Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread

tl;dr:

Started by"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
First post2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Last post2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
        Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
          Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
            Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
                Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
                    Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
                Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
                  Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
                    Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
                      Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
                          Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
                          Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
                    Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
                      Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
                        Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
                    Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
                    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
                      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
                        Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
                        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
                          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
                          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
                          Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
                                                                  Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
                                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
                                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
                                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
                                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
                                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
                                                      Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
                                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
                                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                                        Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
                                              Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
                                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
                                            Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
                                          Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
                                    Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                                Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
                    Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
                      Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
                        Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
                        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
                          Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
                            Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
                              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
                                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
                                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
                                    Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
                                    Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
                                      Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
                              Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
                        Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
                          Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
            Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
              Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
                Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
                  Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
                  Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
        Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
        Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
          Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
    Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
      Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
    Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
    (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
      Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
        Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700

Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10  Next page →


#116609

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
Message-ID<pe4lh0$c0o$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116605
On 23-May-18 9:30 PM, Shadow wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:22:16 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

[....]

>> Then why bother trying to correspond with me?
> 
> 	I don't. My replies are warning to people that might think you
> are not a common criminal stalker.

Unlike you, I've not spent time in prison.

Goodbye, Shadow.

D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116610

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
Message-ID<230520181759304864%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#116609
In article <pe4lh0$c0o$2@dont-email.me>, David B.
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>  I've not spent time in prison.

yet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116618

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
Message-ID<g44cgdt1jrhngkv1jeai207u0fejep7ai3@4ax.com>
In reply to#116609
On Wed, 23 May 2018 22:13:03 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 23-May-18 9:30 PM, Shadow wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:22:16 +0100, "David B."
>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>[....]
>
>>> Then why bother trying to correspond with me?
>> 
>> 	I don't. My replies are warning to people that might think you
>> are not a common criminal stalker.
>
>Unlike you, I've not spent time in prison.

	I've worked as a prison doctor. It's mandatory with state
employment.
	That's why I know a criminal when I see one.
	HTH

	Speaking of criminals

>To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
>stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
>https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

>The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116619

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
Message-ID<5a85e19e-43e9-48c1-8c5d-6f839e7100ff@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116618
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:11:13 PM UTC-7, Shadow wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 22:13:03 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
> >On 23-May-18 9:30 PM, Shadow wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:22:16 +0100, "David B."
> >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> >
> >[....]
> >
> >>> Then why bother trying to correspond with me?
> >> 
> >> 	I don't. My replies are warning to people that might think you
> >> are not a common criminal stalker.
> >
> >Unlike you, I've not spent time in prison.
> 
> 	I've worked as a prison doctor. It's mandatory with state
> employment.
> 	That's why I know a criminal when I see one.
> 	HTH
> 
> 	Speaking of criminals
> 
> >To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
> >stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
> >https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
> 
> >The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT
> 	[]'s
> -- 
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy  - Google 2012



Seriously, what lie? 

Despite my reasoned knowledge of Red Hat, I continue to install it for people who've had down time with OS X. 

Do you even believe the idiocy Snit is spewing? You're clueless! Like most in political groups, Snit relies on right wing media to blindly inform his beliefs on the news. Ergo, he only is aware of and accepts the accepted accounts which also happens to be the ones which characterize climate change in a highly approving and principled way. 



--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm
https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116602

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
Message-ID<e9b08a06-248c-4cac-874c-270c2fe8df6c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116600
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 11:18:33 AM UTC-7, Shadow wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:37 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
> >On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B."
> >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> >[....]
> >
> >>> Here’s how to manage your privacy.
> >> 
> >> 	Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where
> >> does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's
> >> obtained from the 'App Store'."   ???
> >
> >It doesn't. Made you look though!
> 
> 	I didn't, the link was a commercial link about privacy, not
> apps or policy.
> 	I don't click on your links, unless I'm absolutely certain
> they are not spam/malicious (which they usually are, from comments
> from other posters).
> >> 
> >> 	While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding
> >> alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ?
> >
> >It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10.
> 
> 	No, this is a public forum, you don't *own* anything. The fact
> that you can't abide by the *good-guy* rules and respect others is why
> you have been *BANNED* from so many places.
> 
> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
> stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
> https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
> 
> The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
> 	[]'s
> >
> >alt.comp.os.windows-10 reinstated.
> -- 
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy  - Google 2012



Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Melzzzzz for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Melzzzzz has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.

