Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #59927 > unrolled thread

Yosemite (OS X 10.10)

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-02 16:33 -0400
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-02 20:43 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 09:37 +1200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-02 18:20 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-02 23:17 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 18:00 -0700
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-02 16:55 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 18:01 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 13:18 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 20:12 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 20:23 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 20:29 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 13:07 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 06:48 -0700
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-06-03 14:35 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-03 12:53 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 16:59 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-03 16:08 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 11:16 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-03 13:35 -0700
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:29 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 21:39 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 22:08 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-06-05 23:52 -0400
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-06 05:39 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 16:17 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-06-04 01:03 -0400
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 22:48 -0700
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) cb <cb@aol.com> - 2014-06-04 15:39 +0200
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 20:57 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:35 +1200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 11:09 -0700
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:04 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-03 17:19 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 13:16 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-03 22:11 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 18:54 +1200
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:50 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-04 03:08 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:39 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:05 -0700
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:57 -0400
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 17:06 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-04 21:33 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2014-06-05 15:56 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) android <here@there.was> - 2014-06-03 08:46 +0200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 01:43 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2014-06-02 20:20 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-03 05:02 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) befr@eaglesoft.de (Bernd Fröhlich) - 2014-06-03 10:07 +0200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-03 06:51 -0700
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 18:46 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-06-04 01:17 -0400
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 19:00 +1200
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:52 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2014-06-10 04:03 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-10 16:06 +1200
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-06-10 10:35 -0500
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-10 16:06 -0400
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-06-10 15:47 -0500
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:38 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:22 +1200
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-06-10 22:57 +0000
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 13:18 +1200
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 16:24 -0700
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 16:28 -0700
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2014-06-10 18:54 -0600
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-10 20:40 -0700
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 13:17 +1200
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-11 02:52 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-11 09:20 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-06-11 12:23 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:50 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-04 08:58 -0700
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-04 15:09 -0400
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 20:14 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-04 19:26 -0700
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-05 09:53 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:05 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:19 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-05 18:13 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-06 09:25 +1200
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-06-05 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-06 13:03 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-03 12:35 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 16:40 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-06-03 12:58 -0400
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 17:00 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:33 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:45 +1200
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:56 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 02:47 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-18 13:07 -0700
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-19 09:34 +1200
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-02 21:43 -0400
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 13:40 +1200
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 22:14 -0500
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 03:20 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 16:32 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-04 07:30 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:48 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:48 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-04 22:53 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:19 +0000
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-02 22:02 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-06-03 17:55 -0400
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 19:40 -0700
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 02:44 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-03 08:24 -0700
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 12:57 -0500
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-03 18:46 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-03 22:16 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-04 12:16 -0400
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-03 23:20 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 16:17 +1200
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-03 22:58 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-04 00:00 -0700
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-06-03 23:21 -0500
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-04 04:37 +0000
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:58 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-04 22:30 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 22:38 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-05 03:11 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-05 09:37 -0700
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 16:45 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-05 10:04 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 17:53 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-05 11:15 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 19:04 +0000
                                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:30 +0000
                                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-06 21:05 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:28 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2014-06-05 01:32 -0400
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2014-06-04 12:30 -0400
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-06-04 09:39 -0700
              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:03 +0000
                Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 05:23 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 19:02 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-05 19:34 +0000
                  Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2014-06-06 10:33 -0400
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-06 14:58 +0000
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-07 10:22 +1200
                    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-06 19:39 +0000
                      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 02:45 +0000
                        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-07 05:10 +0000
                          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 14:19 +0000
                            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-06-07 08:17 -0700
                              Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-07 16:20 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-06-04 19:01 +1200
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:54 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-04 15:57 +0000
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-05 04:16 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-06-03 15:06 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-04 09:36 +1200
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 15:50 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 15:54 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Darrin "Doc" O'Leary  <droleary@2q2014.subsume.com> - 2014-06-03 19:15 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:52 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 15:54 +0000
    Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 15:55 +0000
      Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2014-06-03 15:24 -0400
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-03 19:38 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) billy@MIX.COM - 2014-06-03 21:33 +0000
        Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 19:53 +0000
          Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2014-06-03 17:52 -0400
            Re: Yosemite (OS X 10.10) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-06-03 22:07 +0000

Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

#60077

On 6/3/14   PDT, 12:39 PM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <lmkjmp$f3h$2@dont-email.me>
>    John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>
>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>
>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>> they could use.
>
>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>
> You are not paying attention.
>
> Mavericks is not a national park and Yellowstone is not in California.
>
See my reply to Duck. I did not know Apple had spoken what they spake....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60067

On 2014.06.03, 09:48 , John McWilliams wrote:
> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>
>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>
>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>> they could use.
>
> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.

I'll bet $100,000 it will not be.

I'm willing to use an escrow service and deposit the money by Friday and 
pay all of the fees.  In advance.  Just tell me when you can make your 
deposit and we'll wait it out from then.  When 10.11 is announced we'll 
settle.

-- 
I was born a 1%er - I'm just more equal than the rest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60078

On 6/3/14   PDT, 2:57 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
> On 2014.06.03, 09:48 , John McWilliams wrote:
>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>
>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>
>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>> they could use.
>>
>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>
> I'll bet $100,000 it will not be.
>
> I'm willing to use an escrow service and deposit the money by Friday and
> pay all of the fees.  In advance.  Just tell me when you can make your
> deposit and we'll wait it out from then.  When 10.11 is announced we'll
> settle.
>
See other replies to this! Or give me 100,000:1 odds....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60189

On 2014.06.03, 20:06 , John McWilliams wrote:
> On 6/3/14   PDT, 2:57 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
>> On 2014.06.03, 09:48 , John McWilliams wrote:
>>> On 6/3/14   PDT, 6:07 AM, Lewis wrote:
>>>> In message <2014060220125662286-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
>>>>
>>>>> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
>>>>> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>>>>
>>>> Topanga? Mt Diablo? Big Sur? Golden Gate? There's probably 1000 names
>>>> they could use.
>>>
>>> Not if they stick with National Parks. I'm betting Yellowstone is next.
>>
>> I'll bet $100,000 it will not be.
>>
>> I'm willing to use an escrow service and deposit the money by Friday and
>> pay all of the fees.  In advance.  Just tell me when you can make your
>> deposit and we'll wait it out from then.  When 10.11 is announced we'll
>> settle.
>>
> See other replies to this! Or give me 100,000:1 odds....

Damn!  I should have offered a 50% fee to the collective of 
blabbermouths....

-- 
I was born a 1%er - I'm just more equal than the rest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60285

On 6/2/14, 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:

>
> Anticipate the following OSX names; Sequoia, Mammoth, Tahoe, Tioga,
> Humbolt, Redwood, Shasta,...
>
>
The only Mavericks I knew about were Bret, Bart, and Beau.  And now 
Yosemite Sam?  Warner Brothers is behind it.  I anticipate Bugs, Kookie, 
F Troop, and Sugarfoot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59990

In article <030620141318211715%YourName@YourISP.com>,
 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> > In article <538ce1ef$0$52793$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> >  Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:

> > Anyway, those names are getting very California-centric. Being neither a 
> > surfer nor a Californian, I had to look up what Mavericks was about.

It was not about California but cattle!
-- 
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59960

In article <billvan-7CBD08.16554402062014@news.shawcable.net>,
bill van  <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:

[unneeded quotage deleted]


>Will it have the same name outside North America? If so, there are going 
>to be pronunciation problems. "Jose might" could be one variation.

Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.


Patty

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59975

In article <538d282b$0$52735$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
 Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:

> In article <billvan-7CBD08.16554402062014@news.shawcable.net>,
> bill van  <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
> [unneeded quotage deleted]
> 
> >Will it have the same name outside North America? If so, there are going 
> >to be pronunciation problems. "Jose might" could be one variation.
> 
> Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
> plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
> 
Granted, people who grew up on Bugs Bunny will know. But once you get 
past Yellowstone, I don't think U.S. national parks are all that well 
known across either big pond, especially ones whose pronunciation is not 
immediately obvious.

