Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #68305
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Mail insecurity |
| Date | 12 Jan 2015 16:15:41 GMT |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Lines | 47 |
| Message-ID | <chia9dFu1h3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <54b034cb$0$56564$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com> <m8pd4b$ebf$1@news.datemas.de> <54b3f124$0$58733$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-Trace | individual.net 5jJB8Ork1GkDO6ImUJ8sDgI2grYgJXcKKjTrQNwW6RuCHcZspW |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nRHDh8JQwLX6slmEHYqEBv7B9SQ= |
| X-Face | _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:68305 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2015-01-12, Jerry Bishop <jerry.bishop@nowhere.nohow.com> wrote: > On 2015-01-09 20:19:24 +0000, Alan Baker said: > >> On 2015-01-09 20:06:35 +0000, Warren Oates said: >> >>> <http://www.itworld.com/article/2867215/glitch-in-os-x-search-can-expose- >>> private-details-of-apple-mail-users.html> >>> >>> All one line, dat. >> >> By "private details"... >> >> ...they mean "IP address". > > Telling the spammers they have a live machine at the other end of a > message, thereby provoking more spam. It won't make all that much difference in the end, since the vast majority of spam messages are sent without regard for weather the address in question is valid, and spam filtering takes care of spam just fine for lots of folks. > And possibly opening up the machine for a drive-by malware download. Nope, the machine is no more open to malware than before. > I set the option for not viewing remote content without express > permission for a reason, and the Spotlight needs to honor that setting. And it will, as soon as Apple fixes this omission. In the mean time, avoiding the issue is as simple as refraining from viewing previews of emails in Spotlight search results. Simple. > Although this isn't the most dangerous bug in the world by a long > shot, it's still clearly a bug with implications. Sure, though nowhere near as bad as some are claiming. > Hopefully this will be fixed in 10.10.2. I have faith it will be addressed by Apple in a future update. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mail insecurity Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 15:06 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-09 12:19 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity Jerry Bishop <jerry.bishop@nowhere.nohow.com> - 2015-01-12 11:07 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-12 16:15 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-12 12:06 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-01-09 15:55 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Wilbur Eleven <wil@nowhere.at.all.ru.ca.fr.uk.us> - 2015-01-10 08:33 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-01-10 06:30 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-01-11 09:48 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-09 21:32 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 09:10 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-11 00:39 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 10:09 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-11 01:14 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 10:41 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 14:28 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-11 11:48 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 20:56 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-11 12:04 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 20:09 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 21:24 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2015-01-11 12:28 -0800
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 21:49 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-11 23:16 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 14:27 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 14:27 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 14:26 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 15:42 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Mail insecurity android <here@there.was> - 2015-01-11 16:16 +0100
Re: Mail insecurity Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-11 19:01 -0500
Re: Mail insecurity Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2015-01-11 13:19 -0500
csiph-web