Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #55637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-30 21:44 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-02-01 10:30 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 269 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-30 21:44 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-31 19:35 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-01-30 22:46 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-31 02:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-31 13:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-01 09:57 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-31 12:48 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-01-31 22:23 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-01-31 20:39 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-01 15:07 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-01 17:06 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:36 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 15:04 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-31 21:50 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-01 15:08 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-02-01 15:27 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:45 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 09:33 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 09:32 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2014-01-31 08:02 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 09:57 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2014-01-31 10:37 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-31 12:57 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism John Albert <j.albert@snet.net> - 2014-01-31 16:59 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-01 12:34 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 18:42 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 12:50 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-02 12:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-02 15:01 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-04 08:47 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-03 20:25 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:13 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-03 17:11 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-03 23:35 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-04 11:19 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 08:51 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 08:06 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 17:12 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 17:23 +0000
P.S. Hoffman (was Re: Malware help and skepticism) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-04 19:34 +0000
Re: P.S. Hoffman (was Re: Malware help and skepticism) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:28 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 10:30 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 17:51 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 11:34 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:36 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:12 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 18:10 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 18:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:29 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 18:28 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 14:03 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 19:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:24 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 08:56 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:28 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:11 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 07:25 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 13:27 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 14:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:42 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 15:02 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:18 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 16:44 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:48 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 22:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 19:13 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:22 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:24 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:03 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 08:06 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 18:02 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:04 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:12 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 06:00 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:32 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 14:04 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:28 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 18:09 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 18:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:19 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 09:00 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:26 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 21:46 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:52 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 22:49 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:43 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 16:59 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 23:57 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:17 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:46 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:32 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 20:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 18:33 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 14:19 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 19:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 17:25 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 22:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 02:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:32 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:58 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 17:52 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 15:46 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:54 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 19:16 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 21:00 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 16:36 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 17:20 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:00 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:49 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 17:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:33 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 15:58 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 13:41 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:29 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 21:14 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 12:35 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 10:04 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 19:10 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 03:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-05 09:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 13:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 14:24 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:36 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 20:50 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:28 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 21:50 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 17:32 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-07 21:50 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:26 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:43 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:42 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:55 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:18 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:51 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:23 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 08:58 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 15:08 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 13:11 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:27 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-07 10:59 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 13:13 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-07 02:15 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 14:06 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 13:57 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:07 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 15:10 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:16 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:39 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:51 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 12:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:18 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:33 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:23 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:04 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:07 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 12:20 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:07 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:24 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 16:56 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 20:04 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 14:47 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 22:03 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 17:17 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 08:02 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 11:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 22:15 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 21:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 14:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 22:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:28 