Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #8622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-03-24 09:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-03-31 05:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 14 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps
Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-24 09:16 -0700
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-31 09:02 +1300
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-03-30 21:14 -0400
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-30 22:40 -0700
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-03-31 11:46 -0400
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-03-31 11:57 -0400
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-31 13:16 -0700
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-31 16:25 -0400
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-31 17:18 -0700
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-04-02 00:54 -0400
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2012-04-01 12:22 +1300
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-30 22:40 -0700
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-31 20:15 +1300
Re: Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2012-03-31 05:44 -0700
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-24 09:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Access Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups from non-Apple Mac machines? |
| Message-ID | <LtOdnXFJR93abvDSnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Hello.
Is it possible to access an external USB HDD's data, that is used for
Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups, on non-Apple Mac machines
(Windows and Linux)? Or can it be only be accessed with a Mac? I use
multiple computers and OSes.
Thank you in advance. :)
--
"In a battle between elephants, the ants get squashed." --Thailand
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 09:02 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <1khtck7.1cpp6j8ywoetvN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #8622 |
Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > Hello. > > Is it possible to access an external USB HDD's data, that is used for > Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups, on non-Apple Mac machines > (Windows and Linux)? Or can it be only be accessed with a Mac? I use > multiple computers and OSes. > > Thank you in advance. :) Yes, you'll need software that adds HFS+ read (at least) capability to your other OSes, e.g. <http://www.paragon-software.com/home/hfs-windows/> and <http://www.mediafour.com/products/macdrive/> for Windows. Things can get a little more involved in Linux depending on the distro, e.g. <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Hfsplus>. IIRC Time Capsules backup inside a sparsebundle, so you'll need to be able to mount those as well in that particular case. Otherwise TM backups to a regular external HD like yours are just files in folders, when viewed from other OSes. Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays), you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk. -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-30 21:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jl5lq9$tqi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8774 |
On 03-30-2012 16:02, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays), > you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk. Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the like in Windows. -- Wes Groleau Nutrition for Blokes: Re-engineering your diet for life http://www.phlaunt.com/quentin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-30 22:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d46dnXpRF-NKBevSnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8782 |
On 3/30/2012 6:14 PM PT, Wes Groleau typed:
>> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays),
>> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk.
>
> Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the
> early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the
> like in Windows.
I see those a lot on places that share with Windows machines like at work.
--
"Ant colonies are remarkably similar to cities. No one choreographs the
action, not even the queen ant, but ant behavior is controlled by swarm
logic--put 10,000 dumb ants together, and they become smart. They will
calculate the shortest routes to food supplies sniffing out pheromone
signals from other ants and Johnson says people do the same thing in
cities using low-level interactions of people on the street." --Alex
Cukan, "Stories of modern science," United Press International, October
8, 2001
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 11:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jl78t3$cig$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8792 |
On 03-31-2012 01:40, Ant wrote: > On 3/30/2012 6:14 PM PT, Wes Groleau typed: JKG> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays), JKG> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk. >> >> Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the >> early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the >> like in Windows. > > I see those a lot on places that share with Windows machines like at work. They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that other file systems don't have them. ._filename is the resource fork for filename -- Wes Groleau Nutrition for Blokes: Re-engineering your diet for life http://www.phlaunt.com/quentin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 11:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jl79hg$gun$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8799 |
On 03-31-2012 11:46, Wes Groleau wrote: > On 03-31-2012 01:40, Ant wrote: >> On 3/30/2012 6:14 PM PT, Wes Groleau typed: > JKG> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare > nowadays), > JKG> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk. >>> >>> Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the >>> early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the >>> like in Windows. >> >> I see those a lot on places that share with Windows machines like at >> work. > > They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that > other file systems don't have them. > > ._filename is the resource fork for filename If you are seeing them on Mac, that's odd. If you are seeing them on Windows, then both filename and ._filename came from Mac. And if they came from your Mac, you DO have resource forks. And the fact that you see them both shows that the resource fork was not destroyed by putting it on NTFS (or FAT, if it's a very ancient Windows). However, if you copy filename back to the Mac without ._filename, then you will have lost something. One place I know where resource forks are still used, is for holding preview images for graphics files. Allows you to see a miniature version of the image in Finder. I have to go through and delete them all before updating the images directory on my website. Up there, they waste space because I'm not using Finder there. -- Wes Groleau Nutrition for Blokes: Re-engineering your diet for life http://www.phlaunt.com/quentin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 13:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <YeCdnSACc6er--rSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8799 |
On 3/31/2012 8:46 AM PT, Wes Groleau typed:
> JKG> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare
> nowadays),
> JKG> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk.
