Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53606 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-21 11:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-12-28 18:55 +1300 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 392 — 38 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 11:21 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-21 21:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-21 13:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 13:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 13:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-22 11:21 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-21 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 16:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:35 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:47 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 21:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 09:13 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-24 16:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 21:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-23 19:09 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-23 09:05 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-23 18:58 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 14:06 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 18:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:56 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:19 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-24 17:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Martin Frost me at invalid stanford daht edu <nospam@stanford.edu.invalid> - 2013-12-25 01:43 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-25 08:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:29 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 18:51 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 19:14 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:59 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:07 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:36 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 12:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 16:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 17:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 23:56 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 16:59 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:22 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe "Ed H." <fake@notreal.net> - 2013-12-27 13:30 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-24 22:02 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:20 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 07:58 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 12:47 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:09 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:09 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 12:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:38 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 17:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 18:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:24 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-24 23:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:50 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-25 13:28 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 15:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:54 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:10 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:26 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-25 04:34 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:52 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 21:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-24 15:16 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-26 19:00 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-27 08:20 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-27 18:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 10:20 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:50 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 09:27 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 13:07 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-29 18:17 +0100
Re: Semantics Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-29 12:34 -0500
Re: Semantics Gripe Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-29 14:53 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Semantics Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-29 21:55 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 14:04 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-26 16:28 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-24 18:22 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-25 00:02 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:15 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-27 18:36 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 21:08 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-12-24 18:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-01-01 17:55 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 11:41 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 11:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-02 09:10 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 13:49 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 15:38 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-02 13:16 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 17:31 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-02 09:10 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-02 11:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-02 22:17 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-02 15:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-01-02 18:33 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-01 13:46 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2014-01-01 15:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:42 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 10:49 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-22 16:54 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-26 10:37 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-26 18:32 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 05:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-26 09:30 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:35 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-23 10:59 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:45 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 04:58 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-21 20:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-22 15:43 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-22 11:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-22 22:35 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 18:08 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-23 09:07 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 04:12 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 15:15 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-23 15:39 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 18:46 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 04:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 22:02 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 01:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-23 19:41 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-23 11:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-23 09:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 13:33 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 21:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-23 18:40 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2013-12-24 10:15 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:01 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:10 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 18:23 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:29 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:49 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 10:32 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 12:36 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:40 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-22 16:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-22 15:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:41 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-23 09:26 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-23 18:47 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-23 23:39 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 00:46 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-24 19:10 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 04:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-25 14:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 18:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 01:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 07:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 05:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 09:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-26 21:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 02:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-27 10:43 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-26 19:16 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-27 08:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:00 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 09:52 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 10:44 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-26 10:00 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-27 13:22 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 10:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-27 15:57 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-27 18:34 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-27 12:43 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 11:00 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 10:57 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 09:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 14:18 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe Di Domenico <joedid@email.com> - 2013-12-28 14:46 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe henry999@eircom.net (Henry) - 2013-12-31 11:54 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-31 14:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:04 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 15:55 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-19 21:20 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 17:21 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 17:22 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-04-20 03:16 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-20 00:00 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:40 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 10:54 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 20:02 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:34 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe billy@MIX.COM - 2014-04-19 15:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-20 08:51 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 22:37 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 12:36 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-20 07:03 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 17:33 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe Wolf Dee <joedid@email.com> - 2014-04-21 07:57 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-04-20 03:23 +0200
