Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.comm > #1723 > unrolled thread

Newsreaders

Started byMichelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org>
First post2013-10-27 09:41 -0700
Last post2015-03-29 13:03 +1300
Articles 20 on this page of 289 — 45 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.comm

Contents

  Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 09:41 -0700
    Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 11:56 -0500
      Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-16 15:20 +0000
    Re: Newsreaders Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-27 13:01 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 12:36 -0500
        Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 14:41 -0500
          Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 19:58 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 15:05 -0500
              Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 20:42 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-10-28 10:23 +1100
          Thoth (not) breaking long URL (was: Newsreaders) "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-10-28 09:37 +0100
    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-27 19:57 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0700
        Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:21 -0500
    Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 10:58 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 19:24 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-27 23:42 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 20:09 -0400
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0500
          Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 00:16 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:11 -0500
            Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 13:54 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 09:01 -0500
                Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:09 +1300
                  Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 20:44 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 01:26 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 21:04 -0500
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 02:11 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 22:01 -0500
                Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 03:40 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 17:26 +1300
                    Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:17 -0500
                  Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:16 -0500
                    Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-10-28 14:20 +0100
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 13:39 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:43 -0500
        Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-11-15 15:29 +0100
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-11-15 09:26 -0600
    Re: Newsreaders Ted Lee <tmplee@mr.net> - 2013-10-27 20:30 -0500
      Re: Newsreaders AV3 <arvimide@earthlink.net> - 2013-10-28 11:02 -0400
    Re: Newsreaders Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 00:48 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
    Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:21 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:31 -0700
        Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 08:57 -0700
          Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 05:25 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:22 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:22 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 13:29 +1300
              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 01:43 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:04 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 18:25 +1300
                    Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 01:33 -0400
                    Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:37 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 19:25 +1300
                        Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 07:25 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 04:07 -0400
                            Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 09:00 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:24 +1300
                                Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:26 +1300
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 21:35 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 16:28 -0700
                        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 13:33 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 23:14 -0700
                            Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 21:43 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:39 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 09:31 +1300
                            Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 08:52 +1300
                        Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 19:36 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:42 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:29 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-10-30 16:44 -0400
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 23:22 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 13:15 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-10-29 10:10 +0100
      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-29 08:36 -0500
        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:25 +1300
      Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2013-11-05 20:31 +0100
    Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-08 00:49 +0200
      Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-07 18:42 -0600
        Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-08 02:05 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-08 16:12 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 15:21 -0600
            Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-08 20:01 -0500
              Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-08 18:09 -0700
                Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 21:48 -0600
              Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 20:51 -0600
              Re: Newsreaders Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-02-28 12:19 -0500
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-09 01:40 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 21:50 -0600
        Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-09 19:26 +0200
          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 17:31 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-09 23:22 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 23:44 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-10 02:01 +0100
            Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 10:00 -0500
              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 13:27 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:51 -0500
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 18:55 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-11 23:28 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-09 19:40 -0600
            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 04:34 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-08 02:04 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-08 03:33 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-09 09:50 +0100
        Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-09 16:19 +0200
      Re: Newsreaders android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-09 09:53 +0100
    Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-27 04:07 -0700
      Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2015-03-27 14:45 +0100
      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-27 14:18 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 11:44 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 22:50 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 13:03 +1300
              Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 00:30 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-27 14:27 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-27 13:10 -0700
          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-27 20:14 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-28 01:26 -0700
              Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:30 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-29 01:41 -0700
                  Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 13:22 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <hshubs@foxtrot.local> - 2015-03-29 19:43 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-28 06:29 -0400
              Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-28 14:47 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 20:36 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 21:27 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:22 -0400
                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 23:47 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 01:26 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:51 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-28 14:00 -0400
                  Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 20:30 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:08 -0400
                      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 21:13 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:10 -0400
                          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 23:46 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-29 01:45 -0700
                          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 13:23 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:09 -0400
                  Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 21:18 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 21:29 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-28 20:15 -0400
                  Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 00:30 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-28 21:28 -0400
                      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 13:21 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 13:15 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-29 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 20:44 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2015-03-29 17:58 -0400