Of his online life Steven says

    I've been booted off by past providers before because people
    complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
    *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
    search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
    from.
    
Some examples where Steven has been booted

X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4

Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity 
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l

FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn

AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman

Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE

Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Melzzzzz

Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.

His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her


    
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available
http://web.archive.org/web/20161019062351/http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net/
https://goo.gl/DMno6J

Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul
http://web.archive.org/web/20161202192456/http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820

He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK

The business still failed.

He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.

https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879


This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Melzzzzz. 


Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.

Melzzzzz is married and by all appearances happily so. 
He never complains about his wife in COLA.


Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.

Melzzzzz does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.


Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself

Melzzzzz has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public. 
No reason to think they are not a happy family.


Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date. 

Melzzzzz has his own business doing technical work and also teaches. 
Melzzzzz offers a true contribution to society. 
Teachers are truly under appreciated.

--
Top Ten Ways Melzzzzz Trolls!!
http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter
https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs
https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116611

FromWolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
Message-ID<0001HW.20B6232400DC330A70000DB1F2CF@news.supernews.com>
In reply to#116587
On 23 May 2018, David B. wrote
(in article <pe31gd$bjf$1@dont-email.me>):

> On 23-May-18 3:37 AM, Wolffan wrote:
> > On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote
> > (in article <pe0ge9$1bo$1@dont-email.me>):
> >
> > > On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote:
> > > > On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote
> > > > (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>):
> > > >
> > > > > True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's
> > > > > obtained from the 'App Store'.
> > > >
> > > > oh? Really? Where is this stated?
> > >
> > > Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums.
> >
> > In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy.
>
> If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock.

Doubt it, trollboy. You simply lie too damn much.
>
>
> Here’s how to manage your privacy.
>
> You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along
> with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and
> with whom.
>
> https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/

Still no nothing showing where Apple advised to install no software unless 
it’s obtaioned from the App Store.

This would be because Apple has never, ever, made any such statement. And 
you’re a lying scumbag troll.
>
>
> HTH

Didn’t answer the question. But you knew that, trollboy.
>
>
> HAND

A good day would be the day that you stop posting to usenet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116612

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
Message-ID<230520181833025584%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#116611
In article <0001HW.20B6232400DC330A70000DB1F2CF@news.supernews.com>,
Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 May 2018, David B. wrote
> ...


> A good day would be the day that you stop posting to usenet.

an even better day would be the day he stops using the internet
entirely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116517

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
Message-ID<e4f6gdln22k2sh6p7gm947921o19n820i8@4ax.com>
In reply to#116492
On Mon, 21 May 2018 08:02:55 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 20-May-18 12:02 PM, Wolffan wrote:
>> On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote
>> (in article <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7>):
>> 
>>> On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B."
>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME>  ?
>>>>
>>>> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it.
>>>>
>>>> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably
>>>> be ignored.
>>>
>>> That is the rc.common script, which should be found here:
>>> /etc/rc.common
>>>
>>> This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still
>>> present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware
>>> can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested
>>> this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been
>>> unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those
>>> systems.
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>> That seems an adequate answer! :bananas:
>> 
>> Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an
>> eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your
>> system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool
>> EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and
>> how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a
>> lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic,
>> too.
>
>Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your 
>identity.

