Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #29778 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-20 13:47 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-08-21 13:59 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Apple High End DSLR? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 13:47 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 17:28 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 15:23 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 18:49 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 16:36 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 19:53 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-20 18:26 -0500
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2012-08-21 15:05 +0200
Re: Apple High End DSLR? YourName@YourISP.com (Your Name) - 2012-08-21 16:10 +1200
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 18:50 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-21 01:10 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-21 01:49 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 23:40 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-21 16:08 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 21:20 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 16:09 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 21:26 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-22 10:25 +0100
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-23 08:06 +1000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-22 15:15 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-23 08:35 +1000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-24 07:57 +1000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-23 16:53 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 14:01 -0700
iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-23 15:13 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 15:27 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-23 19:08 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-23 16:54 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 16:45 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 21:30 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 16:57 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 14:17 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 17:47 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 14:55 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 09:08 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 11:44 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 15:31 -0400
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-27 10:46 -0700
Re: iCloud, PhotoStream and backing up your photos (was Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero!) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-27 19:23 -0400
Keepers, storage, culling photos [was Re: iCloud, PhotoStream a....] John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-27 19:53 -0700
Re: Keepers, storage, culling photos [was Re: iCloud, PhotoStream a....] Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-28 19:49 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-23 21:10 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 21:42 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-23 14:39 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 17:32 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 14:49 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 17:51 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-24 16:46 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 09:12 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 09:13 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 13:00 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-25 10:47 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 14:12 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-25 11:16 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 14:51 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-25 15:37 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! MC <copespaz@mapca.inter.net> - 2012-08-25 16:56 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 16:13 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-26 19:12 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 19:17 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-27 10:48 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-25 17:09 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 18:14 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-25 22:23 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-25 19:53 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-26 12:58 +1000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-25 23:16 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-25 20:28 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 10:47 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 13:33 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-26 19:05 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 19:19 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 10:37 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-25 23:18 +0100
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-26 13:27 +0100
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-25 15:33 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 16:53 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 16:23 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-25 20:23 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 10:48 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-21 16:31 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 21:27 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 21:59 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-21 21:27 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2012-08-22 16:03 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-08-23 01:50 +0000
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-20 15:37 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 18:48 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-20 16:00 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 19:38 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-20 16:51 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 19:58 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-20 17:13 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 19:24 -0700
Re: Apple High End DSLR? "Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> - 2012-08-20 18:52 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 19:42 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-20 22:34 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-20 22:44 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2012-08-21 15:15 +0200
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-21 07:54 -0600
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 21:08 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-21 18:30 -0400
Re: Apple High End DSLR? YourName@YourISP.com (Your Name) - 2012-08-22 13:09 +1200
Re: Apple High End DSLR? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-20 18:04 -0500
Re: Apple High End DSLR? "Mark Dodel" <madodelNOSPAM@ptd.net> - 2012-08-20 19:19 -0500
Re: Apple High End DSLR? "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-21 15:54 +0100
Re: Apple High End DSLR? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-21 13:59 -0400
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 13:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Apple High End DSLR? |
| Message-ID | <michelle-135B63.13471820082012@news.eternal-september.org> |
Poll: Should Apple build an iOS high-end, point-and-shoot/prosumer DSLR? August 20, 2012 at 12:46 pm Thank you, we have already counted your vote. Yes, I'd buy one 27.27% (945 votes) No, iPhone's camera is good enough 53.59% (1,857 votes) Other/See comments 3.87% (134 votes) Yes! but I'm happy with what I have. 15.27% (529 votes) Total Votes: 3,465 <a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/6477046">Take Our Poll</a> iLounge reported in May that Apple is allegedly working on a “standalone digital camera, specifically a point-and-shoot model.” The website further said the device would deliver an image quality far beyond what the iPhone and iPad could deliver and attributed its information to sources, camera-related job openings at Apple, a re-trademarked iSight filing, and Walter Isaacson’s biography on Apple’s late cofounder. According to Isaacson, Steve Jobs named photography as one of three industries that he wanted to transform. With that said, a camera would be a decidedly high-end market that Apple is seen exiting post haste (see Mac Pro, etc.). A REAL CAMERA with iOS camera apps would seem cool, but Apple does not take this type of high-volume market seriously. Most people are perfectly content with the amazing iPhone camera…and the new iPhone’s camera can only get better. Read more at http://9to5mac.com/2012/08/20/should-apple-build-an-ios-high-end-point-and-s hootprosumer-dslr/#wO83RUiYbi6mTEuL.99 -- Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 17:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29778 |
On 2012-08-20 16:47 , Michelle Steiner wrote:
> Poll: Should Apple build an iOS high-end, point-and-shoot/prosumer DSLR?