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:11 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 02:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 13:54 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 11:57 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:56 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 11:47 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-06 20:05 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 13:03 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 16:19 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:34 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:33 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 17:39 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-07 04:37 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 20:10 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:30 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 17:21 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:35 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:29 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:08 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:30 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:32 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:59 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 20:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-02-05 17:46 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 16:10 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 08:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:21 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:09 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:19 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:02 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:26 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 13:35 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 18:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:37 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-07 04:48 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 10:02 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 23:19 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 23:56 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 13:59 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 12:52 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-05 09:09 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:35 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:16 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:55 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 17:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:22 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:05 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 12:51 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 18:32 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-08 08:31 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 17:07 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 11:52 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-08 10:38 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-11 06:52 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-04 13:28 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 08:50 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 11:05 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 19:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 08:53 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 19:39 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 09:40 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-03 18:31 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 13:01 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 11:36 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 14:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 09:06 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:39 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:07 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> - 2014-02-01 08:03 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 09:08 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) - 2014-02-01 20:47 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 16:41 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 11:27 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-02-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-01 07:55 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 11:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-01 20:10 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 10:36 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 10:30 -0500
Page 13 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 Next page →
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-08 11:52 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <080220141152205295%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #56192 |
In article <52f5593b$0$7247$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com>, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <do_ray_me-E53560.08312408022014@news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote: > > In article <ithfsa-fts2.ln1@news.chingola.ch>, > > Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> wrote: > > > On 2014-02-04, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote: > In article > > > <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > Tim Streater > > > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > ... Philip Seymour Hoffman. > > > >> > > > >> Never heard of him. > > > > > > > > Do you go to the movies? > > > > > > > I doubt it. He might go to the cinema though. > > > > Or the flicks. > > When I were a lad in Wales (mid-fifties-ish), we went to "the pictures." > There were Saturday morning matinees. You could buy sweets > four-for-a-penny but you had to buy at least two because the shops had > stopped taking farthings by then, which was sad because my Mam had a > whole bowl of them. A week up to Guy Fawkes Day we'd stuff stuff into > old pants and shirts and go begging for pennies for the old Guy to buy > bangers with. Winston Churchill was prime-minister for a bit, then it > was Anthony Eden. This was before they invented the cat. > > Warren "light blue paper and retire" Oates. I think you'll find the correct term is "Motion Picture Theatre". ;-) Although these days it's more likely to be "over-priced cineplex". :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-08 10:38 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-BD776F.10380508022014@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #56192 |
In article <52f5593b$0$7247$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com>,
Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <do_ray_me-E53560.08312408022014@news.albasani.net>,
> dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <ithfsa-fts2.ln1@news.chingola.ch>,
> > Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2014-02-04, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote: > In article
> > > <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > Tim Streater
> > > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >> > > ... Philip Seymour Hoffman.
> > > >> >> Never heard of him. > > Do you go to the movies? >
> > >
> > > I doubt it. He might go to the cinema though.
> > >
> >
> > Or the flicks.
>
> When I were a lad in Wales (mid-fifties-ish), we went to "the pictures."
Actually, I still say that a lot, maybe even the majority of the time.
I am told, they would say that in Australia too in the 50's.
> There were Saturday morning matinees. You could buy sweets
> four-for-a-penny but you had to buy at least two because the shops had
> stopped taking farthings by then, which was sad because my Mam had a
> whole bowl of them.
In Didsbury, Manchester, it was literally afternoons ("matinée"
meaning this, of course).
We would buy small round sweets to roll down the aisles or stalls
(they sloped slightly), now and then take the bus "punched holes" to
sprinkle from the balcony over the stalls.
Some kids would be much naughtier, stooping to sprinkling pepper to
delight in the ensuing coughing and spluttering in the stalls. Others
would commit almost terrorist acts, stink bombs!
To think, now I find it outrageous if someone opens their crinkly
wrappers on lollies. <g>
--
dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-11 06:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <jdqosa-5nm1.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #56196 |
On 2014-02-07, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote:
> In article <52f5593b$0$7247$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com>,
> Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There were Saturday morning matinees. You could buy sweets
>> four-for-a-penny but you had to buy at least two because the shops had
>> stopped taking farthings by then, which was sad because my Mam had a
>> whole bowl of them.
>
> In Didsbury, Manchester, it was literally afternoons ("matinée"
> meaning this, of course).
To be pedantic,
matinee |ˈmatɪneɪ|
noun
an afternoon performance in a theatre or cinema.
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: from French matinée, literally ‘morning (as a period
of activity)’, from matin ‘morning’: performances were formerly also in the
morning.
However, en français:
matinée
nom féminin
1 Période de temps comprise entre le lever du soleil et midi.: Une froide
matinée. SYNONYME avant-midi.
2 Représentation d’un spectacle en après-midi, par opposition à la soirée.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> We would buy small round sweets to roll down the aisles or stalls
> (they sloped slightly), now and then take the bus "punched holes" to
> sprinkle from the balcony over the stalls.
>
> Some kids would be much naughtier, stooping to sprinkling pepper to
> delight in the ensuing coughing and spluttering in the stalls. Others
> would commit almost terrorist acts, stink bombs!
>
> To think, now I find it outrageous if someone opens their crinkly
> wrappers on lollies. <g>
I also remember UK cinemas being full of smoke, and when I started going
to French cinemas in the 1980s it was a pleasant surprise to to find them
non-smoking, clean and air conditioned too. In Paris cinemas, Monday (or
was it Tuesday?) nights were cheaper than the rest of the week, so
affordable even when you were watching the centimes.
