Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #62403 > unrolled thread

Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday

Started byLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
First post2014-07-24 05:34 +0000
Last post2014-07-28 23:03 -0700
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-07-24 05:34 +0000
    Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-24 18:27 -0500
      Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-07-25 12:24 +1200
        Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-24 20:13 -0500
      Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-07-25 14:52 +1200
        Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-24 22:11 -0500
          Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-07-25 16:27 +1200
          Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-24 21:29 -0700
            Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-25 07:29 -0500
              Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-25 11:11 -0700
                Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-25 13:20 -0500
                  Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-25 12:06 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-25 14:59 -0500
                      Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-25 15:27 -0700
                  Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-07-25 12:24 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-25 15:01 -0500
                    Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-25 15:28 -0700
                      Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-07-25 17:34 -0500
                        Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-07-26 13:58 +1200
                          Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-26 10:21 -0700
                            Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-07-27 10:49 +1200
                              Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-26 17:18 -0700
                                Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-07-27 13:07 +1200
                                  Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-26 18:37 -0700
                                Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-07-29 00:45 +0000
                                  Re: Yosemite Public Beta on Thursday gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-07-28 23:03 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#62468

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-07-27 10:49 +1200
Message-ID<270720141049029733%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#62457
In article <2014072610213426539-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2014-07-26 01:58:26 +0000, Your Name said:
> > In article <c3g4bdFek19U1@mid.individual.net>, Lloyd Parsons
> > <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2014-07-25 19:24:26 +0000, Savageduck said:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Then  perhaps *Scorch* might be useful to you.
> >>>>
> >>>> <http://www.sibelius.com/products/avid_scorch/index.html?intcmpid=SB-HP-A
> >>>> UMU1>
> >>> 
> >>> I think perhaps *Scotch* would be more useful to me.
> >>> 
> >>> Seriously, I'm waiting for Apple to come out with an 8.5 x 11 screen
> >>> and would probably buy it to store my sheet music in.
> >> 
> >> That would be a good size.
> > 
> > Nah, that's the silly "US Letter" size, when the real world uses the
> > much better "A4" (approx. 8.25" x 11.625" in ye olde inches).   ;-)
> 
> Wrong, the "real world" doesn't read music in the A4 format, or any 
> other.  

I never said anything about music ... I said A4 was used instead of
silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.



> Hell--most musicians don't read music either any more.

Most "muscians" these days are just "entertainers" who lipsync and use
electronic gadgetry to make them sound better than they really are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62471

Fromgtr <xxx@yyy.zzz>
Date2014-07-26 17:18 -0700
Message-ID<2014072617181341883-xxx@yyyzzz>
In reply to#62468
On 2014-07-26 22:49:02 +0000, Your Name said:

> In article <2014072610213426539-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>> On 2014-07-26 01:58:26 +0000, Your Name said:
>>> In article <c3g4bdFek19U1@mid.individual.net>, Lloyd Parsons
>>> <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-07-25 19:24:26 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Then  perhaps *Scorch* might be useful to you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <http://www.sibelius.com/products/avid_scorch/index.html?intcmpid=SB-HP-A
>>>>>> UMU1>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think perhaps *Scotch* would be more useful to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Seriously, I'm waiting for Apple to come out with an 8.5 x 11 screen
>>>>> and would probably buy it to store my sheet music in.
>>>> 
>>>> That would be a good size.
>>> 
>>> Nah, that's the silly "US Letter" size, when the real world uses the
>>> much better "A4" (approx. 8.25" x 11.625" in ye olde inches).   ;-)
>> 
>> Wrong, the "real world" doesn't read music in the A4 format, or any
>> other.
> 
> I never said anything about music ...

Right, but you responded to Lloyd and I, and that's what we were talking about.

> I said A4 was used instead of
> silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.

Right--the perfect size for reading music off the stand.  One more time 
around the block?

>> Hell--most musicians don't read music either any more.
> 
> Most "muscians" these days are just "entertainers" who lipsync and use
> electronic gadgetry to make them sound better than they really are.

