Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #70818 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-10 16:29 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-03-17 11:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 145 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Apple Watch: The Disappointments "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-10 16:29 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-13 12:08 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-03-13 15:57 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-13 16:01 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 09:11 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 07:31 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 10:46 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 14:29 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 16:14 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-15 12:07 +1200
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 17:22 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-15 15:14 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:56 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-16 03:19 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 19:25 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-14 07:52 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 11:01 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 19:24 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 17:24 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-16 18:46 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-03-16 10:56 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-16 11:17 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-17 11:07 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-13 14:48 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 17:53 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-13 15:02 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-14 13:11 +1300
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 20:12 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-19 02:02 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-18 22:14 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-13 18:10 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 18:18 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-13 22:25 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-13 18:31 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-13 19:22 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-14 08:16 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-14 05:55 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 07:35 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-14 14:59 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-14 09:27 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-03-13 18:32 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-13 19:03 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-19 14:36 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-19 17:47 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-03-19 16:39 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-20 13:17 +1200
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 23:46 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 18:53 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 23:46 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-13 22:10 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 22:27 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2015-03-14 07:13 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-13 19:33 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 07:57 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 07:53 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 07:33 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-14 00:10 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 00:50 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-14 04:34 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 08:21 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 06:25 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 09:07 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 16:33 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 14:25 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 06:32 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-15 09:19 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-15 07:45 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-15 10:56 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-03-13 22:12 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-14 01:20 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 01:22 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-14 18:49 +1300
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 08:07 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 08:04 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 07:50 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-14 14:14 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2015-03-15 07:13 +0100
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 02:22 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-15 12:35 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-15 16:46 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-15 12:53 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:38 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-15 19:27 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-15 19:30 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-16 00:32 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 06:18 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 07:01 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2015-03-16 10:30 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-17 10:59 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 07:06 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-16 03:22 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2015-03-15 14:02 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:38 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:37 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-15 19:28 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 13:50 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2015-03-16 07:20 +0100
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-16 04:28 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-16 14:47 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-16 20:27 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-16 20:24 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-15 11:33 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:37 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-16 03:21 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 23:23 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-16 04:35 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments David Fritzinger <email@domain.com> - 2015-03-16 12:27 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-17 09:10 +1200
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-15 11:36 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-13 18:29 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-13 16:35 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-14 13:04 +1300
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-14 00:10 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 07:44 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 09:17 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 07:49 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-14 16:15 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-15 12:02 +1200
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-19 14:33 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-03-19 16:36 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-03-20 12:45 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-16 10:18 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-16 17:22 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-16 10:30 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-16 17:37 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-16 11:14 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-17 09:16 +1200
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-03-16 20:36 -0400
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-17 11:21 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-17 11:30 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-16 11:14 -0700
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-16 18:17 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-17 11:02 +0000
Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-03-17 11:17 -0700
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-16 18:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dpednc3WpZzIwJrInZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #71078 |
On 2015-03-14 20:24, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <u6adnbMCLtG9XpnInZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne > <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: > >> On 2015-03-14 17:26, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>> In article <gpednXb-m4D7rpnInZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne >>> <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> I found a much more profound, engaging and possibly controversial >>>> article regarding the shape of the clasp on the red watchband when worn >>>> with a long cocktail dress with gold piping around the waist. >>> >>> Got a link for it? >> >> Sorry, received it by fax. > > Scan it and post it on line? Sure. Any time now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-16 10:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <me75gj$eqa$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #70973 |
On 2015-03-13 19:08:48 +0000, awoolmeyer@gmail.com said: > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 4:29:56 PM UTC-4, M. John Matlaw wrote: >> http://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/daily-cartoon-tuesday-march-10th-apple-watch? >> > > and this: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/03/13/apple-ios-8-2-secret-app/?utm_campaign=yahootix&partner=yahootix > Oh, no: Apple included an app you might not USE! How will you ever cope?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-16 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <160320151117458751%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #71287 |