P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely.
That said I could see Apple making a P&S - even a very good one as long
as they choose a good optics package.
I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where
the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they
teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that
could get traction ...
... as long as the camera function dominated the operation of the
device, that is.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 15:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <200820121523435624%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #29782 |
In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > Poll: Should Apple build an iOS high-end, point-and-shoot/prosumer DSLR? > > P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely. > > That said I could see Apple making a P&S - even a very good one as long > as they choose a good optics package. it's possible. there's already talk of android based cameras. apple really needs to partner with established camera companies though. > I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where > the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they > teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that > could get traction ... there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with canon or nikon, and ideally both. if apple were to introduce an slr with yet another lens mount, it will be a dismal failure. even sony couldn't gain that much slr market share, and they had an established userbase from when they bought konica-minolta. > ... as long as the camera function dominated the operation of the > device, that is. right. if it's claim to fame is auto-upload to icloud, forget it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 18:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <UqadnVvaY9B9I6_NnZ2dnUVZ_qwAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29789 |
On 2012-08-20 18:23 , nospam wrote:
> In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>>> Poll: Should Apple build an iOS high-end, point-and-shoot/prosumer DSLR?
>>
>> P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely.
>>
>> That said I could see Apple making a P&S - even a very good one as long
>> as they choose a good optics package.
>
> it's possible. there's already talk of android based cameras. apple
> really needs to partner with established camera companies though.
>
>> I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where
>> the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they
>> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that
>> could get traction ...
>
> there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with
> canon or nikon,
Uh yeah. What part of "if they team with, eg, Canon" did you have
trouble reading.
There's no way it would be both.
I doubt it will be any SLR maker - cause it won't be an SLR and it won't
be a team effort. It will be Apple period (with news accounts saying
where they get the optics (say Zeiss design manufactured by Sony)).
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 16:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <200820121636539026%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #29793 |
In article <UqadnVvaY9B9I6_NnZ2dnUVZ_qwAAAAA@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > >> I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where > >> the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they > >> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that > >> could get traction ... > > > > there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with > > canon or nikon, > > Uh yeah. What part of "if they team with, eg, Canon" did you have > trouble reading. i was agreeing with it. > There's no way it would be both. then it will likely fail. some users might switch from nikon to canon or vice versa for an apple slr, but not that many because of the hassles and expense of replacing lenses. licensing both would get them about 80% of slr users who would just need to buy a new body. no need to replace lenses. sony users will have to switch but they're probably already considering that anyway. > I doubt it will be any SLR maker - cause it won't be an SLR and it won't > be a team effort. It will be Apple period (with news accounts saying > where they get the optics (say Zeiss design manufactured by Sony)). it's unlikely to be an slr because apple no doubt is looking to the future when mechanical cameras are mostly history, assuming this is more than just a rumour. or they might pursue lytro. supposedly steve jobs talked to them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 19:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <GJ6dnV9mRZCIU6_NnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29799 |
On 2012-08-20 19:36 , nospam wrote:
> In article <UqadnVvaY9B9I6_NnZ2dnUVZ_qwAAAAA@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>>>> I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where
>>>> the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they
>>>> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that
>>>> could get traction ...
>>>
>>> there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with
>>> canon or nikon,
>>
>> Uh yeah. What part of "if they team with, eg, Canon" did you have
>> trouble reading.
>
> i was agreeing with it.
>
>> There's no way it would be both.
>
> then it will likely fail.