>>>
>>> Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the
>>> early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the
>>> like in Windows.
>>
>> I see those a lot on places that share with Windows machines like at
>> work.
>
> They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that
> other file systems don't have them.
>
> ._filename is the resource fork for filename
Is it bad to delete those files? I wasn't sure to keep them or not. It's
like Windows' thumbnail.db files.
--
"It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you
industrious about?" --Henry David Thoreau
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
A song is/was playing on this computer: 0-Running Flash
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 16:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320121625320462%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #8803 |
In article <YeCdnSACc6er--rSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > > They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that > > other file systems don't have them. > > > > ._filename is the resource fork for filename > > Is it bad to delete those files? I wasn't sure to keep them or not. It's > like Windows' thumbnail.db files. potentially, it can be very bad, depending on what's in the resource fork. sometimes it won't matter and sometimes it definitely will.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 17:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d8CdnYlofv1YA-rSnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8804 |
On 3/31/2012 1:25 PM PT, nospam typed:
> In article<YeCdnSACc6er--rSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant
> <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>
>>> They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that
>>> other file systems don't have them.
>>>
>>> ._filename is the resource fork for filename
>>
>> Is it bad to delete those files? I wasn't sure to keep them or not. It's
>> like Windows' thumbnail.db files.
>
> potentially, it can be very bad, depending on what's in the resource
> fork. sometimes it won't matter and sometimes it definitely will.
Thanks. I will stop touching those files then.
--
"Even the ant has his (her) bite." --Turkish
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-02 00:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jlbbej$1fp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8803 |
On 03-31-2012 16:16, Ant wrote:
> On 3/31/2012 8:46 AM PT, Wes Groleau typed:
>> ._filename is the resource fork for filename
>
> Is it bad to delete those files? I wasn't sure to keep them or not. It's
> like Windows' thumbnail.db files.
If you don't know what they're for, I'd leave them alone.
_Most_ of them are not important, but if you don't know....
--
Wes Groleau
“There ain't nothin' in this world that's worth being a snot over.”
— Larry Wall
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-01 12:22 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <1khvfz8.8ztd4mbi77psN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> |
| In reply to | #8799 |
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
> On 03-31-2012 01:40, Ant wrote:
> > On 3/30/2012 6:14 PM PT, Wes Groleau typed:
>
> JKG> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays),
> JKG> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk.
> >>
> >> Depends on what software you use to copy it. That was common in the
> >> early days, but lately I have been seeing a lot of ._DS_Store and the
> >> like in Windows.
> >
> > I see those a lot on places that share with Windows machines like at work.
>
> They are resource forks. That's how Apple gets around the fact that
> other file systems don't have them.
>
> ._filename is the resource fork for filename
Not just the resource fork, also the Finder information, which includes
the filetype and creator codes.
When Mac OS X stores a file on a non-Mac file system, it uses
AppleDouble format, which splits the Mac file into two parts. The data
fork ("normal" content portion of a document) is saved under the name of
the file, and all other parts of the file are saved in ._filename,
structured with AppleDouble header information to identify the various
parts. It might include a resource fork, Finder information, and
potentially other things.
The ._filename part is not created if it wouldn't contain anything
useful, e.g. a file with no type/creator codes and no resource fork.
If the file has a custom file type and no resource fork, that will be
sufficient to require creation of a ._filename part.
The most common reason for having a resource fork in recent versions of
Mac OS X is if the file has a custom icon. They were more common back in
the PowerPC era, as they were a required part of applications on Mac OS
9 and earlier, and sometimes used on documents.
--
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-30 22:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d46dnXtRF-MlBevSnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8774 |
On 3/30/2012 1:02 PM PT, Jamie Kahn Genet typed:
> Ant<ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Is it possible to access an external USB HDD's data, that is used for
>> Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups, on non-Apple Mac machines
>> (Windows and Linux)? Or can it be only be accessed with a Mac? I use
>> multiple computers and OSes.
>>
>> Thank you in advance. :)
>
> Yes, you'll need software that adds HFS+ read (at least) capability to
> your other OSes, e.g.