	Makes STALKING hard, heh ? It IS the norm on Usenet, though,
for that very reason.
	(and weird, coming from someone with > 20 nyms.)
>
><CUT_OFF_TOPIC_STALKING_CONTENT>

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116538

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
Message-ID<pe0n4j$2su$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116517
On 21-May-18 10:42 PM, Shadow wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2018 08:02:55 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 20-May-18 12:02 PM, Wolffan wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote
>>> (in article <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7>):
>>>
>>>> On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B."
>>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME>  ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably
>>>>> be ignored.
>>>>
>>>> That is the rc.common script, which should be found here:
>>>> /etc/rc.common
>>>>
>>>> This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still
>>>> present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware
>>>> can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested
>>>> this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been
>>>> unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those
>>>> systems.
>>>>
>>>> =
>>>>
>>>> That seems an adequate answer! :bananas:
>>>
>>> Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an
>>> eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your
>>> system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool
>>> EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and
>>> how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a
>>> lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic,
>>> too.
>>
>> Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your
>> identity.
> 
> 	Makes STALKING hard, heh ? It IS the norm on Usenet, though,
> for that very reason.
> 	(and weird, coming from someone with > 20 nyms.)

I'll simply refer you to Steve's post, here:-

Message-ID: <TRtMC.356637$AU4.271400@fx02.fr7>

YMMV

-- 
David B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116544

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
Message-ID<psb8gdpc1nhagtu71kia0om6ak480evbno@4ax.com>
In reply to#116538
On Tue, 22 May 2018 10:15:52 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 21-May-18 10:42 PM, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 May 2018 08:02:55 +0100, "David B."
>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>>>
>>> Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your
>>> identity.
>> 
>> 	Makes STALKING hard, heh ? It IS the norm on Usenet, though,
>> for that very reason.
>> 	(and weird, coming from someone with > 20 nyms.)
>
>I'll simply refer you to <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> post, here:-

><CUT_POSSIBLE_STALKING_LINK>

	The post wouldn't contain a STALKING_TARGET, would it ?

alt.comp.os.windows-10 removed AGAIN.

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s

-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116549

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
Message-ID<pe1d7f$lad$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116544
On 22-May-18 4:00 PM, Shadow wrote:
[....]
> 	The post wouldn't contain a STALKING_TARGET, would it ?

No.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116550

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
Message-ID<2688f6c4-2a6a-4535-b975-ba808a2b9160@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116544
On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 8:00:52 AM UTC-7, Shadow wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 10:15:52 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
> >On 21-May-18 10:42 PM, Shadow wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 May 2018 08:02:55 +0100, "David B."
> >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
> >>>
> >>> Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your
> >>> identity.
> >> 
> >> 	Makes STALKING hard, heh ? It IS the norm on Usenet, though,
> >> for that very reason.
> >> 	(and weird, coming from someone with > 20 nyms.)
> >
> >I'll simply refer you to <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> post, here:-
> 
> ><CUT_POSSIBLE_STALKING_LINK>
> 
> 	The post wouldn't contain a STALKING_TARGET, would it ?
> 
> alt.comp.os.windows-10 removed AGAIN.
> 
> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
> stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
> https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
> 
> The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
> 	[]'s
> 
> -- 
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy  - Google 2012



Believe it or not, just recently Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes) are actively working against the success of desktop Linux. 

Lots of jerks are posting about the open source "CLI" as if something like that truly exists. 

Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis's posts are nothing but a meaningless babble. Zsh shell is based on Linux. End of Story. I have a program I use as well, but it's a bit different. Why does Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis focus on his own ego so much? 