--
Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 13:28 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <040220141328593234%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #55819 |
In article <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > In article <drache-7FFD4B.17113203022014@news.eternal-september.org>, > erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> wrote: > > In article <52efb1a2$0$49565$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>, > > Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Speaking of someone dying -- it's a shame about Philip Seymour Hoffman. > > Never heard of him. Me neither, but according to today's newspaper, they found heroin bags "all over his house", so it's likely he's only got himself to blame, and any pity or comiserations should be with his wife and children. > > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > Unfortunately I have heard of this one, but wish I hadn't. Why do > non-entities get all this publicity? Not really a "non-entity" ... just another tween "singer" and child celebrity gone bad. Probably forced into it by pushy parent(s) seeing big dollar signs in their eyes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 08:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <040220140850422571%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #55821 |
In article <040220141328593234%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > In article <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > > > Unfortunately I have heard of this one, but wish I hadn't. Why do > > non-entities get all this publicity? > > Not really a "non-entity" ... just another tween "singer" and child > celebrity gone bad. Probably forced into it by pushy parent(s) seeing > big dollar signs in their eyes. Exactly. A non-entity. -- "People don't buy Microsoft for quality, they buy it for compatibility with what Bob in accounting bought last year. Trace it back - they buy Microsoft because the IBM Selectric didn't suck much" - P Seebach, afc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 11:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <040220141105260729%jimsgibson@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #55838 |
In article <040220140850422571%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > In article <040220141328593234%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > > > In article <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > > > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > > > > > Unfortunately I have heard of this one, but wish I hadn't. Why do > > > non-entities get all this publicity? > > > > Not really a "non-entity" ... just another tween "singer" and child > > celebrity gone bad. Probably forced into it by pushy parent(s) seeing > > big dollar signs in their eyes. > > Exactly. A non-entity. Your definition of "non-entity" is rather ego-centric. I am certainly no fan of Bieber, nor of pop music in general, but Bieber has the following accomplishments (according to Wikipedia): 1. Four number one pop records. 2. Grammy awards: Best New Arist, Best Pop Vocal Album (2011) 3. Artist of the Year (2010 American Music Awards). 4. First artist to have seven tracks from a debut album (My World) in the Billboard Top 100 5. 40 million followers on Twitter (second only to Katy Perry) 6. Third most powerful celebrity in the world (Forbes magazine 2012) 7. 15 million albums sold. So hardly by any reasonable definition a "non-entity". You are fortunate that you haven't heard of him. I am getting pretty sick of hearing about him in the US. This, for example: <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/24/1272156/-You-won-t-believe-why- MSNBC-cut-away-from-this-interview?detail=email> or tiny-ized: <http://tinyurl.com/kjaefvv> -- Jim Gibson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <040220141920571536%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #55875 |
In article <040220141105260729%jimsgibson@gmail.com>, Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <040220140850422571%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > In article <040220141328593234%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name > > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > > > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > > > > > > > Unfortunately I have heard of this one, but wish I hadn't. Why do > > > > non-entities get all this publicity? > > > > > > Not really a "non-entity" ... just another tween "singer" and child > > > celebrity gone bad. Probably forced into it by pushy parent(s) seeing > > > big dollar signs in their eyes. > > > > Exactly. A non-entity. > > Your definition of "non-entity" is rather ego-centric. I am certainly > no fan of Bieber, nor of pop music in general, but Bieber has the > following accomplishments (according to Wikipedia): > > 1. Four number one pop records. > 2. Grammy awards: Best New Arist, Best Pop Vocal Album (2011) > 3. Artist of the Year (2010 American Music Awards). > 4. First artist to have seven tracks from a debut album (My World) in > the Billboard Top 100 > 5. 