Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #21375 > unrolled thread
| Started by | micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-08 10:27 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-03-10 14:23 -0400 |
| Articles | 10 on this page of 30 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps
How to find the SuperDuper schedule micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2014-03-08 10:27 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-08 19:07 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-08 14:41 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-08 22:35 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-08 17:59 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-09 00:42 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-09 01:08 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-09 11:51 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-09 02:54 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-08 23:25 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-09 17:39 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-08 22:43 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-08 23:30 -0500
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-03-08 19:28 -0600
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-09 07:35 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-09 13:01 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-09 17:36 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-03-09 19:23 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-09 15:47 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-09 20:11 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-03-09 22:53 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2014-03-10 13:43 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-03-08 20:23 -0800
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2014-03-09 18:58 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-09 19:09 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> - 2014-03-10 13:48 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) - 2014-03-09 10:19 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2014-03-09 18:24 -0400
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) - 2014-03-10 07:13 +0000
Re: How to find the SuperDuper schedule micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2014-03-10 14:23 -0400
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-09 22:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bo49o6F6vikU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21418 |
On 2014-03-09, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2014-03-09, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: >> >> In article <bo3n4eF2ji2U1@mid.individual.net>, >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>On 2014-03-09, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> But you can also restore everything from TM, right? Just not as >>>> conveniently... >>> >>>Yep, you can. And I find it very convenient too. >>> >>>if you start the Mac from the system installer disc/application, you can >>>choose Utilities > Restore System From Backup. In either case, if the >>>Time Machine volume is connected to the computer or available on a >>>shared network volume, you can select it. You'll be presented with a >>>screen showing the dates of all of the backups contained on the Time >>>Machine backup volume. It's pretty simple. >> >> And if you select the most recent backup, TM will go back and find >> all the older parts it needs to do a complete backup? > > Yep. Works great in my experience. You end up with a new system > configured just like the old one. I recently migrated the wife's MacBook to her new MacBook Pro via TM and then inherited the old backup set by the new machine. The only ancillary tasks were to re-enter the license keys for some software.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-10 13:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lfktjo$6q3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21428 |
On 3/9/14, 6:53 PM, Tom Stiller wrote: > On 2014-03-09, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> On 2014-03-09, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: >>> >>> In article <bo3n4eF2ji2U1@mid.individual.net>, >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2014-03-09, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But you can also restore everything from TM, right? Just not as >>>>> conveniently... >>>> >>>> Yep, you can. And I find it very convenient too. >>>> >>>> if you start the Mac from the system installer disc/application, you can >>>> choose Utilities > Restore System From Backup. In either case, if the >>>> Time Machine volume is connected to the computer or available on a >>>> shared network volume, you can select it. You'll be presented with a >>>> screen showing the dates of all of the backups contained on the Time >>>> Machine backup volume. It's pretty simple. >>> >>> And if you select the most recent backup, TM will go back and find >>> all the older parts it needs to do a complete backup? >> >> Yep. Works great in my experience. You end up with a new system >> configured just like the old one. > > I recently migrated the wife's MacBook to her new MacBook Pro via TM and then > inherited the old backup set by the new machine. > > The only ancillary tasks were to re-enter the license keys for some software. > My recollection from recovering from a dead hard drive in 10.6 is that I used a system install dvd (10.6.3) and a TM backup and then had to run all the system upgrades to bring it back up to my old system running 10.6.8. Does a re-installation using the recovery partition and a TM backup automatically put you back in the latest updated OS?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-08 20:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vilain-F3A021.20235208032014@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21382 |
In article <531b6a58$0$52826$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: > In article <kcdmh918veltql9377nnsl81kc90uhmh22@4ax.com>, > micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >I should add to my previous post, and to the previous thread, that I'm > >thinking what might account for the lack of files in the SuperDuper > >backup is that conceivably, after he screwed up, SuperDuper ran and > >carried the screwup over to the backup. > > SuperDuper only retains the latest backup? It isn't like Time Machine? > > > Patty No, it makes a clone backup to a disk. Or a "smart update" of only changed files to the clone. Or a disk image file, if you paid for it. It keeps no history chronological changes or snapshots. Time Machine or a reasonably configured NAS does that. -- DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee... [I filter all Goggle Groups posts, so any reply may be automatically ignored]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-09 18:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <giqph9t1msqgdumkm2dkp0mi4qqnd3p8ev@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21396 |
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:23:52 -0800, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >In article <531b6a58$0$52826$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, > Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: > >> In article <kcdmh918veltql9377nnsl81kc90uhmh22@4ax.com>, >> micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> >I should add to my previous post, and to the previous thread, that I'm >> >thinking what might account for the lack of files in the SuperDuper >> >backup is that conceivably, after he screwed up, SuperDuper ran and >> >carried the screwup over to the backup. >> >> SuperDuper only retains the latest backup? It isn't like Time Machine? >> >> >> Patty > >No, it makes a clone backup to a disk. Or a "smart update" of only >changed files to the clone. Or a disk image file, if you paid for it. > >It keeps no history chronological changes or snapshots. Time Machine or >a reasonably configured NAS does that. What's NAS. If he only has version Mac OS 10.4, does he even have Time Machine? I vaguely remember that he doesn't. And I asked him and just got a reply and he doesn't think so. He also can't boot from the backup because it's not firewire. It's a USB drive holder and drive that I had around. I bought him one, with his money, with firewire, and then after I ordered it, I found a notice somewhere that that model won't boot, so I was looking for another model, but something slowed that down and I never got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-09 19:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <zu-dnUyqTtMtaYHOnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #21431 |
On 2014.03.09, 18:58 , micky wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:23:52 -0800, Michael Vilain
> <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <531b6a58$0$52826$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
>> Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <kcdmh918veltql9377nnsl81kc90uhmh22@4ax.com>,
>>> micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>> I should add to my previous post, and to the previous thread, that I'm
>>>> thinking what might account for the lack of files in the SuperDuper
>>>> backup is that conceivably, after he screwed up, SuperDuper ran and
>>>> carried the screwup over to the backup.