In article <me75gj$eqa$1@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > On 2015-03-13 19:08:48 +0000, awoolmeyer@gmail.com said: > > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 4:29:56 PM UTC-4, M. John Matlaw wrote: > >> > >> http://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/daily-cartoon-tuesday-march- > >> 10th-apple-watch? > >> > > > > and this: > > > > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/03/13/apple-ios-8-2-secret-app/? > > utm_campaign=yahootix&partner=yahootix > > > > Oh, no: Apple included an app you might not USE! By the way, here is a list of third-party apps that should appear the day the Watch is released. <https://www.apple.com/watch/app-store-apps/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-17 11:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmgg2ps.ucr.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #71298 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> was all, like: > In article <me75gj$eqa$1@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker > <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >> On 2015-03-13 19:08:48 +0000, awoolmeyer@gmail.com said: >> >> > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 4:29:56 PM UTC-4, M. John Matlaw wrote: >> >> >> >> http://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/daily-cartoon-tuesday-march- >> >> 10th-apple-watch? >> >> >> > >> > and this: >> > >> > >> > http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/03/13/apple-ios-8-2-secret-app/? >> > utm_campaign=yahootix&partner=yahootix >> > >> >> Oh, no: Apple included an app you might not USE! > By the way, here is a list of third-party apps that should appear the > day the Watch is released. > <https://www.apple.com/watch/app-store-apps/> Well, that's a pissload. The Parking Meter app looks useful. -- http://2blog.kreme.com Battlemage? That's not a profession. It barely qualifies as a hobby. 'Battlemage' is about impressive a title as 'Lord of the Dance'. <PAUSE> I'm adding Lord of the Dance to my titles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 14:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mdvltg$ck4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70818 |
A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. I feel that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second screen for the iPhone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 17:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151753246264%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #70977 |
In article <mdvltg$ck4$1@dont-email.me>, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. it's comparable to other smart watches (other than the pebble). it's also 18 hours in 'typical' use, which will vary per person. it's up to 72 hours in power saver mode. > I feel > that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second > screen for the iPhone. it's both.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 15:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015031315022825638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> |
| In reply to | #70977 |
On 2015-03-13 21:48:15 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex said: > A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. I feel > that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second > screen for the iPhone. For now it is an iPhone accessory. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-14 13:11 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <140320151311453211%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #70979 |
In article <2015031315022825638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-13 21:48:15 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex said:
> >
> > A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. I feel
> > that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second
> > screen for the iPhone.
>
> For now it is an iPhone accessory.
Yep. Apple are planning release WatchKit to allow developers to create
watch-only apps "later this year" (many people are guessing that it
will be at the Developers Conference in a few months, alongside "watch
OS 2"). Even now the Apple Watch can already do some simple things by
itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 20:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320152012256702%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #70996 |
In article <140320151311453211%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > Yep. Apple are planning release WatchKit to allow developers to create > watch-only apps "later this year" (many people are guessing that it > will be at the Developers Conference in a few months, alongside "watch > OS 2"). Even now the Apple Watch can already do some simple things by > itself. watch os 2 is not coming out in a few months. apps will be at some point, and wwdc is a reasonable guess, at least for information about it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-19 02:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmgkbim.2a1n.tmo1138@davidjr-macpro.local> |
| In reply to | #70979 |
On 2015-03-13, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-13 21:48:15 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex said:
>
>> A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. I feel
>> that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second
>> screen for the iPhone.
>
> For now it is an iPhone accessory.
>
And a far-too-expensive iPhone accessory, IMHO.. I wouldn't mind buying one but
they model I wanted was 1000 bucks. I'd rather buy the new Macbook for the wife
as an anniversary present.
--
When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President. Now
I'm beginning to believe it.
-- Clarence Darrow
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-18 22:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <180320152214009794%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #71542 |
In article <slrnmgkbim.2a1n.tmo1138@davidjr-macpro.local>, tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> wrote: > And a far-too-expensive iPhone accessory, IMHO.. I wouldn't mind > buying one but they model I wanted was 1000 bucks. I'd rather buy > the new Macbook for the wife as an anniversary present. The model I want (stainless with the Milanese loop) is $649, but I'll probably get the $349 Sports model
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mdvn7i$ho3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70977 |
On 2015-03-13 21:48:15 +0000, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> said: > A watch with an 18 hour battery life is not exactly that great. I feel > that even calling it a watch is a bit of a misnomer - it's a second > screen for the iPhone. Marie Antoinette had a watch that provided it's own energy to run continuously. I have a Seiko Kinetic that winds itself. I have another Seiko that charges itself by ambient light sources. I can't understand why Apple, who usually are the innovators, didn't do a better job on this. If you forget to charge this every day, all you have is a paperweight... -- A pessimist says the glass is half empty. An optimist says the glass is half full. An engineer says somebody made the glass twice as big as it needed to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151818125521%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #70980 |
In article <mdvn7i$ho3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a Seiko Kinetic that winds itself. I have another Seiko that > charges itself by ambient light sources. they don't use anywhere near as much power as a smartwatch does and a smartwatch doesn't have anything to wind anyway. > I can't understand why Apple, who usually are the innovators, didn't do > a better job on this. what do you suggest? you could strap a giant battery to your wrist and get a month's run time but not too many people will be happy with that. > If you forget to charge this every day, all you have is a paperweight... nope. you have a watch that drops into power saver mode and becomes *just* a watch for up to 3 days. people are already used to charging phones at night and most people take off their watch to sleep so it's not that big of a deal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 22:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <130320152225078813%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #70981 |
In article <130320151818125521%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <mdvn7i$ho3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >> I can't understand why Apple, who usually are the innovators, didn't do >> a better job on this. > >what do you suggest? > >you could strap a giant battery to your wrist and get a month's run >time but not too many people will be happy with that. Or I could not get one at all. >> If you forget to charge this every day, all you have is a paperweight... > >nope. you have a watch that drops into power saver mode and becomes >*just* a watch for up to 3 days. Gosh, three days. Astonishing. >people are already used to charging phones at night ... No I'm not. I charge mine about every three or four months. It's powered off most of the time. >and most people take off their watch to sleep so it's not that >big of a deal. I didn't wear a watch for the better part of 12 years. Then I got one, and now have trouble remembering to put it on. Personally I think this device will fail, because it doesn't give me anything I need. But then neither does a smartphone or satnav, for the most part. -- "Once you adopt the unix paradigm, the variants cease to be a problem - you bitch, of course, but that's because bitching is fun, unlike M$ OS's, where bitching is required to keep your head from exploding." - S Stremler in afc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #70982 |
In article <130320152225078813%timstreater@greenbee.net>,
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:
> Personally I think this device will fail, because it doesn't give me
> anything I need. But then neither does a smartphone or satnav, for the
> most part.
