Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #52452 > unrolled thread

29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping

Started byGeorge Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com>
First post2013-11-20 13:11 -0600
Last post2013-11-21 06:42 -0800
Articles 5 on this page of 45 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2013-11-20 13:11 -0600
    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-21 09:08 +1300
      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-20 20:37 -0500
        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Recliner <recliner2-news@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-20 19:57 -0600
          Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-21 19:08 +1300
            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> - 2013-11-21 07:24 +0000
              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping John Holt <me@foo.net> - 2013-11-21 15:21 -0500
                Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 20:34 -0500
                  Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-22 02:21 +0000
                    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 23:24 -0500
                      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 23:38 -0500
                      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-22 15:29 +0000
                      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2013-11-22 14:55 -0500
                        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-23 00:56 -0500
                      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-11-24 05:43 +0100
                  Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-22 18:36 +1300
                    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-22 01:06 -0500
                  Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 18:20 +0000
                    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-22 11:34 -0700
                      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 19:22 +0000
                        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-22 16:12 -0700
                          Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-11-23 03:34 +0000
                            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-22 21:36 -0700
                              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-23 12:02 -0800
                                Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-23 15:58 -0700
                              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-11-23 22:34 +0000
                        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-11-23 20:55 +0000
            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Recliner <recliner2-news@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 01:51 -0600
              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-22 09:28 +1300
        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 01:42 -0500
          Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 11:49 -0500
            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 11:56 -0500
        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-21 09:07 -0700
          Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 11:53 -0500
            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 11:56 -0500
              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 12:30 -0500
                Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 13:00 -0500
            Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-22 09:33 +1300
              Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-11-21 15:54 -0500
                Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Recliner <recliner2-news@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 18:47 -0600
                  Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-11-22 11:07 +0000
      Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-11-21 12:04 -0600
        Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-22 09:31 +1300
    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-11-20 18:27 -0800
    Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping "Mr. Strat" <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com> - 2013-11-21 06:42 -0800

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]


#52513

FromDavid Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid>
Date2013-11-22 11:07 +0000
Message-ID<l6ndtm$r6q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#52499
On 22/11/2013 00:47, Recliner wrote:
[]
> Win 98 was still DOS-based. The 'proper' Windows versions were NT, 2000,
> XP, Vista, 7 and 8.

.. and I have Windows NT disks dating back to 1992.

Happy 21st birthday!

-- 
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#52487

FromMatthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net>
Date2013-11-21 12:04 -0600
Message-ID<lybanon-9582F9.12044021112013@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net>
In reply to#52455
In article <211120130908287416%YourName@YourISP.com>,
 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> In article <CEB26571.A4503%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
> <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Reminds me of the VTR Wars. The one that became dominant was inferior there
> > as well...
> 
> It's usually the case that the cheapest or the most popular wins (or
> simply the most entrenched), which isn't necessarily the same as being
> the best.

It's been proven over and over again that the American (probably true in 
other countries also) public is willing to settle for "good enough" if 
it's cheaper.  Convenience is also a factor.  The most obvious example 
is delivery pizza, but there are many other examples.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#52492

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-11-22 09:31 +1300
Message-ID<221120130931553578%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#52487
In article
<lybanon-9582F9.12044021112013@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net>, Matthew
Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In article <211120130908287416%YourName@YourISP.com>,
>  Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > In article <CEB26571.A4503%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
> > <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Reminds me of the VTR Wars. The one that became dominant was inferior
> > > there as well...
> > 
> > It's usually the case that the cheapest or the most popular wins (or
> > simply the most entrenched), which isn't necessarily the same as being
> > the best.
> 
> It's been proven over and over again that the American (probably true in 
> other countries also) public is willing to settle for "good enough" if 
> it's cheaper.  Convenience is also a factor.  The most obvious example 
> is delivery pizza, but there are many other examples.

Most of the American public seems to settle for crap ... the most
obvious examples being fast food that looks absolutely nothing like the
advertising images, "reality" TV, ...   ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#52466

FromSiri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2013-11-20 18:27 -0800
Message-ID<chine.bleu-4E1146.18272020112013@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#52452
In article <CEB26571.A4503%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>,
 George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Reminds me of the VTR Wars. The one that became dominant was inferior there
> as well...

Like herpes, the gift that keeps on giving.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
They hung there dependent from the sky
Like some heavy metal fruit
These bombers, ripened, ready to tilt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#52474

From"Mr. Strat" <mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>
Date2013-11-21 06:42 -0800
Message-ID<211120130642379958%mrstrat@nospam.gmail.com>
In reply to#52452
In article <CEB26571.A4503%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
<ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Reminds me of the VTR Wars. The one that became dominant was inferior there
> as well...
> 
> <http://ct.cnet.com/clicks?t=1308216783-c3d1a4e0f74002d0468009323e725a42-bf&
> brand=NEWS&s=5>
> 

I still have Windows 1 on 5.25" floppies (and Windows 95 on about 24
disks).

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web