Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #116458 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400
Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:11 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2018-05-22 12:20 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-05-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-05-22 21:14 +0000
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 21:27 +0100
Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:08 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:48 -0700
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 08:21 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 03:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 11:55 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:38 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:23 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 19:46 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:22 -0700
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 21:08 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 13:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:32 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:34 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-23 23:14 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2018-05-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 12:00 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 04:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:11 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 03:05 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 05:24 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-24 16:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-24 21:03 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-24 21:29 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:16 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:01 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-24 21:22 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 12:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 12:27 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 13:52 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 13:31 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 14:54 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 14:05 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 15:48 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 15:36 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 17:14 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 17:13 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-25 20:39 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:51 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:49 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:24 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:54 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:14 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:20 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:22 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:29 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 13:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:03 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-05-25 18:25 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-25 19:27 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-25 21:05 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 14:19 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 14:57 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 17:33 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 18:40 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:20 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:44 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:02 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:26 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:37 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:37 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:12 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 17:53 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 19:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 18:47 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 20:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 22:02 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.inwalid> - 2018-05-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 15:31 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:34 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-27 18:15 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:28 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:48 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-27 21:53 +0100
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2018-05-28 04:25 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-27 18:21 -0300
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 08:02 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Frozen North <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0400
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:52 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:56 -0500
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:37 -0400
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 06:25 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 10:57 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 18:16 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 15:17 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 17:30 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-23 22:13 +0100
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-23 22:10 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:12 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:29 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 18:31 -0400
Re: tl;dr: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:33 -0400
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-21 18:42 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 10:15 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-22 12:00 -0300
Re: tl;dr: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2018-05-22 16:32 +0100
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:37 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 05:40 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-05-20 10:31 -0300
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 07:29 -0700
Re: "BurfordTJustice" <burford/associate@uk.MI15> - 2018-05-19 14:55 -0400
Re: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
Re: tl;dr: Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 11:57 -0700
(OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-05-28 23:32 +0000
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:31 -0700
Re: (OT) David Brooks A known stalker! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:00 -0700
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 14:22 +0100 |
| Subject | tl;dr: |
| Message-ID | <AyVLC.336135$AU4.247235@fx02.fr7> |
Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of 'dcollins'? https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229944-is-there-a-better-place-to-ask-my-question/ <aside> Great wedding today! *Share YOUR love* :-D -- D.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 12:21 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <tvf0gd1v42j2jl96rvkplqg188kvdibrhe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116458 |
On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ? Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably be ignored. > ><CUT_POSSIBLE_MALICIOUS_LINK> To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 09:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7> |