--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
http://www.5z8.info/facebook-of-sex_w4l4wg_bomb
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4
http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116471

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
Message-ID<34330773-3c4c-4d5d-ab6b-07de1b30a715@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116466
On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 1:55:46 AM UTC-7, David B. wrote:
> On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B."
> > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ?
> > 
> > Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it.
> > 
> > I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably
> > be ignored.
> 
> 
> That is the rc.common script, which should be found here:
> /etc/rc.common
> 
> This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still 
> present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware 
> can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested 
> this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been 
> unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those 
> systems.
> 
> =
> 
> That seems an adequate answer!  :bananas:



  Melzzzzz:
    -----
    I would love to see the group become that! I would love to see
    people, for example, pick tasks they do with Desktop Linux which
    they believe are handled better than the competition. I have
    encouraged that for a long time. But so far few if any such tasks
    have been shown.
    -----

  Marek Novotny:
    -----
    Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
    developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
    DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
    who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
    obviously. 
    -----

  Melzzzzz (referencing to the above quote):
    ----
    But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
    those things but it is NOT those things.
    -----

  Marek Novotny (some time later):
    -----
    Android isn't Linux. Android makes "use" of the Linux kernel.
    Android is indeed open source, but it is not community driven open
    source. Those that know the difference likely won't cry over Android
    ditching the Linux kernel and adopting their own kernel. It simply
    never mattered for all the reasons I stated above. Now the fact that
    I have to articulate this in writing so these clueless tards like
    DFS and Melzzzzz can gain some insights because they LACK their
    own insights is what I find troubling. They both have no business
    arguing in here. They are simply too stupid to have a conversation
    about that which they just don't fundamentally understand in the
    first place.
    -----
    
Notice Marek uses the concepts I taught him (about how Linux is "USED" by the things he listed) then fantasizes about how I did not know the information HE got wrong and I corrected him with (and did so with no name calling or insults).

  Steve 'The Flooder' Carroll:
    -----
    I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I and if that wasn't enough, I,I,I,I,I,I. 
    Talk about a narcissistic fool.
    -----

  Melzzzzz:
    -----
    You left out his I, I, I, I. AM. BETTER. THAN. Melzzzzz AND DFS!
    He is clearly feeling very insecure these days.
    -----

  Marek Novotny: 
    -----
    Well, if he wants to play this game with me he'll find pictures of
    his wife on imgur with dildos all over her and I can cross post
    those too. Keep fucking around Melzzzzz. I can play this game too. 
    -----

- 
This broke the Internet
http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116472

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
Message-ID<d1u2gdtv91lf1eemm768b4hrdh8o3r5i3g@4ax.com>
In reply to#116466
On Sun, 20 May 2018 09:55:42 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B."
>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ?
>> 
>> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it.
>> 
>> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably
>> be ignored.
>
>
>That is the rc.common script, which should be found here:
>/etc/rc.common
>
>This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS

	Or old Apples. It was present but inactive on MOST machines.
WTF are you going on and on about it ?
	Who's your target this time ? (the question was rhetorical, we
don't want names).

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
	[]'s

-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116473

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
Message-ID<8748f15a-329a-44b3-a13a-b4ef379b8f10@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116472
On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 6:33:00 AM UTC-7, Shadow wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2018 09:55:42 +0100, "David B."
> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
> >On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B."
> >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ?
> >> 
> >> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it.
> >> 
> >> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably
> >> be ignored.
> >
> >
> >That is the rc.common script, which should be found here:
> >/etc/rc.common
> >
> >This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS
> 
> 	Or old Apples. It was present but inactive on MOST machines.
> WTF are you going on and on about it ?
> 	Who's your target this time ? (the question was rhetorical, we
> don't want names).
> 
> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
> stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
> https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
> 
> The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
> 	[]'s
> 
> -- 
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy  - Google 2012



<giggle> Jeff Relf will be overwhelmed once the druggies overindulge. That and there will invariably be a mental midget or two in an open group (i.e. Satan). The current tantrum aside, we've all seen who usually gets angry when he does not get anyone on his side. I will defeat a monkey with my thoughts. 

For all the crowing Satan's done on this topic, the 'College Professor' doesn't understand how to do this. It really takes a couple seconds to click and drag across text and 'reverse' it. 