                          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 00:07 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 21:26 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 22:17 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 01:25 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 12:53 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 16:46 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 17:32 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-27 22:33 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-28 01:33 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2015-03-27 22:16 -0500
          Re: Newsreaders tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-28 05:10 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2015-03-27 21:03 -0700
          Re: Newsreaders tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-28 05:11 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 06:12 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2015-03-28 10:32 -0700
              Re: Newsreaders DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-03-28 12:53 -0700
                Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 21:18 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 22:16 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 01:27 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 12:56 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 16:49 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 17:33 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 18:25 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-29 02:00 -0700
                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 13:30 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <hshubs@foxtrot.local> - 2015-03-29 19:32 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 20:43 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 03:16 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:22 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-29 14:40 -0700
                          Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 03:23 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 00:02 -0400
                            Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-29 21:38 -0700
                              Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 07:43 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-30 08:30 -0700
                                  Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 11:36 -0400
                                  Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 20:18 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 16:34 -0400
                                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:20 +0000
                                        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-04-01 20:46 +1300
                                          Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-01 09:37 -0700
                                        Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 04:22 -0400
                                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-30 21:22 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-31 13:53 +1300
                                      Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-31 01:02 +0000
                                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:23 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:49 -0400
                                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:24 +0000
                                        Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-01 09:39 -0700
                                          Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2015-04-20 20:46 +0200
                                            Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-20 14:52 -0400
                                            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-04-20 18:53 +0000
                                              Re: Newsreaders dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-04-21 10:45 +1200
                                                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-04-21 02:08 +0000
                                                  Re: Newsreaders dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-04-21 15:07 +1200
                                                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-04-21 04:22 +0000
                                                  Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-04-21 11:58 -0500
                                                    Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 13:05 -0400
                                                      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-21 23:49 +0000
                                                        Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 20:53 -0400
                                                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-22 03:30 +0000
                                                      Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2015-04-22 12:03 +0200
                                                      Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-04-22 17:32 -0500
                                                        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-04-23 18:08 +1200
                                            Re: Newsreaders Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 17:05 -0300
                                            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-21 05:41 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-30 23:13 -0500
                                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:32 +0000
                                  Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 20:20 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 20:38 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-30 23:08 -0500
                            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-30 10:01 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 20:24 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-30 14:54 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:27 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:43 -0400
                            Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:45 -0400
                              Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2015-03-30 19:46 -0700
                                Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-31 14:55 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:30 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 16:43 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <hshubs@foxtrot.local> - 2015-03-29 19:36 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-29 23:36 -0500
                          Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 07:39 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:35 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 20:14 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 20:35 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-30 22:59 -0500
                                  Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:18 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 04:22 -0400
                                      Re: Newsreaders TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2015-04-01 08:11 -0500
                                      Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 23:59 +0000
                                        Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-04-02 02:14 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-04-01 09:05 -0500
                                      Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-04-01 16:51 +0000
                                        Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-04-01 17:51 +0000
                                          Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-02 00:03 +0000
                                    Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-04-01 17:06 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-30 22:56 -0500
                          Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-30 15:17 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 11:22 -0400
                            Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:38 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-03-30 20:27 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 20:39 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:26 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-30 21:17 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2015-03-30 23:04 -0500
                                Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:27 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-31 14:28 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:41 -0400
                                Re: Newsreaders Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2015-04-01 07:28 +0000
                                Re: Newsreaders tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-04-01 23:47 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-30 15:33 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 01:49 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 11:44 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-03-28 09:03 -0700
      Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 11:44 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-03-28 09:17 -0700
      Re: Newsreaders sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-03-28 20:52 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-28 16:00 -0700
          Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 23:06 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-03-29 03:00 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 23:51 +1300
                Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-29 12:48 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Buster Friendly <lah@de.da.ru.ru> - 2015-03-29 09:01 -0400
                  Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:33 +0200
                    Re: Newsreaders Buster Friendly <lah@de.da.ru.ru> - 2015-03-29 09:40 -0400
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 17:04 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-30 13:37 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 13:03 +1300
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-29 01:28 +0000
    Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-28 15:59 -0700
      Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-29 13:03 +1300

Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15  Next page →

#1767

FromWes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org>
Date2013-10-28 00:48 -0400
Message-ID<l4kqa9$mi9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1723
On 10-27-2013, 12:41, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks?
> Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?

