Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #57559

Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done)

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done)
Date 4 Mar 2014 20:07:51 GMT
Organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines 25
Message-ID <bnmq4mF9cdjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <gratefuldead-46EAC9.11054304032014@newszilla.xs4all.nl> <53161990$0$52763$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
X-Trace individual.net 9nkiZJbwRIAHW8i8iB1jQAW6WojKykfsC/1JgpZ7yPj225fvw5
Cancel-Lock sha1:/ByOTqEvDXNL7Ini2IbmOhNJpV4=
X-Face _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:57559

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2014-03-04, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:
>
> In article <gratefuldead-46EAC9.11054304032014@newszilla.xs4all.nl>,
> Stephen  <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>http://arstechnica.com/apple/2014/03/snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-do
>>ne-here-are-your-os-x-upgrade-options/
>
> Last sentence:
>
> "Snow Leopard has had a good run, but as time wears on you'll either 
> have to bite the bullet and buy new hardware or be faced with an 
> increasingly less capable, more vulnerable machine."
>
> I'm sticking with the latter path, and it doesn't have me particularly
> worried.

You aren't alone. While I do run the latest and greatest on my main
workstation, I do also have machines that cannot be upgraded past 10.6,
and don't intend to shut them down any time soon.
 
-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Stephen <gratefuldead@xs4all.nl> - 2014-03-04 11:05 +0100
  Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2014-03-04 16:31 +0000
  Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-04 18:21 +0000
    Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-04 20:07 +0000
      Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-04 21:37 +0000
    Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-03-04 15:38 -0600
  Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-04 17:49 -0500
    Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-05 16:11 +0000
      Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-03-05 15:22 -0500
      Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2014-03-08 04:33 +0000
        Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-03-07 21:56 -0800
        Re: Ars article (snow-leopard-updates-are-probably-done) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-08 14:14 +0000

csiph-web