| In reply to | #116460 |
On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ? > > Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. > > I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably > be ignored. That is the rc.common script, which should be found here: /etc/rc.common This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those systems. = That seems an adequate answer! :bananas:
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 07:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.20B18D4F010D3A82700004CE72CF@news.supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #116466 |
On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7>): > On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote: > > On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." > > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > > > > Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ? > > > > Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. > > > > I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably > > be ignored. > > That is the rc.common script, which should be found here: > /etc/rc.common > > This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still > present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware > can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested > this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been > unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those > systems. > > = > > That seems an adequate answer! :bananas: Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <TRtMC.356637$AU4.271400@fx02.fr7> |
| In reply to | #116470 |
On 20/05/18 12:02, Wolffan wrote: > On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote > (in article <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7>): > >> On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote: >>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." >>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ? >>> >>> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. >>> >>> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably >>> be ignored. >> >> That is the rc.common script, which should be found here: >> /etc/rc.common >> >> This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still >> present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware >> can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested >> this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been >> unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those >> systems. >> >> = >> >> That seems an adequate answer! :bananas: > > Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an > eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your > system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool > EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and > how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a > lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic, > too. ClamXAV? Why does Apple enable it to run on Apple machines when it *IS* totally unnecessary and COULD be doing harm? Apple itself should check it out thoroughly now that ClamXav is no longer available from the App store. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Snit is not running from this forger, he's running from me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools -https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV5iqVAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dmLoQAIdHYN1feyWJ/SVZdvG6QxAa z8N7UmFjUAJUtwRzPEpDydU/beEoOGsa/M7MRHfOhRv4XJcQWjk6ouQfW0JyQFG9 rYQONKuvpypOTA4suPMHuRelgV8o5vsT6nsnkhu3A3Vl8JT8QeYvwNlDUtsuPo67 TtJ11dKv9WmtqqV0jspikxaegpb4z8/ipc12/rl6ecLu9xadA/zaWCXinfjKtCdK sv1Y48I4mxhRzURDBf3ad/XteOCnYRum4IS4fP4WrMhjaOF/zrK2dSKtKdZ5BD6c DU1wnP52A35i/ZH02EA60sDBS23YBogMTkx3UJ9RW9wxz/x5derTSyK12z8IRAYE pypLNtDjIzuuebWu17TxVhYjrvy7E2VH5/7ElQmheMlQdAJmQG/GAXozseswBKnV X+jzVigbsOEHsYWvJuP38g9o1wUPp0lENdQpzu3IohaG9X7wGHVz9cZ07he5ciCA tXLtNYcF0/9zoiX2LALGEAOrKkW/APTKkk4FsvPXNf78kdGu9aWd/bygshzUPY9o LnTVyDluUCSmFI70+FSXUy8pmWrgajv8hYqtlxCaxgQr8x1hnc/wnUSb2zPIfYJT dzrKAlFJ5HFJf8llwjKNksAVoU/RQ6Q+Yg3RufvoYH2D8b1pk5rLj9C9svPkU18X 7DDD35qwaoj2vKsXG31G =fwCb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- E-commerce Simplified! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 08:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pdtufg$a5h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116470 |
On 20-May-18 12:02 PM, Wolffan wrote: > On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote > (in article <kKaMC.347433$er7.184068@fx14.fr7>): > >> On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote: >>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." >>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of <CUT_PERSONAL_NAME> ? >>> >>> Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. >>> >>> I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably >>> be ignored. >> >> That is the rc.common script, which should be found here: >> /etc/rc.common >> >> This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still >> present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware >> can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested >> this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been >> unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those >> systems. >> >> = >> >> That seems an adequate answer! :bananas: > > Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an > eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your > system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool > EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and > how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a > lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic, > too. Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your identity. :-( People who do so invariable raise my suspicions about them. What this means, in effect, is that visitors to the Apple Support Communities have to put their complete faith and trust into what is said by, effectively, complete strangers. From what I have already determined, advice given is not necessarily checked by Apple staff. Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to answer questions on the forums. When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do *anything it wishes* on one's computer. (Carte blanche, a French phrase, meaning "unlimited discretionary power to act; unrestricted authority".) You, as the user, will have absolutely no idea whether or not your computer has been compromised. I believe this to be a FACT! Just in case you are wondering about the :bananas: ................... https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/677410/scripts-can-anyone-here-understand-what-this-one-might-do/ By the way, I'm confident in the advice given by Thomas Reed, now a Director of Malwarebytes Inc and someone who has a profile on LinkedIn. https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/229944-is-there-a-better-place-to-ask-my-question/?tab=comments#comment-1243073 What's YOUR view of John Daniel? https://www.linkedin.com/in/etresoft/ "Etresoft, Inc. is a Canadian software development and consulting corporation in business since 2015. Etresoft's most popular product is EtreCheck, a macOS diagnostic tool used by over half a million people and frequently recommended on Apple Support Communities." http://www.etresoft.com/ He elected to terminate email contact with me and became quite hostile on the ASC. That really bothers me. :-( -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <210520180920064347%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116492 |