Usenet is a free phenomenon based on the belief in good character. Why do you keep quoting Jeff Relf? 

It's easy as pie to handpick by bragging about a few special cases differing from what is mainstream. What a better tactic from an advocacy opinion are the regular operations. 

Obviously, the only thing that concerns Satan is seeming "honest", and if he can't have that he will post more evidence to desperately shout truly honest people down, which only serves to disrupt threads. 

--
Puppy Videos
https://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116461 — Re:

From"BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15>
Date2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
SubjectRe:
Message-ID<pdprvr$ice$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#116458
Wait for the black negro baby.


What kind of redheaded nazi marries a divorced mullato with
a well worn passed around hollywod pussy?

harry is a Nazi

https://flashbak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Nazi15.jpg


"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message 
news:AyVLC.336135$AU4.247235@fx02.fr7...
: Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of 'dcollins'?
:
: 
https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229944-is-there-a-better-place-to-ask-my-question/
:
: <aside>
:
: Great wedding today!
:
: *Share YOUR love* :-D
:
: -- 
: D. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116463 — Re:

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
SubjectRe:
Message-ID<52873d80-0e3f-40f1-ba10-d70e3dd72559@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116461
On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-7, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> Wait for the black negro baby.
> 
> 
> What kind of redheaded nazi marries a divorced mullato with
> a well worn passed around hollywod pussy?
> 
> harry is a Nazi
> 
> https://flashbak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Nazi15.jpg
> 
> 
> "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message 
> news:AyVLC.336135$AU4.247235@fx02.fr7...
> : Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of 'dcollins'?
> :
> : 
> https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229944-is-there-a-better-place-to-ask-my-question/
> :
> : <aside>
> :
> : Great wedding today!
> :
> : *Share YOUR love* :-D
> :
> : -- 
> : D.



And you do, of course realize that it isn't impossible for The Underground Marshmallow Person to be doing this, or getting help from someone with a clue? 

Frankly I do not really care. Do you even believe the bullshit The Underground Marshmallow Person is pushing? 

A meaningless discourse by pseudo-experts, magnified by the reciprocal of an infinite twin prime, demonstrating the vast nothingness of the main character's so-called thought process. 

How is FileZilla on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? Sadly this is what happens when seriously poor self confidence takes over The Underground Marshmallow Person's psyche. What did Steve Carroll expect from the lying imbecile? That The Underground Marshmallow Person ignoramus has nothing to blow but time. He has nothing else. Especially not ambition. I am not irate, he wants me to be but I am in stitches because The Underground Marshmallow Person's trolling is so transparent. He purposefully didn't list all the criteria that he would quickly insist are needed... and we all know why, The Underground Marshmallow Person could not hide it if he tried. At least he has morons to back him ;) 



--
This broke the Internet!!
http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow
https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund
https://redd.it/6sfkup
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116462

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
Message-ID<59298440-ceda-4ac8-ab35-763325698a74@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116458
On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 6:22:44 AM UTC-7, David B. wrote:
> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of 'dcollins'?
> 
> https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229944-is-there-a-better-place-to-ask-my-question/
> 
> <aside>
> 
> Great wedding today!
> 
> *Share YOUR love* :-D
> 
> -- 
> D.



From what I've seen it looks like the Gnome ecosystem got more sophisticated. Ha! Right, benj is pushing to market a Gnome variable, which anyone can get in seconds, that allows him to flood multiple groups. If he could stop being so slow he would understand how stupid he sounds. Too much glue for you, benj. benj is trying ("very, very" hard) to project their trolling crap onto Snit. For some time benj has encouraged the claim that Snit needs 'documentation' to point out all his dishonesty. The fact is that nobody needs any proof to do that. So benj pulls this nonsensical trolling poppycock in an incompetent bid to 'push' the idea that Snit is like he is. 

His dream is to see Snit chased away by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean. It's benj's problem and he has to want to deal with it. Obviously he would rather attack than face reality. 