I'm was referring to musicians, not "musicians"; again reducing the 
pool of "users" for any product.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62474

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-07-27 13:07 +1200
Message-ID<270720141307557313%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#62471
In article <2014072617181341883-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2014-07-26 22:49:02 +0000, Your Name said:
> > In article <2014072610213426539-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> >> On 2014-07-26 01:58:26 +0000, Your Name said:
> >>> In article <c3g4bdFek19U1@mid.individual.net>, Lloyd Parsons
> >>> <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2014-07-25 19:24:26 +0000, Savageduck said:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Then  perhaps *Scorch* might be useful to you.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <http://www.sibelius.com/products/avid_scorch/index.html?intcmpid=SB-HP-
> >>>>>> A
> >>>>>> UMU1>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I think perhaps *Scotch* would be more useful to me.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Seriously, I'm waiting for Apple to come out with an 8.5 x 11 screen
> >>>>> and would probably buy it to store my sheet music in.
> >>>> 
> >>>> That would be a good size.
> >>> 
> >>> Nah, that's the silly "US Letter" size, when the real world uses the
> >>> much better "A4" (approx. 8.25" x 11.625" in ye olde inches).   ;-)
> >> 
> >> Wrong, the "real world" doesn't read music in the A4 format, or any
> >> other.
> > 
> > I never said anything about music ...
> 
> Right, but you responded to Lloyd and I, and that's what we were talking
> about.
> 
> > I said A4 was used instead of
> > silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.
> 
> Right--the perfect size for reading music off the stand.  One more time 
> around the block?

Good grief. It must be International Dumbass Day today.  :-\

(Mind you, that's pretty muchg every day on the Internet - please
ignore the "Turn off brain before use" sticker on your modem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62476

Fromgtr <xxx@yyy.zzz>
Date2014-07-26 18:37 -0700
Message-ID<2014072618370960150-xxx@yyyzzz>
In reply to#62474
On 2014-07-27 01:07:55 +0000, Your Name said:

>>>> Wrong, the "real world" doesn't read music in the A4 format, or any
>>>> other.
>>> 
>>> I never said anything about music ...
>> 
>> Right, but you responded to Lloyd and I, and that's what we were talking
>> about.
>> 
>>> I said A4 was used instead of
>>> silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.
>> 
>> Right--the perfect size for reading music off the stand.  One more time
>> around the block?
> 
> Good grief. It must be International Dumbass Day today.  :-\

You're very quick to insult others.  Duly noted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62535

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-07-29 00:45 +0000
Message-ID<slrnltdrm5.1fi9.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#62471
Okay, so one time? In band camp? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> was all, like: 
 --> 	 Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:18:13 -0700 <2014072617181341883-xxx@yyyzzz>
> On 2014-07-26 22:49:02 +0000, Your Name said:

>> In article <2014072610213426539-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>>> On 2014-07-26 01:58:26 +0000, Your Name said:
>>>> In article <c3g4bdFek19U1@mid.individual.net>, Lloyd Parsons
>>>> <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2014-07-25 19:24:26 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Then  perhaps *Scorch* might be useful to you.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <http://www.sibelius.com/products/avid_scorch/index.html?intcmpid=SB-HP-A
>>>>>>> UMU1>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think perhaps *Scotch* would be more useful to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Seriously, I'm waiting for Apple to come out with an 8.5 x 11 screen
>>>>>> and would probably buy it to store my sheet music in.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That would be a good size.
>>>> 
>>>> Nah, that's the silly "US Letter" size, when the real world uses the
>>>> much better "A4" (approx. 8.25" x 11.625" in ye olde inches).   ;-)
>>> 
>>> Wrong, the "real world" doesn't read music in the A4 format, or any
>>> other.
>> 
>> I never said anything about music ...

> Right, but you responded to Lloyd and I, and that's what we were talking about.

>> I said A4 was used instead of
>> silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.

> Right--the perfect size for reading music off the stand.  One more time 
> around the block?

You're talking to someone so slow-witted and dense he has stated he is
incapable of changing the temperature in his car without pulling over to
do so.


-- 
For a very few, the sky's the limit. And, sometimes, not even that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62552

Fromgtr <xxx@yyy.zzz>
Date2014-07-28 23:03 -0700
Message-ID<2014072823031819919-xxx@yyyzzz>
In reply to#62535
On 2014-07-29 00:45:57 +0000, Lewis said:

>>> I never said anything about music ...
> 
>> Right, but you responded to Lloyd and I, and that's what we were talking about.
> 
>>> I said A4 was used instead of
>>> silly US Letter, which is the screen size which was stated above.
> 
>> Right--the perfect size for reading music off the stand.  One more time
>> around the block?
> 
> You're talking to someone so slow-witted and dense he has stated he is
> incapable of changing the temperature in his car without pulling over to
> do so.

Yeah.  It was quite an experience.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web