In article <pdtufg$a5h$1@dont-email.me>, David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav > intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. it was very logical. there was zero benefit. > The > developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to > answer questions on the forums. not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. > When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's > Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do > *anything it wishes* on one's computer. no different than *any* software.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 15:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116495 |
On 21-May-18 2:20 PM, nospam wrote: > In article <pdtufg$a5h$1@dont-email.me>, David B. > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> >> Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav >> intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. > > it was very logical. there was zero benefit. I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though. In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam' >> The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to >> answer questions on the forums. > > not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very interesting posts IMO. >> When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's >> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do >> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. > > no different than *any* software. True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'. "Since the App Store launched nine years ago, millions of apps have been downloaded billions of times. And we’ve used all that we’ve learned to redesign the App Store from the ground up. Inside are must-read stories, expert recommendations, carefully crafted lists, helpful how-tos, and new ways to find your next favourite app or game. This is the biggest thing to come to the App Store — since apps." https://www.apple.com/uk/ios/app-store/ -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 13:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <210520181301190723%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116502 |
In article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>, David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav > >> intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. > > > > it was very logical. there was zero benefit. > > I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of > comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though. there's no need to follow anything. every thread in which you are a participant has a similar outcome, which is why you are banned in numerous forums and/or the threads deleted. > In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam' further demonstrating just how stupid you are. > >> The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to > >> answer questions on the forums. > > > > not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. > > I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very > interesting posts IMO. whoooooooooooooosh. > >> When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's > >> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do > >> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. > > > > no different than *any* software. > > True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > obtained from the 'App Store'. absolutely false. that's not apple's advice at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pduuis$svr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #116509 |
On 21-May-18 6:01 PM, nospam wrote: > In article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>, David B. > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav >>>> intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. >>> >>> it was very logical. there was zero benefit. >> >> I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of >> comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though. > > there's no need to follow anything. every thread in which you are a > participant has a similar outcome, which is why you are banned in > numerous forums and/or the threads deleted. > >> In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam' > > further demonstrating just how stupid you are. > >>>> The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to >>>> answer questions on the forums. >>> >>> not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. >> >> I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very >> interesting posts IMO. > > whoooooooooooooosh. > >>>> When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's >>>> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do >>>> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. >>> >>> no different than *any* software. >> >> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >> obtained from the 'App Store'. > > absolutely false. that's not apple's advice at all. You appear to be wrong on ALL counts, nospam! :-P -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 15:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <210520181512051536%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116511 |
In article <pduuis$svr$2@dont-email.me>, David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav > >>>> intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. > >>> > >>> it was very logical. there was zero benefit. > >> > >> I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of > >> comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though. > > > > there's no need to follow anything. every thread in which you are a > > participant has a similar outcome, which is why you are banned in > > numerous forums and/or the threads deleted. > > > >> In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam' > > > > further demonstrating just how stupid you are. > > > >>>> The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased > >>>> to > >>>> answer questions on the forums. > >>> > >>> not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. > >> > >> I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very > >> interesting posts IMO. > > > > whoooooooooooooosh. > > > >>>> When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's > >>>> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do > >>>> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. > >>> > >>> no different than *any* software. > >> > >> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > >> obtained from the 'App Store'. > > > > absolutely false. that's not apple's advice at all. > > You appear to be wrong on ALL counts, nospam! :-P nope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 12:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <02e0a262-0ecd-49b8-9ff7-2cd54435a3d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116509 |
