Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #71390 > unrolled thread

Using Folder Actions on yosemite

Started byElectric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid>
First post2015-03-17 11:46 -0700
Last post2015-03-20 16:25 -0700
Articles 16 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system


Contents

  Using Folder Actions on yosemite Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-17 11:46 -0700
    Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite "Beasley" <R.Beasley@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-17 19:18 -0400
      Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-17 22:27 -0700
        Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-18 08:22 -0700
          Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-18 13:29 -0700
            Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-18 18:34 -0700
              Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-18 22:24 -0700
                Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-19 04:37 -0700
      Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-18 08:06 -0700
        Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-18 13:28 -0700
      Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-18 22:08 -0700
      Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.org> - 2015-03-20 08:05 -0700
        Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-20 19:31 +0000
          Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-21 18:59 +0000
    Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-18 22:10 -0700
    Re: Using Folder Actions on yosemite Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-20 16:25 -0700

#71390 — Using Folder Actions on yosemite

FromElectric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid>
Date2015-03-17 11:46 -0700
SubjectUsing Folder Actions on yosemite
Message-ID<me9spi$ce2$13@dont-email.me>
Do you use folder actions?

I had to setup some folder actions to make sure when new files got
placed that it popped up a message.

it's working fine on snow leopard and it's simple no frills

but I am reading about yosemite and see a lot of reports the there
is a process call "Folder Action Dispatcher" that's chewing up mem
and cpu.

How are folder actions working for you on yosemite? have you
migrated them along as you go to new OSs?














 




[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#71447

From"Beasley" <R.Beasley@yahoo.com>
Date2015-03-17 19:18 -0400
Message-ID<meacm2$3gt$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#71390

"Electric Comet"  wrote in message news:me9spi$ce2$13@dont-email.me...

Do you use folder actions?

I had to setup some folder actions to make sure when new files got
placed that it popped up a message.

it's working fine on snow leopard and it's simple no frills

but I am reading about yosemite and see a lot of reports the there
is a process call "Folder Action Dispatcher" that's chewing up mem
and cpu.

How are folder actions working for you on yosemite? have you
migrated them along as you go to new OSs?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes just 
keep living in denial.

BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.



.














[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71477

FromMichelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Date2015-03-17 22:27 -0700
Message-ID<170320152227203588%michelle@michelle.org>
In reply to#71447
In article <meacm2$3gt$1@dont-email.me>, Beasley <R.Beasley@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
> fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes just 
> keep living in denial.
> 
> BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.

Ah, yet another trollboi.  Or is it a sock puppet for one of the other
trollbois?

There's a good reason you are called an asshole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71492

Fromawoolmeyer@gmail.com
Date2015-03-18 08:22 -0700
Message-ID<3208257b-760a-4d6a-9b01-6dc7745906bf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#71477
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 1:27:22 AM UTC-4, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <meacm2$3gt$1@dont-email.me>, Beasley <R.Beasley@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
> > fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes just 
> > keep living in denial.
> > 
> > BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.
> 
> Ah, yet another trollboi.  Or is it a sock puppet for one of the other
> trollbois?
> 
> There's a good reason you are called an asshole.

Interesting you consider yourself an Apphole, Butch.

Question; how does it work with people like you?  Does your crack shrink closed from lack of service to a dry socket, or does you "gf/bf" keep it open with a strap-on and heavy lube, like STP?

BTW; ever do anything with that fizzle top hair, Butch?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71511

FromMichelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Date2015-03-18 13:29 -0700
Message-ID<180320151329412209%michelle@michelle.org>
In reply to#71492
In article <3208257b-760a-4d6a-9b01-6dc7745906bf@googlegroups.com>,
<awoolmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 1:27:22 AM UTC-4, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> > In article <meacm2$3gt$1@dont-email.me>, Beasley <R.Beasley@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
> > > fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes
> > > just 
> > > keep living in denial.
> > > 
> > > BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.
> > 
> > Ah, yet another trollboi.  Or is it a sock puppet for one of the other
> > trollbois?
> > 
> > There's a good reason you are called an asshole.
> 
> Interesting you consider yourself an Apphole, Butch.
> 
> Question; how does it work with people like you?  Does your crack shrink
> closed from lack of service to a dry socket, or does you "gf/bf" keep it open
> with a strap-on and heavy lube, like STP?
> 
> BTW; ever do anything with that fizzle top hair, Butch?