It isn't happening period. P&S. High end perhaps. But P&S.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 18:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <CC5831E0.8D4DF%ghost_topper@hotmail.com> |
| In reply to | #29789 |
On 8/20/12 5:23 PM, in article 200820121523435624%nospam@nospam.invalid, "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne > <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > >>> Poll: Should Apple build an iOS high-end, point-and-shoot/prosumer DSLR? >> >> P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely. >> >> That said I could see Apple making a P&S - even a very good one as long >> as they choose a good optics package. > > it's possible. there's already talk of android based cameras. apple > really needs to partner with established camera companies though. > >> I can's see them making a DSLR. That is a whole different beast where >> the optics are far more important than anything else. OTOH if they >> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that >> could get traction ... > > there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with > canon or nikon, and ideally both. if apple were to introduce an slr > with yet another lens mount, it will be a dismal failure. > Exactly. Even for the biggest company in the history of the world, it would be a dismal failure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 15:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skdcg9-03k2.ln1@news1.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #29789 |
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:23:43 -0700, nospam wrote: > In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne > <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > > there's no way they can make a successful dslr unless they partner with > canon or nikon, and ideally both. Probably true. > if apple were to introduce an slr with > yet another lens mount, it will be a dismal failure. Aaarrrrgggghhh! > even sony couldn't gain that much slr market share, and they had an > established userbase from when they bought konica-minolta. I didn't realise they had bought Konica-Minolta. They would have done better keeping those brand names IMHO. -- Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | YourName@YourISP.com (Your Name) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 16:10 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <YourName-2108121610590001@203-118-187-29.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #29782 |
In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely. True, although there a slowly growing number of cameras that are blurring that distinction. Apple started the digital camera way back with the QuickTake, but dropped out of that sector of devices. I doubt they've got much interest in going back there now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 18:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <f-edncrR-eRfjanNnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29816 |
On 2012-08-21 00:10 , Your Name wrote:
> In article <692dnZxJFpV-Nq_NnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>>
>> P&S and "prosumer" DSLR are two different domains entirely.
>
> True, although there a slowly growing number of cameras that are blurring
> that distinction.
To a photographer (amateur or pro) there are distinct features that are
necessary to a SLR/DSLR. It is true that things like pellicle mirrors
and EVF's are beginning to make their mark but they don't subtract from
the essentials of a SLR/DSLR. (Pellicle's are not new to SLR's, but are
making a return in some cameras).
Some pros (city-beat journalists) could use a good P&S with a good
attached flash - that's all they really need for a lot of their shots -
esp. in the web driven era.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 01:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <210820120110018980%star@sky.net> |
| In reply to | #29782 |
Alan Browne: > ... > OTOH if they > teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that > could get traction ... Canon doesn't need Apple or iOS to make great cameras. The same can be said for Nikon, Sony, Olympus, and a host of other camera makers. At the moment Canon's high-end DSLRs integrate nicely with the Mac OS with Canon's own software. I'm sure this is true of other camera makers as well. Professional DSLRs have a lot of electronics and a lot of menu choices on them now; I don't know what the limit is before the camera becomes too complex to allow for flexible and rapid operation, but 12 pages of iOS apps would probably stretch things beyond the breaking point. There may be gadgets beyond iPhone and iPad that Apple could persuade pro photographers to buy, but a camera, be it a compact model or a high-end pro DSLR, is probably not one of them. Yes, many, if not most, pro photographers carry compact cameras alongside their high-end stuff on certain assignments. Yes, they sometimes make pro-grade, marketable photos with their compact cameras. I hesitate to say point-and-shoot because that implies full automation. Pros tend not to go for that. But there are some excellent compact cameras that incorporate both the manual control that pros require and the automatic operation that the lower-end consumer market demands. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 01:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5033217d$0$1546$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #29818 |
Davoud wrote: > There may be gadgets beyond iPhone and iPad that Apple could persuade > pro photographers to buy, but a camera, be it a compact model or a > high-end pro DSLR, is probably not one of them. Forget pro photographers. Apple is a mass market consumer electronics company. They are not into "hobbies". pro DSLRs are not mass market. My guess is that Apple would produce an iShoot which is basically an iPhone in a camera physical form factor with good lens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-20 23:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <200820122340575623%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #29819 |
In article <5033217d$0$1546$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > Forget pro photographers. Apple is a mass market consumer electronics > company. They are not into "hobbies". apple has repeatedly called apple tv a hobby. > pro DSLRs are not mass market. pro slrs aren't, but entry level slrs certainly are. nikon sold nearly 5 million slrs & mirrorless last year. > My guess is that Apple would produce an iShoot which is basically an > iPhone in a camera physical form factor with good lens. probably, although likely without a cellular radio, as that would be yet another device for which to pay access fees.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 19:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <camdnWq6uJfWjqnNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29818 |
On 2012-08-21 01:10 , Davoud wrote:
> Alan Browne:
>> ...