There will never be a consensus on that one.

I still like Thunderbird.  Tried every other free one I've heard of, and 
Thunderbird is the best FOR ME.


-- 
Wes Groleau

    There ain't no right wing,
    there ain't no left wing.
    There's only you and me and we just disagree.
                               (apologies to Jim Krueger)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1780

FromErilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
Date2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
Message-ID<l4lv4a$kjm$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1767
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
> On 10-27-2013, 12:41, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks?
>> Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> 
> There will never be a consensus on that one.
> 
> I still like Thunderbird.  Tried every other free one I've heard of, and
> Thunderbird is the best FOR ME.
> 

That's the real bottom line for everyone 8-)

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1781

FromErilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
Date2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
Message-ID<l4lv4b$kjm$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1723
Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks?
> Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> 
> I'm trying Unison, and I'm not all that happy with it, but I guess that I
> could learn to live with it.  I've downloaded Thoth, but haven't tried it
> yet; is it worth giving it a try?
> 
> -- Michelle

Is Mavericks a new OS?  Did they run out of cats?  Next will be Longhorn? 
It doesn't run MTNW?

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1782

FromSandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date2013-10-28 15:21 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6t0k1.acv.mr@irc.sandman.net>
In reply to#1781
In article <l4lv4b$kjm$2@dont-email.me>, Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:

> > So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks?
> > Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> > 
> > I'm trying Unison, and I'm not all that happy with it, but I guess that I
> > could learn to live with it.  I've downloaded Thoth, but haven't tried it
> > yet; is it worth giving it a try?
> 
>  Is Mavericks a new OS?

New version of OSX.

>  Did they run out of cats?

Pretty much.

>  Next will be Longhorn? 

Hardly.

>  It doesn't run MTNW?

Nope, they removed OpenTransport, which is needed by MTNW. 
 


-- 
Sandman[.net]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1784

FromMichelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org>
Date2013-10-28 08:31 -0700
Message-ID<l4m002$pvp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1781
On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:

> Is Mavericks a new OS?

Yes.  It's OS X 10.9

> Did they run out of cats?

Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.

> Next will be Longhorn?

I think that MS has the rights to that.  Apple is now using "inspiring 
locations in California" for OS X names.

> It doesn't run MTNW?

Correct.  MTNW requires Open Transport, which was deprecated in 10.4 or 
10.5, and removed in 10.9.

-- Michelle

-- 
I'm a year older than I was exactly one year ago.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1786

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2013-10-28 08:57 -0700
Message-ID<2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#1784
On 2013-10-28 15:31:14 +0000, Michelle Steiner 
<email@michelle@michelle.org> said:

> On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:
> 
>> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> 
> Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> 
>> Did they run out of cats?
> 
> Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.

I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

>> Next will be Longhorn?
> 
> I think that MS has the rights to that.  Apple is now using "inspiring 
> locations in California" for OS X names.

I think surf breaks might be the call here, so perhaps, "Trestles", 
"Hazards Canyon", "Rincon", etc., but the Califoria locations also make 
sense/ Consider "El Capitan". "Tenaya", etc. ;-)


>> It doesn't run MTNW?
> 
> Correct.  MTNW requires Open Transport, which was deprecated in 10.4 or 
> 10.5, and removed in 10.9.
> 
> -- Michelle


-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1788

Fromjamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet)
Date2013-10-29 05:25 +1300
Message-ID<1lbhlpm.j14yia1lf7xcxN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>
In reply to#1786
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

I always wanted OS X Housecat, myself.
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1796

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-10-29 09:22 +1300
Message-ID<291020130922510788%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#1786
In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-10-28 15:31:14 +0000, Michelle Steiner 
> <email@michelle@michelle.org> said:
> > On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:
> > 
> >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> > 
> > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> > 
> >> Did they run out of cats?
> > 
> > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> 
> I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