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-04-20 03:11 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 09:35 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 15:51 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-26 15:56 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-26 17:07 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-27 12:05 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-27 21:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-28 09:48 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:47 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-26 09:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-27 09:38 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:59 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:58 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-23 22:18 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 04:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-24 14:19 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 10:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-24 08:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:14 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 20:01 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 15:19 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:14 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-24 16:05 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 15:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 13:07 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 17:08 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 17:25 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:11 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 20:54 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-24 13:00 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 10:21 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-24 12:12 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-25 09:40 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 13:37 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-25 04:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 16:20 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-24 09:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 19:59 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-24 15:38 -0600
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-24 21:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-24 20:03 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-25 10:53 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-25 11:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-04-19 19:55 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-19 13:42 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-19 06:52 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-04-20 09:24 +1000
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-04-19 22:35 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-04-19 23:56 -0400
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-04-19 21:02 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-04-19 21:16 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-04-20 13:43 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-28 16:34 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-28 18:39 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-28 14:57 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:36 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-22 22:54 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-23 03:20 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-22 22:07 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-23 09:56 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-23 04:10 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-22 11:45 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 23:38 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> - 2013-12-23 00:50 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-28 16:24 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 08:55 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-28 04:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 10:09 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Joe W DiDomenico <joedid@outlook.com> - 2013-12-28 09:39 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:37 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:18 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-28 22:36 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 15:07 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 17:27 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:24 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-30 17:34 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 10:04 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 10:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 19:25 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 13:56 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:48 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-01-02 15:10 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-01-03 01:21 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2014-01-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:34 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-28 22:17 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 11:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 09:15 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-29 09:42 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-28 14:01 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 17:49 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 18:04 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 19:06 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 22:17 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 22:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-29 01:12 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 21:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:27 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 00:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-30 01:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 11:57 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-12-30 07:39 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 08:55 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe JoeWolfDee <joedid@email.com> - 2013-12-30 11:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 17:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 18:29 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 17:32 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 15:56 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-30 21:32 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 20:44 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:25 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 22:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:41 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-31 15:27 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:42 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-31 02:33 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-01 09:50 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:24 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 14:51 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-31 17:09 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-01 09:34 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-01-10 18:16 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-31 13:04 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-31 03:03 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 20:44 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-01-10 18:20 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-11 16:17 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-31 18:29 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-31 14:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 12:42 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 09:27 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-30 19:29 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:52 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 16:12 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 17:53 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:01 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 05:31 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 10:39 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-28 14:38 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 12:55 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-29 10:28 +1300
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 17:59 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-12-28 18:58 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-28 23:26 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-28 21:46 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-29 01:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2013-12-28 09:23 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-29 08:44 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-30 04:22 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-29 21:13 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-12-30 00:21 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-29 22:44 -0700
