Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL

From	Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL
Date	2013-12-21 21:41 +0000
Organization	People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID	<bhmg89Fh28qU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <bhifapFli87U1@mid.individual.net> <bhjee3Frgi2U2@mid.individual.net> <slrnlbac7v.sut.g.kreme@amelia.local> <bhln0lFbq9pU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlbbrma.1c7f.g.kreme@amelia.local>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2013-12-21, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <bhln0lFbq9pU1@mid.individual.net> 
>   Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you slow or something? Of course I know what roman numerals are. How
>> stupid do you think I am?
>
> It was a joke.

Ah - I take it back, then. Apologies. : )

>> I can read. Yet somehow, I'm supposed to magically know what is meant
>> by Q5 and Q7 in this context?
>
> I have no idea what QV and QVII referred to, and honestly, I thought it
> was some oblique reference to "Queen Victoria" and having to wait for
> "Queen Victoria II" (Like the QE and QEII cruise ships, perhaps?).
>
>> Apparently "android" wants us to know that Q5 (whatever the fuck that
>> is) is dead, and that I'm reportedly eagerly awaiting Q7 (whatever the
>> fuck that is) and the "relegalization of British piracy" (whatever
>> that might have to do with Q5 and Q7 or me)? 
>
> That's why I thought Queen Victoria. But none of it makes any sense.

I suppose as my name is that of a pirate flag, I am expected to be able
to decipher the gibberish; but alas, no such luck.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Thread

Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-11 23:00 -0800
  Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-12 01:14 -0800
    Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-12 17:45 +0000
  Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-19 13:10 +0000
    Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-19 23:42 -0800
      Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL android <here@there.was> - 2013-12-20 10:01 +0100
        Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 17:52 +0000
          Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-21 06:11 +0000
            Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 14:30 +0000
              Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-21 07:59 -0700
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 15:25 +0000
              Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-21 19:40 +0000
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 21:41 +0000
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Joe <none@given.now> - 2013-12-21 14:19 -0800
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 04:55 +0000
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL David Ryeburn <david_ryeburn@telus.netz> - 2013-12-21 21:26 -0800
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-12-22 20:33 +1300
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-22 15:44 +0000
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2013-12-23 11:07 +1300
              Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2013-12-22 09:09 +1100
                Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-21 22:42 +0000
      Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-20 17:49 +0000
      Re: Recommend a GOOD CFL "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2013-12-20 21:34 +0000

csiph-web