-only sales model ? Of the software currently available Adobe's "Creative Cloud", you can still buy Photoshop CS6 and updates to PS CS6 from CS5, Lightroom 5 and updates to Lightroom 5. I bought my CS5 to CS6 update after the implementation of the CC. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-27 09:28 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <270920130928195832%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #49039 |
In article <52449454$0$16995$c3e8da3$40d4fd75@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 13-09-26 15:59, nospam wrote: > > > adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software. > > Did it change its mind to go to a subscription-only sales model? Yes and no. Adobe no longer sells software boxes in stores (although no doubt some stores still have the old boxed versions), but you do still download a licensed copy of the software to install and pay the monthly / annual subscription fee to be able to use it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-26 15:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2013092615474338165-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #49056 |
On 2013-09-26 14:28:19 -0700, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said: > In article <52449454$0$16995$c3e8da3$40d4fd75@news.astraweb.com>, JF > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > >> On 13-09-26 15:59, nospam wrote: >> >>> adobe absolutely does still sell licensed software. >> >> Did it change its mind to go to a subscription-only sales model? > > Yes and no. Adobe no longer sells software boxes in stores (although no > doubt some stores still have the old boxed versions), but you do still > download a licensed copy of the software to install and pay the monthly > / annual subscription fee to be able to use it. That is true for the Creative Cloud Suite applications, but not for Lightroom (also included in the CC) and CS5 to CS6 upgrades. My PS CS6 upgrade was a download as Adobe did not, and would not have a boxed upgrade to sell me. They have an odd download process, but it works and if I log in check my Adobe purchase history it is there for addition downloads if needed. The biggest hoop I had to jump through was convincing customer service that I wanted to upgrade from CS5 to CS6, without dealing with the CC rental plan. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web