Re: Grammar Gripe Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-29 21:49 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 09:26 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 12:14 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 09:23 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 12:51 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-30 16:11 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe J Burns <burns4@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-30 21:13 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 17:26 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 22:41 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-30 18:11 -0500
Re: Grammar Gripe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-30 23:25 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-29 22:37 -0700
Re: Uniqueness Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-31 13:21 +0100
Re: Uniqueness gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 10:52 -0800
Re: Uniqueness Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-31 14:47 -0700
Re: Uniqueness gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-12-31 14:55 -0800
Re: Uniqueness Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-01 00:32 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2013-12-22 23:33 +0100
Re: Grammar Gripe Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-12-23 10:57 +1100
Re: Grammar Gripe bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> - 2013-12-23 00:00 +0000
Re: Grammar Gripe RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2013-12-27 21:36 -0800
Re: Grammar Gripe Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-28 18:55 +1300
Page 6 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 20 Next page →
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-01 17:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2014010117315185492-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54231 |
On 2014-01-02 00:16:15 +0000, Your Name said: >> That changes nothing. The only political activity I note, is people >> reciting the myth of an invisible army that [re]stricts their use of >> speech. By-and-large, it is a political invention to recite how the >> (implied liberal) PC Police are persecuting you for using acceptable >> speech like "disabled" "merry Christmas" and a boat load of other >> nonsense. > > Whatever you want to delude yourself with. :-\ Reality remains my delusion. Good luck in your quest against "them", whomever them may be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-02 09:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <020120140910252612%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #54226 |
In article <2014010115383742140-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > Of course calling people "cripples", "fatsos", "jigaboos" and > "wetbacks" will get you some pushback. Soldiers for Fox should expect > to encounter political pushback for their political ploys. Who is this Mr Fox of whom you speak? -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-02 11:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2014010211475740222-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54252 |
On 2014-01-02 09:10:25 +0000, Tim Streater said: > In article <2014010115383742140-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > >> Of course calling people "cripples", "fatsos", "jigaboos" and >> "wetbacks" will get you some pushback. Soldiers for Fox should expect >> to encounter political pushback for their political ploys. > > Who is this Mr Fox of whom you speak? Roger Ailes and whomever he reports to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-02 22:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <020120142217436657%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #54289 |
In article <2014010211475740222-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > On 2014-01-02 09:10:25 +0000, Tim Streater said: > > > In article <2014010115383742140-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > > > >> Of course calling people "cripples", "fatsos", "jigaboos" and > >> "wetbacks" will get you some pushback. Soldiers for Fox should expect > >> to encounter political pushback for their political ploys. > > > > Who is this Mr Fox of whom you speak? > > Roger Ailes and whomever he reports to. Who is this Mr Roger Ailes of whom you speak? -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-02 15:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2014010215290572955-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54298 |
On 2014-01-02 22:17:43 +0000, Tim Streater said: > In article <2014010211475740222-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > >> On 2014-01-02 09:10:25 +0000, Tim Streater said: >> >>> In article <2014010115383742140-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: >>> >>>> Of course calling people "cripples", "fatsos", "jigaboos" and >>>> "wetbacks" will get you some pushback. Soldiers for Fox should expect >>>> to encounter political pushback for their political ploys. >>> >>> Who is this Mr Fox of whom you speak? >> >> Roger Ailes and whomever he reports to. > > Who is this Mr Roger Ailes of whom you speak? Who is this *to* whom I speak?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-02 18:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2014010218333079728-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #54298 |
On 2014-01-02 22:17:43 +0000, Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> said: > In article <2014010211475740222-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > >> On 2014-01-02 09:10:25 +0000, Tim Streater said: >> >> > In article <2014010115383742140-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: >> > >> Of course calling people "cripples", "fatsos", "jigaboos" and >> >> "wetbacks" will get you some pushback. Soldiers for Fox should expect >> >> to encounter political pushback for their political ploys. >> > > Who is this Mr Fox of whom you speak? >> >> Roger Ailes and whomever he reports to. > > Who is this Mr Roger Ailes of whom you speak? I believe this is the intended subject. < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ailes > …and he reports to the transplanted antipodean Rupert Murdock. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-01 13:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <010120141346542852%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #54209 |
In article <2014010111293365368-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2014-01-01 18:41:13 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
>
> > In article <231220131909012167%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
> > <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You also are not allowed to say "disabled person" because that means
> >> the perosn is seen as disabled first.
>
> Sure you are. Say it as much as you like. If the purported candidate of
> your speech informs you they aren't disabled or aren't a person, then
> you should moderate your speech to avoid offending them, but you can
> also say "fuck you, I say whateverr I like". See: you've got choices at
> every pass.
>
> >> Instead you have to say "person with a disablity" so the person is
> >> (supposedly) seen as a person first.
>
> No you don't.
>
> >> Of course, these days you can't even say "disabled" either and have to
> >> say "person with a {insert disability} impairment" instead.
>
> Seems you keep yourself from saying WAY too much. Relax!
Please be careful with your pronoun references; it sounds like you're
replying to me, when you are actually replying to "Your Name".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-01 15:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2014010115410036333-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #54216 |
On 2014-01-01 20:46:54 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
> In article <2014010111293365368-xxx@yyyzzz>, gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-01-01 18:41:13 +0000, Michelle Steiner said:
>>
>>> In article <231220131909012167%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
>>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You also are not allowed to say "disabled person" because that means
>>>> the perosn is seen as disabled first.
>>
>> Sure you are. Say it as much as you like. If the purported candidate of
>> your speech informs you they aren't disabled or aren't a person, then
>> you should moderate your speech to avoid offending them, but you can
>> also say "fuck you, I say whateverr I like". See: you've got choices at
>> every pass.
>>
>>>> Instead you have to say "person with a disablity" so the person is
>>>> (supposedly) seen as a person first.
>>
>> No you don't.
>>
>>>> Of course, these days you can't even say "disabled" either and have to
>>>> say "person with a {insert disability} impairment" instead.
>>
>> Seems you keep yourself from saying WAY too much. Relax!
>
> Please be careful with your pronoun references; it sounds like you're
> replying to me, when you are actually replying to "Your Name".
I do my best to strip unassociated ID's out when I can.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-23 23:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <231220132342446635%star@sky.net> |
| In reply to | #53683 |
D.F. Manno: > "Political Correctness" only exists in the minds of the people bitching > about "Political Correctness." By my definition the phrase "political correctness" was concocted by persons who don't like the fact that hate speech and other sociopathic utterances may have consequences. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-24 08:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <201312240803483870-xxx@yyyzzz> |
| In reply to | #53740 |
On 2013-12-24 04:42:44 +0000, Davoud said: > D.F. Manno: >> "Political Correctness" only exists in the minds of the people bitching >> about "Political Correctness." > > By my definition the phrase "political correctness" was concocted by > persons who don't like the fact that hate speech and other sociopathic > utterances may have consequences. Thank you Fox!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-22 10:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l96g3b$n0i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53618 |
