Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53490 > unrolled thread

Mac pro (Late 2013)

Started byLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
First post2013-12-19 15:07 +0000
Last post2013-12-20 16:29 -0500
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  Mac pro (Late 2013) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-19 15:07 +0000
    Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-19 08:52 -0700
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-19 12:00 -0500
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-19 11:15 -0700
    Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-19 08:56 -0700
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 16:41 +0000
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-19 09:56 -0700
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-19 17:03 +0000
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2013-12-19 11:50 -0500
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 16:53 +0000
          Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2013-12-19 13:02 -0500
            Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-20 09:02 +1300
              Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-19 15:08 -0500
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-19 08:57 -0800
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-19 17:05 +0000
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-19 17:01 +0000
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-19 11:15 -0700
    Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) billy@MIX.COM - 2013-12-19 16:17 +0000
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-20 09:38 +1300
    Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 16:39 +0000
    Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-12-19 21:29 -0800
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-20 19:06 +1300
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-20 09:57 +0000
      Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2013-12-20 13:30 -0500
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-20 13:36 -0500
        Re: Mac pro (Late 2013) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-12-20 16:29 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#53547

FromKevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us>
Date2013-12-19 21:29 -0800
Message-ID<mcmurtrie-23CA5A.21292619122013@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>
In reply to#53490
In article <slrnlb62ug.g52.g.kreme@amelia.local>,
 Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:

> So, who bought one?
> 
> Come on, 'fess up!

I started at the online store with a base model Pro then added a few 
moderate upgrades to future-proof it for a year or two.  It came to 
$7200.  At that cost, switching to Linux for my next upgrade is 
completely justified.

I don't like the "trash can" form either.  I have both a Mac Mini and an 
old Mac Pro.  The Mac Pro consumes less desk space because everything 
packs inside of it in a tight form.  The Mini is a mess of cables and 
peripherals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53549

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-12-20 19:06 +1300
Message-ID<201220131906119647%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#53547
In article
<mcmurtrie-23CA5A.21292619122013@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> wrote:
> In article <slrnlb62ug.g52.g.kreme@amelia.local>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> > 
> > So, who bought one?
> > 
> > Come on, 'fess up!
> 
> I started at the online store with a base model Pro then added a few 
> moderate upgrades to future-proof it for a year or two.  It came to 
> $7200.  At that cost, switching to Linux for my next upgrade is 
> completely justified.
> 
> I don't like the "trash can" form either.  I have both a Mac Mini and an 
> old Mac Pro.  The Mac Pro consumes less desk space because everything 
> packs inside of it in a tight form.  The Mini is a mess of cables and 
> peripherals.

Take the Mac Mini and all it's extras, and put them inside an old Mac
Pro case ... problem solved!  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53559

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2013-12-20 09:57 +0000
Message-ID<201220130957139661%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#53547
In article
<mcmurtrie-23CA5A.21292619122013@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> wrote:

> In article <slrnlb62ug.g52.g.kreme@amelia.local>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> 
> > So, who bought one?
> > 
> > Come on, 'fess up!
> 
> I started at the online store with a base model Pro then added a few 
> moderate upgrades to future-proof it for a year or two.  It came to 
> $7200.  At that cost, switching to Linux for my next upgrade is 
> completely justified.
> 
> I don't like the "trash can" form either.  I have both a Mac Mini and an 
> old Mac Pro.  The Mac Pro consumes less desk space because everything 
> packs inside of it in a tight form.  The Mini is a mess of cables and 
> peripherals.

Depends what you need. I've got a recent Mini, with an older-form
MiniStack sitting on top as a TM drive. Atop that is a £20 DVD drive.
All these are connected via short cables and it was quite cheap as the
MiniStack was recycled from a previous configuration. With an SSD
inside it's quite fast enough, too.

-- 
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"  --  Bill of Rights 1689

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53576

FromFred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org>
Date2013-12-20 13:30 -0500
Message-ID<fmoore-82FDA5.13302120122013@mx05.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#53547
In article 
<mcmurtrie-23CA5A.21292619122013@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
 Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> wrote:

> In article <slrnlb62ug.g52.g.kreme@amelia.local>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> 
> > So, who bought one?
> > 
> > Come on, 'fess up!
> 
> I started at the online store with a base model Pro then added a few 
> moderate upgrades to future-proof it for a year or two.  It came to 
> $7200.  At that cost, switching to Linux for my next upgrade is 
> completely justified.

A current discussion on Macintouch says that Hackintoshes are relatively 
easy to assemble these days. If you like the Mac OS, that could be an 
alternative. You get the most bang for your buck reproducing a high-end 
machine.

<http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/apple/index.html#d13dec2013>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53577

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2013-12-20 13:36 -0500
Message-ID<52b48e29$0$49319$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#53576
On 13-12-20 13:30, Fred Moore wrote:

> A current discussion on Macintouch says that Hackintoshes are relatively 
> easy to assemble these days. If you like the Mac OS, that could be an 
> alternative. You get the most bang for your buck reproducing a high-end 
> machine.

At this point, for me it isn't so much "bang for your buck" but rather
to be able to have a system with peripherals I still need.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53581

FromAlan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
Date2013-12-20 16:29 -0500
Message-ID<KpednY1W3-k2KynPnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#53576
On 2013.12.20, 13:30 , Fred Moore wrote:
> A current discussion on Macintouch says that Hackintoshes are relatively
> easy to assemble these days. If you like the Mac OS, that could be an
> alternative. You get the most bang for your buck reproducing a high-end
> machine.

I considered a hackintosh before buying this iMac (i7, 3.4 GHz).

To build a similar spec machine AND get a photography quality monitor 
would have cost nearly as much and then there's the issue of what Apple 
might do in the future to kill H'toshes with 'clever' OS updates/releases.

OTOH Linux sucks as a desktop environment for photography and office work.

-- 
"The radio was once expected to promote international understanding and 
co-operation;
it has turned out to be a means of insulating one nation from another."
                                                  -George Orwell, 1945

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web