Or Ocelot, or Tabby, or Persian, or Manx (this one could have gone well
with the release of the wireless mouse and keyboard), or ...   ;-)

There are 37 species of cats in this list (including "Domesticated
Cat", which in itself would have lots of breeds).
http://www.wildcatsanctuary.org/education/species/

BUT, I'm not sure how trustworthy that list is. For a start it is
missing Panther and has Puma listed as a "Small Cat".  :-\

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1800

FromSandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date2013-10-28 21:22 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6tlnt.b0i.mr@irc.sandman.net>
In reply to#1786
In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> > 
> > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> > 
> >> Did they run out of cats?
> > 
> > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> 
>  I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

And Lynx or Ocelot :)


-- 
Sandman[.net]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1803

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-10-29 13:29 +1300
Message-ID<291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#1800
In article <slrnl6tlnt.b0i.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman
<mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> > > 
> > > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> > > 
> > >> Did they run out of cats?
> > > 
> > > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> > 
> >  I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)
> 
> And Lynx or Ocelot :)

One of the big(ish) rumours at the beginning of the year was that Mac
OS X 10.9 would be called Lynx.  :-)

Apple simply ran out of big cat names. Coming down from Lion (or
Mountain Lion) to Lynx might have been considered to be sending the
wrong "message" about it being less powerful or some such marketing /
pshco-babble nonsense.

They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
silly codenames fit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1804

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2013-10-29 01:43 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6u4mk.15ij.g.kreme@mbp55.local>
In reply to#1803
In message <291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com> 
  Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
> easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
> rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
> silly codenames fit.

The codenames are the names most people know. They are much easier for
people to keep track of than a number.

-- 
'It's still a lie. Like the lie about masks.' 'What lie about masks?'
'The way people say they hide faces.' 'They do hide faces,' said Nanny
Ogg.  'Only the one on the outside.' --Maskerade

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1808

FromMartin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net>
Date2013-10-29 05:04 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6ugfn.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>
In reply to#1804
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote:
>  In message <291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com> 
>    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
> > easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
> > rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
> > silly codenames fit.
> 
>  The codenames are the names most people know. They are much easier for
>  people to keep track of than a number.

I can't. Maybe I'm more the numbers guy, remembering that I jumped from
6.0.8 via 7.0.1 til 7.6.1 to 10.3, upgrading until 10.6.8 and now maybe waiting
for 10.9.1 to jump in again. 

Tell me, which one was Capone?

- Martin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1809

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-10-29 18:25 +1300
Message-ID<291020131825107266%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#1808
In article <slrnl6ugfn.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
Ԥrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote:
> >  In message <291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com> 
> >    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
> > > easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
> > > rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
> > > silly codenames fit.
> > 
> >  The codenames are the names most people know. They are much easier for
> >  people to keep track of than a number.
> 
> I can't. Maybe I'm more the numbers guy, remembering that I jumped from
> 6.0.8 via 7.0.1 til 7.6.1 to 10.3, upgrading until 10.6.8 and now maybe
> waiting for 10.9.1 to jump in again. 
> 
> Tell me, which one was Capone?

Exactly. Most normal people use numbers to indicate a series, not
random silly names.

If someone says they're using Leopard and someone else says they're
using Mountina Lion, only the geeky folls who have memorised all the
code names know which is the newer / better. If someone says they're
suing 10.6 and someone else says they 10.8, then it's immediately
obvious.

Of course, the problem with Apple's 10.Y numbering system is what is
going to come next? 10.10? It would work for humans, but it's going to
screw up many computer sorting systems.

They should have simply done the obvious and called it Mac OS X 1, Mac
OS X 2, Mac OS X 3, etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1810

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2013-10-29 01:33 -0400
Message-ID<291020130133331672%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#1809
In article <291020131825107266%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> Of course, the problem with Apple's 10.Y numbering system is what is
> going to come next? 10.10? It would work for humans, but it's going to
> screw up many computer sorting systems.