>> OTOH if they
>> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that
>> could get traction ...
>
> Canon doesn't need Apple or iOS to make great cameras.
No shit?
The main point is that Apple will likely do a P&S and for that they
don't need Canon or Nikon - but they do need good optics.
As to Canon and Nikon, they don't need Apple to make great cameras as
long as they are DSLR's. But here P&S is concerned it appears that
Nikon have already gone to the dark side:
http://9to5google.com/2012/08/20/leaked-press-shots-tease-nikons-android-powered-coolpix-s800c-camera-photos/
Most P&S's have pretty lame UI's and very little flexibility where
interfacing to other devices is concerned. An iOS (or Android) UI and
interface ability could make managing images a lot easier.
When it's not the silly assed 4-step Apple way, in any case.
My camera:
1. Plug camera or card into computer.
2. Copy photos to computer
Apple way:
1. Plug iPhone into computer (can't WiFi this AFAICT)
2. Run iPhoto
3. Import photos to iPhoto
4. Export photos from iPhoto to a folder on the computer
That is something Apple could make a lot simpler - and w/o the stinkin'
iCould.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bcpq6jkfmj.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #29847 |
Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> writes: > On 2012-08-21 01:10 , Davoud wrote: > > Alan Browne: > >> ... > >> OTOH if they > >> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that > >> could get traction ... > > > > Canon doesn't need Apple or iOS to make great cameras. > > No shit? > > The main point is that Apple will likely do a P&S and for that they > don't need Canon or Nikon - but they do need good optics. > > As to Canon and Nikon, they don't need Apple to make great cameras as > long as they are DSLR's. But here P&S is concerned it appears that > Nikon have already gone to the dark side: > > http://9to5google.com/2012/08/20/leaked-press-shots-tease-nikons-android-powered-coolpix-s800c-camera-photos/ > > Most P&S's have pretty lame UI's and very little flexibility where > interfacing to other devices is concerned. An iOS (or Android) UI and > interface ability could make managing images a lot easier. > > When it's not the silly assed 4-step Apple way, in any case. > > My camera: > 1. Plug camera or card into computer. > 2. Copy photos to computer > > > Apple way: > 1. Plug iPhone into computer (can't WiFi this AFAICT) > 2. Run iPhoto > 3. Import photos to iPhoto > 4. Export photos from iPhoto to a folder on the computer > > That is something Apple could make a lot simpler - and w/o the > stinkin' iCould. It isn't the Apple way you are talking about - it's the iPhone way. I can do the two-step process you describe with my camera on my Mac. And the 4-step process you describe for the iPhone is really a 2-step process if you _want_ to use iPhoto to organize your pictures, and need be no more than a 3-step process if you don't want to use iPhoto to organize your pictures.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 21:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VcWdndsrZI9CrqnNnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29849 |
On 2012-08-21 19:08 , Doug Anderson wrote:
> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> writes:
>
>> On 2012-08-21 01:10 , Davoud wrote:
>>> Alan Browne:
>>>> ...
>>>> OTOH if they
>>>> teamed with, eg, Canon to integrate iOS into a Canon DSLR then that
>>>> could get traction ...
>>>
>>> Canon doesn't need Apple or iOS to make great cameras.
>>
>> No shit?
>>
>> The main point is that Apple will likely do a P&S and for that they
>> don't need Canon or Nikon - but they do need good optics.
>>
>> As to Canon and Nikon, they don't need Apple to make great cameras as
>> long as they are DSLR's. But here P&S is concerned it appears that
>> Nikon have already gone to the dark side:
>>
>> http://9to5google.com/2012/08/20/leaked-press-shots-tease-nikons-android-powered-coolpix-s800c-camera-photos/
>>
>> Most P&S's have pretty lame UI's and very little flexibility where
>> interfacing to other devices is concerned. An iOS (or Android) UI and
>> interface ability could make managing images a lot easier.
>>
>> When it's not the silly assed 4-step Apple way, in any case.
>>
>> My camera:
>> 1. Plug camera or card into computer.