On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: > In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >> >>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used >>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in >>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the >>>> grammar. >>> >>> Care to give an example? >> >> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. > > Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first > sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have > now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). Robin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-22 16:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-Cm8EdfJ0dskz@localhost> |
| In reply to | #53638 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:49:15 UTC, bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: > > > In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > >> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >> > >>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > >>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used > >>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in > >>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the > >>>> grammar. > >>> > >>> Care to give an example? > >> > >> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. > > > > Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first > > sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have > > now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) > > Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is > Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). Yes, but the verb is a copula. -- John Varela
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-26 10:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o0rmb9t5qo3chso5t0l4oe0c6kf5ff11f2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #53638 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:49:15 +0000, bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: > >> In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used >>>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in >>>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the >>>>> grammar. >>>> >>>> Care to give an example? >>> >>> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. >> >> Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first >> sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have >> now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) > >Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is >Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). And a misspelling of paycheque. >Robin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-26 18:32 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <261220131832137200%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #53869 |
In article <o0rmb9t5qo3chso5t0l4oe0c6kf5ff11f2@4ax.com>, Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:49:15 +0000, bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: > > > >> In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > >> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> > >>> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > >>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > >>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used > >>>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in > >>>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the > >>>>> grammar. > >>>> > >>>> Care to give an example? > >>> > >>> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. > >> > >> Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first > >> sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have > >> now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) > > > >Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is > >Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). > > And a misspelling of paycheque. It is the correct spelling - Americans are paid with paper covered in alternating little black and white squares. ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-26 05:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2013122605360321609-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #53873 |
On 2013-12-26 05:32:13 +0000, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> said: > In article <o0rmb9t5qo3chso5t0l4oe0c6kf5ff11f2@4ax.com>, Barry OGrady > <atheist@hotmail.com.au> wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:49:15 +0000, bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: >>> >>>> In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >>>>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >>>>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used >>>>>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in >>>>>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the >>>>>>> grammar. >>>>>> >>>>>> Care to give an example? >>>>> >>>>> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. >>>> >>>> Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first >>>> sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have >>>> now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) >>> >>> Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is >>> Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). >> >> And a misspelling of paycheque. > > It is the correct spelling - Americans are paid with paper covered in > alternating little black and white squares. ;-) I have been getting direct deposit for pay & pension for over 25 years. No check or cheque required. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-26 09:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <261220130930131371%star@sky.net> |
| In reply to | #53876 |
Barry OGrady: > >> And a misspelling of paycheque. Perhaps. But youse guys always misspell "Would you cheque out that dame!?" Furthermore, "cheque" was originally spelled "check," but the British were so enamored of the French and the French language (during those periods when the two countries were not at war) that they adopted many French spellings. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-31 18:35 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <311220131835078879%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #53869 |
In article <o0rmb9t5qo3chso5t0l4oe0c6kf5ff11f2@4ax.com>, Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:49:15 +0000, bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 2013-12-21 21:54:28 +0000, Salmon Egg said: > > > >> In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > >> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> > >>> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > >>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > >>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used > >>>>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in > >>>>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the > >>>>> grammar. > >>>> > >>>> Care to give an example? > >>> > >>> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. > >> > >> Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first > >> sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have > >> now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) > > > >Your grammar lessons can't have been very good. "Last paycheck is > >Friday" has both a subject (paycheck) and a verb (is). > > And a misspelling of paycheque. "Paycheck" could be the correct spelling, if you are talking about payment statement that you are meant to check has the correct amount of your wages on it. ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-23 10:59 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <p4veb9pde1i4etj1k83n3jgbr1qu6fd8lk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #53618 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:54:28 -0800, Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >In article <SalmonEgg-F88CC7.13413921122013@news80.forteinc.com>, > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >> >> > In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >> > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> > >> > > I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used >> > > without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in >> > > most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the >> > > grammar. >> > >> > Care to give an example? >> >> Touche! I got my laugh for the day. > >Just after finishing with this group, I went to another. The first >sentence I read was: "Last paycheck is Friday." How much Friday? I have >now learned to write without verb or subject. :=) Obviously it should read, "Last paycheque is Friday." >Sam
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-22 11:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ofadnRWpBK1IoyrPnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #53617 |
Salmon Egg wrote: > In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>, > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > >> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>, >> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are used >>> without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize that in >>> most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would correct the >>> grammar. >> Care to give an example? > > Touche! I got my laugh for the day. Umm... Touché? Paul Magnussen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Usenet@Grolea.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-23 00:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l98ile$qd2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53652 |
On 12-22-2013, 14:34, Paul Magnussen wrote:
> Salmon Egg wrote:
>> In article <211220132109555154%timstreater@greenbee.net>,
>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <SalmonEgg-865C82.11210121122013@news80.forteinc.com>,
>>> Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have observed, on this group and many others, that sentences are
>>>> used without a subject. After reading them a time or two, I realize
>>>> that in most situations but not all, merely adding "I " would
>>>> correct the grammar.
>>> Care to give an example?
>>
>> Touche! I got my laugh for the day.
>
> Umm... Touché?
Touchy, aren't we?
--
Wes Groleau
There are more Baroque musicians than any other kind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web