10.4.10 and 10.4.11 took care of that issue.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1811

FromMartin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net>
Date2013-10-29 05:37 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6uich.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>
In reply to#1809
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:10 +1300, Your Name wrote:
>  Of course, the problem with Apple's 10.Y numbering system is what is
>  going to come next? 10.10? It would work for humans, but it's going to
>  screw up many computer sorting systems.
> 
>  They should have simply done the obvious and called it Mac OS X 1, Mac
>  OS X 2, Mac OS X 3, etc.

Sorry, I don't get that. Why would Mac OS X 10 vs. Mac OS X 1 sort any
better than MacOS 10.1 vs MacOS 10.10?

Oh, BTW - I sometimes hate how the Finder does sort, since the Finder
sometimes claims to know better than I do how to sort by numbers.
However, see http://666kb.com/i/cisd4qnqcnkyd5lc7.gif

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1813

FromYour Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Date2013-10-29 19:25 +1300
Message-ID<291020131925093223%YourName@YourISP.com>
In reply to#1811
In article <slrnl6uich.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
Ԥrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:10 +1300, Your Name wrote:
> >  Of course, the problem with Apple's 10.Y numbering system is what is
> >  going to come next? 10.10? It would work for humans, but it's going to
> >  screw up many computer sorting systems.
> > 
> >  They should have simply done the obvious and called it Mac OS X 1, Mac
> >  OS X 2, Mac OS X 3, etc.
> 
> Sorry, I don't get that. Why would Mac OS X 10 vs. Mac OS X 1 sort any
> better than MacOS 10.1 vs MacOS 10.10?
<snip> 

Sorry, I didn't mean it would sort any better (which is why it's a
separate paragraph), just that there's a superfluous extra "10" in
there all the time - despite it meant ot be pronounced as "Ex".

Not having it would simply make the name less cumbersome ... unless
Apple is planning NOT to have "Mac OS X 10.10" and instead move to "Mac
OS Y 1.0" or "Mac OS XI 1.0".   ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1814

FromMartin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net>
Date2013-10-29 07:25 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6uonh.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>
In reply to#1813
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:25:09 +1300, Your Name wrote:
>  Sorry, I didn't mean it would sort any better (which is why it's a
>  separate paragraph), just that there's a superfluous extra "10" in
>  there all the time - despite it meant ot be pronounced as "Ex".

Ah, so you may call it MacOSX for the whole family, but should use
MacOS 10.6, MacOS 10.7, MacOS 10.10,
but not MacOSX 6, MacOSX 10, ...

>  Apple is planning NOT to have "Mac OS X 10.10" and instead move to "Mac
>  OS Y 1.0" or "Mac OS XI 1.0".   ;-)

Don't know what they are up to, but they might use hex as well: 
MacOS 10.6
MacOS 10.9
MacOS 10.A
MacOS 10.F

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1815

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2013-10-29 04:07 -0400
Message-ID<291020130407577516%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#1814
In article <slrnl6uonh.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
?rautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:

> Don't know what they are up to, but they might use hex as well: 
> MacOS 10.6
> MacOS 10.9
> MacOS 10.A
> MacOS 10.F

nothing like confusing everyone but geeks, and what do you do after
10.f?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1816

FromMartin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net>
Date2013-10-29 09:00 +0000
Message-ID<slrnl6uu9o.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>
In reply to#1815
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:07:57 -0400, nospam wrote:
>  In article <slrnl6uonh.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
>  ?rautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> > Don't know what they are up to, but they might use hex as well: 
> > MacOS 10.6
> > MacOS 10.9
> > MacOS 10.A
> > MacOS 10.F
> 
>  nothing like confusing everyone but geeks, and what do you do after
>  10.f?
    
    10.10 ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1830

FromErilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid>
Date2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
Message-ID<l4opl5$ltb$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1815
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <slrnl6uonh.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
> ?rautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>> Don't know what they are up to, but they might use hex as well: 
>> MacOS 10.6
>> MacOS 10.9
>> MacOS 10.A
>> MacOS 10.F
> 
> nothing like confusing everyone but geeks, and what do you do after
> 10.f?
Matbe G?

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.comm

csiph-web