Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #59927 > unrolled thread

Yosemite (OS X 10.10)

Started byAlan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
First post2014-06-02 16:33 -0400
Last post2014-06-03 22:07 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 167 — 34 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-02 16:33 -0400
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-02 20:43 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 09:37 +1200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-02 18:20 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-02 23:17 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 18:00 -0700
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-02 16:55 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 18:01 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 13:18 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 20:12 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 20:23 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 20:29 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 13:07 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 06:48 -0700
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-06-03 14:35 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-03 12:53 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 16:59 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-03 16:08 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 11:16 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-03 13:35 -0700
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:29 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 21:39 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 22:08 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-06-05 23:52 -0400
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-06 05:39 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 16:17 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-06-04 01:03 -0400
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 22:48 -0700
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) cb <cb@aol.com> - 2014-06-04 15:39 +0200
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 20:57 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:35 +1200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 11:09 -0700
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:04 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 17:19 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 13:16 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-03 22:11 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 18:54 +1200
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:50 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-04 03:08 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:39 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:05 -0700
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:57 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:06 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-04 21:33 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2014-06-05 15:56 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) android <here@there.was> - 2014-06-03 08:46 +0200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 01:43 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-02 20:20 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 05:02 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) befr@eaglesoft.de (Bernd Fröhlich) - 2014-06-03 10:07 +0200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 06:51 -0700
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 18:46 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-06-04 01:17 -0400
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 19:00 +1200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:52 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2014-06-10 04:03 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-10 16:06 +1200
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-06-10 10:35 -0500
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-10 16:06 -0400
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-06-10 15:47 -0500
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:38 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:22 +1200
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-10 22:57 +0000
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 13:18 +1200
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 16:24 -0700
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 16:28 -0700
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2014-06-10 18:54 -0600
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 20:40 -0700
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 13:17 +1200
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-11 02:52 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:20 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-06-11 12:23 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:50 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-04 08:58 -0700
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-04 15:09 -0400
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 20:14 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-04 19:26 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-05 09:53 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:05 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:19 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-05 18:13 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-06 09:25 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-05 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-06 13:03 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-03 12:35 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 16:40 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-03 12:58 -0400
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 17:00 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:33 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:45 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:56 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 02:47 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-18 13:07 -0700
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-19 09:34 +1200
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-02 21:43 -0400
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 13:40 +1200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 22:14 -0500
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 03:20 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 16:32 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-04 07:30 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:48 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:48 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-04 22:53 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:19 +0000
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-02 22:02 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:55 -0400
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 19:40 -0700
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 02:44 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-03 08:24 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 12:57 -0500
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-03 18:46 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 22:16 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-04 12:16 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-03 23:20 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 16:17 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-03 22:58 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-04 00:00 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-06-03 23:21 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-04 04:37 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:58 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-04 22:30 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 22:38 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-05 03:11 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-05 09:37 -0700
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 16:45 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-05 10:04 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 17:53 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-05 11:15 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 19:04 +0000
                                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:30 +0000
                                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-06 21:05 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:28 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2014-06-05 01:32 -0400
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-04 12:30 -0400
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-04 09:39 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:03 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:23 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 19:02 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:34 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-06-06 10:33 -0400
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-06 14:58 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-07 10:22 +1200
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-06 19:39 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 02:45 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-07 05:10 +0000
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 14:19 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-07 08:17 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-07 16:20 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-06-04 19:01 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:54 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:57 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:16 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-06-03 15:06 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:36 +1200
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 15:50 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 15:54 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-03 19:15 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:52 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 15:54 +0000
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 15:55 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2014-06-03 15:24 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 19:38 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 21:33 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:53 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2014-06-03 17:52 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 22:07 +0000

Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

#60056

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-06-04 09:29 +1200
Message-ID<040620140929433651%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#60052
In article <billvan-F18EA9.13355303062014@news.shawcable.net>, bill van
<billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:

> In article <201406031116493009-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 2014-06-03 16:53:15 +0000, David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com>
> > said:
> > 
> > > In article <lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me>,
> > >  John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
> > >>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
> > >>> 
> > >>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> > >>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
> > >>> 
> > >>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
> > >>> they could use.
> > >> 
> > >> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
> > > 
> > > Who says they are going to stick with National Parks? I don't believe
> > > that Mavericks is a park, just a surfing spot.
> > 
> > They are not using National Parks. It is coincidence that Yosemite is an NP.
> > They are using California locations, some might be NP parks like 
> > Sequoia & Yosemite, some might be lakes like Tahoe & Tioga, they might 
> > be lakes & mountains like Mammoth & Shasta, The could be a wine country 
> > county like Napa (though there is already NAPA Auto Parts).
> 
> Alcatraz!