40 million followers on Twitter (second only to Katy Perry) > 6. Third most powerful celebrity in the world (Forbes magazine 2012) > 7. 15 million albums sold. As none of this cuts any ice with me, it's irrelevant. > You are fortunate that you haven't heard of him. I didn't say I hadn't heard of him, but that he's a non-entity. It was the other geezer I hadn't heard of. -- "People don't buy Microsoft for quality, they buy it for compatibility with what Bob in accounting bought last year. Trace it back - they buy Microsoft because the IBM Selectric didn't suck much" - P Seebach, afc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 08:53 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <050220140853227137%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #55875 |
In article <040220141105260729%jimsgibson@gmail.com>, Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <040220140850422571%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > In article <040220141328593234%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name > > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > > > In article <030220142335364204%timstreater@greenbee.net>, Tim Streater > > > <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > > > > > > > Unfortunately I have heard of this one, but wish I hadn't. Why do > > > > non-entities get all this publicity? > > > > > > Not really a "non-entity" ... just another tween "singer" and child > > > celebrity gone bad. Probably forced into it by pushy parent(s) seeing > > > big dollar signs in their eyes. > > > > Exactly. A non-entity. > > Your definition of "non-entity" is rather ego-centric. I am certainly > no fan of Bieber, nor of pop music in general, but Bieber has the > following accomplishments (according to Wikipedia): > > 1. Four number one pop records. > 2. Grammy awards: Best New Arist, Best Pop Vocal Album (2011) > 3. Artist of the Year (2010 American Music Awards). > 4. First artist to have seven tracks from a debut album (My World) in > the Billboard Top 100 > 5. 40 million followers on Twitter (second only to Katy Perry) > 6. Third most powerful celebrity in the world (Forbes magazine 2012) > 7. 15 million albums sold. > > So hardly by any reasonable definition a "non-entity". <snip> Yep, a real non-entity would be those idiots who are famous for no reason at all ... the Kardashians for example, or anyone who is famous for being on a "reality" TV show.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-07 19:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9slfsa-ml03.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #55875 |
On 2014-02-04, Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> wrote: > Your definition of "non-entity" is rather ego-centric. I am certainly > no fan of Bieber, nor of pop music in general, but Bieber has the > following accomplishments (according to Wikipedia): > > 1. Four number one pop records. > 2. Grammy awards: Best New Arist, Best Pop Vocal Album (2011) > 3. Artist of the Year (2010 American Music Awards). > 4. First artist to have seven tracks from a debut album (My World) in > the Billboard Top 100 > 5. 40 million followers on Twitter (second only to Katy Perry) > 6. Third most powerful celebrity in the world (Forbes magazine 2012) > 7. 15 million albums sold. > > So hardly by any reasonable definition a "non-entity". > I'd heard about the lad in the context of Twitter followers, who I assume are teenage girls, but who is Katy Perry? -- Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-08 09:40 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <080220140940461390%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #56179 |
In article <9slfsa-ml03.ln1@news.chingola.ch>, Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> wrote: > On 2014-02-04, Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Your definition of "non-entity" is rather ego-centric. I am certainly > > no fan of Bieber, nor of pop music in general, but Bieber has the > > following accomplishments (according to Wikipedia): > > > > 1. Four number one pop records. > > 2. Grammy awards: Best New Arist, Best Pop Vocal Album (2011) > > 3. Artist of the Year (2010 American Music Awards). > > 4. First artist to have seven tracks from a debut album (My World) in > > the Billboard Top 100 > > 5. 40 million followers on Twitter (second only to Katy Perry) > > 6. Third most powerful celebrity in the world (Forbes magazine 2012) > > 7. 15 million albums sold. > > > > So hardly by any reasonable definition a "non-entity". > > I'd heard about the lad in the context of Twitter followers, who I assume > are teenage girls, but who is Katy Perry? The girl who was finally smart enough to get rid of the moronic doofus Russell Brand ... although he thinks it was the other way around.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-03 18:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1vOdnSKEubMiu23PnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #55802 |
On 2014.02.03, 10:11 , Warren Oates wrote:
> Speaking of someone dying -- it's a shame about Philip Seymour Hoffman.
> Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber?
Tragic about PSH.
Embellishing that with wishing death on someone else is pretty low class.
--
“Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”
- Mike Tyson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 13:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f12b06$0$50782$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #55818 |
In article <1vOdnSKEubMiu23PnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > On 2014.02.03, 10:11 , Warren Oates wrote: > > > Speaking of someone dying -- it's a shame about Philip Seymour Hoffman. > > Why couldn't it have been Justin Bieber? > > Tragic about PSH. > > Embellishing that with wishing death on someone else is pretty low class. I hate Justin Bieber. I don't care what you think of that. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 11:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <040220141136341246%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #55864 |
In article <52f12b06$0$50782$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > I hate Justin Bieber. I don't care what you think of that. I don't hate him; he's not important enough for me to have any emotions about him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 14:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f13b72$0$44150$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #55872 |
On 14-02-04 13:36, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <52f12b06$0$50782$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>, > Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I hate Justin Bieber. I don't care what you think of that. > > I don't hate him; he's not important enough for me to have any emotions > about him. Last fall, I was in the LA area for a funeral and went cycling. One ride involved climbing a great hill out of Malibu and go down "Stunt Rd" towards Calabassas inland. Amazing ride. After the egg throwing thing, the location of Bieber's home was revealed and I found out that great bike ride had taken me to within less than 2km of his home. My initial reaction: I was lucky that he was likely not there because if he had been driving that day, I might have been killed. Bieber is currently charged with assault in Canada. If is is found guilty and has a record, he may no longer be allowed into the USA. The residents of his gated community would be releieved. (there has been a petition to the whitehouse requesting Bieber be deported). This isn'ty about a singer. This is about an unsupervised rich attention-grabbing teenager being a danger to society.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 09:06 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <050220140906465330%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #55876 |
In article <52f13b72$0$44150$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-02-04 13:36, Michelle Steiner wrote: > > In article <52f12b06$0$50782$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>, > > Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I hate Justin Bieber. I don't care what you think of that. > > > > I don't hate him; he's not important enough for me to have any emotions > > about him. > > Last fall, I was in the LA area for a funeral and went cycling. One ride > involved climbing a great hill out of Malibu and go down "Stunt Rd" > towards Calabassas inland. Amazing ride. > > After the egg throwing thing, the location of Bieber's home was revealed > and I found out that great bike ride had taken me to within less than > 2km of his home. > > My initial reaction: I was lucky that he was likely not there because if > he had been driving that day, I might have been killed. > > Bieber is currently charged with assault in Canada. If is is found > guilty and has a record, he may no longer be allowed into the USA. The > residents of his gated community would be releieved. (there has been a > petition to the whitehouse requesting Bieber be deported). > > This isn'ty about a singer. This is about an unsupervised rich > attention-grabbing teenager being a danger to society. It's too late for Bieber. What it should be about is passing a law that restricts children, and even young adults, from being able to become so famous so quickly ... part of whihc would be to severly limit the number of hours they can work in the industry, legally enforce that all money earned is put into a trust fund that they (and not their pushy parents!) only get any access to when much older, reign in and sensibly cap the obscene amounts of money paid to celebrities, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 09:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <050220140939122933%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #55892 |
In article <050220140906465330%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > It's too late for Bieber. What it should be about is passing a law that > restricts children, and even young adults, from being able to become so > famous so quickly ... part of whihc would be to severly limit the > number of hours they can work in the industry, legally enforce that all > money earned is put into a trust fund that they (and not their pushy > parents!) only get any access to when much older, reign in and sensibly > cap the obscene amounts of money paid to celebrities, etc. As liberal/progressive as I am, even I can't stomach that degree of a "nanny state".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 21:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bld412Fj6ebU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #55876 |