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 10:01:21 AM UTC-7, nospam wrote: > In article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>, David B. > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > > >> Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav > > >> intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said. > > > > > > it was very logical. there was zero benefit. > > > > I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of > > comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though. > > there's no need to follow anything. every thread in which you are a > participant has a similar outcome, which is why you are banned in > numerous forums and/or the threads deleted. > > > In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam' > > further demonstrating just how stupid you are. > > > >> The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased to > > >> answer questions on the forums. > > > > > > not when they're from dumbfuck trolls. > > > > I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very > > interesting posts IMO. > > whoooooooooooooosh. > > > >> When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's > > >> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do > > >> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. > > > > > > no different than *any* software. > > > > True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > > obtained from the 'App Store'. > > absolutely false. that's not apple's advice at all. He is unmistakably trolling, he got caught and he's doing the familiar ego protecting funny business covered in trolling 101 as he knocks himself out to regain what Melzzzzz already has... but it blew up in his face. Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. Melzzzzz pwns Steve Petruzzellis in every way possible. "Missed it by that much" said Steve Petruzzellis's girlfriend. Technologies change. I think the idea of a website is getting to be old fashion. What I do is certainly better. Just hogwash from Steve Petruzzellis. But Steve Petruzzellis has thoroughly left tech behind and is holding me accountable for the words of himself. -- I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 18:51 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <vif6gdl3bbit0ottkglejtelq9niltvgdo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #116502 |
On Mon, 21 May 2018 15:22:34 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> When one approves the installation of software like<an antivirus> onto one's >>> Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do >>> *anything it wishes* on one's computer. >> >> no different than *any* software. > >True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >obtained from the 'App Store'. One born every minute. And what do you do if a software you NEED, like a compiler or a debugger is NOT available from Apple $tore ? You have sht for brains. PS M$ group removed, as it's completely OFF TOPIC. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolffan <akwolffan@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 18:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.20B37F46003DC9F170000DB1F2CF@news.supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #116502 |
On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>): > True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > obtained from the 'App Store'. oh? Really? Where is this stated?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 19:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <KOIMC.172498$1e7.60663@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #116519 |
On 2018-05-21 18:27, Wolffan wrote: > On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote > (in article <pduknp$ppe$1@dont-email.me>): > >> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's >> obtained from the 'App Store'. > > oh? Really? Where is this stated? The defaults when you install/upgrade OS-X revert to Appe store only (System Preferences -> Security & Privacy) Question: In Yosemite, we have: Allow Apps downloaded from: -App Store -App Store & Identified Developpers -Anywhere In High Sierra, "Anywhere" is gone. Is there a way to bring it back, or special key combinations to set it? Or a defaults write command to make it "Anywhere" ? I just realised this and haven't really felt the systyem blocking me, so wondering if under the hood it preserved my "Anywhere" from previous version but the GUI shows App Stored and Identified Developpers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 19:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <210520181947252781%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116520 |
In article <KOIMC.172498$1e7.60663@fx38.iad>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > >> True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's > >> obtained from the 'App Store'. > > > > oh? Really? Where is this stated? > > The defaults when you install/upgrade OS-X revert to Appe store only > (System Preferences -> Security & Privacy) that's a default, which is easily overridden. it is *not* advice to not install third party apps.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 21:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <KoKMC.195956$bS4.191415@fx01.iad> |
| In reply to | #116521 |
On 2018-05-21 19:47, nospam wrote: > that's a default, which is easily overridden. > > it is *not* advice to not install third party apps. Some of the upgrades I did change my setting to allow only App Store apps. Yes, I can change it back to what I want, but Apple changing a setting is most definitly a suggestion from Apple that this is the recommeded setting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 21:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <210520182142105888%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #116524 |
In article <KoKMC.195956$bS4.191415@fx01.iad>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > Some of the upgrades I did change my setting to allow only App Store > apps. no it didn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 21:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <210520182151239773%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #116524 |
In article <KoKMC.195956$bS4.191415@fx01.iad>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > Some of the upgrades I did change my setting to allow only App Store > apps. Yes, I can change it back to what I want, but Apple changing a > setting is most definitly a suggestion from Apple that this is the > recommeded setting. I have a few apps that aren't in the App Store. BBEdit and Carbon Copy Cloner come to mind. Apps I get off the net are nowadays always recommended here by people I respect. Graphic Converter migrated to the App Store some time ago, or I would have included it. SuperDuper! lost the race to CCC on the last major update for me, or I would include it. If you want to be as safe as can be, get all apps off of the App Store. Then if the app devious and expensive harm to you, you can sue Apple. Otherwise, you are on your own. I "think" that Apple only throws up a warning for non-approved apps. I don't care enough to test my hypothesis. leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 22:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Allow Applicatiosn from... |
| Message-ID | <09c28f8a-f972-403b-a16e-67a497f2a5e6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #116531 |
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 9:51:27 PM UTC-7, Leonard Blaisdell wrote: > In article <KoKMC.195956$bS4.191415@fx01.iad>, JF Mezei > <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > > Some of the upgrades I did change my setting to allow only App Store > > apps. Yes, I can change it back to what I want, but Apple changing a > > setting is most definitly a suggestion from Apple that this is the > > recommeded setting. > > I have a few apps that aren't in the App Store. BBEdit and Carbon Copy > Cloner come to mind. Apps I get off the net are nowadays always > recommended here by people I respect. Graphic Converter migrated to the > App Store some time ago, or I would have included it. SuperDuper! lost > the race to CCC on the last major update for me, or I would include it. > If you want to be as safe as can be, get all apps off of the App Store. > Then if the app devious and expensive harm to you, you can sue Apple. > Otherwise, you are on your own. > I "think" that Apple only throws up a warning for non-approved apps. I > don't care enough to test my hypothesis. > > leo Melzzzz's posts are nothing but an incomprehensible mess. Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. Already moved on from that. Keep up! -- Get Rich Slow! http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web