That's Microsoft's OS.  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60061

Frombilly@MIX.COM
Date2014-06-03 21:39 +0000
Message-ID<lmlfa1$ef0$2@reader2.panix.com>
In reply to#60052
bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> writes:

> Alcatraz!

At last -- how apropos.

  For those unfamiliar with it, Alcatraz
  was an unescapable prison on an island
  in San Francsico bay.

What all you guys whould be asking is
where the hell is OS XI (Eleven.*)...

If iOSification doesn't suffice, what does?

Billy Y..
-- 
        sub     #'9+1   ,r0             ; convert ascii byte
	add     #9.+1   ,r0             ; to an integer
	bcc     20$                     ; not a number

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60070

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-06-03 22:08 +0000
Message-ID<slrnloshqv.e8n.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#60061
In message <lmlfa1$ef0$2@reader2.panix.com> 
  billy@MIX.COM <billy@MIX.COM> wrote:
> What all you guys whould be asking is
> where the hell is OS XI (Eleven.*)...

What the hell is OS XI? OS Chi? Never heard of it.

-- 
I've got Mathematica 2.2 on my Quadra

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60320

From"D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com>
Date2014-06-05 23:52 -0400
Message-ID<dfmanno-6315CC.23523505062014@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#60061
In article <lmlfa1$ef0$2@reader2.panix.com>, billy@MIX.COM wrote:

>   For those unfamiliar with it, Alcatraz
>   was an unescapable prison on an island
>   in San Francsico bay.

Not for Clarence Anglin, John Anglin and Frank Morris.

-- 
D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com
GOP delenda est!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60328

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-06-06 05:39 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlp2kvn.1rki.g.kreme@Amelia.local>
In reply to#60320
In message <dfmanno-6315CC.23523505062014@news.albasani.net> 
  D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote:
> In article <lmlfa1$ef0$2@reader2.panix.com>, billy@MIX.COM wrote:

>>   For those unfamiliar with it, Alcatraz
>>   was an unescapable prison on an island
>>   in San Francsico bay.

> Not for Clarence Anglin, John Anglin and Frank Morris.

Maybe. There is no evidence they survived their escape.


-- 
Yeah, Nick. Nick's the kinda guy you can trust. Nick's your buddy Nick's
the kinda guy you drink beers with. The kinda guy that doesn't care if
you puke in his car. Nick.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60072

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2014-06-03 16:17 -0700
Message-ID<2014060316170699149-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#60052
On 2014-06-03 20:35:54 +0000, bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> said:

> In article <201406031116493009-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-06-03 16:53:15 +0000, David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> said:
>> 
>>> In article <lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>>>> they could use.
>>>> 
>>>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>>> 
>>> Who says they are going to stick with National Parks? I don't believe
>>> that Mavericks is a park, just a surfing spot.
>> 
>> They are not using National Parks. It is coincidence that Yosemite is an NP.
>> They are using California locations, some might be NP parks like
>> Sequoia & Yosemite, some might be lakes like Tahoe & Tioga, they might
>> be lakes & mountains like Mammoth & Shasta, The could be a wine country
>> county like Napa (though there is already NAPA Auto Parts).
> 
> Alcatraz!

Perfect for iOS.
Add Soledad, Folsom, Tehatchapi, San Quentin, Corcoran, etc. then the 
iOS geeks will have something to jailbreak.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60103

FromDavoud <star@sky.net>
Date2014-06-04 01:03 -0400
Message-ID<040620140103517983%star@sky.net>
In reply to#60072
Savageduck:
> Perfect for iOS.
> Add Soledad, Folsom, Tehatchapi, San Quentin, Corcoran, etc. then the 
> iOS geeks will have something to jailbreak.

Guantanamo.

-- 
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60106

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2014-06-03 22:48 -0700
Message-ID<2014060322481345058-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#60103
On 2014-06-04 05:03:51 +0000, Davoud <star@sky.net> said:

> Savageduck:
>> Perfect for iOS.
>> Add Soledad, Folsom, Tehatchapi, San Quentin, Corcoran, etc. then the
>> iOS geeks will have something to jailbreak.
> 
> Guantanamo.