On 2014-02-04, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > Last fall, I was in the LA area for a funeral and went cycling. One ride > involved climbing a great hill out of Malibu and go down "Stunt Rd" > towards Calabassas inland. Amazing ride. > > After the egg throwing thing, the location of Bieber's home was revealed > and I found out that great bike ride had taken me to within less than > 2km of his home. > > My initial reaction: I was lucky that he was likely not there because if > he had been driving that day, I might have been killed. > > Bieber is currently charged with assault in Canada. If is is found > guilty and has a record, he may no longer be allowed into the USA. The > residents of his gated community would be releieved. (there has been a > petition to the whitehouse requesting Bieber be deported). > > This isn'ty about a singer. This is about an unsupervised rich > attention-grabbing teenager being a danger to society. Hmmm... I can think of a whole boat load of politicians that far better fit that description. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 01:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlf33n0.1mr2.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #55896 |
In message <bld412Fj6ebU3@mid.individual.net> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2014-02-04, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >> Last fall, I was in the LA area for a funeral and went cycling. One ride >> involved climbing a great hill out of Malibu and go down "Stunt Rd" >> towards Calabassas inland. Amazing ride. >> >> After the egg throwing thing, the location of Bieber's home was revealed >> and I found out that great bike ride had taken me to within less than >> 2km of his home. >> >> My initial reaction: I was lucky that he was likely not there because if >> he had been driving that day, I might have been killed. >> >> Bieber is currently charged with assault in Canada. If is is found >> guilty and has a record, he may no longer be allowed into the USA. The >> residents of his gated community would be releieved. (there has been a >> petition to the whitehouse requesting Bieber be deported). >> >> This isn'ty about a singer. This is about an unsupervised rich >> attention-grabbing teenager being a danger to society. > Hmmm... I can think of a whole boat load of politicians that far better > fit that description. Not to mention many MANY much more dangerous much less supervised teen menaces. -- "Making music should not be left to the professionals." - Michelle Shocked
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-01 08:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <replytome-9B717F.08031301022014@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #55637 |
In article <SalmonEgg-7D5765.21443230012014@news80.forteinc.com>, Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I was having some problems with my Mac Pro that still runs SnowLeopard. > Among other other things, I had trouble saving an Excel program, some > strange files have shown up I cannot eliminate, and I had to use force > quitting several times. I was thinking hardware problems becaus I have > installed an SSD and a 4TByte disk recently. > > To my surprise, someone calls me up and asks for me by name. He tells me > that my computer sent his organization messages that indicated I have > some malware that they could take care of remotely. To say that I was > skeptical is an understatement. The outfit calls themselves iMax support > with website https://www.imaxsupport.com/. > > What can people here tell me about them? What should my first steps be > to track down malware problems? I am reluctant to download software from > the web, but sometimes that is difficult to do. > > The problem may be with eyetv. It often is running in the background and > has strange picture interfaces when text with copy and paste would be > more useful. I always tell these folks that my computer is a company computer and so they will need to call our IT person, whereupon they hang up. My scam caller usually claims to be from Microsoft. I've come to believe that we should be skeptical of any call we receive from someone we don't know. I also believe that 99 44/100% of what they advertise on TV is scams, including the $20 crap where they throw in another one for free, reverse mortgages, investment firms, burial insurance, and the rest. There is no truth anymore, there is only money, and if you have it, someone out there wants it. The world sure has degenerated to an abominable number of lowlifes. -- Good judgment results from experience, and experience results from bad judgment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-01 09:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52ecfffa$0$46505$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #55693 |
In article <replytome-9B717F.08031301022014@news.eternal-september.org>, Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> wrote: > > I've come to believe that we should be skeptical of any call we receive > from someone we don't know. I also believe that 99 44/100% of what they > advertise on TV is scams, including the $20 crap where they throw in > another one for free, reverse mortgages, investment firms, burial > insurance, and the rest. There is no truth anymore, there is only money, > and if you have it, someone out there wants it. The world sure has > degenerated to an abominable number of lowlifes. It's just more obvious and intrusive now that we're all tethered via our computerized underpants. I remember, mid-sxties, my father getting "Nigerian scam" letters in the post -- flimsy carbon copy things. I remember doing those chain letter things for postcards; my uncle did it with bottles of booze. I remember when you could get a "lifetime" subscription to Playboy for $20. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web