>>>
>>> SuperDuper only retains the latest backup? It isn't like Time Machine?
>>>
>>>
>>> Patty
>>
>> No, it makes a clone backup to a disk. Or a "smart update" of only
>> changed files to the clone. Or a disk image file, if you paid for it.
>>
>> It keeps no history chronological changes or snapshots. Time Machine or
>> a reasonably configured NAS does that.
>
>
> What's NAS.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=NAS
--
Privacy has become an essential personal chore that most
people are not trained to perform.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M. John Matlaw" <nouser@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-10 13:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lfktsu$6q3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21434 |
On 3/9/14, 7:09 PM, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2014.03.09, 18:58 , micky wrote: >> On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:23:52 -0800, Michael Vilain >> <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: >> >>> In article <531b6a58$0$52826$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, >>> Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <kcdmh918veltql9377nnsl81kc90uhmh22@4ax.com>, >>>> micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>> I should add to my previous post, and to the previous thread, that I'm >>>>> thinking what might account for the lack of files in the SuperDuper >>>>> backup is that conceivably, after he screwed up, SuperDuper ran and >>>>> carried the screwup over to the backup. >>>> >>>> SuperDuper only retains the latest backup? It isn't like Time Machine? >>>> >>>> >>>> Patty >>> >>> No, it makes a clone backup to a disk. Or a "smart update" of only >>> changed files to the clone. Or a disk image file, if you paid for it. >>> >>> It keeps no history chronological changes or snapshots. Time Machine or >>> a reasonably configured NAS does that. >> >> >> What's NAS. > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=NAS > Dunno for sure but I think hiring a rapper to help out with a backup restoration problem would be both very expensive and not very effective (with apologies to NAS if I've underestimated his computer skills).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-09 10:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1li8gxf.1rwxo1m7ozpszN%dcohenspam@talktalk.net> |
| In reply to | #21375 |
micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: > I click on SuperDuper and there isn't a menu. There > are 2 or 3 buttons that are greyed out, including Schedule. How I know > when it was scheduled to run and when it actually ran? I've just opened my copy of SuperDuper. In the Windows menu there are items for Scheduled Copies and Show Log. The first should list all the copies that are scheduled, the second should tell you what happened on recent runs. -- <http://www.decohen.com> The Labyrinth of the Heart: Changed Myths for Changing Lives book and e-book <http://www.decohen.com/labyrinth> Send e-mail to the Reply-To address, not the From address.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-09 18:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <beqph9p8hqocqtfpkc38d3e29otljco7le@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21403 |
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 10:19:52 +0000, dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) wrote: >micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> I click on SuperDuper and there isn't a menu. There >> are 2 or 3 buttons that are greyed out, including Schedule. How I know >> when it was scheduled to run and when it actually ran? > >I've just opened my copy of SuperDuper. In the Windows menu there are >items for Scheduled Copies and Show Log. The first should list all the >copies that are scheduled, the second should tell you what happened on >recent runs. Maybe I'm not opening it correctly. He has an icon at the right end of a long row of icons along the bottom and I clicked on that. I think. Later tonight, I'm going to start from the beginning with him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-10 07:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1lia6hv.ujpo2x1d2ooigN%dcohenspam@talktalk.net> |
| In reply to | #21424 |
micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: > Maybe I'm not opening it correctly. He has an icon at the right end > of a long row of icons along the bottom and I clicked on that. I > think. Not a long line, just a padlock and three buttons on my version. The thing you're missing is that the Schedule button is greyed out until you have selected a source and target. But, as I said before, the Windows menu has items where you can find what was previously scheduled and done. -- <http://www.decohen.com> The Labyrinth of the Heart: Changed Myths for Changing Lives book and e-book <http://www.decohen.com/labyrinth> Send e-mail to the Reply-To address, not the From address.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-10 14:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4l0sh911ufu8sg2hqpjo7pl9vngsmrv4dh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21451 |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:13:51 +0000, dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) wrote: >micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> Maybe I'm not opening it correctly. He has an icon at the right end >> of a long row of icons along the bottom and I clicked on that. I >> think. > >Not a long line, just a padlock and three buttons on my version. > >The thing you're missing is that the Schedule button is greyed out until >you have selected a source and target. Okay. > >But, as I said before, the Windows menu has items where you can find >what was previously scheduled and done. Yes. We didnt' get together last night after all, not even via Team Viewer. . I wanted to listen to Old Time Radio. We will eventually, and I'll try out all the suggestions. Thanks, and thanks all.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps
csiph-web