Snit created at least twenty virtual machines in the last year or so. I am sure he and the herd are proud. 



--
Curious how these posts are made? www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116809 — (OT) David Brooks A known stalker!

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
Subject(OT) David Brooks A known stalker!
Message-ID<XnsA8F0C825EF9F4HT1@f59xc7RbvRJ7Fz5KAkOU.ND.koF>
In reply to#116458
Just a public service announcement which concerns your online safety. 
For your own good, if you presently interact with David Brooks, it's 
recommended you cease doing so immediately. Whatever information 
you've already provided him with will be abused at a later date, but 
you can prevent him from learning more about you for future abuse by 
ceasing conversation with him. You don't need to take my word for it, 
google for david brooks stalker and educate yourself. He's 
practically infamous for it!

MID: <XnsA8B0CB7AECA97HT1@8gnVlkNxp39z68kkHp26HRb.6nV>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152222085100

Here's some MIDs and urls showing the message where you're clearly, 
STALKING. It's hard to deny it when your own posts show you doing it.

I just thought i'd remind you about some of them. <G>

Begin Davids efforts in rec photo:

MID: <UOlQA.740019$kC.233802@fx16.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149437329500

Request denied. David tries again:

MID:  <PZLQA.735267$Tn2.417645@fx02.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149461165500

Request denied, again. David doesn't give up easily.

MID: <wfTQA.574616$EW4.516451@fx18.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149461088500

Gets no where, again. So, David comes clean with the
group in public on his intentions towards me:

MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100

Doesn't really get anywhere. Makes little progress.. Until...

MID: <xrAeC.774106$xP5.431837@fx08.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201851200

Evidently goes nowhere on him, as I'm still here. But, yes, he did 
try turning things around and painting himself as a victim of some 
kind. Neat huh?

Another go at stalking me and asking others to help. He even keeps 
screenshots incriminating his own stalking behaviors. ROFL!

MID:  <og24t8$v6f$1@dont-email.me>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603382000

He's basically told to pound sand, continues, releasing more 
'information' he thinks he knows about me to speed things up

MID: <og3ai1$3pk$1@dont-email.me>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201858800

Perhaps this additional information regarding his date of birth will 
be helpful in identifying his ACTUAL address?

Davids real upset with me, asks rec.photo for help!
MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100

David stalking a domain site owner
MID: <nnfp92$hld$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201905200

David Stalking Paul Adare
MID: <nh19s7$dq9$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201910900

David specifying an .exe malware file that he knew wasn't on
tekrider domain. After claiming it was previously.
MID: <YWYbC.758650$iM5.434140@fx05.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151796841900

David trying to dox me again with a new signature
MID: <6KyeC.677082$hn.471484@fx07.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151805918800

I can be trusted to 'shop' you and bring you to justice!
You really shouldn't have used a new signature. Perhaps you'll 
refrain from so doing now that I've got one too?

David threatens me with a bigger? doxing. 
MID: <E6GdneYsQ8Xw6p7JnZ2dnUVZ8rudnZ2d@bt.com>
al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201932100

Would you like me to publish YOUR personal details Dustin? I have 
them. They were disclosed to me by a 'friend' who lives in the USA.
Genuine stuff - REAL LIFE info! Just say the word and I'll post same 
in all 110,000 plus Usenet groups  held by Giganews!


-- 
Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! 
Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT)  
to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who 
has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, 
local law enforcement, etc.
https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report?
David Brooks (BoaterDave)
Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane
Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom 
Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) 
Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#116811 — Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker!