So, what you are saying is that you personally thinking it will fail is
a pretty good indicator of success? (Sorry but I never could lay off a
high, hanging rhetorical fastball -grin)
--
“Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.”
— Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 22:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #70984 |
In article <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <130320152225078813%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >> Personally I think this device will fail, because it doesn't give me >> anything I need. But then neither does a smartphone or satnav, for the >> most part. > >So, what you are saying is that you personally thinking it will fail is >a pretty good indicator of success? Look, I can see (just about) that a smartphone or satnav could be useful. I'd be more likely to use a map rather than the latter, at least that way there's no danger of me driving off Beachy Head. But a satnav could be useful for instance for us when we go to France, in navigating a town where we don't know the local geography. We've been thinking about that for the last 12 years, and are likely to go on thinking about it for the next 12 years too. Smartphone with a camera. Yeah, I could see that to catch shots of those bank raids and strafing runs by low-flying communist aircraft that are a daily feature of my life, but I really can't be arsed. Meanwhile, what does little watchy give me. Sod all, near as I can make out. >(Sorry but I never could lay off a >high, hanging rhetorical fastball -grin) I have no idea what you are talking about. -- "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 19:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <44ydnRHKEfK27J7InZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #70987 |
In article <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net>,
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:
> In article <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt
> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >(Sorry but I never could lay off a
> >high, hanging rhetorical fastball -grin)
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about.
A high hanging fastball is a bad pitch that is thought to be the easiest
to hit out the park. The set up was just too good to turn down.
--
“Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.”
— Aaron Levenstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-14 08:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <140320150816428680%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #70989 |
In article <44ydnRHKEfK27J7InZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >> In article <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >(Sorry but I never could lay off a >> >high, hanging rhetorical fastball -grin) >> >> I have no idea what you are talking about. > >A high hanging fastball is a bad pitch that is thought to be the easiest >to hit out the park. The set up was just too good to turn down. I still don't know what you are talking about. -- "... you must remember that if you're trying to propagate a creed of poverty, gentleness and tolerance, you need a very rich, powerful, authoritarian organisation to do it." - Vice-Pope Eric
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-14 05:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015031405552863520-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> |
| In reply to | #71018 |
On 2015-03-14 08:16:42 +0000, Tim Streater said: > In article <44ydnRHKEfK27J7InZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt > Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> In article <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >> >>> In article <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >>> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> (Sorry but I never could lay off a high, hanging rhetorical fastball -grin) >>> >>> I have no idea what you are talking about. >> >> A high hanging fastball is a bad pitch that is thought to be the >> easiest to hit out the park. The set up was just too good to turn >> down. > > I still don't know what you are talking about. Of course you don't. It is a clash of trans-Atlantic cultures and his use of a baseball metaphor to describe you as an easy target. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-14 07:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <me1guc$l27$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71024 |
On 3/14/15 PDT 5:55 AM, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-03-14 08:16:42 +0000, Tim Streater said: > >> In article <44ydnRHKEfK27J7InZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> In article <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <JKednWCljY3M-J7InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kurt >>>> Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> (Sorry but I never could lay off a high, hanging rhetorical >>>>> fastball -grin) >>>> >>>> I have no idea what you are talking about. >>> >>> A high hanging fastball is a bad pitch that is thought to be the >>> easiest to hit out the park. The set up was just too good to turn >>> down. >> >> I still don't know what you are talking about. > > Of course you don't. It is a clash of trans-Atlantic cultures and his > use of a baseball metaphor to describe you as an easy target. OK, the fast bowler got a kink in his elbow, reducing his speed by 50%. Pretty easy to hit for six.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web