Not in California.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60127

Fromcb <cb@aol.com>
Date2014-06-04 15:39 +0200
Message-ID<538f21aa$0$2042$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
In reply to#60052
On 03/06/2014 22:35, bill van wrote:
> In article<201406031116493009-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>   Savageduck<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 2014-06-03 16:53:15 +0000, David Fritzinger<dfritzin@nospam.mac.com>  said:
>>
>>> In article<lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>   John McWilliams<jpmcw@comcast.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>>>> In message<2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>>>
>>>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>>>> they could use.
>>>>
>>>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>>>
>>> Who says they are going to stick with National Parks? I don't believe
>>> that Mavericks is a park, just a surfing spot.
>>
>> They are not using National Parks. It is coincidence that Yosemite is an NP.
>> They are using California locations, some might be NP parks like
>> Sequoia&  Yosemite, some might be lakes like Tahoe&  Tioga, they might
>> be lakes&  mountains like Mammoth&  Shasta, The could be a wine country
>> county like Napa (though there is already NAPA Auto Parts).
>
> Alcatraz!
That's it. Nice thinking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60053

FromPatty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com>
Date2014-06-03 20:57 +0000
Message-ID<538e36bc$0$52791$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
In reply to#60034
In article <201406031116493009-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck  <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>They are not using National Parks. It is coincidence that Yosemite is an NP.
>They are using California locations, some might be NP parks like 
>Sequoia & Yosemite, some might be lakes like Tahoe & Tioga, they might 
>be lakes & mountains like Mammoth & Shasta, The could be a wine country 
>county like Napa (though there is already NAPA Auto Parts).

Tioga Lake is barely known, and there's no Mammoth Lake. Are you 
thinking of Tioga Pass, Tenaya Lake, and the town of Mammoth Lakes?

And didn't Apple already say that they were going to use California
names? So yeah, it's a coincidence that Yosemite is a national park;
that isn't necessarily what the next name will represent.


Patty

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60059

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-06-04 09:35 +1200
Message-ID<040620140935203898%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#60034
In article <201406031116493009-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2014-06-03 16:53:15 +0000, David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> said:
> > In article <lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me>,
> >  John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
> >>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
> >>> 
> >>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> >>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
> >>> 
> >>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
> >>> they could use.
> >> 
> >> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
> > 
> > Who says they are going to stick with National Parks? I don't believe
> > that Mavericks is a park, just a surfing spot.
> 
> They are not using National Parks. It is coincidence that Yosemite is an NP.
> They are using California locations, some might be NP parks like 
> Sequoia & Yosemite, some might be lakes like Tahoe & Tioga, they might 
> be lakes & mountains like Mammoth & Shasta, The could be a wine country 
> county like Napa (though there is already NAPA Auto Parts).

I think it was MacRumors (and probably elsewhere) that reposrted a few
weeks ago that Apple had registered various names ... I can't recall
what any of them were though.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60033

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2014-06-03 11:09 -0700
Message-ID<2014060311093186731-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#59998
On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:

> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>> 
>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>> 
>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>> they could use.
> 
> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.

Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be 
using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60075

FromJohn McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>
Date2014-06-03 17:04 -0700
Message-ID<lmlnq0$d03$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#60033
On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
>
>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>
>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>
>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>> they could use.
>>
>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>
> Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
> using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
>
Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
the shore before it became so newsworthy.

I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation that 
it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.

Now I'm liking Big Sur.

:)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60080

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2014-06-03 17:19 -0700
Message-ID<2014060317193084061-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#60075
On 2014-06-04 00:04:15 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:

> On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>> On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
>> 
>>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>> 
>>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>> 
>>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>>> they could use.
>>> 
>>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>> 
>> Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
>> using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
>> 
> Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
> use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
> the shore before it became so newsworthy.
> 
> I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
> and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation 
> that it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.
> 
> Now I'm liking Big Sur.
> 
> :)

Me too, actually I love Big Sur as it is in my neighborhood so to 
speak. A drive along Hwy 1 from Cambria through to Carmel, with the 
various locations through Big Sur is one of my regular escapes.
< https://db.tt/6opz8a0g >
< https://db.tt/EfKHBEkl >

