Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #133602

Re: Snit Michael Glasser has a new toy- Attacks Diesel--PING DIESEL

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
news:hn9qjbFl4phU1@mid.individual.net Thu, 16 Jul 2020 01:59:06 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On 7/15/20 5:44 PM, Diesel wrote:
> ...
>> Oh, yea, sure.. The same comment Mike Easter wrote that he wasn't
>> able to backup in any way shape or form. I'm no more a bully than
>> you're an honest person, David.
>> 
>>> You should get to know Diesel, Steve Carroll.
>>> Have no doubt that once he has determined that YOU /are/
>>> responsible for the flood post, he'll show you no mercy.
>> 
>> David, that also goes for Snit. I don't see you giving him any
>> fair warning. In fact, I see you completely ignoring his efforts
>> to taunt me into doing an eagle or jenn on him.
> 
> I merely ask for you to be kind... and to let go of your tantrum
> where you are demanding I lie for you so you can be happy. It is
> sick. 

You ask me to give you a free pass for the lies you wrote. You also 
expect me to give you a free pass for additional lies you've been 
writing about me since I asked you to apologize for some other ones. 
Where do you get the silly idea that myself, or anyone else, should 
be 'kind' to you as a result of what you've been doing?

Real life doesn't work like that, what makes you think being online 
would?
 
> I.
> 
> WILL.
> 
> NOT.
> 
> LIE.
> 
> PERIOD.

Yes, you most certainly will. You already have, infact:

For example, here's a few lies written by you, with nothing to 
support them.

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100

"Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of
the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he
clarified it was merely the compiled code he had"

*** end snippit

I ask again:
Where are the post(s) showing I made anything clear about
access to more than the output of the bot? The output as you
know, or should, are the posts it makes. Where is the post by
someone calling me out for what I wrote? Where is the post
where I clarified it was "merely" the compiled code I had?

You made several accusations in that paragraph. I went over them one 
by one with my replies, several times now. Provide the MIDs to the 
posts that backup what you wrote, Snit. If they exist, you shouldn't 
have any trouble providing the MIDs to them so we can all review the 
posts for ourselves. I maintain that you haven't provided any MIDs to 
support your claims above, because things aren't as you claimed they 
were.

If I'm wrong, Snit, provide the MIDs to the posts which backup all of 
yuor statements there. You claimed I made it clear I had access to 
not just the output of the bot, but to the code itself. Where's the 
MID(s) to support that statement? Post them.

Your second statement claims I was called out - Where are the MID(s) 
to those post(s) calling me out, Snit?

Your third statement claims I clarified it was merely the compiled 
code I had. Where are the MID(s) to those posts supporting that 
accusation, Snit?

See, right off the bat, I got you, dead to rights, telling three! 
seperate lies as part of your story you wrote up from your arse crack 
to try and link me to the bot that you have the most interest in 
here. So much interest in fact, you've been asking us to play 
spitball the idea with you. Do you really think we haven't noticed 
your effort to get what amounts to unwilling beta tester information, 
Snit? If you think you're that sneaky, think again. No, your 
questions don't provide evidence that you're behind the bot on their 
own. But, they clearly do show that you have the most interest in the 
bot, and a strong interest in learning from us what we can/or already 
have learned about it, again, by doing nothing more than examining 
it's output. We have access to the same information as yourself, the 
posts it pulls data from on usenet to come up with it's batshit crazy 
replies that often have nothing to do with the subject at hand. 

The bot, if it's even a program of any kind, script or otherwise, is 
very simplistic - it shows that the individual(s) behind it aren't 
very advanced programmers, and most likely, have equ hardware and 
networking knowledge at their disposal. A serious disadvantage for 
them here. 

Well, Snit, where are the MIDs to support what you claimed I'd 
written above? You went well out of your way to write that nonsense, 
it's beyond time you explain yourself and apologize for what you 
tried to do. In case it hasn't already occured to you, nobody took 
the bait, nobody turned on me. Nobody brought their focus concerning 
the bot onto me, Snit. Your plan, didn't work.

> No amount of threats from you will get me to.

If you can't afford a dictionary Snit, just say so, I'll buy you one 
and mail it to you at no cost to you. I've already gone over this 
with you, several times now. I haven't threatened you at any point in 
time. The fact you have trouble understanding the english language as 
written is why you think otherwise. And, that is a fact concerning 
you Snit. One can provide examples for almost (all of them?) any 
thread you've participated in, and it doesn't matter who you 
interacted with. You continue to step on your own dick, and if you're 
called out for it, are super quick to try and project what you did 
onto the person who called you out for it. As you've been trying to 
do with me now.


-- 
The trouble with being poor is that it takes up all your time.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Snit Michael Glasser has a new toy- Attacks Diesel--PING DIESEL Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-16 00:44 +0000
  Re: Snit Michael Glasser has a new toy- Attacks Diesel--PING DIESEL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-15 18:59 -0700
    Re: Snit Michael Glasser has a new toy- Attacks Diesel--PING DIESEL Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-16 10:58 +0000
    Re: Snit Michael Glasser has a new toy- Attacks Diesel--PING DIESEL Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-16 14:09 +0000

csiph-web