Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #50707

Re: MacPro: no audio input ?

Date 2013-10-25 16:54 -0400
From Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: MacPro: no audio input ?
References (3 earlier) <52696dfd$0$9670$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com> <jollyroger-B1306D.16032524102013@news.individual.net> <5269aae8$0$7247$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> <Gf-dncKzz7HTLfTPnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@giganews.com> <5269b840$0$12546$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>
Message-ID <_ImdnZRV9-o-R_fPnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2013.10.24, 20:15 , JF Mezei wrote:
> On 13-10-24 19:42, Alan Browne wrote:
>
>> Pros in the audio business will be using more advanced multi-channel
>> samplers with balanced analog inputs.  It would be foolish to have the
>> audio as part of the Mac.
>
> But wouldn't those samplers come in as TOSlink fibre ? How do they
> interface to a computer and do they need specific drivers ?

The makers will provide whatever drivers are needed.  USB 2.0 (with 
compression) will handle stereo.  USB 3.0 will go a lot further.

Simple sampling (40,100 * 16 bits) = 641,600 bits per second.  (TOSLINK 
uses 20 bits/sample as does ADAT, however).

TB (1) could handle several hundreds of such channels without a blink - 
even if each channel was oversampled 10X higher than 40,100 Hz.

TOSLINK modulates at a respectable 10 MHz - but that would limit 
oversampling and number of channels.  Definitely not the future-path.

ADAT is better for such uses - but the bandwidth is only marginally 
higher than TOSLINK.

I don't know where pro audio is leaning - but I'd bet it would be easier 
for them to go to TB over the next few years than any other direction.

Let's take a peek:
http://apogeedigital.com/products/symphony-64-thunderbridge.php
Even has Darth Vader Macs on the 2nd page.



-- 
"Quotation, n: The act of repeating erroneously the words of another."
                                                 -Ambrose Bierce

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

MacPro: no audio input ? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-10-23 02:28 -0400
  Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2013-10-23 11:29 -0400
  Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-10-23 20:27 -0700
    Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-24 08:19 -0700
      Re: MacPro: no audio input ? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-10-24 14:59 -0400
        Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-24 16:03 -0700
          Re: MacPro: no audio input ? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-10-24 19:19 -0400
            Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-24 19:42 -0400
              Re: MacPro: no audio input ? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-10-24 20:15 -0400
                Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-24 18:34 -0700
                Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-25 16:54 -0400
                Re: MacPro: no audio input ? billy@MIX.COM - 2013-10-25 22:44 +0000
                Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-25 19:13 -0400
              Re: MacPro: no audio input ? billy@MIX.COM - 2013-10-25 20:03 +0000
    Re: MacPro: no audio input ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-24 17:09 -0400

csiph-web