> <http://www.paragon-software.com/home/hfs-windows/> and
> <http://www.mediafour.com/products/macdrive/> for Windows. Things can
> get a little more involved in Linux depending on the distro, e.g.
> <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Hfsplus>.
>
> IIRC Time Capsules backup inside a sparsebundle, so you'll need to be
> able to mount those as well in that particular case. Otherwise TM
> backups to a regular external HD like yours are just files in folders,
> when viewed from other OSes.
>
> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays),
> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk.
Thanks. I don't know what resource fork is. Are you saying copying
folders/directories and files to FAT and NTFS drives would mess them up? :(
--
"Ant colonies are remarkably similar to cities. No one choreographs the
action, not even the queen ant, but ant behavior is controlled by swarm
logic--put 10,000 dumb ants together, and they become smart. They will
calculate the shortest routes to food supplies sniffing out pheromone
signals from other ants and Johnson says people do the same thing in
cities using low-level interactions of people on the street." --Alex
Cukan, "Stories of modern science," United Press International, October
8, 2001
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 20:15 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <1khu7hx.bppf4g1a99xcaN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #8791 |
Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > On 3/30/2012 1:02 PM PT, Jamie Kahn Genet typed: > > > Ant<ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> Is it possible to access an external USB HDD's data, that is used for > >> Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8's Time Machine backups, on non-Apple Mac machines > >> (Windows and Linux)? Or can it be only be accessed with a Mac? I use > >> multiple computers and OSes. > >> > >> Thank you in advance. :) > > > > Yes, you'll need software that adds HFS+ read (at least) capability to > > your other OSes, e.g. > > <http://www.paragon-software.com/home/hfs-windows/> and > > <http://www.mediafour.com/products/macdrive/> for Windows. Things can > > get a little more involved in Linux depending on the distro, e.g. > > <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Hfsplus>. > > > > IIRC Time Capsules backup inside a sparsebundle, so you'll need to be > > able to mount those as well in that particular case. Otherwise TM > > backups to a regular external HD like yours are just files in folders, > > when viewed from other OSes. > > > > Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays), > > you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk. > > Thanks. I don't know what resource fork is. Are you saying copying > folders/directories and files to FAT and NTFS drives would mess them up? :( If they've a resource fork <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_fork>, yes. But few OSX apps or documents use them any more, as resource forks are a legacy technology brought over from classic MacOS days. Instead the OSX way is to use bundles - folders with an extension that means they're displayed as a single file in OSX (unless you right click and go "Show package contents"), but show up as a folder full of other files and folders (the parts that make up the app or document) when viewed in another OS. So you'll probably be ok unless you've older apps (and the documents they produce) from the early days of OSX, or the few that cling to using resource forks. I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's just something to be aware of, if for example you're an old time Mac user like myself, with apps ported over with very little if any change shortly after OSX arrived on the scene, and documents I still access that date back to the 90's :-) -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 05:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MJqdnXyn6pSqYevSnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8794 |
>>> Note if you've backed anything up with a resource fork (rare nowadays),
>>> you'll destroy it if you copy it over to a FAT or NTFS disk.
>>
>> Thanks. I don't know what resource fork is. Are you saying copying
>> folders/directories and files to FAT and NTFS drives would mess them up? :(
>
> If they've a resource fork<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_fork>,
> yes. But few OSX apps or documents use them any more, as resource forks
> are a legacy technology brought over from classic MacOS days. Instead
> the OSX way is to use bundles - folders with an extension that means
> they're displayed as a single file in OSX (unless you right click and go
> "Show package contents"), but show up as a folder full of other files
> and folders (the parts that make up the app or document) when viewed in
> another OS.
>
> So you'll probably be ok unless you've older apps (and the documents
> they produce) from the early days of OSX, or the few that cling to using
> resource forks. I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's just something
> to be aware of, if for example you're an old time Mac user like myself,
> with apps ported over with very little if any change shortly after OSX
> arrived on the scene, and documents I still access that date back to the
> 90's :-)
Oldest Mac OS X applications I can think of are from 2008 (v10.5) so I
think I am OK. :)
--
Captain Marvel: Shazam. Billy Batson: Now put her down. Black Adam: See?
Like an ant. --Superman/Shazam!: The Return of Black Adam
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps
csiph-web