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60081

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-06-04 13:16 +1200
Message-ID<040620141316598413%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#60075
In article <lmlnq0$d03$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams
<jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> > On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
> >
> >> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
> >>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
> >>>
> >>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> >>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
> >>>
> >>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
> >>> they could use.
> >>
> >> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
> >
> > Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
> > using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
> >
> Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
> use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
> the shore before it became so newsworthy.
> 
> I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
> and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation that 
> it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.
> 
> Now I'm liking Big Sur.
> 
> :)

They have to be a bit careful. "Sur" in French can mean "sour" ... "Big
Sour" may not sell well, even for free.  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60104

Frombill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca>
Date2014-06-03 22:11 -0700
Message-ID<billvan-4746D1.22113003062014@news.shawcable.net>
In reply to#60081
In article <040620141316598413%YourName@YourISP.com>,
 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> In article <lmlnq0$d03$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams
> <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> > > On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
> > >
> > >> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
> > >>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> > >>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
> > >>>
> > >>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
> > >>> they could use.
> > >>
> > >> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
> > >
> > > Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
> > > using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
> > >
> > Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
> > use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
> > the shore before it became so newsworthy.
> > 
> > I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
> > and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation that 
> > it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.
> > 
> > Now I'm liking Big Sur.
> > 
> > :)
> 
> They have to be a bit careful. "Sur" in French can mean "sour" ... "Big
> Sour" may not sell well, even for free.  ;-)

It can be "bien sūr" in French, meaning "certainly, of course".
-- 
bill

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60113

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2014-06-04 18:54 +1200
Message-ID<040620141854107984%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#60104
In article <billvan-4746D1.22113003062014@news.shawcable.net>, bill van
<billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
> In article <040620141316598413%YourName@YourISP.com>,
>  Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > In article <lmlnq0$d03$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams
> > <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> > > > On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
> > > >> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
> > > >>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> > > >>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
> > > >>> they could use.
> > > >>
> > > >> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
> > > >
> > > > Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
> > > > using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
> > > >
> > > Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
> > > use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
> > > the shore before it became so newsworthy.
> > > 
> > > I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
> > > and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation that 
> > > it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.
> > > 
> > > Now I'm liking Big Sur.
> > > 
> > > :)
> > 
> > They have to be a bit careful. "Sur" in French can mean "sour" ... "Big
> > Sour" may not sell well, even for free.  ;-)
> 
> It can be "bien sûr" in French, meaning "certainly, of course".

With the continuing "flattening", translucency, iOS-ification, etc.,
the next version of Mac OS X may well be "Big Sour" since it's becoming
a big lemon.  :-(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60132

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2014-06-04 15:50 +0000
Message-ID<bv8thiF6emdU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#60113
On 2014-06-04, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>
> With the continuing "flattening", translucency, iOS-ification, etc.,
> the next version of Mac OS X may well be "Big Sour" since it's becoming
> a big lemon.  :-(

Spoken like a true idiot.

Meanwhile, the rest of us will enjoy it!

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60088

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-06-04 03:08 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlot3cq.lgk.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#60075
In message <lmlnq0$d03$1@dont-email.me> 
  John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 6/3/14   PDT, 11:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>> On 2014-06-03 13:48:11 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> said:
>>
>>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>>
>>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>>
>>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>>> they could use.
>>>
>>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>>
>> Yellowstone is not in California, which is the theme they seem to be
>> using, not National Parks. Note, Mavericks isn't a National Park.
>>
> Well, yes, since you've reported that Apple has said they're going to 
> use just CA names. I've sailed across Mavericks and have watched from 
> the shore before it became so newsworthy.

> I hope you're not telling me where Yellowstone is, or what Mavericks is 
> and is not...And, .based on new information, I withdraw speculation that 
> it's going to be Yellowstone, or any national park.

> Now I'm liking Big Sur.

I thought 10.10 would be Big Sur, But I had no idea what a massive
update it was going to be. Yosemite makes sense.`

-- 
7-Up? What happened to Ups 1-6?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60046

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-06-03 19:39 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlos92o.am0.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#59998
In message <lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me> 
  John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>
>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>
>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>> they could use.

> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.

You are not paying attention.

Mavericks is not a national park and Yellowstone is not in California.

-- 
Over 3,500 gay marriages and, what, no hellfire? I was promise hellfire.
And riots. What gives? -- Mark Morford

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web