Not that it matters much.
-- 
bill

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59981

In article <billvan-468DAF.20204502062014@news.shawcable.net>,
bill van  <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
>In article <538d282b$0$52735$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:
>
>> Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
>> plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
>> 
>Granted, people who grew up on Bugs Bunny will know. But once you get 
>past Yellowstone, I don't think U.S. national parks are all that well 
>known across either big pond, especially ones whose pronunciation is not 
>immediately obvious.

How much time have you spent in Yosemite? When I'm there in the summer
(which isn't often, as I try to avoid that time of the year), I hear 
almost more German, Japanese, and British/Australian English than I do 
American English. Those folks LOVE visiting the American West.

Also, Yosemite has two sister parks in China and one in Chile, so a
fair number of people in those countries must be familiar with it.

Along with Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon, it's one of the best-known 
U.S. national parks in the world.


Patty

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59993

Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:

> Along with Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon, it's one of the best-known
> U.S. national parks in the world.

I can confirm this.

Greetings from Germany,
Bernd Fröhlich

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59999

On 6/3/14   PDT, 1:07 AM, Bernd Fröhlich wrote:
> Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:
>
>> Along with Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon, it's one of the best-known
>> U.S. national parks in the world.
>
> I can confirm this.
>
> Greetings from Germany,
> Bernd Fröhlich

Thank you.

Yosemite is more widely known than the precious Snow Leopard. Oddly, I 
am five miles from the Park, heading to Glacier Point in two hours.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59989

In article <538d282b$0$52735$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, Patty Winter
<patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:
> In article <billvan-7CBD08.16554402062014@news.shawcable.net>,
> bill van  <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
> [unneeded quotage deleted]
> 
> >Will it have the same name outside North America? If so, there are going 
> >to be pronunciation problems. "Jose might" could be one variation.
> 
> Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
> plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.

The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or Mav-er-icks or
Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60105

In article <030620141846385164%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> > Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
> > plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
> 
> The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or Mav-er-icks or
> Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)


Who refers to the OS by the name anyhow? It's always been (to me at
least) Ten-eight, ten-nine, etc.

I could never see the point in the animals, or the current nomenclature
for that matter. Which came first- lion or panther? I think Snow
Leopard was later but I have no idea what the number was.

-- 
m-m
http://www.mhmyers.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60115

In article <040620140117334789%nospam@ny.more>, M-M <nospam@ny.more>
wrote:

> In article <030620141846385164%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
> > > plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
> > 
> > The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or Mav-er-icks or
> > Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)
> 
> Who refers to the OS by the name anyhow? It's always been (to me at
> least) Ten-eight, ten-nine, etc.
> 
> I could never see the point in the animals, or the current nomenclature
> for that matter. Which came first- lion or panther? I think Snow
> Leopard was later but I have no idea what the number was.

Exactly. The names are a pointless and useless marketing gimmick that
mean nothing to anyone. Using them is one of the sillier decisions made
by Apple.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60134

On 2014-06-04, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> In article <040620140117334789%nospam@ny.more>, M-M <nospam@ny.more>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <030620141846385164%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > > Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course, but
>> > > plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
>> > 
>> > The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or Mav-er-icks or
>> > Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)
>> 
>> Who refers to the OS by the name anyhow? It's always been (to me at
>> least) Ten-eight, ten-nine, etc.
>> 
>> I could never see the point in the animals, or the current nomenclature
>> for that matter. Which came first- lion or panther? I think Snow
>> Leopard was later but I have no idea what the number was.
>
> Exactly. The names are a pointless and useless marketing gimmick that
> mean nothing to anyone. Using them is one of the sillier decisions made
> by Apple.