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
SubjectRe: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker!
Message-ID<8bec8547-544d-4fa1-9213-bd4e5ad92fbc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#116809
On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 4:32:22 PM UTC-7, Diesel wrote:
> Just a public service announcement which concerns your online safety. 
> For your own good, if you presently interact with David Brooks, it's 
> recommended you cease doing so immediately. Whatever information 
> you've already provided him with will be abused at a later date, but 
> you can prevent him from learning more about you for future abuse by 
> ceasing conversation with him. You don't need to take my word for it, 
> google for david brooks stalker and educate yourself. He's 
> practically infamous for it!
> 
> MID: <XnsA8B0CB7AECA97HT1@8gnVlkNxp39z68kkHp26HRb.6nV>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152222085100
> 
> Here's some MIDs and urls showing the message where you're clearly, 
> STALKING. It's hard to deny it when your own posts show you doing it.
> 
> I just thought i'd remind you about some of them. <G>
> 
> Begin Davids efforts in rec photo:
> 
> MID: <UOlQA.740019$kC.233802@fx16.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149437329500
> 
> Request denied. David tries again:
> 
> MID:  <PZLQA.735267$Tn2.417645@fx02.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149461165500
> 
> Request denied, again. David doesn't give up easily.
> 
> MID: <wfTQA.574616$EW4.516451@fx18.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149461088500
> 
> Gets no where, again. So, David comes clean with the
> group in public on his intentions towards me:
> 
> MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100
> 
> Doesn't really get anywhere. Makes little progress.. Until...
> 
> MID: <xrAeC.774106$xP5.431837@fx08.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201851200
> 
> Evidently goes nowhere on him, as I'm still here. But, yes, he did 
> try turning things around and painting himself as a victim of some 
> kind. Neat huh?
> 
> Another go at stalking me and asking others to help. He even keeps 
> screenshots incriminating his own stalking behaviors. ROFL!
> 
> MID:  <og24t8$v6f$1@dont-email.me>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603382000
> 
> He's basically told to pound sand, continues, releasing more 
> 'information' he thinks he knows about me to speed things up
> 
> MID: <og3ai1$3pk$1@dont-email.me>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201858800
> 
> Perhaps this additional information regarding his date of birth will 
> be helpful in identifying his ACTUAL address?
> 
> Davids real upset with me, asks rec.photo for help!
> MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100
> 
> David stalking a domain site owner
> MID: <nnfp92$hld$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201905200
> 
> David Stalking Paul Adare
> MID: <nh19s7$dq9$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201910900
> 
> David specifying an .exe malware file that he knew wasn't on
> tekrider domain. After claiming it was previously.
> MID: <YWYbC.758650$iM5.434140@fx05.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151796841900
> 
> David trying to dox me again with a new signature
> MID: <6KyeC.677082$hn.471484@fx07.fr7>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=151805918800
> 
> I can be trusted to 'shop' you and bring you to justice!
> You really shouldn't have used a new signature. Perhaps you'll 
> refrain from so doing now that I've got one too?
> 
> David threatens me with a bigger? doxing. 
> MID: <E6GdneYsQ8Xw6p7JnZ2dnUVZ8rudnZ2d@bt.com>
> al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152201932100
> 
> Would you like me to publish YOUR personal details Dustin? I have 
> them. They were disclosed to me by a 'friend' who lives in the USA.
> Genuine stuff - REAL LIFE info! Just say the word and I'll post same 
> in all 110,000 plus Usenet groups  held by Giganews!
> 
> 
> -- 
> Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! 
> Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT)  
> to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who 
> has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, 
> local law enforcement, etc.
> https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report?
> David Brooks (BoaterDave)
> Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane
> Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom 
> Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) 
> Email(s): davidandtrishab@btinternet.com, boaterdavetj@aol.com



Your system will crawl while this takes place. And it takes a long time. 

Just about everything Steve Carroll says about anyone else is dishonest of course, but he does not care. Times change. I think the idea of a website is getting to be old fashion. Right now there are too many "let's attack Takuya Saitoh for no reason" people in this group and not enough power users with the patience to help the people with Macs. 

Time to blame anything but Linux! 



-- 
Best CMS Solution of 2017!
http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe
http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h
http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web