>> 2. Copy photos to computer
>>
>>
>> Apple way:
>> 1. Plug iPhone into computer (can't WiFi this AFAICT)
>> 2. Run iPhoto
>> 3. Import photos to iPhoto
>> 4. Export photos from iPhoto to a folder on the computer
>>
>> That is something Apple could make a lot simpler - and w/o the
>> stinkin' iCould.
>
> It isn't the Apple way you are talking about - it's the iPhone way. I
> can do the two-step process you describe with my camera on my Mac.
I know. I do what I describe on a Mac. The iPhone way is the Apple way.
> And the 4-step process you describe for the iPhone is really a 2-step
> process if you _want_ to use iPhoto to organize your pictures, and
> need be no more than a 3-step process if you don't want to use iPhoto
> to organize your pictures.
It's still 4 step because iPhoto is a bucket of shit in the bilges of a
tramp steamer on the Borneo coast.
99%+ of my photos are with a DSLR. So when I occasionally make a grab
shot with my iPhone, the incredibly idiotic machinations that Apple make
me go through set my teeth on edge. Indeed photos will fester on my
phone for weeks or month before there are enough to bother with the
stupid Apple 4 step.
Written on a Mac. It makes sense at least.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 16:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820121609012624%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #29847 |
In article <camdnWq6uJfWjqnNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > When it's not the silly assed 4-step Apple way, in any case. > > My camera: > 1. Plug camera or card into computer. > 2. Copy photos to computer > > Apple way: > 1. Plug iPhone into computer (can't WiFi this AFAICT) > 2. Run iPhoto > 3. Import photos to iPhoto > 4. Export photos from iPhoto to a folder on the computer there's no need to run iphoto. an iphone shows up as a standard digital camera, which means *any* app that can copy images from a camera will work, including lightroom. in other words, it's the exact same two steps as your camera or any other camera. or, you can use icloud and they're already on your computer in zero steps.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 21:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! |
| Message-ID | <qKSdnVIYjNWoqKnNnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #29851 |
On 2012-08-21 19:09 , nospam wrote:
> In article <camdnWq6uJfWjqnNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> When it's not the silly assed 4-step Apple way, in any case.
>>
>> My camera:
>> 1. Plug camera or card into computer.
>> 2. Copy photos to computer
>>
>> Apple way:
>> 1. Plug iPhone into computer (can't WiFi this AFAICT)
>> 2. Run iPhoto
>> 3. Import photos to iPhoto
>> 4. Export photos from iPhoto to a folder on the computer
>
> there's no need to run iphoto. an iphone shows up as a standard digital
> camera, which means *any* app that can copy images from a camera will
> work, including lightroom.
>
> in other words, it's the exact same two steps as your camera or any
> other camera.
BLOW ME DOWN!
There are my iPhone photos in Bridge!
Nospam - this is the thrid time in two years you've actually said
something useful!
I can custom re-name, number, tag, etc. all in one shot while importing.
THANK YOU NOSPAM!!!
(Of course I'd still prefer to just see them in Finder, but the above is
a vast improvement over the Apple 4 step).
> or, you can use icloud and they're already on your computer in zero
> steps.
I don't do iCloud. Won't do iCloud.
--
"C'mon boys, you're not laying pipe!".
-John Keating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! |
| Message-ID | <210820121929062896%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #29869 |
In article <qKSdnVIYjNWoqKnNnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > (Of course I'd still prefer to just see them in Finder, but the above is > a vast improvement over the Apple 4 step). many cameras no longer show up in finder. apple isn't unique about that. nikon started doing that a while ago. not that it matters, because it's easier to just pop the card out of the camera and into a card reader. oddly enough, an iphone shows up in windows explorer. > > or, you can use icloud and they're already on your computer in zero > > steps. > > I don't do iCloud. Won't do iCloud. you might not, but others do and with icloud, it's zero steps.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-22 10:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Apple High End DSLR? Nospam is my hero! |
| Message-ID | <timstreater-C76D55.10254022082012@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #29879 |
In article <210820121929062896%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <qKSdnVIYjNWoqKnNnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne > <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > > (Of course I'd still prefer to just see them in Finder, but the above is > > a vast improvement over the Apple 4 step). > > many cameras no longer show up in finder. apple isn't unique about > that. > > nikon started doing that a while ago. not that it matters, because it's > easier to just pop the card out of the camera and into a card reader. Or have, as we do, an SD card that you fold in half and then it's a USB stick. -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web