Please. It's quite common to use code names for software projects before
release, which is where these names came from to begin with. Sometimes
those names are made public after release - sometimes not.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60660

On 2014-06-04, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> In article <040620140117334789%nospam@ny.more>, M-M <nospam@ny.more>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <030620141846385164%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > > Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course,
>> > > but plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
>> > 
>> > The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or
>> > Mav-er-icks or Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)
>> 
>> Who refers to the OS by the name anyhow? It's always been (to me at
>> least) Ten-eight, ten-nine, etc.
>> 
>> I could never see the point in the animals, or the current
>> nomenclature for that matter. Which came first- lion or panther? I
>> think Snow Leopard was later but I have no idea what the number
>> was.
>
> Exactly. The names are a pointless and useless marketing gimmick
> that mean nothing to anyone. Using them is one of the sillier
> decisions made by Apple.

The names make searching for informaiton easier - search engines tend
to give more junk results if you search by version number. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60661

In article <53968393$0$11097$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, Philip Shaw
<jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> wrote:
> On 2014-06-04, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > In article <040620140117334789%nospam@ny.more>, M-M <nospam@ny.more>
> > wrote:
> >> In article <030620141846385164%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
> >> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Yosemite is known around the world. Not by everyone, of course,
> >> > > but plenty of people will know exactly how to pronounce it.
> >> > 
> >> > The current version is much different ... Mav-ricks or
> >> > Mav-er-icks or Ma-ver-icks.  ;-)
> >> 
> >> Who refers to the OS by the name anyhow? It's always been (to me at
> >> least) Ten-eight, ten-nine, etc.
> >> 
> >> I could never see the point in the animals, or the current
> >> nomenclature for that matter. Which came first- lion or panther? I
> >> think Snow Leopard was later but I have no idea what the number
> >> was.
> >
> > Exactly. The names are a pointless and useless marketing gimmick
> > that mean nothing to anyone. Using them is one of the sillier
> > decisions made by Apple.
> 
> The names make searching for informaiton easier - search engines tend
> to give more junk results if you search by version number. 

They shouldn't do if the search engine is used properly with quote
marks enclosing the phrase, "mac os x 10.9".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60671

On 2014-06-10 04:03:31 +0000, Philip Shaw said:

[in regards to giving the Mac OS a name such as Yosemite]

> The names make searching for informaiton easier - search engines tend
> to give more junk results if you search by version number.

Names are far easier to remember than numbers. I, and I assume along 
witih many others, could not tell you whether the latest operating 
system is 10.8 or 10.9 or .....

-- 
James Leo Ryan - Austin, Texas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60710

In article <bvomufFflj8U1@mid.individual.net>,
 TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote:

> On 2014-06-10 04:03:31 +0000, Philip Shaw said:
> 
> [in regards to giving the Mac OS a name such as Yosemite]
> 
> > The names make searching for informaiton easier - search engines tend
> > to give more junk results if you search by version number.
> 
> Names are far easier to remember than numbers. I, and I assume along 
> witih many others, could not tell you whether the latest operating 
> system is 10.8 or 10.9 or .....

But it's right there in the Subject line! :)

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60724

On 2014-06-10 20:06:15 +0000, Barry Margolin said:

> In article <bvomufFflj8U1@mid.individual.net>,
>  TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-06-10 04:03:31 +0000, Philip Shaw said:
>> 
>> [in regards to giving the Mac OS a name such as Yosemite]
>> 
>>> The names make searching for informaiton easier - search engines tend
>>> to give more junk results if you search by version number.
>> 
>> Names are far easier to remember than numbers. I, and I assume along
>> witih many others, could not tell you whether the latest operating
>> system is 10.8 or 10.9 or .....
> 
> But it's right there in the Subject line! :)

Of course it is, but I'd have to look there to be sure of the version 
number I'm running. But I have no problem remembering that I'm running 
Mavericks, and am anxiously awaiting Yosemite!

-- 
James Leo Ryan - Austin, Texas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web