Ooh, you've given yourself away yet again, you nym-shifting cock sucker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71541

Fromawoolmeyer@gmail.com
Date2015-03-18 18:34 -0700
Message-ID<6fb1098e-6529-42f4-b124-5efe874df119@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#71511
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 4:29:44 PM UTC-4, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <3208257b-760a-4d6a-9b01-6dc7745906bf@googlegroups.com>,
> <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 1:27:22 AM UTC-4, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> > > In article <meacm2$3gt$1@dont-email.me>, Beasley <R.Beasley@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
> > > > fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes
> > > > just 
> > > > keep living in denial.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.
> > > 
> > > Ah, yet another trollboi.  Or is it a sock puppet for one of the other
> > > trollbois?
> > > 
> > > There's a good reason you are called an asshole.
> > 
> > Interesting you consider yourself an Apphole, Butch.
> > 
> > Question; how does it work with people like you?  Does your crack shrink
> > closed from lack of service to a dry socket, or does you "gf/bf" keep it open
> > with a strap-on and heavy lube, like STP?
> > 
> > BTW; ever do anything with that fizzle top hair, Butch?
> 
> Ooh, you've given yourself away yet again, you nym-shifting cock sucker.

Go lick another clit, Butch. It would be hard to find a homelier rugmuncher than you.  Do they wear blindfolds? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71575

FromMichelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Date2015-03-18 22:24 -0700
Message-ID<180320152224227123%michelle@michelle.org>
In reply to#71541
In article <6fb1098e-6529-42f4-b124-5efe874df119@googlegroups.com>,
<awoolmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Ooh, you've given yourself away yet again, you nym-shifting cock sucker.
> 
> Go lick another clit, Butch. It would be hard to find a homelier rugmuncher
> than you.  Do they wear blindfolds? 

You never fail to disappoint, you are utterly predictable, cocksucker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71589

Fromawoolmeyer@gmail.com
Date2015-03-19 04:37 -0700
Message-ID<96776eab-48a0-4fc6-acd0-8ce21d96cc6e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#71575
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:24:24 AM UTC-4, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <6fb1098e-6529-42f4-b124-5efe874df119@googlegroups.com>,
> <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Ooh, you've given yourself away yet again, you nym-shifting cock sucker.
> > 
> > Go lick another clit, Butch. It would be hard to find a homelier rugmuncher
> > than you.  Do they wear blindfolds? 
> 
> You never fail to disappoint, you are utterly predictable, cocksucker.


You would even make an ugly man, Butch.  Pussy must be very hard for you to get, eh?

Miss your army days when that sweet young pussy was there for the taking?  Did you hang around the latrine fingering yourself?

What turned you gay anyway;  when the first few guys that tried to fuck you put a bag over your head but still came down with soft offs?




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71491

Fromawoolmeyer@gmail.com
Date2015-03-18 08:06 -0700
Message-ID<b3f435a8-6ea2-44b6-93de-b1e8a4e826da@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#71447
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:18:13 PM UTC-4, Beasley wrote:
> "Electric Comet"  wrote in message news:me9spi$ce2$13@dont-email.me...
> 
> Do you use folder actions?
> 
> I had to setup some folder actions to make sure when new files got
> placed that it popped up a message.
> 
> it's working fine on snow leopard and it's simple no frills
> 
> but I am reading about yosemite and see a lot of reports the there
> is a process call "Folder Action Dispatcher" that's chewing up mem
> and cpu.
> 
> How are folder actions working for you on yosemite? have you
> migrated them along as you go to new OSs?
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every iteration 
> fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal Appholes just 
> keep living in denial.
> 
> BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.


Watch out boy.  Butch is going to slam you over your head with "her" strap-on

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71510

FromMichelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Date2015-03-18 13:28 -0700
Message-ID<180320151328398458%michelle@michelle.org>
In reply to#71491
In article <b3f435a8-6ea2-44b6-93de-b1e8a4e826da@googlegroups.com>,
<awoolmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:

> > BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.
> 
> 
> Watch out boy.  Butch is going to slam you over your head with "her" strap-on

You are?  Thanks for warning him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71565

FromElectric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid>
Date2015-03-18 22:08 -0700
Message-ID<medljb$bbu$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#71447
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:18:34 -0400
"Beasley" <R.Beasley@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every
> iteration fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good,

it's a shame but publically traded companies do what they do not
for the customer

it's common these days, say last 10-15 years for the real
engineers/imagineers to bail while the tier-2 and 3 people
take holdd because the bean counters figure they tier2&3
will be good enough

not just an aapl aaphliction



























 





[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71676

Fromtmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.org>
Date2015-03-20 08:05 -0700
Message-ID<mehcto$jq7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#71447
On 3/17/15 4:18 PM, Beasley wrote:
> Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every
> iteration fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal
> Appholes just keep living in denial.
>
> BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.

Why don't you take this trolling bullshit over to advocacy where it 
belongs then?

-- 
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if 
they are genuine."
   - Abraham Lincoln

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71689

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2015-03-20 19:31 +0000
Message-ID<slrnmgote7.nj.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#71676
Okay, so one time? In band camp? tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.org> was all, like:
> On 3/17/15 4:18 PM, Beasley wrote:
>> Yosemite is a huge POS as have been all the Apple os's .  Every
>> iteration fixes bugs, but breaks even more stuff.  And the good, loyal
>> Appholes just keep living in denial.
>>
>> BTW:  They are called Appholes for a good reason.

> Why don't you take this trolling bullshit over to advocacy where it 
> belongs then?

How abut you don't quote messages from trolls forcing people who've
killed the asshole to read his shit?


-- 
http://2blog.kreme.com
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail but a true friend will
be sitting next to you saying, "Dang, that was fun."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71755

Fromtmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com>
Date2015-03-21 18:59 +0000
Message-ID<slrnmgrftv.102.tmo1138@davidjr-macpro.local>
In reply to#71689
On 2015-03-20, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>
> How abut you don't quote messages from trolls forcing people who've
> killed the asshole to read his shit?
>
>

Noted.

Sorry 'bout that.

-- 
Misery no longer loves company.  Nowadays it insists on it.
		-- Russell Baker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71568

FromElectric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid>
Date2015-03-18 22:10 -0700
Message-ID<medlno$bbu$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#71390
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:46:35 -0700
Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> wrote:

> but I am reading about yosemite and see a lot of reports the there
> is a process call "Folder Action Dispatcher" that's chewing up mem
> and cpu.

after some research I stick with snow leopard
it seems that the "Folder Action Dispatcher" is really broken
and spins in a tight loop looking at files everywhere and
anywhere

amok comes to mind and was used to describe the behavior















 








[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#71697

FromElectric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid>
Date2015-03-20 16:25 -0700
Message-ID<meia92$vem$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#71390
Quick update, there's an issue loggeed about the problem with the
"Folder Action Dispatcher" but I don't know how to look at the bug
database


On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:46:35 -0700
Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> wrote:

> Do you use folder actions?
> 
> I had to setup some folder actions to make sure when new files got
> placed that it popped up a message.
> 
> it's working fine on snow leopard and it's simple no frills
> 
> but I am reading about yosemite and see a lot of reports the there
> is a process call "Folder Action Dispatcher" that's chewing up mem
> and cpu.
> 
> How are folder actions working for you on yosemite? have you
> migrated them along as you go to new OSs?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system


csiph-web